Linksys Ships Dual-band, Tri-standard A+G Wireless 81
Anonymous Howard writes "Designtechnica has a news article about LinkSys shipping to market their new line of wireless dual-band, tri-standard A+G products. They support 802.11a, 802.11b and 802.11g simultaneously with speeds of up to 54mbps.
I could actually bring my laptop home and not have to switch my wireless card and settings! It comes at a pretty hefty price though, $299 for router and $279 for access point. I think my fingers could handle the exercise a bit longer until prices come down. Who here is willing to fork out that much for tri-band gear?" This is exactly what I've been looking for since I got an 802.11g wireless card. All of the 802.11g access points I've seen couldn't operate in 802.11g mode so long as older cards were in the area. Finally, I can upgrade my systems over time.
Now we only need the information to write Linux (Score:1)
Simultaneous b&g (Score:4, Informative)
Yeah, and unfortunately this AP doesn't change that. That's the way the standard was written, and nowhere does Linksys claim to be able to perform such magic...
Re:Simultaneous b&g (Score:2)
Re:Simultaneous b&g (Score:1, Informative)
Airport Extreme does it. (Score:1, Informative)
However all that said, their airport basestation still gives 802.11g laptops their full speed at the same time as 802.11b laptops work at their speed. The standard might not be written to support it, but the Airport Extreme in my dorm works fine simultaneously across TiBooks with G and thinkpads with B.
Apple AirPort (Score:3, Informative)
The Apple AirPort [apple.com] Base Station can be set to operate exclusively in g speeds--it will ignore b clients. I dunno if this is a common or standard feature of g access points, but there you go.
OTOH, if you're looking for something that does both b and full-speed g at the same time, is that even technically possible? And no, I didn't RTFA. However, for instance the Apple base staion again--if it does both b and g, the g speed doesn't crash all the way back to b, but is rather diminished by about 1/2 of it's typical speed. YMMV depending on range and b/g client ratio, and what the different clients are accessing.
Re:Apple AirPort (Score:1)
Sounds perfect for wireless hotspots (Score:2)
This is great but unfortunatly... (Score:1)
A good application for this (Score:3)
Now show me a heavy-duty pro version of the tri-band wifi router and I'll be super interested.
LIES! (Score:1)
There is no problem. All reports of problems are rumors spread by the coalition forces of trolls. I am not afraid to post and neither should you be!
Linux support... (Score:5, Informative)
The wlan-ng [neohapsis.com] project has early stage support for the wusb12 card.
More details available @ the Linux-USB device [www.qbik.ch] site.
Luckily they don't use the hideous Broadcom chipset, which still [petitiononline.com] does not have Linux support, even though it's sold in Dell, Linksys, Belkin and Apple (new Powerbooks, anyone?) wireless products, to name but a few. *grr*
Re:Linux support... (Score:2)
The majority of 805.11g cards use the arm based intersil chipset and they don't give out any information about it. On the other hand intersil offers OEMs an 805.11b/g AP reference platform on a Linux basis.
Re:Linux support... (Score:1)
Re:Linux support... (Score:2)
Re:Linux support... (Score:1)
Not just Linksys (Score:2)
Re:Linux support... (Score:2)
(actually, all the different linksys 100baseT cards I've tried have used the tulip driver anyhow, despite frequent chipset changes.)
Re:Linux support... Get your facts straight. (Score:3, Informative)
If you don't believe me about the
Re:Linux support... Get your facts straight. (Score:1)
I hope somebody from their side is reading this, because its a PITA for customers to not get what they want.
B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:5, Funny)
You are in your favorite coffee house, zipping along at G-speed, when some loser B-Card holder opens up that ancient Apple boat-anchor, and slams the whole building down to B-Speed.
We are looking at the new "smoker" to be admonished, segregated and finally kicked to the curb for daring to fuck with our precious bandwidth, the way that smokers fucked with our oxygen.
Soon, you will see them outside on the street, shivering in the cold, huddled together over warm repeater, taking digital drags of packets, polluting the internet environment with their dropped bits, and NAT requests.
Scorn them, outlaw them, as they fuck it up for the rest of us. Let them connect in their poor neighborhoods, where you can still see the bitches walking the streets crying "Hey Daddy, I'll suck your dick for an IP address. Hook a bitch up!"
Losers.
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:1, Informative)
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:1, Informative)
Betting your ibook with 802.11b is actually logging into another wireless network somewhere close by. No other 802.11g station has been able to pull this one off, care to explain how apple achieve a 'miracle'?
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:1)
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:1)
Sharing B/G;
think it goes something like this
b & g get equal air time
b does its thing as fast as is capable for say one second
then its G's turn to do its thing as fast as it can for its one second.
G needs all the seconds it can grab to do 54mb w/o waiting on B to do its thing so 'G now is sort of a 1/2 speed, 27mb max when mixed mode sharing the AP.
This also is why G is only doing 20mb prox real world thrru-put versus 30mb on
stand alone: it still has a wait state to at l
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:5, Informative)
In the fine print at the bottom (footnote 3):
"To achieve maximum speed of 54 Mbps the wireless network may only have AirPort Extreme-enabled computers on it."
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:1)
I don't know what to trust. I figure I'll just buy an APExtreme and a
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:2)
Systems that do both simultaneously split the channels.
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:4, Informative)
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:1)
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:2)
Re:B-Card Holders; (the new smokers) (Score:1)
Wireless at work (Score:1)
How many of you have a wireless network where you work? I dont..but most IBM consultants i meet carry laptops with wireless cards. Can i use a wireless network card with a wired network? That would be more useful, wouldn't it?
Well you can... (Score:2, Informative)
You may want to ask your place of buisness, if they find out they could get mad. Going wifi *could* open you to some secruity issues. I'd suggest doing some research on wifi secruity.
Re:Wireless at work (Score:2)
RUN AWAY! (Score:2)
Stay away from Linksys. I've since switched to D-Link and even put D-Link firmware on my Linksys WAP11s and they work so much better. I'm not constantly resetting them like I was before.
The Linksys NIC drivers are also bad. They promote Turbo mode on
Re:RUN AWAY! (Score:1)
Re:RUN AWAY! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:RUN AWAY! (Score:1)
Both WD and Maxtor have their issues....(hell...I've had more Whore Digital drives fail than Max-whore drives....and both have been out sucked by IBM's Deathstars). But the good thing is....due to their "suckability," both companies now have better RMA policies. (gotta love the advanced RMA stuff).
Speaking of RMA'ing, I rma'ed that pos WAP11 several times, and they were all defective. (one can say that it's because it was a linksys that it's defective.)
Anyways..
Re:RUN AWAY! (Score:2)
Re:RUN AWAY! (Score:1)
Either way, if it's Linksys, run....RUN....RRRUUUUUNNNNN!!!!
I hope they handle this better than Netgear (Score:5, Informative)
Now I got me a Netgear MA401. Less than half the price, works every time, and it has a common chipset. It may be 'only' 11 mbps, but that's better than 0 mbps.
Re:I hope they handle this better than Netgear (Score:2)
If you want Linux support you need the Cisco cards (Score:1)
Cisco has not only drivers for linux but also their config tools: cisco Aironet 350 linux drivers [cisco.com]
Cisco Aironet 5 GHz 54 Mbps Wireless LAN Client Adapter 802.11a cards don't mention linux drivers on the data sheet [cisco.com], but hopefully they will soon.
If you're interested in linux and 802.11 stuff check out linux wlan project [linux-wlan.com] and wlan resources for linux [hp.com]
So are there cards for each of these for linux? (Score:2)
OS X PCMCIA cards? (Score:2)
Re:OS X PCMCIA card (Score:2)
Re:OS X PCMCIA cards? (Score:1)
Dell's offering... (Score:4, Interesting)
Having that kind of diversity in a card for your portable makes more sense to me then having that kind of diversity in your router.
Craenor
Using B and G in the same area (Score:4, Informative)
Unfortunately, it is part of the standard that a G class access point will drop down to B if it sees any B style encoding.
You can work arround this by setting the configuration of (most) APs to completely IGNORE B, but that's not very friendly.
One solution, and the solution I recommend in the case where you REALLY want to have G out there, is to configure a "B" base station on one channel (1), and a G base station on another (6). Configure the G channel with a different SSID and hard-configure it not to drop down.
You now have a G only system available, and older B users are still capable of associating.
I would also point out that you must also hard code your adapter to run in only G-- it also will follow the standard and drop down.
Frankly, in my personal opinion, you're better off buying a combo A/B access point and also a combo A/B card. Both are significantly cheaper, and the A standard is also significantly FASTER in real-world performance (to the tune of 2-5x better REAL throughput compared to G.)
Good luck!
tri-band? (Score:3, Funny)
Maybe, you should ask that question in some other article...one that discusses tri-band gear instead of dual-band.
Re:tri-band? (Score:2)
band!!
not protocol
in math 1+1 = 2 = dual
thanks for your worthless unthoughtout insight.
my gosh...think! even just a little bit...
100mbit wireless? (Score:2)
It would be awesome if Linksys could rig it so that their cards could saturate both spectrums simultaneously as though it was one single connection.
Re:100mbit wireless? (Score:1)
On the theoretical side: Maximum real-world throughput for G is about 12-18Mb/s or so. Maximum real-world throughput for A is about 26-30Mb/s or so, depending on what you're pushing. So your peak potential throughput would be something like 48Mb/s.
However, on a much more realistic plane, you're not going to be able to do this anyway-- there is only one chip that drives the radio, and the chip isn't designed for dual actiivation, let alone load balancing or anything "fun".
Wireless-G option from linksys, keep away from .a (Score:2, Informative)