More Linux Portable Media Players On The Way 181
An anonymous reader writes "According to LinuxDevices.com, Taiwanese motherboard maker FIC will unveil a Linux-based portable media player (PMP) at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas this week. FIC's 'Vassili' includes a 3.6-inch color LCD screen and a 20GB hard drive, and supports files in MPEG 1-4, MP3, WMA, WAV, ASF, AVI, and JPEG format. Speaking of Linux-based PMPs, Archos will also showcase its lastest PMP, the Pocket Media Assistant PMA400 at CES, and other Linux-based PMPs have recently been announced by iRiver, Veritouch, and Zupera."
But the real question is... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:But the real question is... (Score:2)
~phil
Re:But the real question is... (Score:2)
We're about to find out. That's what iRiver is accused of [kerneltraffic.org]
Re:But the real question is... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:But the real question is... (Score:2)
Re:But the real question is... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:But the real question is... (Score:5, Informative)
-Firewire is freely licensed by Apple.
-USB is not. At least last I heard.
-Firewire does not require a CPU, ie a PC, to mediate file transfers.
-USB requires a PC. And originally, Windows, tho that changed eventually.
-Firewire 400 is faster than USB.
-Firewire 800 is faster than USB2. Note that contention on the inferior bus and the mediation of the CPU are two big factors that retard USB and USB2.
-Firewire, six-pin, has a superior ability to power peripherals compared to USB.
-(Bone to pick) Firewire and USB were introduced by Apple and Intel, respectively. Intel used its influence in mobo design and OEM to promote its own, inferior, standard over Apple's. (And Apple waived the licensing fees - $1 per mobo, I believe, early, so that was not a factor). As a result, to this day Firewire still hasn't hit the magic numbers to drop the cost down to parity with USB. Microsoft had no small role in retarding the introduction of Firewire in Windows. MS/Intel swing a lot of weight. They did not exactly like Apple making a new standard.
So we're stuck with a slower data transfer rate in real life and a lousy peripheral power option because Intel wanted to rool over all.
Re:But the real question is... (Score:4, Interesting)
USB is royalty-free.
Firewire does not require a CPU, ie a PC, to mediate file transfers.
This is irrelevant in most cases (unless you are transferring data between peripherals). The advantage of the USB approach is that the everything is considerably simpler and cheaper.
They did not exactly like Apple making a new standard.
How exactly does Intel (or Microsoft, for that matter) profit from USB being the standard? It was just that Firewire was considerably more expensive than USB to implement -- both on the host and on the peripheral side. To this day, the only popular Firewire peripherals I know of are DV camcorders.
As a result, to this day Firewire still hasn't hit the magic numbers to drop the cost down to parity with USB.
Maybe that's because the complex protocol makes everything expensive while offering few advantages?
Re:But the real question is... (Score:2)
Re:But the real question is... (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.digit-life.com/articles/usb20vsfirewir
Given the option I'd get an HD with both interfaces and use firewire as much as i can.
Re:But the real question is... (Score:2)
Re:But the real question is... (Score:5, Interesting)
It's a circuit board and a cable. The costs are negligible in either USB's or Firewire's manufacture; the cost was in the initial implementation in hardware and software.
How exactly does Intel (or Microsoft, for that matter) profit from USB being the standard? It was just that Firewire was considerably more expensive than USB to implement -- both on the host and on the peripheral side. To this day, the only popular Firewire peripherals I know of are DV camcorders.
Apple and Intel were engaged in simultaneous R&D on a high-speed serial bus. An old story. Who benefits? Well, for one, Intel didn't want to find it wasted time and money.
Secondly, and most importantly: Intel is in the business of making processors. They designed USB to require an Intel processor to operate. (3. Profit!) That simply wasn't necessary, and it slowed the actual data rate a great deal.
Remember, we had to wait a long time before USB2. We were putting up with pokey speeds on bloody everything. Webcams sucked mostly because they were trying to send a video signal down a telegraph wire. Firewire worked fine, but was unavailable because Intel made it clear to everyone concerned that supporting Firewire would not make Intel happy. (AMD wasn't a factor yet.)
It was a Catch-22 for Firewire. With no boards or peripherals supporting it, no incentive to build same. USB's unit cost dropped, Firewire stayed high. And as electronics companies usually do, they cranked up the price of the technically superior Firewire components because those who needed the speed would pay through the nose for it.
Maybe that's because the complex protocol makes everything expensive while offering few advantages?
Firewire was more complex than USB - but a Celeron is also more complex than a 486SX. Yet a Celeron costs less than the old 486SX. After the initial costs are recovered, it's just mass production. Ditto USB and Firewire components.
Re:But the real question is... (Score:2)
It's pretty obvious you have never done any hardware design. USB supports 1.5Mbps; AFAIK, minimum speed on Firewire is 400Mbps. This means the cables, boards, connectors, and chips have to be about 10x the price. This means it's completely impossible to make $5 mice/keyboards/joysticks for Firewire (unless you want a $50 mouse with a 1
I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:3, Funny)
You are a worthy typist.
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:5, Informative)
The FIC Vassili is limited to MPEG4, MP3, WMA, WAV, ASF, AVI, and JPEG.
The iRiver PMP-120 does not currently support it, but they promise it will soon, I think.
The VeriTouch iVue doesn't mention which formats it supports.
Zupera Technology's one is limited to MP3, WMA, WAV, CD and AC-3.
So none of them support it.
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:5, Informative)
So iRiver does.
iRiver seem to make great players in any case. When I get a new MP3 player, I'll get an iRiver. Especially if Rockbox [rockbox.org] is ported to it!
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:2)
If this thing was made elsewhere. Will this Portable Media Player (PMP) be globally ready?
Making it a Portable Media Internationalized Player (PIMP).
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:2)
And yet under the category "Music," it says:
"* Playback support for: MP3, WMA (level 1, 2A, 2B), ASF, WAV"
You'd think they would mention Ogg right there under music, where it's most pertinent. There is ZERO mention of Ogg for the PMP-120 on the official iRiver sites.
I'm hopeful, but there's just too many contradictions.
Gnnnnnnnnnn! (Score:2)
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:2)
EXACTLY. I'm in the market for an HDD music player. It HAS to handle Ogg Vorbis, as all my files are in that format. It turns out, my "Christmas bonus" is in the form of a gift certificate from (choose one) BestBuy, Amazon.com, or CircuitCity. So, now I'm looking at PMP's. The iRiver PMP-120 sounds worthy, since at least three (third-party) online reviews have stated it has Ogg support, yet there is nary a mention of this on any of the
Their most recent music players support Ogg. (Score:2)
I am surpirsed their websie don;t specify this, the documentation they provide is second to none, I would have a second look at manuals and available information.
Re:I'll save you all the trouble. . . (Score:2)
Death of the PDA (Score:4, Insightful)
But it's OK! We have this nifty device you can watch movies on! Look at the pretty colors!
Re:Death of the PDA (Score:2)
Re:Death of the PDA (Score:2)
Are they? Well, let's assume they are:
I don't find it sad. It's hard to justify $500 for a PDA. Whoopee, it has a calender. Whoopee, it can kinda sorta browse the web and get email. Whoopee, some of them have cameras. Besides playing media, what use do they have that would appeal to a broad segment? Why is it so 'sad' that entertainment machines that are capable of storing fun-to-watch stuff is, as you say, popular?
Re: Death of the PDA (Score:2)
When it first got used, I think it really meant 'pocket computer' -- Newtons and Psions are general-purpose machines and you can do an awful lot of stuff with them, particularly the later ones. But then Palms and their type became popular and took over the market, and 'PDA' came to mean 'electronic calendar and address book', because that's all people could find to do with them (and, initially, all they were up to).
So, personally speaking, I'm not too upset
So they run Linux ... (Score:5, Funny)
Girl: "Hey, that's a cool MP3 player!"
Luser: "It's not JUST an MP3 player! It runs Linux with a 2.4 kernel, and I even have a copy of GCC installed so that I can compile stuff on it!"
Girl: "Uhh, okay
Re:So they run Linux ... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So they run Linux ... (Score:2)
You don't know much about women... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:So they run Linux ... (Score:2)
Luser: "It's not JUST an MP3 player! It runs Linux with a 2.4 kernel, and I even have a copy of GCC installed so that I can compile stuff on it!"
Girl: "Uhh, okay
If you're relying on your MP3 player to pick up women, you have bigger problems.
That's not why it's cool, anyway. It's cool because it's one more step to Total World Domination Soon.
That said, if a girl was swooning over my gadgets running Linux, I
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:So they run Linux ... (Score:2)
But is it OPEN? (Score:5, Interesting)
I mean, as an end user, I don't much care if something is "linux-based" or "foot fungus-based" if I can't open it up and re-do the way that works best for me.
I had an Archos, and the guys at rockbox.org went to considerable trouble to reverse engineer it (and I contributed my own smidgen of code to that project), but Archos apparently saved a bunch of money on assembling their machines, and the damned thing broke down (and mine was far from the only one to break down -- I'll no longer buy anything from Archos).
And Archos's firmware was so ridiculously bad (the Rockbox guys sped up directory browsing alone by a factor of perhaps 50) that I no longer want to buy an mp3 player that I can't hack. Having hacked with teh Rockbox software, I know what I want in an mp3 player -- and I figure I'll have to do it myself.
I want a new mp3 player, indeed my mom wanted to buy me one for Christmas and asked what kind I wanted, but I wasn't anymore versed on what is open source and what isn't but is reversed engineered and what is totally closed, so I couldn't tell Mom what to buy.
Loss for me, loss for the electronics store, loss for the manufacturer.
So "linux-based" I don't really care about -- open source, I care about.
So reply if you know: what hard-drive based mp3 players have hackable source or open source firmware replacements?
Re:But is it OPEN? (Score:5, Informative)
The Neuros [neurosaudio.com] has open firmware, hardware, and software. You currently have to download a trial version of TI's compiler for their DSP, but last I knew there was an effort underway to get a gcc target written for it.
Start here [neurosaudio.com] to find out more about its open-sourceness.
Re:But is it OPEN? (Score:4, Informative)
I use plenty of hardware with third-party, hacked drivers and such, but if I'm shelling out US$300 or US$400 for an MP3 player, it would be nice to have support for at least some decent OS.
Re:But is it OPEN? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:But is it OPEN? (Score:2)
Re:But is it OPEN? (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/Iriver
Re:But is it OPEN? (Score:3, Informative)
Open firmware for a popular PMP!
Is this Useful? (Score:3, Insightful)
At work, they have a 14" screen but no couch.
Outside of work and home, well its -15F today...
Re:Is this Useful? (Score:2)
eg: Pre-recorded announcements on trains/busses. Pre-recorded speech/sounds for exhibits at museums, science centers, etc.
Quality playback systems wouldn't go amis on those animatronic toys the stores get stuffed silly with. At present, they sound like someone used a cheap tape deck, worn-out cassettes, and a tin can for a
Re:Is this Useful? (Score:2)
I wonder if questions like this were raised when the first laptops came out.
I actually have a TabletPC that does basically that job for me. It has all my music and a few DivX rips of DVDs I have. Sometimes when I feel like laying down and watching a movie, I use it for that. I'd enjoy having a smaller more portable version of a media player
Re:Is this Useful? (Score:2, Insightful)
I spend at least 2 hours every day on public transit.
Plenty of time to find the Amulet of Yendor while humming along to some mp3's
Train commuters. (Score:2)
Re:Is this Useful? (Score:2)
I've never been that cold! Where are you from?
I live in Georgia,USA, and it's 65 here (usually about 40 for this time of year). Damn global warming.
North Dakota, not to brag but most winters we'll get down to around -40F at least once. Bring on the global warming.
Re:Is this Useful? (Score:2)
No Ogg Vorbis? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:No Ogg Vorbis? (Score:2)
You are correct, sir.
Linux for the Nintendo DS!?!? (Score:2)
Has anyone heard of any new progress on the Linux/Nintendo DS front? I heard that there was a $1,000 bounty for getting linux to load up on the DS, but that site is now down! I think it uses a dual ARM7/9 processor
Re:Linux for the Nintendo DS!?!? (Score:2)
How long did it take for writeable media to come out for the GBA?
On the other hand, maybe we can take advantage of the DS's wireless download capability, that would be easier I think. Someone just needs to figure out Nintendo's crazy wireless protocol (just checkout www.teamxlink.co.uk to find people trying just that).
I hope they use mplayer... (and support NUV) (Score:5, Interesting)
Why?
Well... mythtv records in this crazy format called NUV. It's opensource, but it's not in any top ten codecs list. But... mplayer supports it just fine.
I sure would like to have a portable media player that supported "raw" mythtv recordings
Forget it (Score:2)
Misconception. (Score:2)
No contradictions I believe, but I am willing to be educated.
Re:Misconception. (Score:2)
Only if the patent is available royalty-free to everyone. Most codecs charge patent license fess, which are incompatible with the GPL.
Re:I hope they use mplayer... (and support NUV) (Score:3, Informative)
It's not really a crazy format. If I remember correctly, It's an information wrapper around some other media format (MPEG2, MPEG4, etc.) You can then export it to various other standard formats via nuvexport.
Re:I hope they use mplayer... (and support NUV) (Score:3, Informative)
There are many TV cards that aren't mpeg2 hardware encoders.
My point is/was that Linux and mplayer provide extremely good codec and format coverage.
Along similar lines, I find that the cheapie DVD players can play any VCD, DVD, DVD+R DVD-R, DVCD, KVCD, XVCD or whatever file forma
Archos gmini400 (Score:2)
Why why why oh why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Hackability value. (Score:2)
ANd alos there are many of us who care who different companies are paying to when implementing embedded solutions.
I will rather support companies using OSS software since they will al least be aware of how it works, closed source company should be punished when one can do so since their business model is stalling progress in the IT industry.
Re:Why why why oh why? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
iRiver violates the GPL? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Does running software on Linux imply it's GPL? (Score:2)
Re:Does running software on Linux imply it's GPL? (Score:2)
That would be UNfree as in beer. Nobody is twisting their arm. If they use GPLed code, they either agreed to abide by the GPL or are violating copyright. They actually get off pretty easy doing that, since there have never been any damages awarded. Try including an unlicensed copy of Windows with a product and see how much better off you will be.
You can brand them all as
Re:Does running software on Linux imply it's GPL? (Score:2)
The kernel traffic article does not imply that at all, because it is wrong. If iRiver uses Linux and busybox, then they only have to provide source to Linux and busybox. But they have not done it.
If their silver bullet.... (Score:2)
It is only uninformed, lazy people that continue to use the MS given mantra of "viral" when refering to GPL licensing.
At least we are trying to redress the balance. (Score:2)
I read the blurb.. (Score:2, Offtopic)
and the first thing I heard in my mind was Snoop and 50 cent:
I don't know what you heard about me
But da iPod ain't got nuthin over me
I have color LCD and more bling tham you can see
cause I'm a m%$*&*&%#%& PiMP
Re:I read the blurb.. (Score:2)
Great (Score:2)
GPL Compliance (Score:3, Interesting)
Will the FSF or other copyright holders finally stand up for their rights? I'm no lawyer, but I seem to recall that if you don't take affirmative steps to protect your copyrights you can lose the protection they provide.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:GPL Compliance (Score:2)
You're thinking of trademarks.
Just wondering... (Score:2)
Re:Just wondering... (Score:3, Funny)
Problems with all these stupid devices.. (Score:2)
NONE.
So unless their devices are 100% open source that I can hack and modify freely, these are just more companies jumping on the "Hey we run Linux too! *snicker*" ban
How did FIC license wmv for Linux? (Score:3, Insightful)
Thad
Re:How did FIC license wmv for Linux? (Score:3, Informative)
I hope you're sitting down: any company is allowed to license WMA/WMV for any platform. [microsoft.com] Microsoft hates Linux, but they won't sacrifice Windows Media world domination just to spite Linux.
Re:How did FIC license wmv for Linux? (Score:2)
Thank you, AC -- that's interesting. I hadn't thought it was possible, but the link you include clearly MS will allow and perhaps even encourage this kind of thing. My internal model of the nuances of Microsoft's plan for world domination will have to be modified considerably
Thad Beier
Re:How did FIC license wmv for Linux? (Score:2)
competitor in the embedded market.
They don't care what OS is on people's embedded
processors, it's the desktop market that they are
after.
But how do you get material in? (Score:2)
If you have to rip a DVD first, then you're looking at a fair bit of time at a desktop first, and then a portable DVD player starts to make more sense because you won't get that many ripped DVDs with reasonable quality on these units.
I would like to see one of these that can be docked in a
Re:But how do you get material in? (Score:2)
Very good news. So where's the cameras? (Score:2)
These sorts of consumer products are what will REALLY show the non-technical consumers the benefits of open source in their pocket devices. They will soon come to see that once they buy the product it does not remain static, but will adapt as user groups form that contain techies motivated to extend the products capabilities. As more and more consumers realize the advantages, the market for open-source based devices will increase, and hopefully open-source will become an important sales feature.
Companie
Re:Very good news. So where's the cameras? (Score:2)
Yeah, right. Half of the embedded Linux products on the market come with no source code (sure it's illegal, but what are you going to do about it?) and the other half come with minima
Inevitable "But what about the iPod" post (Score:3, Funny)
These Linux based PMPs are cool.
But the iPod Photo is a Portable Image and Music Player.
And everyone knows nothing else is as cool as a PIMP.
PDAs with hard drives (Score:3, Interesting)
So why don't we see more PDAs with built-in hard drives?
Seriously, is it a battery life issue, or is it just that nobody else has thought of it yet? It seems to me that if a Palm or PocketPC device came out with even a 5GB microdrive inside, it would cause real problems for a lot of MP3 players that aren't iPods. Plus, PDAs with built-in hard drives would automatically have an advantage over most smartphones in terms of storage. Add in a faster processor and some extra memory, and now you're talking about something as close to a PC as you can get in your pocket. (Assuming your pockets aren't quite big enough for that OQO, of course...)
Personally, I'd be all over something like that Tapwave Zodiac if it could hold 20GB of my music collection, too. Wouldn't you?
Linux Connectivity to non-Linux Players (Score:2)
Um... what about NON-portable? (Score:2)
Re:Um... what about NON-portable? (Score:2)
And an AC, to boot.
Re:No OGG? (Score:3, Interesting)
".music" would have worked. or: ".tune", ".sound", ".tun", ".mix", ".track"... anything but Ogg!
Names have power. As Bankie would say, there were the fingers of the Ogg developers, far from the people's pulse...
Re:No OGG? (Score:2)
Re:No OGG? (Score:3, Funny)
All occurences of the string "OGG" in encoders/decoders/players and existing song file names will be replaced with 69R
eg: "Rammstein - Reise, Reise.69R"
Think of the pickup lines... "Hey baby, want to sample my 69R selection?", etc.
Re:OGG support ... (Score:2)
Re:OGG support ... (Score:2)
WTF? Who would do this?
Re:OGG support ... (Score:2)
Re:OGG support ... (Score:2)
program to work properly...it did not like mp3