Linux-Controlled Segway Robot 123
ptorrone writes "It was just a matter of time until the Segway technology would be used as a robotics platform. University of Southern California Robotics Lab's Segway RMP (Robotic Mobility Platform) has a lot of great information if you're looking to convert a Segway to a robot. On the site there are videos as well as instruction on how to build your own." Update: 07/13 21:30 GMT by T : Dr. Andrew Howard writes with an important clarification about the project: "This is *not* a standard Segway HT that we have
converted to robotics applications. Rather, this is a customized, limited
production unit that has been specially modified by the manufacturer.
The web-site does *not* show how to convert an existing Segway HT into a
robotic platform."
World's most expensive consumer RC toy (Score:5, Funny)
This THIS is the toy for you!
Segway marketing department brainstorming session (Score:2, Funny)
1: Geek commuter toy.
2: Toy robot.
What next... I guess if you lie it on its side you could sell it as a pottery wheel.
Re:Segway marketing department brainstorming sessi (Score:1, Offtopic)
and pottery wheels are always funny
like ducks
I know evrybbody has laughed at it already but.... (Score:4, Funny)
falling over (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously, though. Why would you use a Segway instead of, say, a four-wheel RC car?
Maybe because... (Score:1, Informative)
see, why you'll use a Linux segway, that's the real question....
Re:falling over (Score:1)
Re:falling over (Score:2)
Re:falling over (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:falling over (Score:2, Funny)
Give me $6,000 and I think I can find some epoxy.
Re:falling over (Score:4, Interesting)
Because it is easier to model and control the segway. Think of it this way: You have a robot based on the segway, and one based on a 4-wheeled rc car. They are both pointing north. Consider how much easier it is to get the segway to point south, while maintaining the same position (Just changing orientation). If the RC car had differential steering (like a tank), then yeah, you don't need a segway.
If you look at most lab grade wheeled/tracked robots, most all have differential steering. What the segway based version has going for it is that it maintaines a constant vertial orientation--it is a stabilized inverted pendulum: It's always "righted" or "pointing up." (Well, in cases where the wheels are at the same Z, anyway.)
From the computer vision point of view, this is really nice to have. If you had a camera mounted on any other type of robot, and wanted to visually point "out" at something, you'd need to measure the changing orintation of the robot as it clambered over objects or moved up and down hills. The most common way of doing this is to put a gyro or other angular rate sensor or inertial reference unit on the robot base, and then feed-forward the dynamics of the base to a pan/tilt type mechanism to move the camera. (All the extra work & crap required to do this would offset the cost of buying the segway, by the way...) Alternatively, you could close a loop around a video tracker to adjust pan/tilt, but that's been done before, too.
What would be really cool would be to stabilize the segway in 2 angular degrees of freedom. Then, a vision system could be decoupled--easily-- from the robot platform in roll & pitch.(An additional single axis rotation stage could offload any yaw.)
Sorry, disagree. (Score:2)
As you note, it's better to use an RC tank than a car (or the higher-grade equivalent). Compared to a standard differential drive though, the Segway looses big. Consider having the robot just sit there, stationary. The segway doesn't. It must move it's wheels to maintain balance; a modeling nightmare. In any case, if you want a precise match between model and moveme
Re:Sorry, disagree. (Score:1)
It is an inverted pendulum. Of course it has to move its wheels to maintain balance. Unless its wheels are constrained.
I disagree it being a control nightmare. Have you ever seen an inverted pendulum? Find a video on the web. They're easy to control, and well studied. (Missiles, rockets, inverted pendulum, cart and pendulum, etc.)
I might be wrong, but isn't the seg
Controlled Segway Robot? (Score:1, Funny)
Like this one? [usatoday.com]
what I want to know is... (Score:3, Interesting)
Anybody that has know know the answer to this? If they do, you could make a little device that it goes and attaches to which fits a lawn mower onto the segway. Add some voice recognition, and you're one "Segway, please mow my lawn." away from enjoying a lime and tonic while your grass gets cut.
Re:what I want to know is... (Score:1)
or
Mount the lawn mower blades in the design of a next generation of Segway, the "Lawn Care" Segway, that spins those blades at a speed comparable to whirly gigs. Just have to be careful where you go with it and don't forget the stepping off... *SLICE* *THUD* *LAWSUIT*
Re:what I want to know is... (Score:1)
It can push a 200+ lb adult around at 15mph and you're wondering if it can move a lawn mower?
Re:what I want to know is... (Score:1)
I'm beginning to understand the advantages of a two-legged robot: we don't have to redesign our riding lawnmowers to take advantage of them!
Re: yeah, torque is cheap (Score:3, Insightful)
I giv
Re: yeah, torque is cheap (Score:2)
I always thought the segway looked like a push mower, and was picturing a design with the blades around the body. It'd be much cooler to just strap a segway to a regular mower though. For both designs the auto balancing isn't needed.
Re: yeah, torque is cheap (Score:1)
Or a remote-controlled mower. I thought of fully automating my mower, but dealing with the safety issues of an unattended 5hp motor spinning a sharp blade isn't worth the effort for something I do about once every 10 days. However, by radio control, safety is easier to deal with and it goes from being an annoying, sweaty chore to an entertaining one. The only problem I foresee is steering
Re: yeah, torque is cheap (Score:4, Funny)
If that is the case, its time to ditch the segways and buy friggin' STAIRMASTERS.
Re: yeah, torque is cheap (Score:1)
To quote Denis Leary:
guy walking up to a guy on a stairmaster and asks : Where are you going?
"i'm going up and i pay for it too, i can stay here as long as i like"
what's next the Doormaster? i open the door
Re: yeah, torque is cheap (Score:2)
I don't have a gut, I'm 5'11" and 200lbs. In fact most of my friends are all between 5'5" and 6'4" and are an average of 200lbs.
So, even though I consider myself atypical, I am infact the typical North American caucasian adult male. *shrugs*
Re: yeah, torque is cheap (Score:1)
Especially the women!
Why bother (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Why bother (Score:1)
Don't be silly we could wait years for decent injurys that way, go the the home job, some ones bound to get it wrong and hurt themself, soon :-)
Re:what I want to know is... (Score:2, Interesting)
This mowes your lawn (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:what I want to know is... (Score:1)
http://www.robotic-lawnmower.com/
There's also another company that sells a robotic vacuum cleaner.
http://www.roombavac.com/
well sign me up! (Score:4, Funny)
Excellent!
Re:well sign me up! (Score:2)
I'll name mine Marvin and install a personality module. You never know though...it could end up being manically depressed and I'd have to carry a towel with me at all times. Now, where did I leave that guide?
=P
-Cyc
Re:well sign me up! (Score:1)
Eh...it's a fine line between snagging in responses and getting the flat-professor-joke. I was just trying my hand at a humor troll. In any case, it's a learning experience. I hope to try to land a good one some day and once I do, I'm done trolling and back to lurking and posting rarely. That's the Slashdot Game! =P.
-Cyc
No fun (Score:4, Interesting)
Yeesh. Build your own balancing bot [smu.edu] and have at it. This isn't even a hack worthy of mention - it's more like a Segway sales pitch targeted at overbudgeted academics with too much time on their hands.
Re:No fun (Score:1)
Matt Groening's Dream Realized (Score:5, Funny)
Why the fuck would someone want to tear apart an umpteen thousand dollar toy and, in the process, make it even more useless?
Because it puts us one step further towards the dream of robots that drink alcohol and steal things.
Re:No fun (Score:2)
Have you looked at the prices of ready-made robot platforms? $5000 or whatever isn't a lot of money for a robot platform that's self-balancing and can carry around 300 pounds or more.
it's more like a Segway sales pitch targeted at overbudgeted academics with too much time on their hands.
Building your own takes less time? I don't think so. Building mechanical devices is time-c
What? (Score:2)
Re:What? (Score:2)
Robotics research isn't a hobby, and the point of robotics research is not to "spend time with it", it's to achieve results.
this is nothing more than a sales pitch.
No, it's a web page from a robotics research group about a tool they use for their research. Then some Slashdot editor picked it up as a story about a nifty commercial gadget, like many other stories about nifty commercial gadgets posted on Slashdot. If you can't deal with it,
I just hope... (Score:1, Funny)
People will be dying in droves if the stability of my own Linux box is any indication.
Re:I just hope... (Score:2)
Build your own (Score:1)
Yep, wasn't doing much this afternoon. Looks easy enough. Guess I'll just try it out.
Seems to kinda defeat the purpose... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Seems to kinda defeat the purpose... (Score:5, Insightful)
200 pound weight limit (Score:1)
Considering this company also makes those electric scooter-style wheelchairs (which may even cost more), I think Segway's goal is to increase obesity in the world so they can sell more of these darned things.
If yo
Re:Seems to kinda defeat the purpose... (Score:2)
What do you have to throw away? A two-wheeled self-balancing vehicle requires the same kind of sensors, whether a human is standing on top of it or not.
And the reason why you want a two-wheeled self-balancing robot is because it can stand up; a three- or four
I'd rather... (Score:1, Funny)
I'm a real man.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I'm a real man.. (Score:1)
Aren't we up to 300k or so for a
Catchy headline (Score:3, Insightful)
Is the fact that this thing runs on Linux so important that it should lead the headline? Really, is the story about the robot or the OS it uses?
Would there be a similar headline if it used XP or OSX?
I'm just wonderin'.
Re:Catchy headline (Score:1)
You didin't get the orther right.... (Score:1)
SCO lawsuits,DMCA is baaaad,SCO lawsuits,DMCA is baaaad,SCO lawsuits...
a story of how Linux is used in the real world and then we go again with the
SCO lawsuits,DMCA is baaaad,SCO lawsuits,DMCA is baaaad,,SCO lawsuitsSCO lawsuits...
(here I was going to put an "a", as well, but it seemed impossible;oP) Windows security flaws,
SCO lawsuits,SCO lawsuits,SCO lawsuits,SCO lawsuits
Re:Catchy headline (Score:5, Funny)
If it run Win XP, the article would read:
Maniacal robot running Windows XP is unleashed unto the world. How long before it kills someone?
Re:Catchy headline (Score:2)
Re:Catchy headline (Score:2)
So, is it better to toot your horn about something that works and works well or something that mostly sucks but you have so much money that you can buy your way into anything( including a US DOD warship )?
LoB
Re:How about? (Score:1)
Re:How about? (Score:1)
And let's assume hydrogen fuel cells can generate power in the future (or even better, a Kamen Stirling engine).
Linux (Score:2, Insightful)
Running Linux, eh? (Score:1)
Re:Running Linux, eh? (Score:1)
http://www.riverdale.k12.or.us/linux/toaster/
Toaster: Check (Score:2, Funny)
Silly people... (Score:3, Funny)
Haven't you seen his house? He has a machine shop next to his kitchen. The only plausible explanation for this is that he eats nuts and bolts.
Re:Silly people... (Score:3, Funny)
(*ducks and runs... err, bolts*)
Brave boy (Score:2)
Re:Silly people... (Score:2)
That sounds like a CowboyNeal poll option.
What OS should a Segway robot run?
it's about time (Score:1)
Just don't run a server on it... (Score:2, Funny)
Could bush still ride it? (Score:1)
All I have to say is.... (Score:1)
Top Gear (Score:2)
While they aren't a useful and sensible mode of transport (yet), they are very good fun. Jeremy Clarkson crashed one, and swore (quite entertaining), while shortarse Hammond at the end improvised the Segway equivalent of the sand dance.
The best thing on the show, however, pissed on the Segway in all departments - a totally mad bike-car tilting hybrid from Holland, the Carver [bbc.co.uk].
Kamen's still cool though - I sa
They are not the only ones (Score:2, Insightful)
Also got to ride a segway. I thought they were pretty lame before I tried one. Especially off road.
working on one myself... (Score:2)
i'll post it up on the segway journal [bookofseg.com] in the articles section, when i start.
cheers,
pt
Segway TX (Score:1)
DARPA is funding this... (Score:2)
He's been doing distributed robotics and autonomous robots for years. He's also in charge of MARS [darpa.mil], another USC robotics project. Some pretty wild stuff!
Re:DARPA is funding this... (Score:1)
Harry Potter sucks (Score:2)
segway sucks too.
Re:Open Source Segway? More like Open Sores Segway (Score:1)
Re:Open Source Segway? More like Open Sores Segway (Score:2)
DMA being disabled on any operating system means a significant amount of CPU time gets spent on reading and writing to disk. You can either enable it in your kernel config (I can't see why your distro provider wouldn't have done this in the first place), or y
Re:Open Source Segway? More like Open Sores Segway (Score:2)
"hdparm -d1
Re:Open Source Segway? More like Open Sores Segway (Score:1)
Re:Open Source Segway? More like Open Sores Segway (Score:1)
Re:Open Source Segway? More like Open Sores Segway (Score:2)
Re:Why did they do the videos as AVI? (Score:1)
Re:Why did they do the videos as AVI? (Score:1, Informative)
easy AVI on mac (Score:1)
Re:easy AVI on mac (Score:2)
I have both Mplayer for OS X (latest version) as well as an up-to-date and full ($29) version of Quicktime that both are able to play many AVI files I run across, but both of them claim I am missing DivX. Both are also capable of updating themselves on-demand with codecs, but neither will play the files on that site.
I find AVI files to be much more problematic than MPEGs in general though. I wonder why that is?
Re: (Score:1)
Re:When terrorists hack(picture too small) (Score:1)