Big Screen for NYPD 131
Roland Piquepaille writes "With millions of emergency calls every year, the New York City Police Department (NYPD) decided to invest in a new command and visualization center in order to keep up with the ocean of data it has to deal with. According to this article from BusinessWeek Online, the display system consists of hundreds of Mitsubishi digital light-processing (DLP) monitors covering three walls. The NYPD thinks it will help it to also manage the hundreds of thousands of annual arrest records and to further reduce crime in the city. You'll find more details and references in this overview, which includes impressive pictures of former visualization centers built by Imtech, which will integrate the NYPD one."
Supplier? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Supplier? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Supplier? (Score:1)
How dare they? (Score:5, Funny)
This is why democracy doesn't work...
Re:How dare they? (Score:2)
But spending money to turn a city police station into a war room for day to day operations? I know it's crime-ridden New York city and all, but this is beginning to get ridiculous. If they actually need to fund the police that heavily, they have bigger problems than public service deficiencies. Like this one: they're looking less like a democracy and more like a police state... ;o)
Maybe if they would stop nailing people to the wall for protecting themselves against crime [frontpagemag.com] (N.B., there are quite a few other
Re:How dare they? (Score:2)
New York City fights crime better than any other city in America. The fact that at 8 million people, it's safer than most cities of 100,000 people is amazing.
Re:How dare they? (Score:1)
A light rainfall creates runnels down my cowl, to pool silently at the base of my cloak as I gaze down upon my charge. Yes, the city of Gotham is well defended tonight.
Re:How dare they? (Score:2)
Better? I guess it's more convenient now that the link works.
Re:How dare they? (Score:2)
Man, I don't even know why I'm justifying a troll with a response but:
The Actual FBI Report [fbi.gov]
Some [nynewsday.com] more [cnn.com] stories [nytimes.com].
If you don't want to read the actual report, some facts from it:
Re:How dare they? (Score:3)
Which is probably why New York's finest are usually busy issuing tickets to pregnant women for sitting down, bar owners for allowing dancing, seniors in the park feeding pigeons, or for that most heinous of crimes, sitting on milk crates.
Re:How dare they? (Score:2)
It's even safer now than in 1997 [ny1.com]. By a LARGE margin.
Thank you. Come again.
NYRAD? (Score:4, Funny)
I hope... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I hope... (Score:2)
Re:I hope... (Score:2)
Would that be called The Blue Wall of Silence ?
OT - its a joke, giggle (Score:5, Funny)
Something I've always wonders about these displays (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Something I've always wonders about these displ (Score:2, Interesting)
Besides, it looks good.
Big Picture? (Score:2, Insightful)
Ah, that's the thing. (Score:4, Insightful)
In the images shown in the links, and from the limited experience I've seen of them in person, they aren't looking at the same thing. There's five or six different things being displayed (and a monitor showing CNN because the boss thinks it's neat) that have nothing to do with each other. If the people only use a small portion of what's being displayed (or don't really use it at all), it's a pretty expensive toy.
Now if the display was one 'thing'--for example, a wide area network status with some of the monitors devoted to a map showing the links, while others showed statistics--then I see the value. And I'm sure there are places using them in just this way; is it just that people showing off the multi-monitor displays feel a need to be flashy with ten different things being displayed, then go back to a boring yet practical application?
The reason they show CNN... (Score:2)
A place I worked actually had a meeting about this when we designed our data center.
And yes, it does also look cool.
Re:Slacktime (Score:4, Informative)
Actually, New York City has one of the lowest crime rates of ANY big city in the USA. See This Link [state.ny.us] for more info. We do a lot of problems here, but NYPD has reducing crime every single year for over 20 years.
Lower Crime? (Score:5, Insightful)
Are these monitors secured to the wall in some new way to prevent theft?
All joking aside, how does this lower crime? If a Bigger, Better display helps lower crime, doesn't that imply that they are currently allowing things to slip through the cracks because they can't manage their data?
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:3, Interesting)
The statute of limitations for rape is 5 goddamn years in part because of all the data that needs to be retained. Many different precints have files on different rapists that years later are proven to be the same perp.
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:1)
Lets see. This is better how than a few more cops on the beat? I think they have been watching too much Sci-Fi
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:2)
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:5, Interesting)
In the 1990s, the NYPD developed an intensely data-driven style of policing centered around a program called CompStat, which basically tracks crimes and their locations, times, etc. This allows the police to see where things are heating up and deploy more and better-targeted resources to the area. It's been extremely effective, and crime has dropped about 60-70%.
Obviously, visualization tools mix well with this kind of system, but why a big board? One possible answer is that there is a whole culture of public accountability that goes along with CompStat -- local commanders are called in to group meetings and are expected to know the figures for their area and discuss plans for dealing with them. When you get a group talking about the same visual data, a shared image is really helpful. Since the idea seems to mesh well with the culture, and the culture has been successful, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt.
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:2)
Also, it should be pointed out that seeing stuff on your computer screen isn't quite the same. This board lets them display a hell of a lot more data at once and, possibly more importantly, lets a whole lot of people see it at once. Anyone who's used a whiteboard knows how useful having such a thing for scribbling on can be when discussing. I suspect having these walls of data will be an important way for sharing information for the people who actually have to analyse it.
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:2)
How do you know the drop was due to CompStat and not to Giulani's controversial law enforcement practices?
http://www.disastercenter.com/crime [disastercenter.com]
Re:Lower Crime? (Score:2)
Hmm... /me starts thinking about joining the NYPD!
Re:Lower Crime? ANSWER: (Score:1)
Looks like (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Looks like (Score:1)
Burger King (Score:1)
Watch a Burger King workaurant get robbed, and you'll see how insightful beefing up the security around the Whopper can be.
Re:Looks like (Score:1)
The District? (Score:5, Interesting)
I wouldn't mind seeing systems like this implimentated in say, elected public offices to keep track of opinion areas, ethnic densities, crime rates, poll results, average pay. etc. To help them keep better tabs on what they need to improve and how to vote on what bill.
Oh, did I mention I plan on making a run or two for public office?
Re:The District? (Score:2)
I am not voting for you so that you can take a poll and see what the majority want and vote accordingly. If that were the case, we should go to a full democracy and get rid of the bureaucracy in the middle.
I am voting for you because I feel you are the best candidate to make the best decisions for your constituents, despite their feelings. If politicians did thei
Re:The District? (Score:2)
Thing is, typically the public views it that if you're spending large amounts of money on the police, that you're doing something to improve the community.
On the other hand, if you're spending large amounts of money on the elected official
Re:The District? (Score:2)
It'll be like playing SimCity *grin*.
I think it's a seriously bad idea though. I think that if a system like this would be installed in city government officials and the like, they'd spend the whole day staring at the screen, and making quick fixes to address small local problems. They might be able to spot trends and see the la
Re:The District? (Score:2)
Do you mean the racial distribution of the population? If so, why the fuck is this important? And anyway, this kind of info can be gotten easily via standard sociological research with greater accuracy and less expense.
Think Ahead (Score:2, Funny)
Except when the entire staff uses it at once, to monitor for problems on the field of play of major sporting events.
In case of slashdot... (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:In case of slashdot... (Score:1)
Hey... (Score:1)
Re:Hey... (Score:2, Funny)
The solution for these "hotspots" in SimCity is to destroy them and build nice parks instead. Harlem is still standing, so I can safely say that nobody in charge of NYC plays SimCity, unfortunately.
The big rooms actually exist (Score:5, Funny)
And when will this happen? (Score:1)
Kubrick flashback! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Kubrick flashback! (Score:1)
Re:Kubrick flashback! (Score:1)
(Seems to apply to bush too - he was comparing iraq to ww2 the other day)
Most commonly heard quote on system launch day (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Most commonly heard quote on system launch day (Score:1, Funny)
Main screen turn on!!!
Viewing the Wrong Way (Score:4, Insightful)
The magnitude of the fraud, waste and abuse so rampant throughout government pursuing boondoggles like this is endless, and the excuse is always some "Sound Bite Focused" explanation that "It's for the Children", "It's for the fight against terrorism", or some other thinly veiled B.S. intended to take ever more tax money from citizens and waste it on needless government programs.
A smaller example of this was in Portland, OR where the police needed an extra quarter million dollars in order to be able to track "Racial Profiling" in traffic stops. Seems that none of the cops were able to record the vital statistics of who they stopped unless they were given Palm Pilots (and all sorts of other alleged I.T. expenses to support them).
Seems nobody even considered those little paper notebooks and a few boxes of pencils.
Amazing how the public seems entirely ignorant of the paramilitarization of the police and the resulting "Us against Them" rift that continues to widen.
The best thing that can be done in the U.S. (Short of Jeffersonian suggestions of periodic revolutions to toss out abusive and tyrannical politicians) would be to cut all government spending and staffing by 25% immediately, and 50% within 5 years.
Woah! (Score:2)
Re:Woah! (Score:2)
Main screen turn on!
Starting Windows 2000...
We get signal!
IRQL_LESS_OR_NOT_EQUAL
How are you gentlemen...
Heh. (Score:2)
Demolition Man (Score:2, Interesting)
Political showpieces and $$ for supporters (Score:5, Insightful)
Any "trends" in criminal activity are located far faster by the cops on the beat than by a computerized system. These guys know their beat like the back of their hand: details that would never be stored in a computer are at their fingertips. They are _extremely_ observant. By the time any "visualization center" knows it has a problem the cops have been on it for hours at least. This is a form of "swarm intelligence": independent agents (police officers) cooperating, exchanging information and coordinating activity. If you impose a hierarchical command structure, the flow of information can be imparied.
As for "trends": what are you looking for? A 5% increase in convenience store robberies? Day to day police work deals not with statistics but with individual incidents. "Trends" are important, but mostly to politicians and bureaucrats who must fund police work long-term. The police are concerned that someone robbed two Stop N'Go's in the west borough in the last 3 hours, killing 3 people. That's not trend analysis, that's a f'ing problem to be solved quickly.
There are good uses for statistics and trend analysis in police work, but they don't require a huge realtime display of information - they require only a CRT that can produce a graph or a map and some quiet time for the captains to think about how they will allocate their beat's manpower next month or how they can justify a request for additional manpower for a particular precinct where crime levels are rising year-to-year. This is traditional spreadsheet and database work.
Re:Political showpieces and $$ for supporters (Score:2)
Some of them maybe, but not all - I just listened to one of the chief analysts from Washington talk about their incident room (it was meant for major incidents only, but then they decided why not use it all the other days too) and how this was a key part of reducing their homicide rate by significant amounts (disclaimer: they're
Re:Political showpieces and $$ for supporters (Score:1, Interesting)
I respect your honesty in stating that you work for a vendor. I was a specialist in Geographical Information systems and have very deep experience in that field. Nonetheless when I analyzed the utility of GIS for police work I came up largely
Re:Political showpieces and $$ for supporters (Score:3, Insightful)
I'd agree largely with that - my background was GIS too (census data on chloropleth maps - I wrote Supermap back in the 80's that replaced mainframes with a PC and a CD-ROM drive) and while our law enforcement products will hook in to GIS sy
Re:Political showpieces and $$ for supporters (Score:2)
That doesn't stop patterns from appearing where the same opportunity occurs multiple times (muggings in dark alleys, bag snatchings in high streets, iPod thefts near universitys etc.), the study of the locations of the 300 odd gun related homicides in Washington revealed some interesting patterns not in terms of the absolute location where they
Re:Political showpieces and $$ for supporters (Score:3, Insightful)
Since you seem to be so skeptical about the usefulness of computerized crime tracking technology, I think you might find this article from the Economist [economist.com] an interesting read. I couldn't tell whether it's subscriber-only, so I'll reproduce part of it here:
Re:Political showpieces and $$ for supporters (Score:2, Insightful)
Scenario: I rob two Stop N'Go's on the East side of town. Run in with a shotgun, shoot the guy behind the desk, exact same MO both times. Now, I hear sirens. I jump a train to the West side and hit another Shop N'Go in the same fashion. I live up north, so I start heading that way. I hit another Stop N' Go on the way. 4 identical crimes in 3 different parts of the city.
Purely using your swarm intelligence, how long do you think it would be before someone said "Hey, let's see if someone in another pa
Re:Political showpieces and $$ for supporters (Score:1)
Multiplayer Halo (Score:1)
-- n
Something similar in U.K. (Score:2, Interesting)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2070312.stm [bbc.co.uk]
We're now living in a Big Brother world, aren't we? Of course, if it helps catching criminals, then so be it.
Re:Something similar in U.K. (Score:1)
You do realize that this type of thinking is exactly what enables leaders to take more and more steps towards an actual Big Brother society? Say you use it to catch criminals, then move on to other, less innocuous uses...
Using it (Score:2)
You can blame the poll.
You too can have the same effect for less. (Score:2)
I set up a network management center this way with scotty. Course it goes through loads of lamps.
Where I live (Score:3, Informative)
Of course, that's not going to happen. We don't have much in the way of crime -- our biggest problem is usually someone failing to stop at a stop sign.
The sheriff's department usually only comes out for funerals. One time, rather than drive out to check something out, they saved the trip out by asking me if I could look into it and let them know if there was anything they needed to worry about.
Usefull (Score:3, Interesting)
Crime will find a way (Score:2, Interesting)
Look at Japan.
Re:Crime will find a way (Score:2)
"... Persons violating Japanese law, even unknowingly, may be expelled, arrested or imprisoned.
CS (Score:1)
SimCity? :) (Score:2, Funny)
I've got a better idea... (Score:1)
Built by Imtech huh? (Score:2)
Re:Built by Imtech huh? (Score:2)
Wow, larger-than-life pr0n (Score:2)
The Rest of The Story (Score:2)
Initech? (Score:1)
This futuristic war room will look good on TV (Score:2)
Now, if we could only staff this war room with a bunch of good looking out-of-work actors and a couple of embedded journalists, then we would be all set and New York would be ready for just about anything.
Re:Another link (Score:2)