Fossil/Palm PDA Watch Reviewed 176
SLiK812 writes "Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal has a pretty good review of Palm's and Fossil's new wrist PDA. We all knew some time ago that this was coming out, and was initially covered last November and briefly last month. This is the first review I've seen, and Mossberg does bring up some interesting points, both good and bad. Definitely worth the read before buying it."
I can't imagine (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I can't imagine (Score:2, Insightful)
the same way digital watches did ? (HHGTTG)
Re:I can't imagine (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I can't imagine (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
the importance of good editing (Score:5, Funny)
Re:the importance of good editing (Score:2)
There are web sites that guarantee to ENLARGE YOUR STYLUS! Er, um, pointing device.
Importance of consistent editing, Palm comparison (Score:3)
This looks oddly familiar, minus the links about the comparably priced Palms. No, I'm not complaining. It's just weird. But I do hope for a little more consistency in the future, especially considering that Amazon taking orders for this watch [slashdot.org] was considered front-pageworthy.
* 2003-07-17 14:15:56 Mossberg Reviews Fossil's Palm PDA Wristwatch (articles,pilot) (rejected)
It's not really a handheld, but in today's Personal Technology column Walt Mossberg reviews Fossil's Palm-based PDA wristwatch [wsj.com] that was a [slashdot.org]
My Plam Pilot is a real fossil (Score:3, Funny)
This won't be a problem for this group!! (Score:3, Funny)
I LOVE MINE (Score:5, Funny)
wrist pda
is very co
nvenient i
f you dont
mind a ver
y small di
splay area
and a tiny
stylus.
But it is
so very st
ylish and
gets me la
id daily.
Perfect for haiku (Score:5, Funny)
Looks very
high-tech,
but it's
Super hard
to use.
Re:Perfect for haiku (Score:5, Funny)
An ocean of circuitry
But what time is it?
Re:I LOVE MINE (Score:2)
ol That wa
s a great
joke!
od parent
up !!!!!!!
World's Smallest Spam Whisked daily to your wrist! (Score:1)
L V~I~A~G
~R~A~ FOR
pennies a
bottle yo
u could h
ave the w
ang you a
lways wan
ted! And
SHE will
love it t
oo!
Our adver
tisements
are entir
ely opt-i
n. Click
here to r
emove.
Re:World's Smallest Spam Whisked daily to your wri (Score:5, Funny)
LARGER!!!
add THREE
INCHES to
your styl
us!!
Re:I LOVE MINE (Score:1)
WSJ article:
But there's
a problem
with this
quest.
Watches are
too small to
accommodate
too many
techie
functions.
And if you
make a watch
too large or
weird-looking,
the wearer
can look so
geeky that
he may never
get a date.
Re:I LOVE MINE (Score:1)
Just a little too small (Score:5, Insightful)
It definitely has its uses, but many would be well suited with a larger Palm Pilot or PocketPC.
Re:Just a little too small (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Just a little too small (Score:1)
2MB of memory is really plenty for this device. That amount of memory will provide enough capacity to carry your fat address book and manage even the busiest of schedules. That's rea
Don't RTFA, this sums it up (Score:5, Funny)
Summary: Functionally clumsy, but it looks cool!!
Re:Don't RTFA, this sums it up (Score:5, Funny)
That watch is my polar opposite, it seems. (probably true of most geeks).
Re:Don't RTFA, this sums it up (Score:2)
That watch is my polar opposite, it seems. (probably true of most geeks).
Now you can have it all... buy the watch.
Tor
Re:Don't RTFA, this sums it up (Score:3, Funny)
Ummm
My summary (FWIW): Functionally clumsy, butt ugly.
YS.
Worse than that (Score:2)
Fashback to the 80s! (Score:3, Insightful)
Mmmm..big and ugly, where do I sign up?
If I had my way (Score:1, Interesting)
Delays? (Score:3, Informative)
Company name change? (Score:3, Funny)
So "palm" has to change its name to "bodypart" since they start selling things you don't use in your palm.
Re:Company name change? (Score:1)
Best suited... (Score:5, Funny)
For those people who think that a calculator watch just isn't quite geeky enough.
Yeah, right. (Score:5, Funny)
For those people who think that a calculator watch just isn't quite geeky enough.
Uh huh. And the rest of us look like James Bond with our tri-corders clipped to our belts, right?
hurrah (Score:1)
Meh. (Score:5, Insightful)
Traditional PDA screens are about as small as you can go while still retaining a reasonable degree of usability. Get a watch that's too large, and it's no longer anything that you want to wear on your wrist.
While the entire concept of being able to wear your gadgets on your wrist is cool, it takes more than simply saying "I'll meet you halfway" to design such a device. Simply put, the PDA is too small, and the watch is too big for most people to be interested in this device.
Unless you're dealing with a very limited input style--think at most four or five buttons and maybe some form of roller switch--it's going to be nearly impossible to develop a viable wrist-worn device that relies on tactile input. Data storage, sure. Even limited data output is doable--an iPod-esque control system could be adapted to a wristwatch, and one can create relatively unobtrusive displays for a watch (without too great of expectations for resolution, readability, or volume.) But trying to drop a PDA into a watch--that's just too much fine motor control and tactile interaction in too small a space to be practical.
Re:Meh. (Score:2)
Re:Meh. (Score:1)
Now, if they tried to sell me a normal-sized and -looking watch, that would sync up with my calendar and tasks, and maybe even contacts, with no more than the standard number of buttons, I'd buy it. While my PDA is portable, it's not as transparently portable as a watch (I've never left a watch in someone's car). There's plenty of times in life when I just need to be reminded - which is 80% of my PDA's job.
But the idea of b
Re:Meh. (Score:5, Insightful)
Rather than be put off by the "lack of Palmness" and expectations that it will be a substitute PDA, consider it a watch that happens to run Palm OS.
Now, if you don't expect to perform input on a watch, then don't. Instead, you can write a Palm OS program and download it to the watch to have as your watch "face." You want a Matrix-like falling digit clock? Write it. You want a port of the Dali clock, with constantly morphing digits? Port it. You want to write a Tetris clock-game, where the falling blocks are shaped like numbers? Cool. You can even push the buttons on the side to play a little game. Thne, when you want to run OmniRemote to change the channels on the TV in the bar, fine. It runs, it's Palm OS.
Just don't expect it to be your be-all/end-all PDA and it won't disappoint you.
DISCLAIMER: I work for a company who has a retail division that sells Fossil watches. However, I am not trying to shill these watches in order to get you to buy one; I'm just pointing out that they are not as useless as they look as long as you lower your expectations. I personally won't buy one for the same reason I won't buy a PalmOS / cellphone combo: they are two different devices serving two different functions using two different human interfaces that only share a common need for internet connectivity. Viva la Bluetooth!
Large face watches (Score:2)
shortcomings (Score:1)
Re:shortcomings (Score:5, Funny)
Re:shortcomings (Score:1)
Not little memory capacity.
2Mb is quite large, for a watch.
Anyway, thank you about the image of a hot girl asking me the time, I think I am going out today to make it a reality.
Sheesh... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Sheesh... (Score:2)
Translation: Psiren is a woman at Caltech. ; )
Tor
Already a knockoff version (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Already a knockoff version (Score:1)
Re:Already a knockoff version (Score:1)
from the article...
Re:Already a knockoff version (Score:2)
Actually, for most of us infra-dig urban hipsters, a phone is the best place for a data storage.
I happen to be partial to the Kyocera Smartphones, but there are other good Palm OS models by Samsung, Handspring, and even Palm.
If you're willing to support The Beast, there are a whole bunch of WinCE/Pocket PC phones, too, although they're uglier than the Fossil watch. Th
Re:Already a knockoff version (Score:2)
but, you wouldn't like this for a data storage, unless you like keeping around the connect box and special cables that you need to attach it.
which makes this watch pretty much pointless, if it had bluetooth functionality or even ir or just a regular usb plug, it would be way much more useful.
Re:Already a knockoff version (Score:2)
It has IR beaming.
any way (Score:1)
Two handed use... (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, I've always had the same problem with my regularly sized Palm. Whenever I hold it using both hands, it is damn near impossible to use the stylus with any accuracy, much less trying to write letters. However, I don't suspect Palm is going to fix this anytime soon. My inclination is that they will just wait for users to evolve a third hand. Even then, I suppose you will have people trying to hold their Palms with all three of their hands.
Re:Two handed use... (Score:1)
Battery (Score:5, Informative)
From the specs page
POWER REQUIREMENTS : AC power adapter (100V-240V), DC output (4V-9V), Lithium-ion rechargeable battery (internal).
BATTERY LIFE : 4-5 days (based on average use of 30 minutes per day with no backlight or IR)
Right, so in real life, if I was to use the thing normally, with backlight at night and syncing with my desktop with IR, I'd say I'd probably have to charge it up every 2 or 3 days. Given that a real-life Li-Ion batteries have a typical life of 300 recharge cycles (yes, you can get more out of them, but you have to be *very* careful when you charge and for how long, which isn't always practical in a consumer device), especially since it's probably a super-small fragile battery, that means the battery will have to be changed after 2.5 years of use at most.
Do I want to see the face of the watch repairman when I bring him the Fossil for a battery change? Do I want to see the bill when I have to send the watch back to Fossil for a battery replacement? No.
So, no PDA watch for me. Nosiree
Re:Battery (Score:3, Insightful)
How much power can a self-charging watch get from the skin?
Does this somehow mean (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Does this somehow mean (Score:1)
Re:Does this somehow mean (Score:2)
What about lefties? (Score:4, Insightful)
Should I try graffiti with my right hand? I have a hard enough time with my left.
Re:What about lefties? (Score:2)
I guess we are both buggered.
Puhlease (Score:5, Funny)
Palm pilot watch w/ almost no features...$300
Look on wife's face...priceless.
"Almost no features" is false - it's a full Palm (Score:2)
Palm pilot watch w/ almost no features...$300
Actually, the Fossil watch has almost exactly the same feature set as the $70 Palm Pilot (a Palm Zire). The screen is the same number of pixels, the pixels are just smaller. The memory is the same, there's IR beaming and character recognition. It's even got buttons; they simply don't happen to ship mapped to the usual functions.
The Linux version (Score:2)
Then again, I'd hate to have SCO sue me just because I'm wearing a damn watch. Man it sucks being a geeks sometimes.
Re:The Linux version (Score:1)
I *so* want one (Score:1)
For the following reasons:
I do have some questions:
Re:I *so* want one (Score:1)
Re:I *so* want one (Score:1)
According to Fossil's spec page [fossil.com], it uses Jot [cic.com] instead of Graffiti for input. You can download a demo of Jot if you want to try it out on a traditional Palm device.
Does the add-on software the author mentioned require Windows or can I use the current version of pilot-link?
I'm sure they only officially support Windows. But the interface is USB. Assuming they conform to Palm's specs, you may be able to use any other application that can talk with a USB-based Palm dev
Re:I *so* want one (Score:1)
According to the spec sheet: "Based on an average usage of 30 minutes per day", not including backlight or IR.
30 minutes * 4 days = 2 hours
I'd like more than that if possible.
Smartphone? (Score:1)
Maybe I'll consider it after they add the cell phone capability
Re:Smartphone? (Score:1)
I actually have a use for this! (Score:3, Funny)
Pretty good review? (Score:3, Insightful)
Among Mossberg's comments about the watch:
Now in all fairness, keep in mind that Mossberg is in his 50's, and that's not Fossil's target audience of 20-something, eagle-eyed early adopters. So his first experience should be taken with a 30-year-old grain of salt. But I think I'll let some other people "early adopt" this one.
The toughest market to crack . . . (Score:1, Insightful)
Author in awe... of standard Palm feature? (Score:5, Informative)
But the most interesting feature of the Wrist PDA has nothing to do with the Palm functionality. In watch mode, when the thing is just telling time, you can scroll through and select from a wide variety of different watch-face designs. This is the first watch I know of that lets you pick the way its face looks and change that look as often as you like.
Well, duh! It's a Palm, so of course you can make the watch have whatever face you want!
My Palm III (all of $11 on eBay) has multiple clock faces, too -- Analog [palmadd.com], Big Digital Clock [gacel.de] with world time and weekday-only alarms, another Analog [astraware.com] version, and my favorite, the Hell Clock [minordemons.com] with built-in countdown to Halloween. "Hell Clock" is the one that I like to beam to the cell phones at the Verizon store, to give them more "visual interest".
I'd have dozens more, but I lost interest after four. And I didn't pay one red cent for any of 'em (all were freeware at the time).
My Grandma once said... (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, I think she was referring mostly to posted speed limits, and how she would commonly drive 5-10 mph under the limit, but...
Re:My Grandma once said... (Score:2)
Re:My Grandma once said... (Score:1, Offtopic)
Ask her to GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE LEFT LANE!!
-Peter
Pssst! (Score:3, Funny)
Hey, buddy...wanna buy a Beowulf cluster of these?
Re:Pssst! (Score:1)
"now you can wear your very own miniture super-computer"
walter got lucky to get one (Score:4, Interesting)
Crazy Interface Idea (Score:4, Insightful)
It almost seems to me that we need to wait until we have an interface that can be built on the fly - say, a hologram idea.
Now, let's pretend that this actually works, and, a la Star Trek style, ignore the science: you have a flat pane of the watch that normally tells time. At the touch of a button, an interface appears over the watch that is about the same size of a standard PDA screen. It is able to sense the location of objects moving over it, so you could "touch" the images with your fingers, "scroll" through the address book, read an e-book (though you might want to move the watch for that to make it more comfortable, etc). You would have to allow the user to shift the display (so if you're driving, you can make it stay "upright" as you look into your address book before smacking into the car ahead of you because you didn't have your eyes on the road).
If you wanted to be really cool, you could let the user lay the watch flat, and "expand" the interface into a whole desktop complete with "keyboard" so they could type, use their fingers as pointer devices, etc. (We are of course pretending that the watch's electronics are so small and heat efficient they don't burn a hole in your wrist/desk to compute all of this information).
This technology I'm sure is about 15-20 years off, but I think that's what you would need to allow something that small to have an interface worth using.
Of course, this is just a "pull the idea out of my ass" concept - I could be totally wrong as to whether this would be useful or not.
Re:Crazy Interface Idea (Score:2)
As I have Said Before (on Slashdot, as well as in life)... a little computer paired with a laser projection keyboard and screen (ala CeBit about a year or two ago) would be a super cool device.
Usually, my favorite form factor is a device the size of a lighter or a pager. But a watch would do too.
-WS
Re:Crazy Interface Idea (Score:2)
This is exactly what I believe will happen once we have holographic displays. Right now something like a watch can only have a display that is limited to the dimensions of the watch itself. Once we can create a holographic display, suddenly the size of the watch is no longer an issue. I wonder how far away this technology is though.
Here's what I want (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Here's what I want (Score:2)
on the otherhand watches that change their faces arent new or unique
and thats the only feature the reviewer likes
he shoulda looked at some of fossils other watches
sure not as extensive as this one, but jesus its an ugly palm interface...
nasty...
What would be more useful... (Score:2)
It should be able to display reminders etc but would n't really need a full user interface.
Tor
a cool addon (Score:2)
Yea right... (Score:1)
So if you're the type of person that wants a PDA in your watch, you will never get a date period. So just buy the "less stylish" $179 model.
This is stupid. (Score:2)
And as per usual, (Score:3, Insightful)
I mean, the normal palm is bad at times with the scrollbar on the wrong side of the screen [don't tell me about lefthack; it breaks Eudora]
Experiment: Put your watch on your right wrist. Now change the time. Now imagine you need to do this with far more dexterity.
Bah. They're only losing about 10-15% of the market by doing that, so no great loss, I guess...
Gary (-;
The inevitable Casio Databank comparison (Score:4, Informative)
Fossil features: clock, calculator, backlight, address book, date book, to-do list, IrDA port, ability to run Palm apps, and a memo pad.
Casio features: clock, calculator, backlight, address book (kinda), 5 alarms, world time, atomic time synchronization and a stopwatch.
Fossil battery life: five days
Casio battery life: two years
Fossil price: $295
Casio price: $89
I'm going to stick with my Casio Databank.
Re:The inevitable Casio Databank comparison (Score:1)
I love my DataBank 150. I'll keep using it until my aging eyes can't see it anymore.
(Plus, there's no better chick magnet than a mini-keypad on your wrist.)
Re:The inevitable Casio Databank comparison (Score:2)
I bought a DBC-30 about nine years ago, and it's still chugging along perfectly. After about five years, the original CR2016 battery died, so I replaced it with a CR2032 (it's a thicker battery, but it will fit with a little pressure). I'm expecting another few years before this battery dies.
The watch band for it used to wear out and break on me occasionally, until I replaced it with a 22mm metal watch band. Now it is close to indestructible. I cherish this watch too much for
Re:The inevitable Casio Databank comparison (Score:2)
from what i've seen (Score:1)
I can't see the point in wearing one of the first generation if the functionality is so limited vs the size. Never mind the battery life.
Personally, I hope that a larger form factor watch gains acceptance though, so that a 2 or 3 inch^2 display could be used. (Flex displays?) At that point you might actually be able to use it for something. Chapter of an Ebook while you wait for the bus?
I think cooler
Whats the point? (Score:1)
Anyone who has the money for this thing will almost 99.99% certainly have a mobile phone aswell and therefore the phone book function is completely useless. Infact anyone who has the money for this probably has a quite a decent phone that they can store memos/todos etc on, download programs for, take photos, read email, browse the net and all with a colour screen. Ok so ma
Microsoft SPOT Watch (Score:1)
great (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, I can imagine Wal-mart selling them at a 30% discount with a permanent Wal-mart logo face. And then I can imagine someone writing a De-WalMart hack to replace the logo, and going to court for violating the DMCA because they thwarted the rot13 encryption neccesary to bypass the logo lock. Same shit, different year.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)