Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Handhelds Linux Business Operating Systems Software Hardware

Lycoris Shipping Linux OS For Handhelds 165

Posted by timothy from the cool-to-see dept.
Bill Kendrick writes "According to LinuxDevices.com, it appears Lycoris has put together an OS for handhelds like the iPAQ and Zaurus. It's based on the Open Source OpenZaurus and OPIE projects, so it should look pretty familiar to Linux-on-PDA fans."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Lycoris Shipping Linux OS For Handhelds More

Lycoris Shipping Linux OS For Handhelds

Comments Filter:

  • Excellent! (Score:5, Funny)

    by nil5 ( 538942 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:29PM (#8166460) Homepage
    Now I can fit my geekiness in my pants pocket and take it to parties and pick up girls and . . .

    /me wakes up from another ridiculous dream
    • Now I can fit my geekiness in my pants...
      Perhaps you could show us some pointers? My geekiness always seems to come out at parties.

    • Re:Excellent! (Score:3, Funny)

      by R.Caley ( 126968 )
      Now I can fit my geekiness in my pants pocket and take it to parties and pick up girls

      Is that a page fault in your pocket, or are you just pleased to see me?

  • Is that a... (Score:5, Funny)

    by cujo_1111 ( 627504 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:30PM (#8166471) Homepage Journal
    Is that a penguin in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?

  • new place for distro wars (Score:5, Funny)

    by contrasutra ( 640313 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:30PM (#8166473) Journal
    Just when I thought the embedded market was safe, we'll now have distro wars on a PDA!

    Lycoris vs Gentoo [opensistemas.com] for my palm.

    Actually, no one really knows if Gentoo on your PDA works, as it hasn't finished compiling yet. It always gets about half way there (est. time: 6 weeks) and the pda starts to smoke.

  • Better than OpenZaurus? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by NoDoZ ( 232151 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:30PM (#8166476)
    How does this compare to the OSes already available for the Zaurus?
    • I'd try it on my zaurus, if I could find a place to download it. But unfortunately the link in that article is dead. and i can find no mention of the distro on the lycoris site. Anyone have a download mirror?
    • If they're expanding on projects like Opie and OpenZaurus, which already exist and would absolutely love contributors... why the heck fork? If there is a reason, I guess I just don't see it.
    • It looks quite similar to me. Eye candy is a bit different, but not much more than that. It looks to be basically the same functionally with a brand applied. The sync application is perhaps the biggest custom piece, tho i've no problem syncing data from my zaurus (calendar, mail and contacts) to evolution. Ssh, scp, http, for the rest. Don't get me wrong, the Z is _great_, but don't put it off to wait for this distribution, and if you are considering, consider the C7x0 series.

      Andrew

  • Wow (Score:1, Funny)

    by NEOtaku17 ( 679902 )
    This will definitely have to make it into the Beaver benchmark round-up. Man I bet those Dell PowerEdge 2650s are shaking in their boots!
  • Truly cannot wait for this baby to come out. Just purchased an Ipaq 2215 and really want to see just how different this is when it finally comes out.

  • Palm OS's (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Rick and Roll ( 672077 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:33PM (#8166488)
    Yeah this looks nice. But what I would really like is to have an Open Source Operating System on my cell phone. They already have 640x480 digital cameras on some sleek models. I would like to be able to take a picture with these and have it go into my Photo-Blog. This could be done by sending the image over e-mail (which might be the way I code it anyway) but I don't want to have to enter things in every time.

    But putting this on an iPaq would be sweet. I dunno, though, if I shelled out money for a palmtop, I would probably get the Palm model with the expanding screen. That is nice for viewing pictures and stuff.

    • Re:Palm OS's (Score:2, Informative)

      by notsoclever ( 748131 )
      Sharp makes a CompactFlash camera attachment for the Zaurus. It's a bit pricey at something like $130 though.

      Also, you can always use the Zaurus to view pictures taken on a digital camera. One time I was borrowing a friend's digital camera for a photo shoot, and rather than hold on to the camera I just used my Zaurus to copy the contents off the camera's CF card, and then when I got home used my CF WiFi card to transfer the images to my computer. Worked wonderfully.

      • Actually, I just got a Zaurus 5600. I got the camera too, for $15. Looks like they used to be in the $130 range, but no more.
        • I'll have to pick one up. Thanks for the heads up. :)
    • Check out foneblog [demotelco.com]. I haven't tried it, since I don't have an mms or wap phone, but there are lots of phoneblogs out there, so clearly it's possible to get it to work.

  • I'd take a look at it... (Score:4, Funny)

    by TheMadPenguin ( 662390 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:34PM (#8166498) Homepage
    If I didn't have my beloved Zaurus, I might try Lycoris... but only if you threatened me at gunpoint of course. Or maybe poked me with a sharp stick a few times :)

    ----
    http://www.madpenguin.org [madpenguin.org]

    • If I didn't have my beloved Zaurus, I might try Lycoris... but only if you threatened me at gunpoint of course. Or maybe poked me with a sharp stick a few times :)

      Poke you with a sharp stick, ok if you'd really like, we wont even make any demands we'll do it for free.

  • So you want to make a Linux PDA? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by IceFox ( 18179 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:36PM (#8166504) Homepage
    Having worked for Sharp and have stuff in Opie and delt with quite a lot of Linux in the PDA scene. I put together an article in my free time the last few years. Some ideas you may like, some you may disagree with. A few ideas you might not have known about, and many that you probably could list yourself. Without further delay here it is:

    http://www.csh.rit.edu/~benjamin/articles/linux_pd a.php [rit.edu]

    -Benjamin Meyer

    • Good page...I can see you've given this a lot of thought. I would love to take linux with me, that's for sure
    • I like the ideas... Funny BAC calculator is at the top of your list for applications...
      I hope to see a good majority of your specs used in this new open source pda model.. I have used Pocket PC for a while, and found that I didn't like it because it wasn't flexible. I could never get it to do what I wanted it to do. I had to fight the software to make it usable, and a laptop was just easier.
    • Nice Article - seriously!

      Too bad no one at Sharp ever read it...

    • Many of the things I agree with.

      But I think it's a fundamental mistake to approach PDA development like desktop development (in fact, I think it's a mistake to approach desktop development like people do today, but desktop machines are powerful enough to get away with it).

      For a usable PDA environment, you need efficiency, robustness, easy communications, and easy extensibility. A dynamic language that runs everything in a single address space can give you that. A collection of C/C++ behemoths linked aga

    • Too bad nobody at Sharp was listening about the sync portion at least. Syncing with Opie is possible but not great, but at least we are trying to improve it out in the open, rather than changing formats in a closed way like Sharp did.

      If you look at the way that Opie and Multisync [multisync.org] are headed I think that we will get there eventually on the sync front.

  • Lycoris vs Lindows? (Score:5, Informative)

    by kevin_conaway ( 585204 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:36PM (#8166505) Homepage
    On the lycoris [lycoris.com] website, it says

    Buy Desktop/LX pre-loaded on PCs at WalMart.com! Check out the entire line of MicroTel Desktop/LX- Certified PCs ranging from $199 to $558.

    I thought that was Lindows market. Has WalMart dumped Lindows or are they coexisting? If the latter, that will be extra confusing for Joe Sixpack buying Linux at WalMart
  • They've made a great choice, the size and speed of Linux is definitely evident, as well as the time and money saved on liscensing and porting to new hardware as time marches on. Currently the DL-PPC will ship with 2.4.18, but I think others will agree that the added responsiveness of the 2.6's will really be appreciated in the PDA arena. Joseph "Redmond" Cheek, definitely did his homework here, this is a great match.

  • 31337 h4xxor (Score:4, Funny)

    by LnxAddct ( 679316 ) <sgk25@drexel.edu> on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:45PM (#8166541)
    Look at the third picture on the site.

    " Owned by Joseph Cheek"

    Damn not even on the market yet and already 0vvn3d. This Joseph Cheek guy is 1337.

    -Steve

  • What is with Lycoris trying to emulate XP? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by gotr00t ( 563828 ) on Monday February 02, 2004 @11:50PM (#8166568) Journal
    One of the biggest reasons why I went with GNU/Linux with X and KDE is the fact that I can configure it to whatever I want it to look and feel. Many distros also seem to have this philosophy, and have created their own unique interfaces, using KDE as a starting point.

    However, of all of these distros, Lycoris has tried to emulate WinXP for all their desktop platforms, and now, they are emulating Microsoft's PocketPC OS for their mobile platform, and by doing so, they have conceded that the XP interface is perfect, and something to copy, which it is definately not (just look at the number of people who have added a program that simulates the OS X dock onto their WinXP desktop) This is the reason I will probably never even consider using Lycoris: because the XP interface (IMO) is terrible, and I would definately not use it, or a rip of it, voluentarily.

    • It boils down to, "who do you think they are going for?" You? Nope. You're already copping an attitude of "why would you want it to look like XP?" Reality is that people want familiar and XP is familiar. Business wants to sell to profitable segements and people who cop an attitude and can install it themselves aren't profitable. Take Business 101 and Humility 101. Most people do not want to take the time to learn something new because most people do not have enough time in their lives to do the things that way to do, much less reinvent their way of working with a computer.
    • What is with Lycoris trying to emulate XP?
      I can configure it to whatever I want it to look and feel.
      So what you are saying is that people can set it to look and feel like whatever they want as long as its not XP? People may like the XP look and feel because it is familar to them.
    • Well, that's kind of the point of KDE being so flexible. So that people (like Lycoris) who want to customize it to be an easy transition from Windows can do so.
    • No, they are conceding that the XP interface is marketable as a crossover product. This is an entirely different thing.

      I wouldn't recommend Lycoris to anyone either, but that has to do with their business model catering to a perception of propriatariness of Open Source software, and it's no particular compliment to OSS that one of the reasons I find this inappropriate is the fact that the general low quality of much of what Lycoris "sells" is remarkably poor compared to their propriatary cousins. Particula
    • Lycoris used to be called Redmon Linux. I even planned to install it at some point because it looked like some ridiculous parody of windows. At least one of the main lycoris devs worked for microsoft, so they have been throughly brainwashed.

      Anyways, ever since they renamed to Lycoris, I no longer wanna install the distro. It went from funny to sad. How can someone be so serious about looking like a cheap copy of xp?

    • *argh*

      It's NOT that the XP interface is perfect. It's that it is well understood and used by people every day! If Linux looks completely foreign to your normal, average end user, you'll have a very hard time getting them to use it.

      If you were to go to a car dealership and find a new car that had its speedometer upside down, steering wheel was a yoke (think helicopter), etc etc, would you be wary of it at first?
      • If Linux looks completely foreign to your normal, average end user, you'll have a very hard time getting them to use it.

        Someone finally said this ... I havent used a windows box for any great length of time for 3 or 4 years. I always find the windows gui to be unfamiliar and confusing. I dont really think that a well-configured gui (my preference is kde gnome still feels ropey to me), on Linux is every bit as good as a windows one, in some ways KDE is better (from a configuration standpoint).

        I was using a
    • look at what they're naming it:

      Pocket PC.

      You'd think they'd run into problems with that.
      And why would you want your market to be confused by the name (which is what would happen)?

  • I'm still trying to get Open Zaurus to compile on my SL5600... it needs work before it's as good as the Sharp ROM that came with my Z.

  • Need? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by bluewee ( 677282 )
    Do you really need Linux on a PDA? it seems kinda redundant. I do agree it is better to use opensource programs, because you know what is actually going on, but I would bet that the Prop. software that HP, palm, Sony created is just as good, or better(people's jobs depend on how good the software is).

    • For most people, whatever ships with the hardware is probably fine. But it's nice to have an alternative possible for if you knwo what you're doing.

      PalmOS has a few limitations. Still no proper filesystem, as far as I know, and no bundled decent WP package (unless things've moved on in the past couple years.
      And Windows is, well, Windows. It does a good job, but like on a desktop sometimes you just want an alternative, y'know?

      Plus there's the beauty of Open Source. If something goes wrong consistentaly,

    • (people's jobs depend on how good the software is).

      Come on... Windows is not open and look how crappy it is.

    • My Linux based Zaurus has Apache/PHP running, along with a wired ethernet card attached to it. When I go to a client site to work on web server hardware upgrades, I configure my Zaurus with the same IP as the machine I'm working on and plug in. While the main server is offline, the Zaurus takes over with a pre-made "Server is being upgraded" message for all those who surf there.
    • Who needs linux on a "PDA" -- basically a toy for keeping your address, phone book and to do list?

      Nobody.

      Who needs Linux on a mobile computing platform?

      Me.

      I develop mobile field inspection software for public and and environmental monitoring. When I started in this, people were either buying ruggedized computers or they were creating custom hardware solutions. PDAs where a godsend. The engineering you get for a few hundred dollars is terrific, because its cost is amortized over millions of gadget ho
  • Anyone know if it will compatable with phone PDA's like the XDA2 ??
  • I might give it a shot, but I'd need a really compelling reason to actually shell out money for this. I hope they make it free for the first few versions at least, I'm pretty unkeen on this whole "paying for software" thing.

  • In development... (Score:3, Informative)

    by mirko ( 198274 ) on Tuesday February 03, 2004 @12:12AM (#8166666) Journal
    Some inside info about Cacko Linux [cacko.biz] : We are about to port our environment [slashdot.org] to others PDA such as ARM based Palm..
    So, if you think Qtopia is too slow or Zaurus/iPaq are too expensive... Wait a moment :)

  • So where is this company located again? Redmond? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LittleBigScript ( 618162 ) on Tuesday February 03, 2004 @12:54AM (#8166832) Homepage Journal
    linux version 2.4.18 initially, with updates planned soon....

    OpenZaurus 3.3.5 is already based on the 2.4.18 kernel but it some major problems with recognizing compact flash cards inserted after boot-time. Now, the 2.6.1 kerenel ported to the Zaurus would impress me, byt Lycoris is more interested in forking and thus gaining market interest than contribution to an excellent, but understaffed (four volunteers!) openzaurus.

    According to Cheek, DL-PPC adds customizations to the OpenZaurus, Opie, and other open source project code bases that improve usability....

    Meaning that they use everyone else's code, but add a "feauture" to make the background changable. Unfortuanatly they didn't recieve the memo. This can already be done easily.

    DL-PPC will include the Samba-based Lycoris "Network Browser,".It's Opie-based PIMs will support synchronization with Lycoris's Desktop operating systems...

    So they are adding nothing that isn't already there, but featuring their Logo will give the Zaurus credibility? Samba has been ported, as has Apache.

    DL-PPC will support a variety of text-input methods...

    It does already! Ever seen a Zaurus?. It possesses a thumbboard and the Qtopia enviroment has a Jot-styled input screen and a virtual keyboard, and even more will be found in the Opie fork.

    What is it that Lycroris is contributing back to Linux? I must have missed that. They seemed more keen on hyping the idea or porting linux to a linux platform.
    • I think one of the main reasons that people are having to stick with the 2.4.6 and 2.4.18 kernels is because of the binary-only SD driver from Sharp.

      • Used to be the case, but not really any more. The handhelds.org CVS has the source for an open source SD driver that is modular enough to support different devices. OpenZaurus's kernel guy has most of the info he thinks he needs to do a new SD driver, but what is really lacking is the time to do the ports to 2.6 for the different devices.

        He has started working on it, and you actually can the C7x0 devices to "boot" 2.6.somethingorother on a serial console, but the flash and fb drivers still haven't been p

    • Indeed.

      It's Opie-based PIMs will support synchronization with Lycoris's Desktop operating systems...

      Some of us have been working on that [1] [multisync.org] [2] [handhelds.org] for a while. I'm hoping they plan on using that and contributng back.

      I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt - nothing wrong with providing "customizations" on top of Opie, but they need to provide code back. I haven't seen anything yet to say whether this will occur or not.

  • I'm uncertain about the logic of Lycoris branching out into Tablets and now PDAs. Especially when they have a Linux distribution that is looking *so* 2001 (gcc 2.95, KDE 2.22). Perhaps they should consider perfecting that one first - no Linux distribution is currently equivalent to Windows on the desktop for the average user. It is almost as if Lycoris have decided participating in the fledgling desktop Linux market isn't fringe enough and they need to venture in to even less chartered waters. I want to ad
    • no Linux distribution is currently equivalent to Windows on the desktop for the average user

      I don't mean to nitpick, but I'm putting a Linux box together for my dad. KDE 3, Konqueror, KMail, OpenOffice.org 1.1, and some board/chess/puzzle games and some other potentially useful/fun apps.

      My dad is in his 60s and has been using Mac OS Classic on an ancient Performa 62xx for a number of years.

      I definitely don't think of myself as an 'average' user, although, while I'm a fairly good programmer and have a g
  • wonder what happens when you get a kernel oops on your PDA.. i guess on most pda's you can restore Win CE, anyone have an experince like that? im curious.
    Now, more seriously, I doubt anyone would like to use linux on their PDA.. at least from the quality of the PIM apps i see on the desktop. The best and arguably the most popular linux PIM is evolution, i think the developers shoudl be targeting their apps to evolution (or maybe even using it on the PDA). In the end folks its all about the PIM it doesnt
    • I don't know enough about imbedded systems to know exactly what's going on in there, but the Cassiopeia (pocket pc 2000) that my brother gave me for Christmas froze on me twice. After pokeing the "reset" button on the back it "rebooted" or something equivalent. All my files in RAM were still there, but my programs were shut down. If this is the hardware below the kernal, I don't think there's much of a problem.

    • Re:Linux (Score:5, Informative)

      by JabberWokky ( 19442 ) <slashdot.com@timewarp.org> on Tuesday February 03, 2004 @04:20AM (#8167430) Homepage Journal
      As for the kernel, you do the same thing as if WinCE crashes - hit the reset. Hit the hard reset and your system goes back to default. Windows is not some sort of magic system; Linux on these systems works pretty much the same way.

      I doubt anyone would like to use linux on their PDA.. at least from the quality of the PIM apps i see on the desktop.

      I installed Linux to upgrade the PIM apps from the very limited ones on my iPaq. Opie provides a much nicer environment for standard ToDo, Calendar, Contacts and Notes. WinCE provides nicer voice recording and some interesting input methods. I'd rather have the better apps that I'll use regularly. DateBk5 on my Palm III still blows them out of the water... but I can emulate Palm on Linux.

      The nicest thing is that I can use PyQt on it. I can create a form with QtDesigner, do the typical GUI dev cycle of clicking on the widgets and writing Python code for what it should do when it is clicked, scrolled, loaded, etc. The whole thing is converted into two .py files (one for the UI, one for the main code), and I can copy it over to my iPaq... really fast and easy custom app creation. Custom databases, little useful apps... the kind of uses that make PDAs really shine.

      if you cant take down a meeting time or a note and sync it with your PC.

      Between DrawPad and Kate, I can take notes much easier than on any PDA. I use Palm Grafitti for input when doing lots of text, or DrawPad to made quick scribbles. As for meeting times, you hit the Calendar button, pick the date and go... the same as every other PDA. Syncing is quick, easy and works fine.

      I use unison to sync, but that's because my entire home LAN uses unison to backup all systems to a file server. Everything that appears on the network (and is configured as one of "my" systems) gets automatically synced if it hasn't in the past 24 hours. With my iPaq, that's right after it hits the cradle and is automatically assigned an IP address.

      That's a bit more difficult to set up than the default sync (which has a nice GUI interface on the PDA), but I mention it because that's the kind of thing that admins in large office networks would give their eyeteeth to be able to do. As soon as an employee's PDA goes in a cradle, it is backed up to the server... the entire thing. If they run over it with their car, they simply go to the Help Desk, fill out a loss form, and get a new PDA... configured precisely as their old one was, every app, every note, every setting, identical.

      --
      Evan

  • Cool (Score:2)

    by ndogg ( 158021 )
    Lycoris has been doing a lot of interesting things lately, from putting their OS on tablets [elementcomputer.com], to this. Sounds like they have a lot of fun with all this Linux stuff. I guess that goes to show the power of openness, huh?

  • This inspired me to do Opie on iPaq yesterday (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 03, 2004 @01:33AM (#8166980)
    This Lycoris announcement looked cool so I went out and looked around for similar solutions.

    I ended up putting Familiar Linux and the Opie environment on my iPaq 3850 ( I backed up the wince ROM just in case I want to go back ) It looks exactly like the screenshots for Lycoris and I got it for free.

    Not only that but I can run almost all the Zaurus software out there and there's plenty (see zaurus software index website and others...) I can get a shell on my iPaq, use the Internet over ppp through my desktop via the iPaq cradle (I don't have any fancy networking h/w for my iPaq) ssh in, use my Compaq microkeyboard, rotate the screen, get a better and crisper display of text, have a media player that supports more formats, use my SD cards (3800 series only) scp files over with no stupid Activesync installation and all that crap, install and remove software with ipkg, update the whole system (which is debian-like) with ipkg update; ipkg upgrade, have a konqueror web browser with multiple magnifications that actually work and look good... etc.

    I think Linux unleashes a lot more of the power of my 206mhz iPaq than PPC Windows ever did.

    Now if only Opie had A DECENT WORDPROCESSOR THAT WORKED!!!!!!! Someone, please! Something that would read/write Openoffice files would be amazing.
    • > Now if only Opie had A DECENT WORDPROCESSOR THAT WORKED!!!!!!! Someone, please! Something that
      > would read/write Openoffice files would be amazing.

      Hancom Office is pretty good. It's only free with the Zaurus, though. Otherwise, you might have to give up some of those little green pieces of paper that nobody has anymore.

      Hmm. It doesn't support OOo, though.

      --
      -JC
      coder
      http://www.jc-news.com/parse.cgi?coding/main
    • Well.... depending on what you mean by 'edit' I suppose you could gunzip the file & use on the many xml packages to modify the textual content of the file. Personally, while I love my Zaurus 5500, I don't really find it a good platform for document layout. Text is good, though, and html in a pinch handles the layout challenges I can be bothered with 'on the go'.
  • Lycoris Pocket PC (or whatever they end up calling it after the dust settles) could be a good alternative to the standard Zaurus ROM from Sharp.

    If Lycoris can put together a system that looks good, runs on all of the different Zaurus models (OpenZaurus is not yet usable on the Zaurus 5600), and has a decent Personal Information Manager that syncs seamlessly with a decent PIM on the Linux desktop machine, that would be a good thing.

    I picked up a Zaurus 5600 from Amazon a couple weeks ago, hoping that the w
  • This is good news. Now I can take my OS with me everywhere I go.
    ---
    http://conradsheldon.web1000.com [web1000.com]
    The story of an Internet hoax, and the game it inspired.

  • iSync'ability ? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mirko ( 198274 ) on Tuesday February 03, 2004 @04:30AM (#8167461) Journal
    Do this OS support SyncML (in order to be able to iSync it with OSX) ?
    I think this could be THE reason I'd buy it.

  • Why Linux? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by R.Caley ( 126968 ) on Tuesday February 03, 2004 @06:41AM (#8167742)
    Maybe I'm missing something, but ISTM that unixoid OSs were not designed for this kind of role. Eg power management is just an afterthough on such systems, and size has never been a high priority.

    Same can be said for windoze too of course.

    What's the battery life like on one of these things? Psions go for 10s of hours (and run off normal batteries, which is a huge advantage).

    Actually, of all the small computers which have come and gone, the only one which really made me go `I want one' was the (now deceased) rex. When my Psion 5 started looking it's age I was tempted to get a very small laptop and a rex. The buggers had stopped making them.

    • Re:Why Linux? (Score:2, Insightful)

      by BlortHorc ( 305555 )

      Maybe I'm missing something, but ISTM that unixoid OSs were not designed for this kind of role. Eg power management is just an afterthough on such systems, and size has never been a high priority.

      Minor quibble, but given UNIX was first developed on computers with a mighty 128KB of RAM, I think you may be slightly confused regarding the design priorities of "unixoid OSs".

      I do know the first system I ran linux on was a 486/33SX (feel that emulated FPU goodness) with 4MB, and I suspect that in terms of th
      • Minor quibble, but given UNIX was first developed on computers with a mighty 128KB of RAM, I think you may be slightly confused regarding the design priorities of "unixoid OSs".

        Yes, but a PDP with a stonkinging big power supply gives a massively different fundamental design than something which has to deal with small batteries which will always go zonk! at the most inconvinient time possible.

        As for size, yes early unixes were designed small, but there was a fundamental switch when they hit virtual memor

  • 386 and 486 (Score:5, Insightful)

    by macemoneta ( 154740 ) on Tuesday February 03, 2004 @06:54AM (#8167784) Homepage
    I wish someone would package this environment for old 386 and 486 systems.

    • And today me without mod points.... Anyway, this is an excellent suggestion!

      A PDA version on a 486 or old pentium would rock as an Internet appliance for relatives.

    • Seriously, I would love this, too. I may be ignorant, but what would be the barrier to this?

      Specifically, what does the Opie environment do on the Zaurus (fb-wise) that couldn't be easily ported to a PC?
    • The only problem is, 486's max out at what, 66Mhz? While my Zaurus 5500 is 200Mhz, and the 5600 is 400Mhz. Also, the PDA's resolution is generally 320x240, which is way too low for a desktop monitor, but I believe some PDA's run at 640x480, which would be acceptable for old machines.
  • Having a Zaurus for some time now, all I can say is this is great.. but please.... add a decent IMAP client ot OPIE. The only one available really blows, is incredibly show, does not support any kind of encryption or secure authentication...

  • Linux has been available for PDAs for years (Score:3, Informative)

    by tmbg37 ( 694325 ) * on Tuesday February 03, 2004 @08:00AM (#8167941) Homepage
    I don't see why everyone is so excited about this Lycoris Linux distribution. I mean, Linux has been avaiable for iPaqs and Zauruses for years. The Familiar Linux Distribution [handhelds.org] for iPaqs is in version 0.7.2, and is in my opinion very stable already. And for Zauruses, not only does it run Linux out of the box, but the OpenZaurus project has provided an alternative for users. Both of these projects already have Opie [handhelds.org], a Qtopia look-a-like as an option for desktop environments, but you can also use GPE [handhelds.org] as well.
  • The Zaurus appeals to me mainly because i'm a Linux freak, but the ability to be able to compile your own stuff (or other open source stuff) easily for your handheld is also a huge bonus. I also like the micro keyboard feature.
    I also like the clamshell version, which sports an incredibly high resolution display for such a small unit.

    My question is thus... With these new Linux handheld distributions, is there a case for getting an ipaq or other compatible pda?

    What do people think? Get an Zaurus or swallow
    • The Zauruses (Zauri?) are very big compared to other PDAs. I have a 5600, and it makes my old Handspring Visor Deluxe look svelt. The 5500 is a bit thinner (because it uses a smaller battery), but it is just as tall.

      I think the main advantage of the Zaurus is that you get some more choices about the software you run. I also have a Dell Axim Pocket PC, but I'm annoyed that most of the additional software made for it, even by hobbyists, is not free. I'm not against people making money from their work, but yo
  • runs Clytoris Linux on her embedded device.
  • Before you go flashing your PDA, please remember that it may not be as safe as you might be led to believe. I went from the stock Sharp Zaurus SL-C750 ROM to Cacko Linux and now I'm stuck. I can't install any other ROM. I'm sure there is a way but the doucumention is nonexistant, and even though I'm sure the Cacko folks are good people I've gotten no useful support from them. So now I'm locked in as a Cacko beta tester whether I like it or not and I am pretty much on my own getting it useful again. The only

Slashdot Top Deals

The relative importance of files depends on their cost in terms of the human effort needed to regenerate them. -- T.A. Dolotta

Close