Pentium 4 6XX Sequence and New EE P4s Launched 198
Mojo-Dog writes "Today Intel took the wraps off their new
Pentium 4 Processors with EM64T extensions for 64-bit computing. The
Pentium 4 6XX Sequence and Pentium 4 3.73GHz are based on Prescott 2M cores with
a full 2MB of on-chip L2 cache as well.
HotHardware.com has a full review with benchmarks posted of these new P4s,
many of which also offer Intel's SpeedStep technology for power savings and
improved thermals, which has been available in Pentium Mobile CPUs for some time
now."
Re:'lagging a bit' (Score:1, Insightful)
Compatibility with AMD64 (Score:5, Insightful)
Wow, nicely said. Is this close enough to make binaries interchangable or are they two separate platforms? Either way I am 100% sure that things are exactly as they are.
still (Score:3, Insightful)
Still catching up to Athlon wrt games (Score:5, Insightful)
This P4 still lags behind the Athlon FX-55 and 64 4000+ for Doom3, HL2, UT2004, and the general 3dMark benchmark. Pricewatch has the FX-55 at 900$ US and the 64 4000 at 620$, which is cheaper than the best chip of the bunch at 999$. Granted, video cards are probably the biggest system decision for gamers, but if CPUs figure into your decision, you might want to consider the comparisons.
Nothing really about 64 bit performance (Score:5, Insightful)
Intel the leader in 64 bit extensions? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: EM64T Extensions - 64-bit computing? (Score:1, Insightful)
1. 8 registers increased to 16 (it still sucks compared to SPARC's 128).
Intels have many more internal registers and use register renaming. Basically that means you don't optimize by using a bunch of registers but instead try to keep the processor pipeline full enough so the out or order loads and stores from memory, which is hopefully in cache, have zero cost. But you do that naturally when you program, don't you?
Re:64-bit GPUs (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Oy! (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sure you see the irony here [slashdot.org]...
After reading a few other articles about the 600s (Score:4, Insightful)
Forests, not trees (Score:3, Insightful)
Intel and HP chose to work together on a development effort to produce a totally new processor [wikipedia.org] that offers drastically improved performance, but doesn't execute IA-32 code very well. AMD chose to emphasize IA-32 support [wikipedia.org] instead of overall performance. As in the past, backward compatibility won out over superior technology, and AMD has been winning market share from Intel.
Intel is doing a course correction for its 64-bit strategy -- not suddenly moving into the 64-bit world.
Worthless Review (Score:3, Insightful)
Hello - This is 10 years ago calling! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Intel the leader in 64 bit extensions? (Score:3, Insightful)
intel has been beating this dead horse for over a decade and it hasn't lived up to a single one of its design goals, and has never been profitable.