

Lycoris Announces Desktop/LX Tablet Edition 190
penguinrenegade writes "Lycoris has announced the release of a new Tablet Edition of their popular Desktop/LX Operating System. There are several screenshots in the tour, and it looks like a really polished system, including some of the things that you'd really need in a Tablet, like the virtual keyboard, actually working. It appears according to one page that there are already Tablets in production by some manufacturer, too. So much for Bill Gates and his vision of only Microsoft on a Tablet, eh?"
Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:2)
And I suspect that arguement will actually work, in an edited way, on bankers.
Only one letter different....
Re:Why? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:2)
The only problem is that there are no applications that make use of pen input in a good way Not on windows, and not on Linux.
Besides all existing tablet-PCs are fare too heavy.
If you work with them on the run as you are supposed to, it will almost certainly result work related injuries to neck and sholders. The weight must get down to below at least 500g.
And if you work with them on a table like an ordinarey laptop. There is little need for pen input.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
Small niches can be very successful. Apple is doing just fine thank you very much.
Why is why? (Score:5, Insightful)
I, for one, am looking forward to the day when I can recline on my couch and surf the web or read an ebook with the same ease I now read a paperback. Yeah, you can do that with a laptop, but it's awkward. You don't always need a keyboard.
Re:Why is why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why is why? (Score:2)
Besides which, new tech is always more expensive than comparable old tech. I mean, if price is the only issue, I'll sell you a Thinkpad 770 for fifty bucks!
Re:Why is why? (Score:2)
Re:Why is why? (Score:2)
I borrowed one for a few days and it sure was convenient to have access to a
Re:Why is why? (Score:2)
Which is exactly how new products get cheaper. It's not a law of nature. At first the product costs "too much" for most people, but if it's got any good points, some people buy a bunch of them because they have a process that justifies the cost. When this happens enough times, you get economies of scale and the price starts going down.
Of course if
Re:Why is why? (Score:2)
If you could get a touch/pen interface for trivial incremental cost and no resolution/weight/durability penalty, people would probably go for it. Maybe someday, but not yet.
Until then, as for Apple taking the niche: I worked on
Re:Why is why? (Score:2)
I don't think so.
The way you use a laptop and tablet are very different. The hardware might not be all that different, which is what you are probably thinking. But the two products are very different.
The biggest thing is the stylus, a user interface designed for it, and including handwriting recognition.
Re:Why is why? (Score:2)
Re:Why is why? (Score:2)
Parititions and Crusoes (Score:2)
I saw a TC1000 in a store, and totally fell in love with the physical design: it's a tablet and a laptop with an oversized swivel screen. But I was put off by the Crusoe processor. I had a Sony sub-laptop that used it, and there was a nasty delay starting new apps. Didn't seem very economical of power eith
Re:Why? (Score:1, Insightful)
And for your just sitting back surfing the web I'd take a tablet any day if I could just afford one.
Re:Why? (Score:1)
Re:Why? (Score:2)
That's a bit harsh above, but there are people who'd manage quite nicely with a tablet PC.
Re:Why? (Score:2)
If I was buying a tablet PC (and I _do_ like the form factor), I sure as hell wouldn't want it running Windows XP, so its just nice to have the choice.
Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe (Score:1, Insightful)
b) because companies exist to make profit, not practically give stuff away
c) because people will pay more than $400
Disposable computers - via C3 small FF like (Score:1, Insightful)
Upgrade every other year for whatever system is about $150.
Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe (Score:2)
b) because companies exist to make profit, not practically give stuff away
c) because people will pay more than $400
My response:
a) Bullshit. The average laptop is only worth about $250 in parts bought in bulk. Tablets are only slightly more expensive due to the touchscreen. But the form factor reduces the cost.
b) Companies exisiting for profit is the worst approach. They should exist for the customer. We should be their masters, not the other way around.
Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe (Score:3, Insightful)
You can barely even get an LCD monitor for $250 retail (lowest LCD price on pricewatch is $196 for a 14"), let alone the motherboard, processor, hard drive, battery, CD/DVD drive, keyboard, trackpad, case, power adaptor, and RAM. I know things are a lot cheaper in bulk, but I don't see them becoming cheap enough to ju
Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe (Score:2)
um, you're in college, right? maybe you want to get a job and work for a company that doesn't make a profit? companies that serv e the customer best (except in cases of monopolies) are the most profitable. but hey, we're all idealists here at
Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe (Score:2)
Um, wrong. I'm a 33 year old guy who works in IT doing a LOT of really cool stuff.
maybe you want to get a job and work for a company that doesn't make a profit?
You're right on that count. I work for a non-profit organization because I believe it's the right thing to do. The organization I work for provides a lot of really cool stuff to people who need it, at no cost. And I still manage to live well. Even through the dot-bomb bubble that the neocons brought on themselves
Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe (Score:2)
now, you choose, in a free market to work fo
Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe (Score:2)
While this is a really nice sentiment this doesn't happen much if at all unless:
-They are going to get a tax break
-It's going to increase their opportunities for more revenue (Think Microsoft "giving" PCs to public schools and libraries)
-There is basically something that they stand to gain from th
Re:NAACP officially calls republicans nazis (Score:1)
Additional Information (Score:5, Funny)
Rumor has it that there are stylus limitations, however.
Re:Additional Information (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Additional Information (Score:2)
Re:Additional Information (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, but the reboot times are out of this world.
Re:Additional Information (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Additional Information (Score:2)
About time (Score:1)
virtual keyboard (Score:1, Funny)
or you could just flip the screen around and use the real keyboard, actually working
Re:virtual keyboard (Score:5, Informative)
Well? Where can we get one? (Score:4, Insightful)
Not bad for a complete ripoff (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Not bad for a complete ripoff (Score:2)
As if Windows XP isn't already a ripoff of other modern OSes?
I mean, seriously, Microsoft rips off every other company that has an original idea (Apple, Xerox, Palm), and usually gets their ripoff wrong in the first few iterations, but through attrition they manage to be the last guy standing...
That there's a Linux variant that is designed for Tablet PC use is wonderful. There are vertical markets where Tablets make sense, and the cost benefits of Linux on Tablets means
Comdex Best of Show - BeOS Webpad (Score:2, Interesting)
A few months later, the company that won Best of Show for their BeOS-based webpad switched to Windows CE...
BeDoper [bedoper.com]
Yes, well (Score:1)
Perhaps they should stop copying Windows XP, eh?
Re:Yes, well (Score:1)
Re:Yes, well (Score:2)
Re:Yes, well (Score:2)
What? You make no sense at all. Why would I cry over ms windows XP? Now march along sonny and go back to your legos and Fisher Price(TM) GUI.
Resistive touch screen? (Score:3, Informative)
Plus a side switch and eraser.
There was an article a while back about linux on an Acer Tablet PC so I know it can be done.
Linux GUI Design (Score:4, Interesting)
Strater
strater.ca [strater.ca]
Re:Linux GUI Design (Score:4, Funny)
Because the only people that like having one toolbar shared between all apps already own macs.
Why copy anyone? (Score:2)
Re:Why copy anyone? (Score:2)
I've thought a lot about this, but as sub-standard as the current way of doing things is, I can't really think of another that would work to any degree.
Especially now that everyone is used to the Windows/KDE/Gnome/Mac OS/Everything else way of doing things... there's a lot to be said for familiarity, that's why all the interfaces you see are so similar.
Re:Linux GUI Design (Score:2)
Re:Linux GUI Design (Score:1)
Because MS doesn't sue when you copy XP and Apple does.
Re:Linux GUI Design (Score:2)
Once we have 60% market share, we can start making the running ourselves.
Re:Linux GUI Design (Score:2)
Re:Linux GUI Design (Score:2)
I agree. It is so annoying that all automobiles have very similar controls. All just cheap knockoff copies of each other.
I personally believe that every car should have radically different controls and good online help. Approaching the intersection too fast? Just pull up the online help! It's right there for your convenience.
I'm very interested in hearing more about your ideas for interface design
Re:Linux GUI Design (Score:2)
KDE seems to copy elements from OS X. It seems like we have transparent menus. OS X alike desktop wallpaper. Very similar styled GUI widgets. Numerous things that are obviously and overtly influenced by OS X. So it's not like everything is being copied from Windows.
It seems to me that desktop themes that look "too much" like OS X get pro
Tablet XGalaga??? (Score:5, Funny)
In related news, Microsoft commented on the perceived threat to their tablet PC platform:
"Even though this is a pretty slick move on their part, our developers are working right now on a new and improved version of TabletMinesweeper. Not only will it feature much bigger buttons, we will also include improved 16-color graphics and at least two different sound effects. That oughtta show them who's boss."
But seriously, if you want to show off the power of your high-tech bleeding edge computing platform, don't use GALAGA, for god's sake!
Re:Tablet XGalaga??? (Score:2)
Super simple game - really addictive. How games should be made.
Don't knock a game as a killer feature for a platform.
Re:Tablet XGalaga??? (Score:2)
taptaptaptaptaptaptapCRUNCH
Re:Tablet XGalaga??? (Score:2)
I always have to put the flags down to keep myself from screwing up and getting the sad face.
Damnit! (Score:2)
Touchscreen? (Score:4, Insightful)
Please tell me Lycoris' Tablet supports WACOM pads...
Im interested... (Score:2)
Im more interested in this distro. Is there a demo version out there somewhere. I will probably spend more time looking deeply into this but is this the distro with the built in winex stuff that runs win32 apps easily?
Re:Im interested... (Score:3, Insightful)
You can download a copy at LinuxISO.org [linuxiso.org].
I'd have to say that I've tried Lycoris and I'm rather impressed with it. It seems to be somewhat picky about what hardware it works with, but otherwise it is a fast, no-nonsense desktop. There is one well-chosen app for each task you could need, and the menu layout is simple and straightforward. I think they were even using Mozilla as the default browser before RedHat was. Everything is designed to look and work like, say, Win
Do we even like Lycoris? (Score:1)
As near as I can tell, Lycoris is the artist formerly known as Lindows. They took freely available open source software, slapped a Windows-lookalike skin on the desktop, then started charging for the priviledge of using their specialized click-and-run installer.
Something about them just rubs me the wrong way... Did they really do a lot of work to make open source an easier pill to swallow for the masses, or are they just prettying up the same stuf
Re:Do we even like Lycoris? (Score:2)
Re:We who? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do
Whatever happened to reading sources and forming a coherent opinion all your own?
Or am I expecting too much?
Re:We who? (Score:1)
The free software myth. (Score:5, Insightful)
Free software is not about giving away software for free. If you can take free software, and bundle it in such a way that you have an edge, and can make money off it... that's great. Go for it.
Yes, Lindows did do a lot of work to make linux get out there into people's homes. They have a deal with a MAJOR outlet to sell lindows preloaded on pcs. That sounds good to me.
It's not the job of everyone who works with open source to "promote open source". Not everyone is a holy crusader.
Lindows has caused a lot of people to use linux who otherwise wouldn't, becuase of how their products are sold. They abide by the licenses of the software they are given, and found a way to profit from it. That's not something to complain about.. and frankly, all the complaining every time someone makes money off open source while still complying with licenses is what gives open source a bad name.
Do I think lindows is technically a great feat? Hell no, but I don't see anything wrong with what they are doing. If you release something under GPL, you should not be upset when someone takes it, packages it, and sells it. Your license, after all, permitted it.
If the authors did not want people to sell or use their products in this manner, the licenses would refect that fact.
Re:Do we even like Lycoris? (Score:1, Informative)
Their distro is based on old Caldera Openlinux code (hah! - will Sco sue them next?!?)
Their goal, as near as I can tell, is to make a Linux distro your grandmother can use. And they do give back to the community.
Lindows is a "pay-as-you-go" distro, based on Xandros (used-to-be Corel Linux), based on Debian.
Tablet PC's & Rock & Roll = Fad-tastic (Score:1)
Re:Tablet PC's & Rock & Roll = Fad-tastic (Score:3, Insightful)
I think a properly done tablet PC would take hold in special markets (such as package delivery), where the devices used now are much more limited than a full-blown PC.
(Look at the wireless slabs carried around by UPS drivers, for example. Sure, they get the job done pretty well - but I bet much more information could be presented to a driver if it was an actual tablet PC. Perhaps, an instant display of package tracking results for the current customer the
Sleep? (Score:1)
I wonder what kernel they're using. Linux 2.4.x does not support ACPI S3 sleep, and it seems surprising that they would ship a 2.5.x kernel. I can't wait to take a look at the sources they release.
Re:Sleep? (Score:2)
(I'm in a sarcastic mood today.)
Re:Sleep? (Score:3, Informative)
In fact, the Linux ACPI development project has declared it impossible.
I couldn't find the direct quote, but this sums up the situation [debian.org].
Basically, the framework for notifying each device driver that the system is sleeping/waking up is not possible with 2.4. There were major changes in 2.5 to add support for this.
But how does it work with the GIMP? (Score:1)
Will pressure sensitivity work right out of the box? Or not at all?
Can it output to a seperate monitor? The viewscreen's a bit small for art purposes - sure you can zoom in for details but an artist also needs to see how the full image is going to look at its print dimensions.
I'd love to be free from wacom/adobe/microsoft, I don't know if the Lycoris tablet will do the trick but it's an exciting step in the right direction.
Handwriting? (Score:1)
Whiny Little Condensending Trolls. (Score:1, Insightful)
What? Do you pricks think everyone should only have a term? Maybe run a tablet with 1 key so you can input commands i
Hand-writing recognition? (Score:1)
What's the point of lugging around something so big, then having to resort to typing using the on-screen keyboard with one finger (tiny on-screen keyboard+the hand your holding it in)? You may as well have some form of PDA or even...just a good old pad and paper. At least Microsoft is
Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? (Score:2)
In the simplest terms, it's as hard to work with in the CLI as any mainstream GUI addicted user will find, but as easy to get to the CLI as Windows is (usually run>cmd in the windows environ). However, since it's well designed enough for newbie needing net usage, it takes little to no time for a beginner to track down the documentation needed to operat
Re:Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? (Score:2)
Re:Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? (Score:2)
Re:Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? (Score:2)
My Complaints:
#1. It uses
#2. Video modes for the desktop cannot be switched without restarting the xserver.
#3. Thier version of Mozilla keeps turning on popups for some dumbass reason.
#4. It really should come with mp
TabletPCs (Score:4, Informative)
Give me a good 16 hours of battery life and I'll be real happy. The only real downside I've found is the screen. Since it is a touch screen it is not as clear as a normal LCD monitor. But, at least on the Compaq, it never gets fingerprints on it like most PDAs.
Now I can finally switch my tablet to Linux! (Score:2, Insightful)
Seriously, I'm afraid that this falls into the category of products that make "Joe User" think that Linux (+GNU) is a cheap knock-off of Windows. I mean, th
Handwriting Recognition (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, where could I buy this, and what would it cost?
List of Supported Tablets? (Score:2)
There are handwriting recognition programs available [freshmeat.net] for Linux, including several under the GPL, but you are correct that the Lycoris website, which does have a "keyboard free" [lycoris.com] section, only seems to mention a software keyboard (xvkdb perhaps?) and not handwriting recognition as such. I too would be interested in a clarification of this, although I suspect the virtual software keyboard is the only form on 'keyboard free' inpu
You should take a look at the MSFT Tablet... (Score:2, Insightful)
Have a Tablet PC, how do I get this software? (Score:2)
Shouldn't a product actually be available before being promoted so heavily?
Re:Windows XP Ripoff (Score:2)
No kidding. For those who care to compare:
Re:Windows XP Ripoff (Score:2, Insightful)
I think a lot of people complain about the wa
Re:Windows XP Ripoff (Score:2)
No, it's good to make it as familiar to people as possible. Many people are familiar with Windows XP (or other Win variations) and this will allow them to get up to speed quickly. What's interesting is if Microsoft copied some innovating UI from Linux (take your pick). All hell would break loose and people would decry Microsoft's blatant ripoffs. But because it's copying from Microsoft, it seems to be okay. After all, it's just a matter of making it comfortable for users, right?
Re:Windows XP Ripoff (Score:2)
Seriously, the only reason that Lycoris exists is to give "Joe User" an alternative to Windows. What good is an alternative if the look and feel isn't very similar? The two screenshots you linked aren't identical. They have a sameness, but no more so than the trash can on the Windows 9x desktop had to the Mac OS Trash icon. Nothing to see here folks... move along.
Hell yeah (Score:2)
Recovering from what? (Score:1)
When did Lycoris NOT look like WinXP? (Score:2)
Since it uses KDE, you should be able to configure just about everything about the interface if you have an internet conneciton. A great site to get new styles for the interface is here [kde-look.org]
No, call it Linux with training wheels. (Score:3, Informative)
They are not pulling a Robertson and keeping their tools closed-source. Aside from Iris, their easy-install software gallery, they have released source on everything that makes Lycoris Lycoris. I would rather give an absolute beginner Lycoris tha
Modbombing (Score:2)
(and befriend me, too. I have no friends and it depresses me so much)