Dell Axim X50 Running Linux 132
Venture37 writes "the guys at handhelds.org have managed to boot the linux kernel on a Dell Axim X50 handheld, the project is at alpha stages, you can grab a copy of the files from
handhelds.org or fisherss.com."
Re:to boldly go... (Score:3, Interesting)
Been there done that... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Been there done that... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Been there done that... (Score:2)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
IBM & Citizen Watch develop Linux-based "WatchPad" [linuxdevices.com]
Watch This Wednesday: the Linux Watch [engadget.com]
Et Cetera [google.com]
Why, I'm not exactly sure.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:3, Interesting)
By wearable computers this would naturally cover a wristwatch with an IC inside it.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:5, Insightful)
TBH though, I don't see the hype. So, it runs Linux, and does absolutely nothing useful. Big freaking deal. Lots of geek points, yes, but minus several million engineer points in the practicality department?
Re:to boldly go... (Score:5, Insightful)
Gotta say I concurr. Supposing I did buy an Axim and put Linux on it, what useful stuff could I do with it that I couldn't before? This is a serious question. These days, you can almost affordably buy one of these with a 480 by 640 display, 3d accellerator, and equip it with a 4 gig micro drive. Any real advantage to putting Linux on it?
Re:to boldly go... (Score:5, Funny)
Keeps girls away.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Now, if we can just get Gentoo to target this...
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
I would've friended you, but I've just discovered a 400-friend limit or something. Sorry.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:3, Interesting)
For the average user? Probably not.
A couple of possibilities:
* Getting openvpn to run, so that you can connect back to a linux gateway, whilst on the road.
* Being able to share contact/appointment data between evolution and the handheld (multisync/synce is a bit touchy at the moment).
* Being able to install applications without needing a windows box hanging around.
* Wireless LAN sniffing for security evaluations (kismet, etc).
* Coding on the road (if you're VERY despera
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
Also I don't know this specific device, in principle I see some advantage to use Linux on a handheld. A friend of mine has a LAMP installed on his handheld, with some scripts to organize his schedules, addresses, whatever. The advanage compared to other organizers is the increased availability of your data: You can easily export it to any format you need without being locked in some proprietary applications.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
Why doesn't he just turn on the backlight?
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
A friend of mine has a LAMP installed on his handheld
What's a LAMP?
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
A LAMP is a very commen combination of Linux, Apache (Web-Server), MySQL and PHP.
Some PHP-skripts implement the required functions to access the SQL database and to format the output as HTML, apache opens a port so any web-browser can be used to display the UI and to access the skript. Not particular useful on a PDA, but flexible because you can copy the skript to your PC at home and access the skript (and therefore Your data) through the Internet. (Of course you will probably need to some
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
Easy to answer (Score:2)
From what I've seen the GUI libraries are slimmed versions of QT and GTK.
Re:Easy to answer (Score:1)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
So it won't SUCK?
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
If you want a PDA that Just Works, buy a Palm. I had one before. I wanted to tinker with something that had WiFi (Palms with WiFi are expensive).
Speaking of WiFi, one of the t
Re:to boldly go... (Score:5, Insightful)
1) Mobile FULL-FEATURED WiFi scanner and auditing kit. Run Kismet, Airsnort, and a lot of other Linux-only tools (any Windows equivalents cost $$$ and have stripped-down handheld versions) for serious portable work. 100x easier than carting a laptop around. Break WEP keys, perform breakin demos, and hunt down rogue APs with a pocket-sized monster.
2) During the NYC blackout, my ISP was still up and laptops had juice, but my routers ran down the UPS batteries in about 30 minutes. Jury-rigging a car battery, some DC-DC conversion stuff, and an Ipaq w/ PCMCIA sleeve holding 2x PCMCIA network adapters = an instant router that stayed up, routing 1.5 Mbps DSL to five users, for 12 hours. Do you know how much a 12-hour UPS costs??
3) Since the Ipaq (like the Axim) has a microphone and WiFi, it makes a killer wireless microphone. Turn on a recording app, stream the data via wireless to a laptop somewhere nearby, and you've got at least an hour of recording time on batteries alone. Makes an excellent conference-room bug, for checking up on meetings that you can't attend or negotiations that you shouldn't know about--and you record all day if you plug your Ipaq in to charge and then "forget" about it.
4) Portable streaming MP3 player. I've got kerberos-protected NFS shares full of music, and I can stream music out of those shares from anywhere I can reach my APs.
The point is that the sky's the limit with Linux--whatever you can think up, within the limits of RAM and battery life (which are pretty substantial!) is yours to do.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:3, Interesting)
-kaplanfx
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Of course, it will be much better geek value when I can run a full pabx on it (asterisk...).
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
*Disclaimer* I am not a PDA developer, I have no idea how tough it is to program for them.
Re:to boldly go... palm OS linux based ! (Score:1)
So yes, this is important to be able to run all theses apps !
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
You could have gone outside (yeah, sunlight won't actually melt you) or read a book, or in the worst case, you must have saved some porn on the laptop...
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Actually, yes, $6k [ballard.com] and a couple of bottles of hydrogen.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Sheesh. Kids nowadays. What's the world coming to?
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
You could do lots of cool stuff running linux on one of these
Basically you can do (obviously) all the things you can
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
Well it would be of use to me, I couldn't care less if it wouldn't be of use to you, but it makes you look dumb to call it bullshit considering that I, and a bunch of other people have legitimate uses for it.
Thats great for you, it shouldn't bother you that other people will want to use it for other stuff though.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:2)
Linux on your PDA is a great way to take your favorite applications with you. I use gpsdrive on my iPAQ H5450, many other GTK-Applications do run under GPE, and it's pretty cool to use your handheld device in your universities WLAN/VPN (hello vpnc) and browse Wikipedia on your palm. I also use SSH to get home and browse my E-Mail via mutt.
I don't see why I should run another OS than Linux on my PDA, the user interface is quite nice, I can get a wide variety of applications, and I have the possiblity to inf
Re:to boldly go... (Score:5, Interesting)
Opie is the OpenSource fork of Qtopia, the same interface that powers the Sharp Zaurus. It's quite usable, and I installed it on my iPaq 3970 without any problems. As a matter of fact, handwriting recgnition is better than WindowsCE one.
Check those screenshots http://opie.handhelds.org/gallery/ [handhelds.org]
GPE is a GTK+2 based enviroment for handhelds, is a little bit cruder than Opie, but it uses a X server instead of the frame buffer, so it's easier to port software to it. There's already stuff like SNES9x, Quake and Doom running on it!
Again, some screenshots http://handhelds.org/~gpe/gallery/ [handhelds.org]
Also, one may guess that Nokia's Maemo could get ported to it.
So, there's lot of usefull things to do with it once the port is stable.
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
Re:to boldly go... (Score:1)
It's easier to carry than a dead badger.
TBH though, it won't ever do anything on a pda, and people will never program for the pda incarnation...
Wait for it...
If it doesn't actually *run* on the pda first.
If lack of ported apps is a rationale for not getting the OS to run on new hardware, how wo
Advantages and disadvantages of linux on a PDA (Score:5, Informative)
It discusses the various pros and cons of file systems, graphic systems, etc.
Re:Advantages and disadvantages of linux on a PDA (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Advantages and disadvantages of linux on a PDA (Score:5, Informative)
http://opie.handhelds.org/ [handhelds.org]
http://gpe.handhelds.org/ [handhelds.org]
Familiar Linux [handhelds.org] for iPAQs and other handhelds (presumably the X50 soon) provides images that include Opie and/or GPE by default.
It might also be pointed out that the Sharp Zaurus runs Linux natively, and manages to be both a useful PDA and a powerful computing platform at the same time, so the two are not mutually exclusive as you seem to imply.
Re:Advantages and disadvantages of linux on a PDA (Score:2)
It's has pocketpc-2003, or is it 'windows mobile 2003' whatever. The built-in network connec
Re:Advantages and disadvantages of linux on a PDA (Score:1)
How to get Linux on any PPC (Score:1)
That's fine... (Score:2, Funny)
I know - it's bad. Mod me down.
Re:That's fine... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:picture (Score:1)
Re:picture (Score:2, Informative)
Original [cnews.ru]
Mirror 1 [img216.echo.cx]
Mirror 2 [photobucket.com]
Also Toshiba (Score:4, Informative)
eh, zaurus for me (Score:5, Insightful)
perhaps that axim people will have better luck, i surely hope so. But really if this is what you are looking for you should consider buying one that supports linux natively. Not only will it save you some time but you also get to put your money where your mouth is and support companies that support you.
Re:eh, zaurus for me (Score:3, Funny)
Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:5, Interesting)
From what I gather from the site Linux is nowhere near there on most, if not all, of these points. For your average user Linux might be there on the desktop, and it is my desktop OS, but it certainly is nowhere near there on the PDA. I enjoy tinkering with my PC OS but when it comes to my PDA it has to just work and it is for getting serious work done quickly. It is the device I turn to when all else fails to get the job done. This is one Linux user that is not going to be running Linux on his PDA. I think it is many years away from being close to functional in the way that I need it to be and the way MS's product is today. I give credit where it is due and MS is due it for their Windows Mobile OS.
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
The Sharps are pretty nice but not available in the US through normal channels.
I guess I will have to see what Palm does.. I hope they survive and prosper. I would hate to have to buy a CE machine
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Cons? Sure. The cheapo speaker blew out on my when I had Beta Player cranking up the tunes. Battery life on wifi is really short. The bluetooth keyboard I got took a pairing, backup, hard reset, restore, pairing, to get it working.
But in a Microsoft shop, this is a pretty slick device. Syn
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:5, Interesting)
Although most people may not know this, the port of Linux to the iPaq brought forth several nice embedded systems and even commercial products. Fluke for example created a Linux-based wireless network scanner using an iPaq. We use one at work, it's much lighter than a laptop and works with much less configuration. Odds are the device would have been slower to market and probably have had fewer features if the Linux port to iPaq handhelds had not existed.
This story may not be interesting for everyone here, but to state that a Linux port to the PDA is irrelevent would be short sighted at best. There are many possibilities for a device which can be hacked up and turned into new products, and that's what excites me to see stories like this.
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2, Interesting)
She dosen't use a desktop.
She started using a Palm 7 with the intent of using a wireless PDA exclusively for her Internet access.
She's upgraded a few times.
Her next planned upgrade is to a PalmOne Treo 650. This PDA/Phone can be used as a wireless modem for a computer. The Zaurus can be that computer.
The plan is to set up so mom can use her Zaurus when her Treo isn't powerful enough.
Step two is to build a camra that supports bluetooth. The Linux PDA
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
How can this be? I have the Clie TH55, and the software is very unstable. Even doing a "find" causes the machine to reset. The web browser requires occasional resets. The HP48 emulator I installed locked the thing up so hard it wouldn't reset until the batteries ran dead.
It's sad, because the TH55 hardware itself is kick-butt. But my next "palm" will be Windows-based.
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
Most likely the difference
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Hmm.
Ehhhhhht-to ...
VisualStudio?
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
Linux on handhelds is rock solid and widely used (Score:4, Insightful)
There are dozens of handheld devices with Linux pre-installed and supported (often in innovative form factors and applications). There is nothing to tinker: they turn on and are rock solid. They also have lots of software available for them.
Handhelds.org is an effort to bring Linux to unsupported devices, in addition to the supported devices. Why do people do that? Because they can and because they like to have an even broader range of hardware available to them. Generally, installing Linux on unsupported devices involves some effort, but in my experience, the end result is as solid as it is on supported devices.
Re:Linux on handhelds is rock solid and widely use (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
You should know though (apparently having had a treo) that palm supports word/excel better than win mobile does. Formatting, saved files etc. It's a well known irony that palm does better than MS at it's own format.
All the rest you mention...palm does that too, effortlessly (although why you'd want to read stuff in
"but when it comes to my PDA it has to just work and it is for getting serious work don
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
I agree in general, though: Palm devices are still amongst the best general PDA devices.
(and yes, I do work for Dataviz)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
Even that depends on what you actually want from your handwriting engine. The PPC handwriting engine is easy to learn and does fairly well on normal text. But it is far from the fastest handwriting input method around, in particular if you need letter accurate input of things like names.
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
However most people who use Windows CE actually need the Microosoft brand name product.
Most every Windows office application has a Windows CE counterpart. A clone exists for Linux PDAs and a file reader exists for PalmOs but only Windows CE has the offical PDA mini version of the same applications with the same support.
However this means nothing to a person who runs Linux on the d
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
1) It's temperamental. Like Windows on the desktop, it occasionally slows down for no reason, apps stop responding or close, etc. I have to stop and restart drivers (which sometimes means soft-resetting the device). It's much more stable than it was back in the pre-PPC days, but it's still flakey compared to, say, Linux and OS X.
2) The process for loading applications can be restrictive and convoluted.
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:1)
I was aware that you couldn't sync it with Linux (which I run at home) but not about OSX which I agree is a bit of a bummer for those Macheads out there. Since I usually charge/sync it with my work PC (XP) and MS exchange that hasn't been an issue for me.
I let all of the apps install to the default location and install into System Memory and I have never had a problem. I use the storage card only for documents/music/videos/backups. I had a few of th
Re:Windows Mobile 2003 SE is Great - So why? (Score:2)
But MS did not port the NT kernel or APIs to the PDA. Instead, they created a half-hearted derivative that is a pain to program even for Win32 programmers. That is in addition to the fact that NT was never designed for embedded systems.
Linux, on the other hand, has the full desktop APIs on PDAs. Furthermore, its POSIX APIs have been used in embed
Project Details (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Project Details (Score:2)
Re:Project Details (Score:1)
it is certainly possible. the t3 uses an ARM processor (not sure which one exactly) and the linux kernel has been ported to arm. The first thing you'd have to do is write a palm program that can probe hardware for you and return the values. I think the t3 has a serial port on it, so that would be a good way to send the output.
The next thing you'd need to do is create a bootloader that would run as a palm program, reset the cpu (mmu, interrupts, etc), load the kernel into ram, and start executing it.
Th
Re:Project Details (Score:2)
About some of these pda's, I read about USB host support. Do you think the x50/x50v can be USB hosts? That would be a really nice feature with a usb harddisk... especially with the intel 2700g and some appropriate xvmc support, or a special version of mplayer or something.
Jelle.
Haskell on Handheld Linux Machines (Score:2)
As an X30, X30H and iPaq (HP) owner (Score:4, Interesting)
As a veteran of 3 wireless applications that link to a remote interface I have seen a great deal of potential in the handheld paradigm, there was a slashdot link about a many to many pradigm in computing screens, where angles dictate what you saw, well my idea if different handhelds have differnet views on a computer system, like thin clients.
Right now the ipaq is an up and coming bluetooth tv remote control, which shows the tv guide on the ipaq, and allows you to email using the qwerty keyboard, or web surf (built in apps).
Right now it is a bad set of programs, and hacks, with linux opening up the system, I can make customised system designed for this.
Imagine, watching seinfeld on xvid through your RF link to you 42" screen, from your PC, but then watching satellite channels on yoru handheld, while you check for latest news on an earthquake, and then at a push of a button send the image you are seeing to the tv screen.
Yes, it is already here, but not working nicely.
Wray for linux!
H1940 also on this list (Score:3, Interesting)
H1940/30's are pretty cheap 2nd hand these days, and would make a reasonable linux handheld.
Red.
Just became service unavailable (Score:4, Informative)
Wonderful... (Score:2, Funny)
The Asus port is even more succesful (Score:2, Informative)
too bad but it's probably because develope do not want to many lusers asking questions arount untill things get a little more stable...
Please Linux on PDA cant.... (Score:1)
Homepage moved!! (Score:1)
http://narcotize.com/~axim [narcotize.com]
In some hours, when the dns is ready:
http://axim.narcotize.com/ [narcotize.com]
Re:why this sad obsession with installing linux? (Score:2, Insightful)