2005 FIRST Robotics Competition Announced 96
Gothic_Walrus writes "Dean Kamen strikes again! The 2005 game for FIRST Robotics was announced today through an international sattellite feed provided by NASA. Dubbed 'Triple Play,' the game features two groups of three robots competing to stack pyramid-shaped pieces and to align them in rows. Think Tic-Tac-Toe, but three-dimensional. This game should be a challenge for the 1,000+ active teams in FIRST, which are located throughout the U.S. and Canada (and even Brazil). Video of the game can be found here. Go 818!"
Instead of a starting gun.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Instead of a starting gun.... (Score:1)
Re:I was in FIRST long, long ago (Score:1)
Interesting and all... (Score:2)
Re:Interesting and all... (Score:2)
Then again, if anyone has the bandwidth to withstand Slashdot, I think that it'd be NASA... :)
Re:Interesting and all... (Score:2)
Re:If any robot wants an A Mind... (Score:2)
Whoever moderated this idiot "Informative", you should be incredibly ashamed of yourself!
Just wondering here... (Score:1)
Re:Just wondering here... (Score:1)
Re:Just wondering here... (Score:2)
Go 288!
Please destroy the winner (Score:2)
the teams (Score:1)
like Team 174 - they are at snobot.org [snobot.org]
Looks boring this year... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:2)
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:2)
The answer is a simple one: the skills may be useful for something where a prepackaged answer might not be available...and who knows if that answer will still be available for the next time it's needed?
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:2)
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:1)
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:4, Informative)
I'm the student head of our programming group, and I'm surprised at how much they gave us. We spent endless hours trying to get our robot to drive in a straight line last year (motor power issues). This year? We've got software that will auto-correct its path...software that FIRST gave us.
That said, I still think that there's room for the programmers to work here. There are actually many, many options for the autonomous mode - we could block other robots, for example, or maybe go to the human player pad instead of for the magical green pyramids.
Besides...who said that you have to use the code that FIRST gives us? If it bothers you that much, write your own! :)
I agree that drivers and mechanical issues will decide the game, but I still think there's room for us to be important in the team's success.
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:2)
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:2)
I'm somewhat ambivalent. As a coach with a team with a fairly good history (Team 95, Lebanon, NH), and last year's programming coach, I'm somewhat disappointed that the playing field has been leveled, since my stu
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:2)
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:2)
It probably is. But from my experience watching IR trackers and line-followers do particularly poorly, I truly do expect other non-camera solutions to present themselves, and do well.
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:1)
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:3, Insightful)
What are you talking about? You have a robot vision system to program! You should be excited! For years FIRST has left software to be a last-minute glued-on part of the robot, programmed in PBASIC for lack of an alternative. We now have PIC micros, and they're giving us vision systems and lots of fun sensors to play with. This is going to make it a lot more fun.
One thing I would l
Re:Looks boring this year... (Score:1)
Are you kidding? (Score:1)
No one used the IR sensors last year because they were useless; too many sources of IR noise and reflections that are literally invisible and there were better ways to find the posts in autonomous mode. The CMUCam is much more interesting and useful. If you don't like, don't use it, but don't complain because they gave us something better this year.
FIR
This involving mega bucks or something because... (Score:2, Informative)
Also we have Robot Wars where robotic vehicals would battle it out etc, yet none of this ever makes BIG news such as this.
Is it just because this has N.A.S.A backing that everyone is sitting up and taking notice, or is there something unique about this?
Re:This involving mega bucks or something because. (Score:1)
Re:This involving mega bucks or something because. (Score:5, Informative)
FIRST teams are made up of high school students, people who would never be able to experience this otherwise. The competition isn't an issue - FIRST provides the game every year. The money can be hard to come by, but donations from large companies such as General Motors (our sponsor) or from other groups or individuals take care of a large portion of that. Supervision isn't hard to find either; most teams are led by engineers, teachers, and other volunteers.
The main empasis of FIRST is not the game itself - as Dean said today, "the robot is just a vehicle, no pun intended." FIRST emphasizes what is known as "gracious professionalism" - in essence, remembering that playing fairly and developing respect and possibly even friendship for your opponents should NEVER come after winning the game. FIRST is trying to get students to become interested in engineering, in math and science. The UK may be different, but America needs those people to fill the holes in the already-falling number of technically skilled employees.
It may sound corny and stupid, but the main goal of FIRST is literally to change the world. I'd bet that the BBC shows aren't going to benefit society quite as much in the long run. :)
Re:This involving mega bucks or something because. (Score:1)
the teams in the BBC one are all schools and colleges.
Now, in robot wars we saw some amazing stuff, some were schools, some from other places, some in it for fun, some speading $$$$$$ on their robots (we heard over £2k for some machines). The most heartbreaking part was when two "rival" teams would be fighting, and then one robot would have some kind of malfunction, and then the teams would give each other help to fix the bots, because they would rather win a fair battle (or lose)
Re:This involving mega bucks or something because. (Score:1)
It's the little guys (Score:3, Informative)
The FIRST Competition can only be competed in by highschool teams. That said, they almost always have some sort of sponsorship from a large corporation or many smaller businesses. The fee for a team to go to one event was $3000 when I was on a team (GO 904!) and then $2000 for every competition after that.
Also another thing that makes this competition unique is that every team starts with the same basic kit of parts, and are limited to certain parts that they can buy separately, despite this there are ofte
From a team member.... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:From a team member.... (Score:2)
Teams Located Around the World (Score:4, Informative)
Dean Kamen will tell you, FIRST isn't about building robots. It's about building our future.
------------
Jack Higgs
Programmer / Mentor / Parent
Team Fusion #364
Gulfport High School, Gulfport, Mississippi, USA
Familiar plot! (Score:2)
Robots? Pyramids? Stacking things? NASA?
Are they trying to free Sutekh the Destroyer from his Pyramid of Mars [dwwa.net]?!
Oh, no one here is a Doctor Who fan... (Backs slowly out of the room, embarrassed.)
Correction (Score:1)
Re:Correction (Score:1)
Re:Correction (Score:1)
Re:Correction (Score:1)
Re:Correction (Score:1)
Yes! Now I know!!! (Score:1)
Re:Yes! Now I know!!! (Score:1)
No NO NO! (Score:1)
CMUcam2 and other fun stuff (Score:2)
They've really kicked it up a notch, technologically. A lot of time in previous years would be spent brainstorming, designing, and building extremely specialized mechanisms, and our team would have to spend our whole kickoff weekend picking a strategy so we could pick how the robot looks. This time, however, they have created a game that requires specialized software rather than hardware, and they have also included in the kit of parts a ready-to-assemble chassis and gearbox. The end result is that we wi
Re:CMUcam2 and other fun stuff (Score:2)
Oh, so you already have a nice mechanism for scoring tetrahedrons that works reliably and can't be optimized?
There is still plenty of work to be done, and plenty of design as well.
The end result is that we will have a robot to work with in a week, instead of four, and the programming team can start hacking at that
go 1243 (Score:1)
Re:go 1243 (Score:1)
site down? Torrent? (Score:1)
Re:site down? Torrent? (Score:1)
Robots riding Segways? (Score:2)
A quick summary (Score:3, Interesting)
For those who aren't familiar with the US FIRST Robotics Competiton [usfirst.org], here's a quick summary.
Dean Kamen started an organization called For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) because he felt that students were not being inspired to pursue science and engineering. His usual analogy is that while we have immense respect for athletes, celebrities, and entertainers, we don't recognize engineers and scientists in the same way, and he wants to change that.
The practical implementation of this is the FIRST Robotics Competition. Each January, the kickoff from Manchester, NH is broadcast to teams across the country (and world) on NASA TV, and they find out about a new game. They also receive a kit of parts, and they then have six to seven weeks to design, build, program, practice driving, and ship a robot to play that game.
This year's game, as many are, is just complex enough that I will not try to explain it fully. Essentially, you earn points by stacking small tetrahedrons ("tetras") on the large tetra-shaped goals. There are 9 of these in a grid. You get 3 points for each tetra of your color stacked (upright) on top of a goal, and 1 point for each that is inside the goal but not stacked. Then you get 10 points for each row of 3 goals where your color is on top, and you get 10 points at the end if all three robots in your alliance (there are two alliances, red and blue, with three teams each) are in your end zone. You also receive bonus tetras (placed directly on top of the goals on your end of the field) for certain actions during autonomous mode: placing vision tetras (these have a green stripe for the camera to track) on the goals in the middle (1 bonus tetra for putting it on the side goals, 2 for the middle) and knocking down the tetras magnetically hung from the goals on your side (1 bonus tetra, and the knocked-down one stays in play; it otherwise would be removed).
The structure of the match is 15 seconds of autonomous mode, where the robots can't (electronically) receive communications, and must navigate on their own. This is made much more interesting this year by them throwing a CMUcam2 [cmu.edu] (a small serially-controllable robot vision system--quite cool!) into our bag of sensors. Then the remaining 1:45 of the match is human-controlled. Scoring is probably another "coopertition"-style deal where the winner gets 2x the loser's score or something similar to keep good teams from kicking bad teams' asses completely.
Re:A quick summary (Score:1)
Simple, yet complex (Score:2)
I'm very excited to get my hands on the software ('specially the math libs) and new compiler for this year. We've done some work with gyros already on our 2004 robot, but the math required to filter the noise was too much to run all our ot
Re:Simple, yet complex (Score:1)
During today's
More software oriented this year (Score:3, Informative)
This year FIRST has really placed the emphasis on software. They've given us an easy-to-build chassis and gearbox, a game that requires at most one manipulator (for moving tetras), and a boatload of awesome tools. We get a CMUcam2 [cmu.edu], which lets our robot track things using a camera. (This also offers some interesting possibilities for funny things, like making a cart that follows a student around as they scout teams or something... we're planning on building both the FIRST drivetrain/chassis and our own, and using the FIRST one as a testbed... I want to convert it into a human-following robot cart once we're done using it ;-) They've also apparently written lots of software modules to make it easier to use gyros, position encoders, and the like, and combined them to make a plain-text-scriptable autonomous mode thing, that allows you to write the robot instructions for what to do. (This gives teams with "intelligent" robots an advantage, as more people will take the dead-reckoning route if it's easy and reliable, so smarter bots will face less competition.) Personally I'm a programmer, and our job was usually neglected in previous years, so I look forward a great deal to a season where programming becomes a major portion of our robot, and not some little detail to be filled in at the end.
Wow, this brings back memories.... (Score:1)
Programming (Score:1)
No life for the next six weeks (Score:1)
Pitching in my team support (Score:2)
sattellite? (Score:1)
Re:sattellite? (Score:1)