Lanlink Linking The Coasts 340
Dan Bricker writes "A guy in Parma Heights, Ohio has a website to promote an idea of linking the east coast to the west coast using standard off-the-shelf 802.11 equipment. He is aiming for a July 4th, 2006 first coast-to-coast ping. This project appears to be totally volunteer based, With no other stated reason than fun with pringle cans and bad weather, and do it just to do it. Can this be done? What real world applications does this have?"
Warchalking (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Reminds me of the mid-1980's (Score:5, Funny)
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
I was going to... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What "real world" applications??? (Score:5, Funny)
In case of an all out war, the 'real' internet may be shut down, but this air based one could keep on keeping on... although without electricity after the war, only as long as all the laptop batteries lasted... so really only about 1 hour after the strike... just long enough for the users to start a thread:
"Woh! What was that?"
"Dunno... kinda bright though"
"Dude... I think this is bad"
"Yup"
"BBFN"
Re:Reminds me of the mid-1980's (Score:5, Funny)
Pings Across America (Score:5, Funny)
Considering the latency, I'd aim for July 4th, 5th, and 6th.
Main problem... (Score:5, Funny)
Location, location, location (Score:2, Funny)
Re:What "real world" applications??? (Score:3, Funny)
Whoa (Score:5, Funny)
LAST POST! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What "real world" applications??? (Score:3, Funny)
"Woh! What was that?"
"Dunno... kinda bright though"
"Dude... I think this is bad"
"Yup"
"BBFN"
I read the last line as "Be Back Friggin Never"
what if... (Score:3, Funny)
Promontory, Utah (Score:3, Funny)
Re:He'll need lots of volunteers... (Score:1, Funny)
Eh, that's a pretty easy problem to solve. For those places, you use a solution that's been proven to work over big empty spaces: TCP/IP over carrier pigeon.
Re:Reminds me of the mid-1980's (Score:3, Funny)
It's not about "Can we, the geeks, mobilize." It's about if we, the geeks, think that it would be worth doing. I would say no. Off the shelf wireless is not up to this task. Sure it can be done but not effectively. And there is no immediate need for a user run Internet (or non-Internet, whatever) backbone. It would be neat but in the end, going thru a few 1000 access points, I don't think the ping time or transfer rate will be close to useful. Thats all that matters to me. If the thing can do what it was designed for. I'll stick with using fiber for distance and wireless for lans/mans.
Re:Reminds me of the mid-1980's (Score:3, Funny)
Re:other non-commercial world-wide networks (Score:2, Funny)
Shirley, you must've been smokin' crack.
Re:what if... (Score:3, Funny)
The significance of such a voltage would, I am afraid, be comprehendable only by slashdot's lameness filter.
Ergo, the repeater/digipeater.