The Aroma of Fine Wine From Your Computer 136
SonomaSteve writes "Wine Spectator Magazine is reporting on a new computer accessory that could have you smelling fine Burgundy wine over the web. The prototype, called Olfacom, is being developed by France Telecom and showcased by the Bureau Interprofessionnel des Vins de Bourgogne (BIVB.) The technology uses 'essential oils' stored in several tanks inside the peripheral to generate aromas like hay, flowers and fruit. Will Olfacom be more successful than DigiScents? The French say, 'Mais, oui!'"
Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Actually, it would probably result in some shocking realizations for most geeks.
Re:Obligatory (Score:1)
Re:Obligatory (Score:1)
I doubt anything will ever come of this sort of thing, but it does have the potential to revolutionize certain businesses. That is what the entrepeneuers are always thinking about, and that's why this technology keeps resurfacing every few years.
Re:Obligatory (Score:1, Funny)
Does this we can warez purfume and Glade plugins? (Score:1)
Re:Does this we can warez purfume and Glade plugin (Score:2)
Re:Obligatory (Score:1)
I sent off the link to a few contacts of mine in the Adult Industry.
China Lake (Score:1, Insightful)
Uh oh! (Score:5, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Uh oh! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Uh oh! (Score:1)
Re:Uh oh! (Score:2)
Ummmmm, I'm gonna guess 'crude' oil. Baaahahaha!!
Re:Uh oh! (Score:1)
They've finally done it... (Score:2)
Smellevision...and here I thought it would always be a bad joke from the 80s...
Re:They've finally done it... (Score:2)
we'll see.
Seriously, though... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Seriously, though... (Score:2)
For games, I can only imagine this being part of a deeply immersive experience, although that would require much better screen resolutions, probably some 10 years off.
Until then, this is going to stay a niche thing
Re:Seriously, though... (Score:2)
Re:Seriously, though... (Score:1)
Re:They've finally done it... (Score:2, Funny)
KFG
Re:They've finally done it... (Score:3, Interesting)
Thankfully, there's an RFC for a truly open protocol: the Olfactory Transport Protocol (OTP) [rru.com]. Hopefully, people will use it.
Re:They've finally done it... (Score:2)
Re:They've finally done it... (Score:2)
Worse yet; Imagine some prankster or worse (skript kiddie?) who's website opens a thousand windows, all of which smell like the raunchiest Porto-Potty you've ever been within 100 feet of on a hot summer day.
Imagine co-workers sending a fart over AIM to embarrass you in your cubicle while you're talking to the new hot blonde who wants to go out friday night...
...then again, imagine all that happening to your boss...maybe
Again? (Score:4, Interesting)
It's pretty obvious that it didn't work out before, I'm not sure why they're still trying.
Re:Again? (Score:1)
Re:Again? (Score:1)
Re:Again? (Score:1)
call me when.. (Score:2)
can't see the wine buffs falling for this though..
Re:call me when.. (Score:1)
Time and again... (Score:5, Insightful)
First: How should this ever really work? There are millions of scents out there and our noses are really sensitive organs. How should five or ten different oils be able to reproduce all the variations? Remember, we are not talking of different frequencies of one single quality (as with light) but of really different substances. One cannot mix scents as on mixes colors.
Second: Even given it would work: Does anyone want such a thingy? Just wait till the first script kid out there writes a worm that fills half of the world's office cubicles with the nice smell of, [insert your favorite salacity here].
Re:Time and again... (Score:1)
Re:Time and again... (Score:3, Insightful)
I would not be surprised if a limit
Re:Time and again... (Score:5, Informative)
For something like fine wine, where the smell is subitle and complex, it would totally fall flat. I mean that's what really makes fine alcohol fine. Wine smells and tastes like wine, be it jug wine or $300/bottle. However the finer vintages are more mellow, and have unique flavours and smells. Getting a synthetic to simulate something like the basic wine taste is probably no problem. Getting it to be like Opus One or Domaine de Chevalier is a whole different story.
Re:Time and again... (Score:4, Informative)
However there is no obvious way to mix smell of vanilla with smell of creosote and get the smell of rose, for example. Furthermore, you can not get the smells of varying roses by changing the amount of creosote or vanilla. Smells are not very additive.
This still doesn't mean that such a device is impossible. It only means that you need many different "essential oils" (a.k.a. stinky liquids) to generate some good number of smells.
But on the other hand such a device does not have to generate many smells. A marketdroid may be happy if each "oil" generates just one smell, and that's it - the device just can make 10 or 20 smells at all. This would be acceptably good to accompany TV ads, for example.
However I see no way in hell a device like this can recreate a smell of some good wine. It is even hardly possible to do in a chemical lab. Wine is quite a complex product. Year and age of the wood used to make the barrels may make a big difference; those 10 or so oils can't even approach that precision; I would be even surprised if they can recreate the smell of common beer - because they'd need to stock up on some yeast products among those oils, and these wouldn't last long in that cartridge.
The previous device failed, and this one is likely to follow. The main reason to that is not its limited spectrum of smells, but the absence of any need for the device. Sense of smell is not very strong in humans, and we are not driven by it as we are driven by vision or by hearing. There are theaters of vision (movies), there are theaters of word (drama) and music (opera etc.) but no smell theaters. We are just mostly blind to smells.
Re: (Score:2)
Refresh rate... (Score:1)
Re:Time and again... (Score:2)
I don't think that this is the major reason. We are not that great at smells, but to say we are blind to it?
More importantly is the speed and locality of smells. Because of this we do not _communicate_ by smell (except in puberty).
As
Re:Time and again... (Score:2)
The basic idea behind scratch and sniff is to take the aroma generating chemical and encapsulate it in gelatin or plastic spheres that are incredibly small, about a few microns in diameter. Scratching ruptures a few of these spheres generating the smell.
with this idea, couldn't you make a box containing millions and millions of spheres, with a few thousand different types of spheres for various a
Re:Time and again... (Score:1)
What the hell's the point of being a wine connoisseur if you don't like to drink wine? Are you just one of those pretentious assholes who talk about wine to make themselves look "cultured"?
Re:Time and again... (Score:1)
Same as your eye can see 3 different basic colors (+luminance), and with that you can see about 8*10 different linear combinations of that 3 base vectors, (yes 24bit colors is double that we can see), the same stands for smell, but with 30 "base vectors" - 30 sorts of oils.
Re:Time and again... (Score:2)
Although we don't presently know an orthogonal basis for perception of odor, it seems that quite a range of odors could be generated with a reasonable number of components. I believe that the no-longer manufactured iScent had 200 oils. With such a number, not only would there be a very large number of combinations, but there would be enough single odors to give a wide choice for many purposes. What does seem doubtful is whether fine distinctions like those among wines could be synthesized by a system that
Vapor (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Vapor (Score:1)
Re:Vapor (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Vapor (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Vapor (Score:2)
My fears.. (Score:1)
Will Olfacom be more successful than DigiScents? (Score:1)
KFG
that's pure evil (Score:2)
Re:that's pure evil (Score:2, Informative)
If you'd RTFA, you'd realize that not only are they not attempting to actually duplicate the aromas of fine wines, but that a critic has already made the exact complaint that you did.
Use real wine, not digital fakes (Score:2)
The glass of wine I've got on my desk right now is just Two Buck Chuck [traderjoes.com] cabernet, but it's good enough for an average dinner or for reading Slashdot in the evening. Some websites really need coffee [peets.com] instead.
And the author of the press release had probably cranked up the volume on /dev/marijuana a bit too rece
YES! (Score:1)
Now I can email spammers back with a fresh scented fart!
Sign me up.
Re:YES! (Score:1)
You can e-mail spammers back?!?
i thought this was old (Score:1)
Wasted R&D (Score:3, Insightful)
No - this would be a handy companion to an emailed "flaming bag of dogshit" pic, but for items with a high quality aroma, I wouldn't hold your breath.
Re:Wasted R&D (Score:2)
That part has been tried and failed repeatedly. They can identify all the components of a given wine, catalog [aoweb.com] them and create the basic scent of a 1998 Bordeaux for example, but creating "wine" from the base compounds yields s
Re:Wasted R&D (Score:2)
Re:Wasted R&D (Score:2)
But there is also the yeast and wood used to age wine. Even though the yeast is carefully cultured in labs, small variations in yeast strains and the fermentation temperature make a big differnence in the final wine's esters, fusel alcohols, phenols, etc. Wood varies from year to y
File formats (Score:3, Funny)
Unfortunately it accepts only compressed Nosepeg.
The smell of geek... (Score:2)
Socom X, don't just hear your buddies, get to smell them too....
Including genuine "rotting corpse" smell when you make a kill.
Then again the smell of grass as you walk onto the football pitch would be superb.
Now EVERYONE on the internet knows... (Score:5, Funny)
obvious (Score:1)
indeed, it might be interesting to experiment with additional pheromone tanks. w3c would need to extend css with olfactory properties..
is an inverse peripheral (scent detector) in development somewhere?
Excellent story! (Score:1)
We don't need no stinking SmellO'Vision!? (Score:1)
-- "ok, which one of you
Sweet Smell of Wine (Score:2)
the impossible (Score:1)
technology is always proving me wrong.
Alert: A new kind of DoS attack - H2S (Score:5, Funny)
H2S virus/ worm targets vulnerable WINDOWS machines on the internet and causing the infected machines to reboot and releasing a small does H2S (a large dose of it will desensitize your olfactory) whenever the machine is connected to the internet.
Oh, it smells ...
A Large dose can kill (Score:1)
Didn't Maude have one of these? (Score:1)
I thought.. (Score:2, Funny)
Damn Monty python, next people will tell me theres no giant foot crushing things.
The french say: (Score:2)
Sorry, it's the only french word I know
sounds like one of those bad future predictions (Score:5, Insightful)
No it wont be more successful
Smell add-ons are like flying cars - we can do it but no one wants it
Its not ironic, meaningful or in anyway interesting that "To a computer, the fragrance of a rose or a pine cone becomes just another group of zeros and ones"
Computer games dont need smell and hardcore gamers wont give a crap
No one will agree on a standard
People wont buy one just to take a wine tour especially when it cant even do the bloody wine smell!
Re:sounds like one of those bad future predictions (Score:1)
Re:sounds like one of those bad future predictions (Score:2)
Home brewing system... (Score:2)
Olfacom... (Score:1)
As a french (Score:1)
oh boy (Score:1)
"Ooooh, that smell!!!" (Score:1)
Prior "art" from RealAroma (Score:2)
"you oughta get a whiff of RealAroma, the next big thing to make a stink on the Net, offering lucky users the chance to "Reach Out and Smell Someone," "Click and Sniff" and "Surf and Smell." Yes, this heaven "scent" technology is definitely the cheese: using fragrance push and ATML (Aroma Text Markup Language) you can "share smells in real time, over the Internet, with olfactory buddies all over the globe." Nobody nose better than the folks at RealAroma, who promise the release of SmellU SmellMe aroma confe
THE GREATEST THING SINCE CUT CHEESE! (Score:2)
Don't forget, at the time 8 years ago there was a popular application for video conferencing called "SeeYouSeeMe"
RealAroma.com [archive.org]
burris
Let's all buy it! (Score:1)
Mais? (Score:1)
Oh, great (Score:2)
God, not again (Score:1)
Give it up people, even Digiscents was too late and too dumb.
In 2000 some company even wanted to put this type of tech into the gaming community. Wow, smell the singed flesh and the burning rubber!
Another stink product for your computer (Score:2, Informative)
Trisenx.com [trisenx.com]
They make some kind of scent dome that uses refillable cartridges.. connects to the computer via serial...
looks like an expensive useless piece of crapola...
Yes, it's from France (Score:2)
What's the point? (Score:1)
My computer already smells like wine (Score:2)
Uhuh (Score:1)
50 year old prior art infact [twd.net]
Just a thought (Score:1)
Smell is liked very closely with memeory and emotion and is a very effective marketing tool. Just look at Cinnabon. They are one of the biggest money makers in mall food courts because of one thing. Smell. Department stores for years have used smells in the ventilation systems to evoke certain emotions from people while shopping.
Imagine going to a cybercafe where the machines are provided by a marketing company. As you serf, sm
This is revolutionary to marketers (Score:1)
Re:Slow newsday? (Score:1)
A swapless machine that runs as fast as a dog wagon and stinks.