DVD Writer RoundUp 146
CodeHog writes "Got socks instead of the new DVD writer you were looking for this holiday season? Tom's Hardware has a writeup on the latest DVD writers and their 'true speeds'. The conclusions may be surprising: higher speeds won't necessarily do any good as media availability continues to be a problem." From the article: "Despite the stagnation of write speeds for DVD-R and DVD+R at 16x, new DVD writers are regularly being marketed, since performance for other types of writing (RW and dual-layer) is still improving. But as is customary, manufacturers of writers have a lead on media manufacturers. For this article, we visited all the stores to see what types of media are actually available for sale, and once again the result was most enlightening. You can find 16x-compatible -R and +R discs, but in the other formats they simply aren't out there."
Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:2)
I'm curious what Apple used, the latest Powermacs are all SATA, previous iterations had PATA optical drives with SATA hard drives.
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:1)
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:2)
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:3, Interesting)
It'll be more useful in future with flash-RAM cached HDD's, which will be able to send out data from time to time at speeds that make sense to be SATA.
If ain't broken, don't fix it. Many motherboards have SATA, but buggy implementation. Also SATA isn't much faster than PATA right now. It's still on the PCI bus for most motherboards, while to make full use of its speed it has to be on a separate bu
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:2)
Yes, I confirm this is what "except" means. No benefit, exception few minor ones which are not worth it.
"Ah, right. You're one of those people who, whenever an improved product appears, says "but my existing product still works, therefore nobody should need the new and improved one"."
Yes, I'm one of those people who don't throw their working equipment to buy the new fad because it helps sustain the Mighty Capitalism.
And you appear
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:2)
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Where are the good SATA burners? (Score:2)
Some Advice (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Some Advice (Score:1, Troll)
Re:Some Advice (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Some Advice (Score:1)
Re:Some Advice (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Some Advice (Score:5, Interesting)
This review would be much more interesting if they showed some quality data with each burner.
Re:Some Advice (Score:5, Informative)
Optical storage reviews [cdrinfo.com] at www.cdrinfo.com does this.
Re:Some Advice (Score:1)
Re:Some Advice (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
Never trust someone who gives incorrect information. The Plextor 740 is a remarked BENQ drive (as is the SONY DRU810a). Of course, the BENQ has more features and is cheaper than the rebadged drive, if you can find it.....
The 716 is a nice drive if cost is no object. The BENQ is the best drive for the money (DW1640).
Re:Some Advice (Score:3, Insightful)
Ding, thank you. My Plextor external firewire DVD burner, which cost a rather pretty penny, claims to have all sorts of dodads to let it write to virtually everything, even lower quality media. "PowerRec" and some sort of angle adjustment widget, the whole 9 yards. 16x write and so on.
Imagine my surprise when:
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
Don't be surprised. It's ALL going downhill now. All the great quality brands you could depend on, have turned to crap in the past few years. The expensive Plextor drive you bought was probably manufactured in the same Chinese plant as a $30 NEC drive.
In my experience, just about everything I've bought in the past several years has failed at about the 2 year mark.
What's the solution? I really don
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
Myself, I have a bunch of own-name LiteOn CDRWs and DVD-ROMs in heavy use with zero problems (I've yet to see one fail). I just got an own-name LiteOn DVD writer, hopefully it'll be the workhorse its older kin have been.
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
You get crazy things, such as the drive needing to be closed by software to be able to set the recording speed, different recording modes that simply don't work, standard recording modes that leave out certain bits of information (like subchannel data) making it completely non-standard, and playable only in devices which ignore the standard to comply with LiteOn's completely disregard for quality.
Sorry for
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
As to data disks (written with plain old Nero, which I detest but use because it writes no coasters) my LiteOns have been 100% reliable, and two of 'em have done a number of marathon burn sessions. And I've never seen one of their drives die (unlike Yamahas,
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
I can assure you it is 100% the drive. I don't use Windows/Mac at all, so all my burning is done with cdrecord, cdrdao, burncd, dvdrecord, etc. etc.
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
Still wonder if it could be a glitch in your burning software? as you're the only such case I've heard of, and not only myself but also all my clients use LiteOn drives, w/o any problems.
Or maybe it's something in the LiteOn firmware that's not completely compatible with your setup?
Very often the "obvious culprit" isn't really at fault, or is not the whole story... frex the "47 day rollover bug" in Win9x: It does *not* affect ALL Win9x systems (at least three of mi
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
I'm certainly not the only one with the issue. It's well-known that Lite-on drives don't write subchannel data, causing problems particularly with older audio CD players which expect that info. You can just try to set your drive to a slightly lower speed and watch it still record at maximum (4X was the only expection in m
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
If you've got a link to documentation of the problem, I'd be interested in seeing it.
Re:Some Advice (Score:2)
These sites always test how fast these drives are in a controlled environment.
With hard drives, it's understandable since most users use the drive in a controlled environment during normal usage. What I mean by this is; the platters are safely enclosed, and the worst that generally happens is heat build-up or ribbon damage.
Optical drives, on the other hand, do not operate in anything resembling "ideal use" during normal operation. It would be n
Re:Froogle (Score:2)
Nice try....
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:What's the physical difference? (Score:3, Informative)
Dual Layer (Score:5, Informative)
Wow, really? Where did they look?
http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=dual-layer+DV
Re:Dual Layer (Score:2)
Re:Dual Layer (Score:2)
http://froogle.google.com/froogle_cluster?q=dual-l ayer+DVD%2BR+8x&pid=4800771902108447843&oid=146193 15550543807723&btnG=Search+Froogle&lmode=&addr=&sc oring=p [google.com]
I sure as heck can't find them in retail stores though.
Re:Dual Layer (Score:1)
Re:Dual Layer (Score:2)
Re:Dual Layer (Score:2)
3 for $11 isn't too bad. Similar to the prices of DVD 4GB media a few years back.
ALL about DvD (Score:4, Informative)
Also see my journal about Nero 7 DvD burning probs.In short ,stick with Nero Version 6.X
Re:ALL about DvD (Score:2)
Re:ALL about DvD (sic) (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:ALL about DvD (sic) (Score:1)
cheap = good (Score:2)
Re:cheap = good (Score:1)
Re:cheap = good (Score:1)
Re:cheap = good (Score:1)
Re:cheap != good (Score:2)
Re:cheap != good (Score:1)
The LG has been more reliable at linked packet writing than the very slightly more expensive Pioneer 110D. Both of them
Re:cheap != good (Score:3, Informative)
There is a USB2/Firewire chipset (Prolific PL-3507) which is just downright broken. The A revision is not flash upgradable without desoldering the chip and the subsequent revisions are flashable, however the "fixed" firmware is pretty mu
Re:cheap = good (Score:2)
Re:cheap = good (Score:1, Interesting)
Ugh! Dell uses them in computers, and some models have a near 100% failure rate! Do some research before recommending garbage like that.
As an example, in the last batch of 480 computers we bought from Dell, we've replaced almost 600 Lite-On DVD/CDR drives. That's more than 1 per computer. The only reason we haven't replaced more than that is that we've started replacing the drives with Sony's that we pay for out of our pocket rather than using the Dell 3 year on-site warranty we paid a lot o
Re:cheap = good (Score:3, Interesting)
This post is hilarious for so many reasons.
Ugh! Dell uses them in computers, and some models have a near 100% failure rate!
Bullshit. No model of ANYTHING that has a "100% failure rate" will remain available for long.
Do some research before recommending garbage like that.
Anyone who did research Lite-On quality, will find most people have very good things to say about them.
As an example, in the last batch of 480 computers we bought from Dell, we've replaced almost 600 Lite-On DVD/CDR drives. That'
Re:cheap = good (Score:2)
Well, I guess that would explain why I co
LiteOn = KProbe (Score:2)
Lite-On is also one of few brands for which you can actually verify the burn quality. Well, you can if you believe in Kprobe [kprobe2.com].
Re:cheap = good (Score:2)
I agree. I currently have a DVDRW DL (desktop size) Lite-On, a DVDRW DL (laptop size) Lite-On, 2x CDRW Lite-On's (one Lite-On branded, the other Iomega which I have sinced kept up to date with Lite-On firmware updates), a DVDROM Lite-On and an NEC DVDRW. I also recommend Lite-On to all my customers and have had far too much experience with Pioneer DVDRW drives.
I have never had a Lite-On go bad on me, they perform fantastically and they are very cheap. Chanc
Re:cheap = good (Score:2)
Mt Rainier ?? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Mt Rainier ?? (Score:2)
Hmmm (Score:1, Funny)
People who want to make totally legal Fair Use backups of games they get from blockbuster of course.
Re:Hmmm (Score:2)
If you have a file that is larger than a single-layer DVD, it is much more convenient to back up to one dual-layer than to two single-layer DVDs. Like a Ghost of a drive for instance.
I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. (Score:2)
First, thanks to the article submitter for supplying the "printable" version of the article and aleviating us from having to click through 20 "pages" of reviews.
Second, I own a black ND-3540A that I got from Newegg three months ago for $38.00. It is very nice and replaced a generic CD-RW drive that was just terribly loud. Newegg doesn't stock the ND-3540A anymore. However, they do have the ND-3550A for about $40.00, which is a very good price (you better hurry because they are limited, 500 to a custom
Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. (Score:1)
So i see this article, i scroll to the conclusion part of the article. The two winners, the ND-3540A and the toshiba that isn't out yet. I do a quick search for ND-3540A, wow only $44
A few minutes later, and I just ordered my first DVD burner!
Thanks slashdot =P
Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. (Score:2)
All of my home-built desktop machines now have burners. Even if I don't have burner software installed, I can always borrow those drives for use in the other machines if one breaks.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. (Score:2)
Being able to flash it from Linux was the deciding factor when I bought the NEC ND-3540A. See http://binflash.cdfreaks.com/ [cdfreaks.com]
Never had the the chance to try it since the drive went dead after less than 4 months, having burned less than 10 discs in total. Perhaps it died from underuse? Well...
--
Regards
Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. (Score:2)
Support (manufacturer/store) is also important (Score:2)
Re:Support (manufacturer/store) is also important (Score:2)
Re:Support (manufacturer/store) is also important (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Did they use the same media for all their testi (Score:2)
Ahh. See, it's not your media that's at fault. It's your Sorny burner!
Re:Did they use the same media for all their testi (Score:2)
You're spoiled by today's prices for media. Three years ago, you typically paid $2 or so per disc for 4GB media. (Which is the price point at which DVD media sales seem to have taken off.)
8GB media is just getting below the $2 each price point. (There are cakeboxes that are around $2/disc.) So as volume goes up on them,
Re: (Score:2)
Strange things... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Strange things... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Strange things... (Score:1)
Re:Strange things... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:AMEN! (Score:2)
One of the things about TY is that their CDs and DVDs are actually manufactured in Japan, as opposed to, say, China or Taiwan. Chalk up another one against outsourcing. Yes, you have to go to the online stores to get them, but the price for a TY spindle is about the same as with any other mainstream DVD media out there.
Re:Strange things... (Score:2)
"True speeds" (Score:1)
Would someone tell them 14:03 and 14:06 are not four times faster than 6:09 timings? A "true speed" 8X works for me.
And I delved far enough into the meat of the article to see that they mixed up captions and pictures for +R and -R at 16X
This write=up sucks dick... (Score:1)
5 Burners (Score:1)
Jaysyn
Re:5 Burners (Score:2)
Re:5 Burners (Score:1)
Jaysyn
Whatever works. (Score:2)
how about noise? (Score:2, Insightful)
Mt Rainer & DVD+RAM ? (Score:1)
BDR-101A (Score:2)
cdrinfo.com (Score:2)
Take a look at the CDRinfo Optical Storage [cdrinfo.com] section.
Media Problem (Score:2)
Speed schmeed (Score:2)
Re:Speed schmeed (Score:2)
And yep, if I had to choose, I'd rather have a slower unit that does it right, and isn't beholden to some special interest.
(As it is, I just bought a LiteOn DVD DL writer, mainly cuz I have 6 LiteOn CDRW and DVD-ROM units that have been 100% reliable in heavy use.)
Re:It's the print version (Score:3, Funny)
Re:It's the print version (Score:1)
Re:It's the print version (Score:2)
Re:It's the print version (Score:2)
Re:Author read results backwards! (Score:2)
harryk
Re:Arn't you using your optical drives less and le (Score:2)