FIA On3 Networked Multimedia System Reviewed 125
Anonymous Howard writes "Designtechnica has reviewed Fia's On3 networked multimedia system. It uses Linux for its OS, supports Samba, audio & video (including Ogg), but the On3 seems to be marred by a lack of some important features. For example, you can't create playlists or autoplaylists (playlists based on rules.) You can only play music sorted in folders, so if your music is sorted by artist and album, you can only listen to each folder at a time. Files are played back in alphanumeric order, so playback order depends on how the tracks are named. The On3 does not handle ID3 tags and track names are simply the name of the file. I'm trying to find a non-microsoft, out-of-the-box solution for a networked media system. Are there any other solutions out there? How do they compare? Are they worth it or does the industry still have a lot of growing to do?"
Re:Linux-based? (Score:3, Insightful)
Links? (Score:4, Informative)
From TFA:
This seems a bit odd, since MPEG-4 is an encoding standard, DivX and XviD are implementations of MPEG-4, MOV and AVI are container file formats. Saying it plays MOV and AVI files presumable means that it can play MPEG-1/2/4 streams inside MOV and AVI containers, but this is highly ambiguous.Is it a myth (Score:1)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:2)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:1)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:3, Informative)
I will say that I don't much care for the way it handles large amounts of tracks though... it needs a better UI for setting up playlists.
Re:Is it a myth (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:1)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:3, Interesting)
I've often thought of making a little spreadin' around money from building MythTV systems and selling them. I think a lot of people would buy them, especially if they don't have to deal with TiVo.
Really, the only three things holding me back are a lack of time, a lack of money, and liability issues should one of them catch fire and burn someone's house down or something.
Re:Is it a myth (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:3, Interesting)
Or you could do custom systems. How much would someone pay for a personal "On Demand" system? That is, a big server with multiple tuners and a RAID in the basement with MythTV serving up recorded shows and DVD rips and music, networked to every TV in the house wirelessly or wired using cheap front-end boxes
Re:Is it a myth (Score:1)
Chop
Re:Is it a myth (Score:2)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:1)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:2)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:1)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:3, Interesting)
I can't help you with the first two; but as for the third, well, that's what they make lawyers for.
After one finds the time and the venture capital, a good lawyer usually is the next smart move, though I'd think one should be more worried about the entertainment industry than about catastrophic product failure.
Re:Is it a myth (Score:3, Insightful)
Finally, you offer just hard drives imaged w/ pre-made images of the full computers you offer. Along with the image you include the hardware that the setup requires.
Every person who installs MythTV should not have to take the hours and hours to get it running. It should be distributed in a few forms (hdtv/d
Re:Is it a myth (Score:1)
But I never followed through because I think it would cost too much, and nobody would be interested. Anyone want to make me a liar? :-)
Aaron.
Re:Is it a myth (Score:1)
Re:Is it a myth (Score:1)
Not Quite A Slash-Ad But Close (Score:4, Insightful)
While I sympathize, as playlists should be a feature in any player... Because you explained the autoplaylist feature, you should not expect it as a standard feature. The rest of what you're saying makes perfect sense to me and begs the question: why was this posted at Slashdot if the On3 networked multimedia system appears so lacking? Also, calling something The On3 (The One, ie: Neo), certainly appears to be a misnomer if the system is so utterly lacking.
Also, I must take issue with that review because it lacks any definative bottom line summary. They don't come out and say : this rocks, or, this is a bad buy. I think it might have something to do with the fact that the reviewers are selling this product [shopping.com]. I won't cry "Slash-ad!" (because of the insight in this
Re:Not Quite Begging the Question (Score:1)
42?
42.
ah crap there goes reality
Re:Not Quite A Slash-Ad But Close (Score:1)
NO!
NO, IT DOESN'T!
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/begs.htm l states, among other things:
An argument that improperly assumes as true the very point the speaker is trying to argue for is said in formal logic to "beg the question." Here is an example of a question-begging argument: "This painting is trash because it is obviously worthless."
Sorry, I'm not trying to be a grammar Nazi, but after my meetings with a certain cr
So it's more or less useless... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:So it's more or less useless... (Score:1, Interesting)
I've worked at a few of those, actually. Always sucks to see your name on something that is so obviously bad.
Re:So it's more or less useless... (Score:1)
Now that I've just read your sig, my yearly review for my company is tomorrow. I share your paranoia. Thanks slashdot.org!
Re:So it's more or less useless... (Score:2, Funny)
Balls.
KFG
Re:So it's more or less useless... (Score:2)
Re:So it's more or less useless... (Score:3, Funny)
How much of a LUSER are you. I mean any real geek would just organize his music in different folders with different names using hard links so the songs play in the desired order. The folder
Re:So it's more or less useless... (Score:2)
5 years ago.
Just because it runs Linux, that doesn't mean it can't still suck.
Re:So it's more or less useless... (Score:1)
I'll try to make it even more over-the-top next time.
MM
--
Re:So it's more or less useless... (Score:1)
Plenty of non-MS out-of-box solutions (Score:4, Insightful)
Check out SLIMP3 and/or various offerings from Apple just to name two sources off the top of my head for audio. For video, just build a custom linux box with MythTV or something and stick it in one of those spiffy home entertainment cases. Or pay lots of money for the commercial equivalent. [slimdevices.com]
Re:Plenty of non-MS out-of-box solutions (Score:1)
Re:Plenty of non-MS out-of-box solutions (Score:2)
Yeah, I guess it's time to build a MythTV box. Not that I even care about video. Pics and music for me.
Re:Plenty of non-MS out-of-box solutions (Score:2)
OggVorbis (Score:3, Funny)
It supports OggVorbis. What else is there?
Re:You don't understand (Score:1)
Re:You don't understand (Score:1)
"doing listening to oggs..." ?
Dear Me,
Use preview. Thanks.
Your Humble and Faithful Servant,
Me
Re:XBMC (Score:2, Informative)
Edna (Score:1)
another alternative : the 1.4 Ghz Xbox (Score:4, Informative)
Celeron 1.4 ghz instead of the 700 Mhz, 128 Mo Ram instead of 64...
Available as a reboxed set [gamestron.com] @ 399 US $.
For the more adventurous, you can have just the modded xbox mobo [gamestron.com] for 260 US $...
So you still have a microsoft box (which you don't want), but now with extra juice to run all apps...
No ultra-compressed video stream should pose problem anymore, and you have better perf on all Original Xbox Games (tm)...
+ Having access to just the mobo should give you the opportunity to mod your own media center, if you're [bit-tech.net] into that [thebestcasescenario.com]...
As parent said, no video capture.
But you have everything else now possible 8)
Icecast? (Score:1)
XBOX MediaCenter (Score:2)
Re:XBOX MediaCenter (Score:2)
Re:XBOX MediaCenter (Score:2)
Sure, if you add all the money Microsoft has spent on the XBox (development, production, administrative costs, marketing, advertising, logistics, retail incentives) and divide it by the number of XBoxes sold, you may get a figure that's higher than the price of an XBox in the shops. But that doesn't mean Microsoft loses money on each XBox sold.
Look at it this way: the average retail shop or restaurant takes 2 to 3 years to become profitable. Still that doesn't mean that the
Re:xbox media center (Score:2)
Xboxmedia center REQUIRES you to steal software to compile it. so it is 100% illigit not even thinking of the modchip.
how about you suggest a LEGAL solution?
don't get me wrong, I think it's a neat project but it is 100% impossible to compile it legally if you are not a microsoft X box licensed developer, and I will bet $1000 bucks that they have a license clause that forbids you from compiling that project or one like it.
Re:xbox media center (Score:1)
in order to compile the software you HAVE TO break the law that is not a grey area.
please tell me what country it's legal to steal the Xbox SDK?
for anyone to have an executable copy of the xbox media center you MUST blatently break the law.
even if modchips are deemed 100% legal in the supreme court or even mandated by law for everyone to own one, it is STILL horribly illegal to have a working Xbox media center box.
how did you compile the software? with a stolen SDK that is
Playlist Hack (Score:2)
cd bad_music/
ln -s ~/music/mp3/murray_head/"Murray Head - One Night in Bangkok.mp3" bangkok.mp3
ln -s ~/music/mp3/cw_mccall/"C.W. McCall - convoy.mp3" convoy.mp3
ln -s ~/music/mp3/william_shatner/"Common People.mp3" common_people.mp3
ln -s ~/music/mp3/slim_whitman/"Love Song of the Waterfall.mp3" waterfall.mp3
(Sadly, I have most of these tunes....)
Re:Playlist Hack (Score:1)
Whats wrong with.... (Score:2)
Networked Multimedia Center that does everything (Score:1)
Check out TomsHardware.com's review of Soundbridge (Score:3, Informative)
Tom's Networking [tomsnetworking.com] just did a review that covers this subject, including how to serve tunage to it over a Linux server (they mention the hacked NSLU2 project, but it sounds like any Linux box could do the job).
Or, heck, skip the network and just use CompactFlash.
Re:Check out TomsHardware.com's review of Soundbri (Score:3, Insightful)
Slimserver is perl and is supported on Win/Max/Linux/BSD, supp
Get a Squeezebox instead (Score:2, Insightful)
http://www.slimdevices.com/ [slimdevices.com]
Last I heard, Roku gives back nothing to the project, possibly in violation of the GPL.
Re:Get a Squeezebox instead (Score:1)
And possibly, they eat babies and voted for George Bush.
Do you have a substantial claim, or are you just speculating?
Roku has much better looking hardware. It's hard for me to accept that one would sound substantially different than the other, since they're just playing a digital bitstream. If Slim didn't want their software to be used by other people, they probably shouldn't have GPLed it.
Re:Get a Squeezebox instead (Score:1)
I've been reading the Slim Devices mailing lists for a while. As I said, last I heard Roku has given nothing back.
Of course they want people to use it. One of the best ways to further development of a product is to get more people to use it, look at it, and tinker. However, I'd guess that they and anyone else that has contributed don't want someone to take the work they have done, pass it off as their own, and give nothing back.
Isn't part of
Re:Get a Squeezebox instead (Score:1, Interesting)
We haven't modified the SlimServer software, we're merely a client for it. No GPL concerns enter into it.
It should be noted that SlimServer is just one of MANY servers we support including iTunes (directly, using licensed DAAP from Apple) and many UPnP-AV Servers (including Windows Media Connect with support for DRM'd WMA files).
So, if you're considering the Squeezebox, you should do yourself a favor and consider the SoundBridge since it can do what the Squeezebox does and MUCH MUCH more,
Re:Get a Squeezebox instead (Score:2)
In other words, "No, Moofie, I don't have a substantial claim. I am reporting hearsay."
I think that if Slim didn't want people to "pass it off as their own" (which Roku doesn't do) or "give nothing back" (what should Roku give back? They're a hardware mfr.) then they should have drawn up a license that says that.
They didn't.
Re:Get a Squeezebox instead (Score:1)
http://lists.slimdevices.com/archives/discuss/2004 -January/008323.html [slimdevices.com]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/archives/discuss/2004 -February/025448.html [slimdevices.com]
More:
http://lists.slimdevices.com/archives/discuss/2004 -February/025440.html [slimdevices.com]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/archives/discuss/2004 -January/008125.html [slimdevices.com]
So admittedly, I'm a bit behind on this story. My bad. It does look like they may have originally intended to pass off the SlimServer as their own, but backed off when they w
Re:Get a Squeezebox instead (Score:1)
The other articles basically say what I said. "Good looking hardware." "Roku hasn't yet done anything wrong."
So, again: Speculation and hearsay. Whatever might have happened before, Roku seems very clear now that they support SlimServer as one option for streaming to their device, and under the GPL that is totally OK.
So what's the problem?
Playlist by Symlink (Score:1)
microsoft (Score:1)
Close but the price! (Score:4, Interesting)
I've been thinking about buying a mod-chip for my Xbox for some time (cost: about $70 including shiping/handling for the no-sauter kind) and using the Xbox Media Center, using Handbrake on the DVD's, leaving them on the Powermac, then streaming them to the TV through a SMB share. DVD's stay in the cases, kids get to see movies, and Daddy doesn't kill anybody.
But the idea of using a "real" product (not just a self made hack) is always appealing - but $500 is a lot of money to spend. Then again, my iPod cost $399, so I really can't talk for a similiar device that does video as well as audio.
Still, you'd think they could create an iTunes like system for the video and music files. I mean, is a database of MP3 tags really that hard to come up with?
Re:Close but the price! (Score:2)
John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)
Roomjuice! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Roomjuice! (Score:1)
--RJ
Do the people that make these things (Score:1)
This sounds like a hacked together item that requires OSS community work to function. Is that the new business model now?
1. Make Linux device with no functionallity.
2. OSS geeks with too much money and time will write the real software for it.
3. Profit!
Geez. Get an Airport Express - it's cheaper and does way more, and doesn't look like a Smurf's office building.
Squeezebox (Score:4)
http://www.slimdevices.com/ [slimdevices.com]
non-Microsoft? (Score:1)
Take a look at the Prismiq (Score:1)
DigitalDeck (Score:1)
Non Microsoft and DIY (Score:1)
PowerMac G4 400mhz -this machine was made in early 2000 and came with optional 802.11b card. They can be had cheap now but I have had this one since new. It went from my main system and now it just handles my AV which it is doing beautifully.
Upgraded RAM to run latest OSX -found 4 very cheap pc100 ram chips for 1G ram.
Upgrade HD to 120 from 20 -gives me lots of room to time shift rented DVDs and for downloads.
Sony surround stereo. I got a great deal on this unit because i
Pimpin' Myself (Score:2)
I use it all the time. In fact I'm using it right now.
How does it compare with the Hauppage mediamvp? (Score:1)
In a recent thread I discovered this little gem: the Hauppage MediaMVP, which reminds me so much of the Linksys WRT54G... I mean, it's a Linux-based networked media player, and of course there are hacked firmwares:
The original firmware does not support playing DivX on the box itself (it does if you stream it from the server), but it's very likely that it will be done in the future. MythTV-client functionality is under development.
Download iTunes, get Airport Express. (Score:2)
Tivo .. yep, Tivo. (Score:1)
(And for those of you who already have S2 directivos, the 4.0.1b software now runs on your boxes. Google "4.x on RID" for details. Did the upgrade over the weekend, and its -nice-. Didn't even lose existing recordings.)
Re:so what you're telling me... (Score:2)
Re:so what you're telling me... (Score:2)
Re:Try the HomePod... (Score:1)
It's got Linux/BSD support? I guess it does not use iTunes.
Have you noticed that all these new wireless devices still use a bunch of wires so as usuall those nice pictures of clean white devices floating in space are just some art directors dream. Look at the side view of the HomePod I think I see six jacks there, kinda breaks the clean image.