Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Supercomputing Hardware

25th TOP500 List Released 274

Chris Vaughan writes "The 25th edition of the TOP500 list of the world's fastest supercomputers was released today (June 22, 2005) at the 20th International Supercomputing Conference (ISC2005) in Heidelberg Germany. The No. 1 position was again claimed by the previously mentioned BlueGene/L System. At present, IBM and Hewlett-Packard sell the bulk of systems at all performance levels of the TOP500. The U.S is clearly the leading consumer of HPC systems with 294 of the 500 systems installed there (up from 267 six months ago)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

25th TOP500 List Released

Comments Filter:
  • Obvious Link? (Score:5, Informative)

    by yellowbkpk ( 890493 ) * on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @01:11PM (#12882187)
    The list can be found here:
    http://www.top500.org/lists/plists.php?Y=2005&M=06 [top500.org]
  • Links are Fun (Score:3, Informative)

    by TPIRman ( 142895 ) on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @01:12PM (#12882193)
    And here's a link to the actual list [top500.org]. Also interesting is the historical chart of the TOP500 by manufacturer [top500.org], which tells a story in itself -- the decline of Cray and rise of IBM and Hitachi, for one.
  • by SeanTobin ( 138474 ) * <<byrdhuntr> <at> <hotmail.com>> on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @01:15PM (#12882215)
    You'd think that it would be a good idea to actually link [top500.org] to the html list [top500.org], or the xml list [top500.org], or the pretty charts [top500.org].

    The press release [top500.org] is interesting too.
  • AMD on the list. (Score:4, Informative)

    by B5_geek ( 638928 ) on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @01:40PM (#12882458)
    For you rabid fanbois (like me) here is how AMD scored:

    Rank Site Country/Year Computer /Processors Manufacturer Rmax Rpeak
    10 Sandia National Laboratories
    11 Oak Ridge National Laboratory
    31 Shanghai Supercomputer Center
    32 Los Alamos National Laboratory
    33 Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
    39 US Army Research Laboratory (ARL)
    46 Grid Technology Research Center, AIST
    57 Swiss Scientific Computing Center (CSCS)
    75 DOE/Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory
    76 DOE/Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
    109 The University of Nottingham
    144 Automotive Manufacturer (F)
    155 Los Alamos National Laboratory
    156 Government
    167 Universitaet Wuppertal
    174 United Institute of Informatics Problems
    244 DaimlerChrysler
    300 Veritas DGC
    306 Ford Motor Company
    347 Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
    348 Japan Adv. Inst. of Science and Technology (JAIST)
    388 Umea University / HPC2N
    490 Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing
    499 Doshisha University
  • Re:I'm confused (Score:4, Informative)

    by CardiganKiller ( 854899 ) on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @01:47PM (#12882519)
    It all depends on the system architecture and the type of problem being solved. Certain problems will adhere better to certain architectures and thus allow for a smaller gap between the theoretical and actual performance. The gaps can also be inherent in the architecture itself (e.g. communications bandwidth like you said).
  • Misleading rankings (Score:2, Informative)

    by 0xABADC0DA ( 867955 ) on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @01:54PM (#12882587)
    These ranking are based on LINPACK doing traditional operations like solving linear equations, so supercomputers like the Cray MTA [cray.com] aren't even listed even though for some grand challenges they destroy everything else, for example when doing dynamic mesh weather simluations. Each processor on the memory grid has 128 processor threads where the active thread switches every cycle (so memory fetch has huge latency). This lets it have a unified memory model and still have extremely high throughput.

    So the MTA can adjust the mesh to compute the tornado in very fine detail while using far fewer points for the huge swaths of calmer weather around it. Traditional supercomputers can't do that well since just distributing the data points to each processor is so much overhead.
  • Top50 by CPU family (Score:5, Informative)

    by frankie ( 91710 ) on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @02:38PM (#12883057) Journal
    Just a quick breakdown for comparison.
    • 11: PowerPC: 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 16, 21, 22, 23
    • 10: POWER: 13, 18, 19, 24, 25, 35, 36, 42, 45, 49
    • 9: Xeon: 20, 28, 29, 34, 37, 40, 42, 44, 47
    • 8: Itanium: 3, 7, 15, 17, 26, 30, 38, 48
    • 7: Opteron: 10, 11, 31, 32, 33, 39, 46
    • 2: NEC: 4, 27
    • 1: Alpha: 12
    • 1: Sparc: 41
    • 1: Cray: 50
  • Re:Obvious Link? (Score:3, Informative)

    by devinoni ( 13244 ) on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @03:01PM (#12883304)
    BlueGene/L is also much smaller than Earth Simulator. At 65536 processers you get 32 cabinets (2048 per). While Earth Simulator is 320 cabinets for the CPUs alone, not including the 65 cabinets for the interconnects. Construction of BlueGene/L is not complete it will have 131072 processors when it is fully completed.

    Earth Simulator Facts [top500.org]
    BlueGene/L Facts [top500.org]

  • by devinoni ( 13244 ) on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @03:56PM (#12883950)
    Remember the goal of BlueGene is to build very dense systems. Not only do you have to factor in the costs of the system, but you have the costs of the facilities. This includes costs of construction or renovation of the facilities to handle the power and cooling requirements of these behemoths. BlueGene/L in it's current incarnation is using 32 cabinets for it's processors. While Earth Simulator is comprised of 320 cabinets for the CPUs (an additional 65 for interconnects).
  • Re:Wrong criterion? (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @05:54PM (#12885085)
  • by SkinnyTurkey ( 414376 ) on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @06:29PM (#12885312)
    top500.org provided statistics for all top 500. For breakdown by processor family, see http://top500.org/sublist/stats/index.php?list=25& type=procfam&submit=Generate+Table [top500.org]. Assuming your summary for top 50 is correct, the statistics is rather different from top 500.

    I don't know why top500.org didn't provide breakdown by operating system, so I found out myself. Here it is:

    328 (65.6%): Linux
    73 (14.6%): HP Unix (HP-UX)
    52 (10.4%): AIX
    16 (3.2%): UNICOS
    7 (1.4%): Super-UX
    6 (1.2%): Solaris
    4 (0.8%): Tru64 UNIX
    4 (0.8%): MacOS X
    3 (0.6%): SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9
    2 (0.4%): Redhat Enterprise 3
    2 (0.4%): HI-UX/MPP
    1 (0.2%): SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 8
    1 (0.2%): Paragon OS
    1 (0.2%): IRIX

    I expected a few Windows, but surprisingly there is none at all. Not sure how accurate top500.org's "Operating System" field value is though.
  • by soldack ( 48581 ) <soldacker@yahoo . c om> on Wednesday June 22, 2005 @10:52PM (#12886673) Homepage
    http://www.top500.org/sublist/System.php?id=6560 [top500.org]

    Cornell is using a Windows cluster. It is ranked 326.

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...