Old Floppy Drive Becomes New Turntable 329
vinyl1 writes "This must be the ultimate in retro-cool hardware hacking. The floppy drive is obsolete, but the turntable is not, and that got one guy to thinking. He provides a full tutorial on how to turn that worthless old floppy drive into a most desirable piece of audio gear."
No Modding Needed (Score:2, Funny)
What about the stylus? (Score:2, Interesting)
Doesn't sound like such a good deal!
Daniel
Re:What about the stylus? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What about the stylus? (Score:3, Informative)
If you didn't know, a stylus is *not* an integral part of a turntable. It's a component (replaceable or not) of a *cartridge*. They're sold separately, just like tonearms so no ripping up involved.
This project only aimed to build a turntable(plinth, platter, bearing + motor), and not a tonearm or cartridge. They would be much more complex to DIY.
What stylus? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What stylus? (Score:2)
Re:What stylus? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What stylus? (Score:2)
No... but old school sounds so much better...
Tom
Re:What stylus? (Score:4, Insightful)
Shooting from the hip. Ouch. (Score:2, Informative)
Here's [smartdev.com] the history and some review. The story on the site hosting that is also interesting.
At any rate, it looks like the guy who produces that laser turntable does so with proper permission from the owner of the original patent.
Re:Shooting from the hip. Ouch. (Score:3, Interesting)
Some of the listeners got suspicious when the demonstrator wouldn't play anything on the cheap Technics turntable he had, claiming there wasn't time and the audience wanted to hear the laser turntable. A reviewer finally called his bluff, and the $200 conventional unit easily beat his $15K beast.
Re:The patent finally expired, I guess. (Score:5, Interesting)
While working on the Laservision scheme the Philips engineers realized that what they should do instead is completely redesign the system from scratch. They joined up with a group of Sony engineers working on a similar project and the result is known as Compact Disc.
What this guy has done is to turn his floppy drive into (part of) a gramophone. In other words he has turned a recently obsolete technology into an even more obsolete technology.
Vinyl records were a dreadful technology. They scratched, they wore out and the sound from them was distorted in all sorts of ways by the production process. Worst of all they allowed 'audiophiles' an excuse to spend $15,000 plus on equipment and then brag about it at tedious length.
The high end market for audio equipment is essentially a high tech version of the fortune teller industry. The service is essentially a fraud; if there is a difference in sound it is negligible. People pay for it because of the flummery thaqt surrounds it.
This guy has just discovered that you can get a high quality motor for about a buck.
Re:The patent finally expired, I guess. (Score:4, Funny)
If one of my audiophile buddies doubts I spent $2000 on it, I show him the old SCSI cable I have connected (only on the one end), which is about half an inch thick, and ask him if his connection cable is that good.
I've had more fun with this thing than one man should rightly have. It does a fine job of playing CDs, too - back when CD ROM drives cost $400, they built them solidly - I never did find out why someone threw it away. Hmmm, maybe I should start claiming it uses tubes internally - nothing makes a digital signal sound good like using tubes!
Re:What stylus? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What stylus? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What stylus? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What about the stylus? (Score:2)
If you could rip apart an optical 'intelli-eye' style mouse and make an optical stylus out of it, then you'd have my attention.
Re:What about the stylus? (Score:3, Funny)
"How to turn an expensive top-of-the-range set of computer parts into a diy, low-quality turntable"
Would be a big hit on
Daniel
Re:What about the stylus? (Score:2)
I've made a 7 inch floppy disc turntable (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I've made a 7 inch floppy disc turntable (Score:2)
That's pretty damn cool, actually. Did you consider doing it with the original 7 inch (*) mechanism and read/write head, hacking the head movement and electrical in/out for the magnetic head?
Strikes me as being two potential problems with that;
(a) Tracking; no physical groove nor 'intelligence' to keep the head over the spiral track would be a major problem and
(b) The motors in the floppy drive are probably st
Re:I've made a 7 inch floppy disc turntable (Score:2)
Re:I've made a 7 inch floppy disc turntable (Score:3, Funny)
That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2, Informative)
Why not simply buy a decent used turntable from eBay? It isn't as if they are all that expensive.
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2)
You can get one of these [bestbuy.com] brand new from Best Buy. It even includes a built-in pre-amp, so you can hook it directly to the line-in on your sound card. I'm sure it'll make audiophiles scream (what doesn't, though?) ... but I'm perfectly happy using this setup to convert vinyl to CDs.
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:4, Informative)
So you get that cartoony effect where the sound starts out all slowed down and gradually reaches the correct pitch.
If you tried to scratch one of these, it's go like:
Rock the - rrrrrRRRRROOOOOCK the - rrrrrRRRRROoooock the beat!
Direct drive turntables are used by DJs and musicians because you can physically stop the record, or scratch it or whatever, and when you let it go, it'll return to the correct speed almost immediately, so it's like:
Rock the - Rock - Rock the beat!
Direct drive is better, but significantly more expensive, which is why it's cool that you can make them out of something as crappy as a floppy drive.
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:3, Interesting)
Hmm. Have you ever tried using that little lever that raises the arm? Give it a try sometime!
But seriously, he said he was using it to rip his vinyl to CD, so all he wants is for it to sound reasonable and play all the way through. Dir
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:5, Informative)
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2)
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2)
Think of it as Frequency Modulation - the frequencies in your music are modulated by the error on the motor's speed.
Jw
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:5, Insightful)
This was a home project - he did it because he wanted to, not because he needed to. Would you have preferred he watched survivor? Or that donald trump show? Maybe downloaded, so he could be spoonfed his entertainment.
This is one of the few slashdot stories of the past few days that actually belongs here. In my opinion.
Think about it for a minute.
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:4, Informative)
For these kinds of DIY projects, I've been enjoying hackaday [hackaday.com] and the print version of Make Magazine [makezine.com] (although I see they have a fair bit of stuff on the site now.) Being able to buy something doesn't invalidate the many reasons for doing it yourself, or in this case, the entertainment value of seeing that someone else did it.
If I had more time (and didn't live with my girlfriend) I'd probably do lots more of these kinds of things.
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2)
I did get away with making speaker mounts for my car a few weekends ago, which kills me because now I'm getting rid of the car for something more family friendly (managed to sneak a turbo in there, though.)
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2)
As for the 'why', he likes to make things, that's why.
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:5, Informative)
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:5, Informative)
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2)
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2)
Stepper motor? (Score:2)
Re:That would make one *terrible* turntable (Score:2, Insightful)
Where its at! (Score:5, Funny)
nerdcore rules
Re:Where its at! (Score:2, Funny)
But not quite as much as Beck
Before anyone asks... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Before anyone asks... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Before anyone asks... (Score:4, Informative)
Someday I'll ge tired of saying "if you RTFA"...
Re:Before anyone asks... (Score:2)
Now I have a working floppy motor I decided to make a unit that can have a removable pulley and magnet with 33rpm and 45rpm pulleys...I wanted to make a new turntable to house it in.
Re:Before anyone asks... (Score:2)
I've always wanted to do something like this (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't suppose he tested the torque of the motor to see how quickly he could get the record to playing speed. That's one of the key features that I understand to be important to audiophiles. And for the DJs, I imagine they are interested in what sort of clutch (?) mechanism there is that could help the motor recover from an accidental reversing of direction.
Seriously, I need to go to Barnes & Noble and pick up a book on basic electronics. It's one of those itches that I just haven't had the resources to scratch.
Floppies are fun. (Score:3, Interesting)
Recently I made a heliostat [abrij.org] from one though the design could use a bit more work.
Lately I've been mulling over the possibility that, since the FM/MFM read heads use a comb frequen
Re:I've always wanted to do something like this (Score:2, Informative)
How long does it take for the magnets to "recover" from each motion?
Electric motors do not work by interlocked mechanical devices. They work entirely through the EM force field. They self "clutch." The function of a clutch is prevent interlocking mechanical devices from damage. Take an electric model car and set it to running at slow speed. Now grab a tire. The motor will stop turning. You wi
Re:I've always wanted to do something like this (Score:2)
I think that audiophiles would be more interested in the stability of the system (meaning that there's no variation in the turning speed) than in startup time. DJ's on the other hand...
Re:I've always wanted to do something like this (Score:5, Informative)
Has no vibration from the motor transmitted to the platter/tonearm.
Has stable speed (startup speed is unimportant)
Typically you'll see them use fairly low torque belt drive setups (the belt helps with both vibration and speed flutters).
DJs are interested in a turntable which:
Starts fast (thus has high torque)
Has variable speed (pitch)
Doesn't mind being stopped, reversed, etc (there's no "accidental" about it!)
These are typically direct drive units, where the platter actually forms part of the motor itself. For example, in the classic SL1210, the coils are in the base of the unit, and the magnets are mounted right onto the (free spinning) platter. There are no gears, cogs, belts or anything else to wear out. The things are virtually indestructable. It's also worth noting that most of the movement of a record under a DJs hand is facilitated not by the platter but the slipmat - the platter continues turning underneath. This is very beneficial to the startup time, as when you release the record friction grabs it and it's up to full speed right away.
There is something beautiful about ... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:There is something beautiful about ... (Score:3, Funny)
So, considering the converse problem - who will be first to boot from vinyl? Now that would be a cool hack... :-)
Re:There is something beautiful about ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Not booting, but...
Re:There is something beautiful about ... (Score:2, Informative)
I just had a quick google, and found this [kempa.com] - apparently during the 70's and 80's there were a few such vinyls. Possibly the one you're thinking of was 'New Anatomy' by Inner City Unit?
Another cool example (also mentioned on the site I linked just above) was on a record called XL-1 by Pete Shelley (of The Buzzcocks). If the program encoded in the last track was run while the music played - OH WOW images and lyrics in time with the music!
Re:There is something beautiful about ... (Score:2)
Summary of the article (Score:3, Insightful)
Hardly a floppy drive hack.
LED??? (Score:5, Funny)
Ummm... wouldn't the turntable actually turning be a dead givaway???
Re:LED??? (Score:2)
Re:LED??? (Score:2, Funny)
Aha.. weren't expecting that were you!?
Well, I guess you were..
Re:LED??? (Score:2)
Doesn't matter (Score:2)
We're talking about audiophiles here. These people would convince themselves that they can hear a difference in their equipment in Nebraska when I turn my TV in Alaska on because our power grids are connected somewhere in Texas.
For what it's worth, you can have issues with components dirtying up the power supply. I've seen it but not with audio - If you're doing research with a lot of sensitive electronic equipment, you have
Thats wicked (Score:2, Interesting)
The idea of turntables is you get ultimate control over the music, he's taken this idea one step further & built the turntable too!
Re:Thats wicked (Score:2)
A shop near my house sells vinyl LP records. My wife bought a couple of disks from them one day and we borrowed an old turntable from a neighbour to play them.
My dad has a good turntable, and this was the one I used to listen to my records in pre cd days. I put one of my favourite Vangelis records onto the borrowed turntable and imagine my surprise. Electronic music uses a lot of flat tones, played for many seconds, in contrast to acoustic music where notes are pretty short.
The sound went up and down in
Re:Thats wicked (Score:2)
Re:Thats wicked (Score:3, Informative)
cool DIY project, but: (Score:5, Informative)
Direct drive. There's a reason why DD turntables cost more. Those pulleys wear out, they slip, they stretch on start up and oscillate as they balance out. Why bother with a brushless motor if you're slapping it to a rubber band? Why praise the electronic speed control features of the floppy motor when you're wiring it to a system that by design can't regulate it? Give me torque. When I press that "go" button, I want it spinning perfectly at 33, 45 or maybe 78 RPM, now, not a quarter turn from now. I'm sure there's a way to wire a floppy to do just that, so get back at it!
cf. The Hold Steady, "Everyone's a critic and most people are DJs"
Re:cool DIY project, but: (Score:2)
Re:cool DIY project, but: (Score:5, Informative)
If you're wanting an audiophile deck for just putting a record on and listening, then you probably don't want DD after all.
Re:cool DIY project, but: (Score:3, Interesting)
That's amazing (Score:4, Funny)
Give this man a prize!
Use a Scanner (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Use a Scanner (Score:5, Interesting)
Standard plug: We did roughly the same thing, but with 78 RPMs. Of course, it sounded much better, because of the lower resolution of 78 RPM disks.
http://www.s3.kth.se/signal/edu/projekt/students/0 3/lightblue/ [s3.kth.se]
Re:Use a Scanner (Score:2)
Re:Use a Scanner (Score:2)
You wouldn't have said that if you had listened to the samples from Springer :-)
Sibling poster iainl is of course right. Also, since the LP grooves are denser and move less, they are represented by fewer pixels when scanned, which gives a considerably lower SNR.
Now we just need someone... (Score:2, Funny)
part 2 - turn your floppy drive into a webserver (Score:3, Funny)
Never mind the precise control... (Score:3, Informative)
The result will be very smooth, precisely controlled speed.
Other cool floppy hacks... (Score:2, Interesting)
Hold on just one damn minute! (Score:2)
You never know when you'll need a boot disk to reinstall Windows (yes, I've heard that they come on bootable CDs now, but I don't believe it).
I've also got a box of about 1500 blank floppies that I got in the mid 90s when they were cool.
Wrong Way Around (Score:3, Funny)
YES!! (Score:3, Funny)
It'll play my 8-track tapes??
Oh
Slashdotted (Score:3, Informative)
(use Coral Cache, guys!!!
Analog is better - history will prove it (Score:3, Interesting)
Therefore, analogue is better - scratches and pops and all.
RS
CacheDot (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Wow and flutter (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I doubt it will work well (Score:2)
The only reasonable option I see here: Attach the turntable directly to the floppy motor, detach motor from the floppy electronics, then drive it through a microcontroller with several DAC output
Re:I doubt it will work well (Score:2)
Wow. Analysing turntable torque requirements, yet hasn't heard of gears and transmissions. Impressive.
Re:What's even cooler (Score:2)
Better than Russian Roulette!
Mirrordot (Score:5, Informative)
Re:/.-d (Score:2, Informative)
Re:NOW you tell me!!!! (Score:2)
"Turn one piece of obsolete kit into another piece of obsolete kit... yeah, slashdot will go fo that one"
Turntables were always onto a loser, as one audiophile friend pointed out to me... they're destructive - once you have played an album the needle has subly altered the sound by scratching it, so a true audiophile would only ever play a record once (if at all). Add to that a Linn Sondeck would require expensive recalibration every 2 we
Re:Site /.ed, but... WTF?! (Score:4, Funny)
Just a minute... I have an email...
Re:Site /.ed, but... WTF?! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Digital vs Analog(y) (Score:2, Interesting)
The biggest problem with "digital sound" is that it enables a huge amount of abuse of the signal and yet make it *apparently* still OK, but on closer listening the flaws become noticeable.
Digital radio, mp3s downloads, digital TV, and all such digital delivery mechanisms have conned the consumer into expecting more choice whilst compression has killed the quality with artifacts - i.e. visible blocking on video, distortion on video.
I
Re:Digital vs Analog(y) (Score:2)
There is no such thing. Get close enough and you'll notice the ENTIRE picture is full of noise, it's just harder to see it at a certain distance on most TVs. Digital images are superior to analog ones since they are noise free.
If you have not noticed the noise from an analog TV set then I don't see why having a little (basically inaudible) losses in sound would be such a big deal.
Audio[phile] fantasists (Score:2)
In effect, nerve transmission is based on a kind of PCM over a number of channels. Nerve cells fire in roughly binary fashion. The bandwidth available from ear to brain is quite finite. Provided the S/N ratio of the digital signal exceeds a certain value over a certain bandwidth, it is indistinguishable from an analog signal. Indeed it must be, because it is converted into an analog signal in the reproduction chain.
Audiophiles with golden ear
Re:Err...not quite... (Score:2)
It turned out that there IS a lot of output in the 20-40KHz range on a properly-recorded analog record.
Of course, you cannot hear tones at this frequency played in isolation. But in real life, there is only one continuously variable wave of air pressure hitting your ear, with all the frequencies present at once. So it may make a diff
Re:Hey (Score:3, Interesting)
CDs are only 16bit, and Vinyl has a MUCH higher frequency response range.
Granted, I've got $20K+ into my system, and not everyone has an environment like that, but don't discount a technology because you don't understand it.