Disk Drives Face Challenge From Chips 235
WSJdpatton writes "Researchers are reporting significant progress in perfecting a different way to store data in semiconductors, which could replace one widely used type of memory chip and possibly become a credible competitor to disk drives. The researchers, in a paper being delivered at a technical conference in San Francisco, say they used a novel combination of materials to create prototype phase-change components that are more than 500 times as fast as flash chips, while requiring less than half of the electrical power to record data."
Yeah, but (Score:4, Insightful)
The iPod Fanboys..... (Score:1, Insightful)
Good news (Score:5, Insightful)
No more harddrives? (Score:3, Insightful)
Although it could make really cool applications for OS installs. Could you imagine your favorite OS installed on something as fast or faster then today's RAM? I don't want to think about the cost of 4G of this stuff though. *shiver*
Ita about time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ita about time (Score:2, Insightful)
The real challage is price. (Score:5, Insightful)
Price is a major driving force in memory.
CPU Registers are the fastest but most expensive (very small amount is used)
Cache is the next fastest and the second most expensive. (4 Megs or so)
Then comes normal RAM Memory Still slower then Cache and cheaper normally systems now have about a Gig or 2 of that.
If price wasn't a case Computers wouldn't have much RAM but all Cache, or huge amount of registers. But in real life price is the final decision.
Re:Good news (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Yeah, but (Score:5, Insightful)
Even if the first unit they put out is 2x [standard size of whatever] but 500x as fast & uses less battery power... don't you think there's going to be a market for it?
Re:Good news (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Good news (Score:5, Insightful)
Wow! I never suspected. You should probably let Seagate know. I'm sure they will want to rethink their 5 year warranty.
Perhaps you buy really cut rate drives, but in my experience hard drives almost always outlast their usefulness. I've disposed of more drives due to a combination of obsolete busses and pathetic capacity than outright failures. If you are really seeing high failure rates after only three years, you should be looking for some external factor because that isn't normal.
Re:Yeah, but (Score:5, Insightful)
I'd probably still keep the platter drive for secondary storage and put the OS and critical apps/servers/whatever on the phase drive though.
I wouldn't pay twice as much for a drive with half the head room though - even if it is 500X faster. That kind of speed (and especially power consumption) may be a big deal for notebooks, but if density is really a problem, the notebooks would probably have to give up a lot more headroom - relatively speaking. We're finally seeing 200G notebook drives, but keep in mind they're tiny compared to your standard laptop drive. If the new phase drives can store the same or more data in the same space, then yeah, I definitely see the end of the platter drive in mainstream use - once the supply outweighs the demand enough to make it financially realistic. If they can put no more than 30G in a notebook drive, then I think it'll take a couple product generations for that to happen.
Re:Cost is what matters (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Good news (Score:3, Insightful)
Flash is good for some things like portable media, but where constant activity is found you should use something more durable.
Re:Good news (Score:2, Insightful)
Formats (Score:5, Insightful)
So run out, children, and buy your SD 2.0 standard devices while they're not yet obsolete. That way you can buy your camera again and again for no good reason.
ten states per 20 nanometer cell (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Good news (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Yeah, but (Score:2, Insightful)
Even if this tech can be turned into solid state drives in the next 10 years, with 500X the performance of current drive tech, how many of you have never seen your CPU pegged?
What about the rendering for that new game?
Just because one component of your system is boosted by a huge factor, doesn't mean you'll see any improvement at all. It's very likely that games available in 10 years will have much higher HW requirements anyway, and the FSB, CPU, and/or GPU will be the bottlenecks, not the HD.
Unless the cost is a HUGE savings, I don't see too many people giving up their space.
After all, how much pr0n can you store on a 40G drive?