Projecting Video On Curved Surfaces 177
Jochen Bedersdorfer writes "According to golem.de, a research project in the area of Augmented Reality created a technology to
project videos onto arbitrary existing screen surfaces, like wallpapered walls or window curtains. ... Quite awesome. Now I can use this ugly corner in my living room effectively."
Imagine (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Imagine (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Imagine (Score:1)
Re:Imagine (Score:1)
Re:Imagine (Score:1)
Re:Imagine (Score:4, Funny)
If I could... (Score:2)
Re:Imagine...uh (Score:1)
(Yes...yes...insert the obligatory 1024x768x38DD reference here.)
Re:Imagine (Score:2)
Eeek! It's some kind of infinite loop - slowly sucking in all around it...
Re:Imagine (Score:1)
2. Project pron on b00bz
3. Make video of pron projected on b00bz
4. Find more b00bz
5. Project pron of pron projected on b00bz
6. etc etc etc
7. oh yeah, and Profit! somewhere along the line
Re:Imagine (Score:2)
i'll buy a copy of that
Omnimax @ Home? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Omnimax @ Home? (Score:1)
Interior Decorating from Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
Try paintings. Or a ficus.
Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot (Score:1, Funny)
If you don't like your face, just project a better looking image over it
Or if you're in a conversation, and you don't like the face of the one you're talking to, well, that problem is easily solved now
Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot (Score:1)
Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot (Score:2)
Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot (Score:3, Funny)
Just Another... (Score:2, Insightful)
curved surfaces? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:1)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:3, Insightful)
What I probably should have said in the first post: all this technology does is make it so you can move that area around. (of course that area is always going to be where the camera is, in this case)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:1)
MOD PARENT DOWN (Score:1)
The projector (both in stills and on the avaliable film) compensates for both surface color and configuration automatically and applies the transformation on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Good idea, IMHO. Sure seems to work. Seems to be arbitrarily flexible, to first order.
There are definitely artifacts, but they seem to follow curved edges - not surprising when one realizes that pixels are finite and rectangular.
I wonder how the re
Re:MOD PARENT DOWN (Score:1)
That being said - just sit where you can see best. Same as I do watching movies on my laptop.
Re:MOD PARENT DOWN (Score:2)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:1)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:1)
Re:curved surfaces? (Score:1)
Well done. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Well done. (Score:1)
Re:Well done. (Score:2, Interesting)
A more general solution would be to do a ping through to the site when you mouse over a link and show the results as a hover tip. I'm sure that this might already be a Firefox extension already as some very useful ones have been popping up recently.
Re:Well done. (Score:2, Insightful)
I thought that jumping on any story from Germany or Japan with little digs based on nationality was the way (?)...
Working link (for now) (Score:5, Informative)
Solution looking for a problem? (Score:5, Insightful)
Before televisions became the norm, projectors were a common sight around middle-class homes. I remember my father used to show us home movies, Disney cartoons, and science documentaries on a compact Super 8mm projector on idle evenings.
I don't remember the size or even the presence of the "canvas screen" being a big issue. A blank wall did just fine (without any significant loss of picture quality IMHO). If a smaller/larger image was desired, the projector was just moved nearer/away from the wall as necessary. Not such a big deal. Ofcourse the room had to be pitch dark because of the low contrast produced by the projector.
IMHO, this is a solution looking for a problem. I agree the ability to project on curved surfaces might be a bonus, but the pictures did not reveal any significant advantage.
I was more impressed by the "light insensitive" projector that was on /. a few weeks back - it could display images/video effectively in bright light - can't find the link.
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:1)
or how about ads on a moving subway car.
and what is setup time like, does it take an hour to calibrate the camera.
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:2)
Which is why we have Exhibit B: The white bedsheet.
One bedsheet plus one TV plus one Fresnel lens plus one smaller lens = several fun childhood parties with friends. The room had to be pitch black, and we never did solve all of the distortion problems using a two-lens system, though.
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:5, Insightful)
If it's usable with a normal projector you'll get a better quality image with a projector like this.
It isnt magic. It can compensate for color shifts that would cause distortion, but you still pay in image quality by losing contrast and color range. For an extreme example, take a black and white striped wall. As you're unlikely to have an entirely unreflective surface on a wall, you could create a compensated picture by strongly increasing illumination on the black parts and decreasing it on the white part. However, the maximum brightness of the image becomes the maximum brightness reflectable by the black parts, which decreases the contrast range. Same thing with any other surface, you'll lose quality, you just wont lose as much, or in such a visually disturbing fashion as you would with an ordinary projector.
So if you care enough about image quality to bother getting an expensive projector you'd probably want to get a projection screen anyway.
Still, it would be quite useful when you either dont care that much about the image quality, or in situations where you have to project on a not quite suitable surface and cant use a screen.
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:2)
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:2)
Simple! The projector sees the green wall and attempts to compensate by increasing the intensity of the red component; eventually (if the green is pure enough), the projector turns up the intensity of the red so far that the wallpaper (which is absorbing the red light) catches fire, and your house burns down!
Therefore, stick to white walls, or magnolia if you like living on the edge.
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:1)
I remember that too, but a number of things have changed. The biggest one (to me anyway) is that we've become accustomed to many more pixels, and much less visual noise. Frankly back then the picture was so bad that bumps in the wall were not the biggest resolution problem.
Second, those projectors threw a lot more lumens than afford
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:2)
And if it's mostly software, it'll become a cheap add-in that'll become ubiquitous whether it's really useful or not, like "movie mode" in digital cameras or fancy ringtones in cellphones.
Re:Solution looking for a problem? (Score:1)
jeff
Projecting onto clouds (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Projecting onto clouds (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Projecting onto clouds (Score:1)
Re:Projecting onto clouds (Score:2)
What do these sheets of water look like? Water-fall like? White and foamy? Smooth and blue/clear?
Re:Projecting onto clouds (Score:1)
http://www.fogscreen.com/technology.html [fogscreen.com]
-snip
The basic components of the screen are a laminar, non-turbulent airflow, and a thin fog screen (or any particles) injected into and inside a laminar flow. Created this way, the fog screen is an internal part of the laminar airflow, and remains thin, crisp, and protected from turbulence.
Re:Projecting onto clouds (Score:2)
Q.
Re:Projecting onto clouds (Score:2, Interesting)
It's not impossible; ever notice spotlights illuminating clouds - usually originating from car dealearships and such? Last winter, I noticed a four-spotlight pattern swirling on the underside of some low clouds at night while heading out to the movies. By chance I passed the actual dealership where the spotlights were originating (the light patterns were visible 30 miles away.) The dealership was using s
Re:Projecting onto clouds (Score:2)
Q.
Re:Projecting onto clouds (Score:2)
This sort of technology was shown last year.... (Score:5, Informative)
There was one demonstration showing projection onto the inside of a translucent sphere, while in the paper "iLamps: Geometrically Aware and self-configuring projectors" Raskar et al showed a system that could also combine the output of several projectors. It was quite impressive.
siggraph yesterday, (Score:2)
The internal projected sphere you mentioned was in the art gallery exhibit, and you could choose between a number of video/art projects (only one worth watching was a cool animation of plate tectonics).
A commercial exhibit had setup using like 5 or 6 projectors to produce one *big* panorama animation of a 3d fish tank (or undersea, not sure), and it looked flawless.
Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... (Score:5, Interesting)
I thought that it was quite clever when I first saw it.
Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Taj Mahal (Score:1)
I thought that it was quite clever when I first saw it.
So did I. At Taj Mahal. There are some passages from the quran around some of the archways. The size of the lettering increases towards the top of the arches to compensate for the perspective.
Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... (Score:1)
Instead plates were painted with an apparently abstract pattern. However when a mirrored cyclinder is placed in the middle of the pattern the picture can be seen.... Can't find a link to a pic of it sadly.
Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... (Score:1)
So did I. Then I started to hate it, because it messes with my sense of perspective.
Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... (Score:2)
One way to do it: (Score:4, Interesting)
Useful (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Useful (Score:3, Funny)
Not projecting curves
What Curves? (Score:2)
Seriously, I doubt a Keira Knightley projection will have problems making any woman appear to have the body of a teenage boy.
Re:What Curves? (Score:1, Redundant)
Disneyland (Score:5, Interesting)
If you go here [mouseplanet.com] and scroll down halfway to "Sleeping Beauty Castle gets a new look", you can see a couple tests that Disneyland did to "paint" the castle. One painting it gold with a ribbon around it, and another one turning it into a US flag.
Re:Disneyland (Score:1)
Half's been done? ... (Score:2, Interesting)
http://www.siliconoptix.com/products/index.shtml [siliconoptix.com]
I work at a planetarium and we researched this product as a means to project video onto our dome theater. It can do any number of near-realtime distortions to the video, including hemispherical mapping, or you can use included software to create custom mappings (like corners).
We concluded that this product was perhaps one generation early but looked promising. Hopefully they sold enough of them to stay a
Useful for odd projection angles? (Score:3, Interesting)
In our church, we are having issues mounting a projector in a place that is inconspicuous. Most of the inconspicuous places introduce too much of a keystone effect. That means that we will have to fix a (very expensive) projector to project with a special lens to one and only one screen. It might work fine when there is a large group, but if a smaller group wanted to use it in a more intimate setting, everyone will be sitting up front craning their necks. It would be neat if we could just point the projector at any surface and have it automatically correct for whatever distortion happened to be there.
Re:Useful for odd projection angles? (Score:1)
You might want to check the existing digital projectors to see if any have features to suit your needs. If your screen is flat, the mapping to adjust for the projector location is a lot simpler than ajusting for irregular shapes and colours of the surface.
"I was a 98 Pound Weakling..." (Score:4, Funny)
Meep meep! (Score:5, Funny)
Looks a lot better then I expected (Score:3, Insightful)
Sure it won't replace regular screen in places where there is room for them, cinema, meeting room, entertainment room, but it seems perfect for holding a demonstration and not having to take a screen with you and for information/commercial displays.
Eeek more commercials. Bad germans.
Lamping still a problem (Score:3, Interesting)
My TV is pretty good in ambient light, but not great -- I still find myself closing the drapes closest to the TV for daytime watching. You can always jack up the lumens with brighter lights, but this leads to heat problems and lamp replacement costs. I'm already scared for the replacement bulb price for my TV, which is only good for 3 years -- supposedly its a couple of hundred dollars.
Actual projectors are pretty worthless in any real ambient light in my experience; you need semi-darkness as best.
And it's not just ambient light, it's image quality. Projection systems usually have pretty crappy black levels. I can live with mine since I'm not that much of an image zealot (no ISF calibration, etc). But you also have uniformity issues, focus, etc.
Re:Lamping still a problem (Score:1)
Re:Lamping still a problem (Score:2)
I also thought that the image was way too overprocessed -- it looked like a video image that had been transcoded between compression formats one too many times, particularly on standard-def content.
Side-by-side with the GWIII, the GWIII offered a be
Re:Lamping still a problem (Score:2)
Summary of My Method (Score:1, Funny)
Beyond screens and monitors... (Score:2)
Re:Beyond screens and monitors... (Score:2, Funny)
Or Duke Nukem Forever.
I'll have one mini version for VR please (Score:1)
mmmmm....
Color Correction (Score:2)
Predistorted images for people with bad vision (Score:2, Interesting)
Doom3 would rock on this :D (Score:2)
will be very very very disillusioned now ;)
Maybe off topic (Score:2)
OK, I think this is cool. But I have a pet peeve with people calling something like this "a technology." Isn't it really just an application of technology? Or a technique, or a method, or a system? Calling something a technology has become a cliche that immediately connotes--for me anyway--something that its overhyped. Like "an historical event" or "a software engineer." It's press release hyperbole.
Or am I just jaded?
This technique is a refinement of other systems that project on curved surfaces [skyskan.com]
Back to the future. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Back to the future. (Score:1)
maybe the headline was misleading for people who don't RTFA.
it's about projecting on irregular surfaces with irregular coloring, without expensive technology.
Viscus Projection (Score:1)
Perfect for rally games (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:DOOM 6 (Score:2, Funny)
Re:DOOM 6 (Score:2)
:-(
blakespot
Re:somebody tell IMAX (Score:2)
But you didn't know that, because you didn't RTFA...