World's Largest Databases Ranked 356
prostoalex writes "Winter Corp. has summarized its findings of the annual TopTen competition, where the world's largest and most hard-working (in terms of load) databases are ranked. The results are in, and this year the contestants were ranked on size, data volume, number of rows and peak workload. I wrote up a brief summary of the top three winners in each category for those too lazy to browse the interactive WinterCorp chart."
Spam databases (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Google (Score:3, Insightful)
IMHO some of them didn't want to be in that list.
Re:94.3TB!?!?! (Score:4, Insightful)
What else do you expect from the company that kinda sorta wrote Unix?
pseudo (Score:2, Insightful)
Daytona? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:SQL Server? (Score:5, Insightful)
sPh
Re:SQL Server? (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, "SQL server" is a stupid way to refer to a RDBS. That's like calling Apache "perl-server". I'm not surprised the only people chosing to name their RDBS products as SQL-something-or-other are the open source developers and Microsoft. Also I've never heard of MS sueing MySQL or PostgreSQL for use of the term SQL in relation to a RDBS.
Besides, the product is officially called Microsoft SQL Server and has always been, just like Microsoft Windows, but everybody refers to it as SQL Server or, if there is possibility of confusion, MS SQL Server or MSSQL for short. Is it malevolence on the part of Microsoft if people can't be bothered to use the full name of each and every one of their products?
Re:What surprised me... (Score:3, Insightful)
Another factor could be caching; if intelligently used could cut down on the DB workload substantially.
Re:SQL Server? (Score:4, Insightful)