Walgreens PureDigital Camera Hacked 177
Powercntrl writes "While the Ritz version of the PureDigital single-use camera was recently hacked, the Walgreens version wasn't - until now. Codeman, the same guy who brought us the I-Opener hack, found a way to add a standard Smartmedia interface to the Walgreens camera and extract images with a standard Smartmedia reader. Links to sample images showing the camera's quality are included."
Iopener (Score:4, Funny)
SuperComment (Score:4, Funny)
Let me get it all out of the way for y'all, ok?
Did I miss anyone?
Quick! (Score:1, Funny)
Ooooh Chicken Shit software! (Score:5, Funny)
I can hardly contain my excrement...
Dude, it's a PARODY (Score:4, Funny)
God, can't anyone take a damn joke? I hope you all get meta-moderated to hell.
Re:SuperComment (Score:3, Funny)
You missed:
Microsoft!
RIAA
MPAA
and the potential Beowolf cluster (Imagine).
you missed... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:you missed... (Score:2, Funny)
And don't forget...
"In Soviet Russia, Walgreens hacks YOU!"
Re:while it may be neat... (Score:5, Funny)
I see your point. However, if you actually buy the product, it's not illegal. If you're merely licensing the product, then you're altering someone else's equipment. Alternatively, perhaps the author of the HOWTO could be prosecuted for advocating destruction of property.
To use your analogy, I'm in trouble if I pimp out a Hertz rental car and then fail to return it. If I buy a Kia, however, and then put in BMW accessories that I purchased, neither Kia nor BMW will care (although some BMW employees may get heartache).
Image Mirror (Score:3, Funny)
http://ice.syne.net:88/sd/sm_hack.jpg [syne.net]
PureDigital Camera Hacked and... (Score:1, Funny)
Does anyone else see the connection? :-)
Re:Film (Score:4, Funny)
Over the long term, digital cameras are inherently cheaper than film cameras. A digital "disposable" may cost a little more than a film disposable initially, but the processing and refurbishing cost is negligable.
Think of it as a delaying tactic.
As time goes on and electronics get better and cheaper, the cost difference between a film and a digital camera of equivalent quality will end up favoring the digital. A film camera contains all kinds of mechanical devices that a digital camera doesn't need.
And this shift will start at the low end, where the optics aren't good enough to resolve images better than cheap digital hardware can replicate.
So, just as all cheap watches are electronic ("quartz" watches are basically an accurate timer driving a motor), all cheap cameras will soon be digital. The niche that all these expensive 24-hour automatic film processing labs are filling... processing the output of cheap cameras... will dry up as only professionals (who have their own darkrooms) and antiquarians and hobbyists (who either have their own darkrooms or will end up having to make them) keep using the increasingly expensive film.
So, they're trying things, looking for a new niche they can scratch open, and you know you should never scratch a niche.
Re:damn it! (Score:3, Funny)
Shouldn't a techy/geeky/nerdy website have more up to date policies? Oh, well, just a thought.
Re:If you hack it, virtually free photos (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, because, let's face it, when I'm shopping for a $10 camera, image quality is way up there on my list. Heck, quality is why I have my prints done by Walgreens in the first place!