Bluesniper Creator Interviewed on Gizmodo 42
carbolic writes "Gizmodo interviews John Hering, one of the Bluedriving crew (of which I was one: picture) and creator of the Bluesniper rifle. Get the backstory on the recent 1.08 mile cellphone Bluesnarf attack and find out his motivation for building the rifle and trying a snarf to a cellphone you can't even see."
its coming... (Score:1, Funny)
Motivation is always simple (Score:3, Insightful)
The real question to be asked is - What next ?
--
Linux upped my productivity, now up yours.
Customs (Score:2, Funny)
No he would be called a "corpse" (Score:2)
Something tells me these guys are going to be in the news more often.
Re:Customs (Score:2)
Your average X-ray machine will trivially see it isn't powered and doesn't contain explosives and they'll just ignore it.
Go way to get tackled down by security! (Score:3, Insightful)
No doubt a solid way to get in trouble is to make something look like a weapon and walk around public with it, or to point one of them laser pointers at Bill Clinton [canada.com] at a next book signing (offtopic note: notice the stiff no-ass-grab-hug in that picture he has to do now).:P
Re:Welcome to slashdot (Score:1)
Deja vu (Score:1)
Just look at the replies, everyone is just going over the same "you'd totally get arrested" ground. There's nothing new to discuss, which begs the question, why post the story?
Firearm offence? (Score:1, Interesting)
Double Standard? (Score:2, Interesting)
And this makes him a geek hero?
If this device was a US government-sponsored project,can you imagine the barrage of outraged posts?
Re:Double Standard? (Score:2)
You can be sure that the government won't. They like having backdoors anyway, although they generally aren't smart enough to close their own backdoors.
I think it is stupid to make a yagi look like a sniper rifle-raygun anyway, the beam width is usually way too wide anyway. I'd like to see the range those things get with a parabolic. You won't be able to do the sniper look
Re:Double Standard? (Score:1)
Re:Double Standard? (Score:2)
No, this guy built a device to mess with his own property. So long as he is only using it for legal, ethical purposes I have no problem with it. If he were using it on unsuspecting random people, then he should be jailed.
I have in my house right now a device that can not just mess with people 3 miles away, but actually kill them. So does a large percentage of the population, but I don't try that because it is unethical. (Never mind that I'm not a good enough shot to hit at even 1 mile) Same thing, its
Seems like a bad idea (Score:1, Interesting)
Anyone care to try this out at the upcoming RNC in NYC. Police: "I think we have a shooter here." "Take him out, now!".
Re:Seems like a bad idea (Score:1)
I don't get it... (Score:1)
Seriously, why not put all that effort into something that *might actually* be useful for people? I mean it's not like RF devices are black magic anymore, so where's the challenge, the feeling of discovery.
This sounds like something that rednecks should be doing not geeks. Overall I rate the story: "Boooo!!".