Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Data Storage Software

Real Quietly Releases More Code as Open Source 22

AlexJeff writes "Yesterday Real open sourced the server source code of its Network Optimized FileSystem (Asynchronous FileSystem). Actually it "dual-licensed" it under its open source (RPSL) and commercial licenses. According to a posting on the Helix Community, the Asynchronous FileSystem provides asynchronous access to the OS file-system and is mainly used to help resolve timing issues with Network File System(NFS). This functionality provides improvement capacity in 'Helix DNA-powered servers, especially on frameworks that use Network File System.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Real Quietly Releases More Code as Open Source

Comments Filter:
  • Real Quietly Releases More Code as Open Source

    People sure do like noting how things are done "quietly" around here.

    Since it's from Real, it probably is actually part of some horrific conspiracy, right?
  • Is this a smart move, considering that MS is having to rip out its player from the EU version of Windows?

    Maybe I'm just talking out of my @ss, but now would be the time for compeititors to make their move to start taking market share from MS that belonged to Ms by default via the free player?

    Just a thought. I wonder how many more companies will make a play for that market share?
    • I don't think that this has a whole lot to do with that.

      Real making a play on that would be more like a super feature-rich player, with marketing directed straight in the faces of EU customers.
    • by Anonymous Coward
      A tweaked version of NFS has very litte relationship to what media player your Winbox ships with.
    • You're not serious, are you?

      First of all, the stripped down version is only in Europe, which is a saturated market anyway.

      Second, most pc makers won't use the new version [pcworld.com].

      Third, XP is a very mature product, and MS is clearly looking beyond it.

      Fourth, how could this code release impede their ability to increase market share? Could not it also help it? Please provide an argument.

      cheers, potor

  • Helixcommunity (Score:4, Informative)

    by tcopeland ( 32225 ) * <tom AT thomasleecopeland DOT com> on Saturday June 11, 2005 @07:16PM (#12791449) Homepage
    ...is the largest public GForge server in the world [gforge.org].

    There's a picture of their server rack as of a year or so ago right here [gforge.org].
  • by CyricZ ( 887944 ) on Saturday June 11, 2005 @10:39PM (#12792476)
    Real has proven time and time again that they're the unsung hero of the open source movement. While companies like Sun promise to open their software time and time again (thankfully they actually do), and then others like Borland release theirs but quickly make it proprietary again, Real has proven they are serious. They release a massive amount of code back to the community, but never earn the respect that other companies do. That's why I'd just like to give a big Thanks! to real, for all they have given to the open source community.
    • They're betting on open source like a whole lot of other companies which is great. But I would strongly argue that it is unjustified and even far-fetched to call Real Networks the heroes of the Open Source community. And it would be completely false to say that they're even friends with the free software movement.
      Real is first and foremost about closed proprietary protocols which are a form of DRM. That has been the core of their business from the beginning and still is and there is no reason yet to ex
  • Neither the /. summary nor the article itself explains what this technology is and how or what to use it for. Beside being "Real" technology, why should I be interested in it?

    Oh, yeah, it's real quiet here. I got a bad feeling about this.
    • Re:What is this? (Score:3, Interesting)

      Good question -the project page doesn't say either.

      From the context clues, I'll take a guess - NFS performance is OK if you use the async mount option. But then you risk data loss. The Linux NFS devs tell you never to use async mode. So you use sync mode and then the performance sucks (3.5x slower in the tests I did a few years back).

      So maybe this provides a safe async filesystem. That would be nice, especially if it's easier to setup than OpenAFS.

      Still it would be helpful if they had a WTF page. Ma
  • I know it's early here (~7:30AM) but am I the only one who read it as:
    Real Quietly Releases Morse Code
    And I'm thinking, how in the hell is Morse code quiet?!?!
  • Wake me when they start allowing people to convert RealAudio and RealVideo into other formats.

    (Last time I checked, their license still prohibited that.)

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...