Water Cooled Power Supply 279
lmd writes "Digital-Explosion has an article with step-by-step instructions on how to cool a power supply with water (yes, water) instead of fans/heatsinks to make it quieter. Please read the warning and disclaimer (and buy insurance if you don't have any) if you decide to try this at home."
Water cooled? What wusses (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Water cooled? What wusses (Score:1)
I'm waiting for the cooling system that needs its own cooling system.
Re:Water cooled? What wusses (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Water cooled? What wusses (Score:2)
According to the data sheet [webelements.com] on Sodium, the melting point for good old Na is "370.87 Kelvin [or 97.72 C (207.9 F)]." For the slow, this means it's solid at any temperature below this. So, to use liquid sodium in a computer, the coolest you could get the system while keeping the sodium liquified is ~208F. I think I'll stick with H2-0 for now...
Liquid Mercury Cooling Systems (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm not too sure liquid sodium is the best choice to cool your computer, since sodium melts at 208 degrees F (98 C). Besides, when you first boot up the computer, you'd have to have special heaters installed just to melt the sodium and get it moving! But, you know, in the end, I know you were being facetious. Nice job.
I want to run mercury through my cooling system. I've got a couple of pounds of it, and it would certainly absorb heat more readily than water.
But just one drop of mercury inside your computer and it's finished.
Maybe could use gallium with small heaters?
Re:Liquid Mercury Cooling Systems (Score:2)
If I'm not mistaken, H2O (water) has a MUCH higher (1.00) specific heat than Hg (mercury) (0.033).
Water would certainly absorb heat more readily than mercury.
You'd need approximately 3 times the amount of mercury as water, to get the same effect.
(been a long time since chem 112, though -- correct me if I'm wrong).
See: http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node=Specific
S
Re:Liquid Mercury Cooling Systems (Score:2)
Re:Liquid Mercury Cooling Systems (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm glad you indicate your own realization that mercury is a dangerous choice for cooling system, or I'd say you've been drinking all that mercury you say you own.
Drinking it? No. I've probably breathed a little more vapor over the years than would be considered healthy.
Note the origins of the term "mad as a hatter" are from the days when hat-makers would use mercury to help shape the felt; the long-term exposure had interesting effects on rational thought and normal behavior.
Note also that I once put a Chevette engine onto a snowblower.
Interestingly enough, back when fast breeder reactors were still being considered as viable nuclear power sources in the US, there were proposed designs involving mercury cooling. Talk about unpolitical.But I'm sure it would be an effective cooling system.
Re:Liquid Mercury Cooling Systems (Score:2)
Actually... they lined their hats with lead, not mercury. But I'm sure it would have had the same effect.
Not lining - I don't know about that. I'm talking about forming it, using the weight of the mercury and its liquid state to shape fedoras, etc.
Re:Liquid Mercury Cooling Systems (Score:3, Interesting)
The felt used in Victorian-era hats was treated with mercury salts to make it easier with which to work. Whether this is the actual origin of the phrase "mad as a hatter" is debated [snopes.com], but it was definitely mercury compounds that caused hatters' neurological problems.
Re:Liquid Mercury Cooling Systems (Score:3, Interesting)
Digital Explosion (Score:5, Funny)
Digital Fireworks Display, one way or another. (Score:5, Informative)
Well I guess a site called Digital Explosion is really the best suited to report this.
Yeah, I have a couple of problems with the way this was carried out. Conceptually, I would love a completely water-cooled computer since I'm tired of the noise. But this is pretty dangerous.
Why remove the existing heat sinks? Rather than removing them from components and risking forgetting a mica insulator or doing other damage, why not simply take advantage of them as an easy surface to which to attach cooling tubes. Most power supplies I've opened, I could solder copper tubing to the heatsinks fairly easily.
The other thing is that the mass of the heatsinks would provide a little thermal inertia to buy you some time in the event of a bubble or other failure.
I've also got concerns about the overall safety of this. Even without mica insulators or any other outward signs, a heatsink may be running at some potential other than ground. Pure water isn't very conductive, but all the same, your cooling water is likely to be grounded - and should be grounded. Pumping water through a tube attached to a component or heatsink will bring the water to that potential; using a piece of plastic tubing to insulate one metal tube from another is NOT safe.
What you need to do is have electrically insulating but thermally conductive means to couple the heat to the tubing. Mica insulators and thermal transfer grease are a good start.
I think I'd solder some copper tubing to some copper sheetmetal, and then I'd coat the flat surface with heat transfer grease, add a sheet of mica and more transfer grease, and then screw it to a heatsink inside the power supply. I'd use off-the-shelf electronics hardware to screw the two pieces together but maintain their electrical isolation: even Radio Shack sells the stuff.
Make sure that the water is grounded, and then run the power supply from a Ground-Fault Interruptor (GFI) receptacle like you'd find in a bathroom. This way, a water leak in the power supply should turn off the power at the outlet and reduce the risk of a bigger problem.
Re:Digital Fireworks Display, one way or another. (Score:2)
I've also got concerns about the overall safety of this. Even without mica insulators or any other outward signs, a heatsink may be running at some potential other than ground. Pure water isn't very conductive, but all the same, your cooling water is likely to be grounded - and should be grounded. Pumping water through a tube attached to a component or heatsink will bring the water to that potential; using a piece of plastic tubing to insulate one metal tube from another is NOT safe.
By the way, even if there's no immediate symptom of a problem with this potential difference across the water, I think anyone who ignored such a situation would quickly find bizarre actions like the galvanic corrosion and eventual failure of metal pipes or tubing in the system.
Re:Digital Fireworks Display, one way or another. (Score:3, Interesting)
Hmmm. Soldering copper to aluminium is not immediately trivial - ordinary 60/40 lead/tin solder won't wet aluminium, you need special (silver-loaded?) solder which is much more expensive and uses pretty nasty flux chemicals.
Even then, you'll have increased the thermal resistance of the joint significantly. I'd be tempted to try a solid block of copper with a hole drilled lengthwise and copper tubing soldered (actually I'd braze it - much stronger)to the outside faces. Then use mica washers / thermal paste as usual.
Be aware that domestic GFI plugs (also known as earth leakage or RCD trips) often don't trip until the current difference is ~ 30mA; typical tap water has a resistivity in the range 1 - 10 kOhm.cm, so at 120V, a few cm of insulated piping might stop the breaker tripping.
Jon.
Re:Digital Fireworks Display, one way or another. (Score:2)
Jon.
Re:Digital Explosion (Score:1)
Water should be boiling around now....
Be very carefull with this (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:Be very carefull with this (Score:5, Insightful)
Ok, I can't read the site because it is slashdotted, and yeah, you shouldn't trust these guys anyway, because of what they are doing.
But nonetheless, your logic is shit. I know HV electricians, pipe workers, welders, heavy plant operators, who don't even know what the internet is, but spend their lives doing stuff more dangerous that you can comprehend.
It constantly annoys me that geeks think that they know better than everyone else, just because they know the exact ins and outs of computers and networking. Yes, they are important... but there are far more important things in life.
what are the tolerances? (Score:1)
Relatively slashdotted... (alternative site) (Score:4, Informative)
Here's another site [tomshardware.com] that discusses water cooling your system.
--sexygal [slashdot.org]
Re:Relatively slashdotted... (alternative site) (Score:4, Informative)
Geez (Score:5, Funny)
I guess those water cooled things *still* don't hold up.
Some web server somewhere has probably just evaporated in a cloud of steam.
hmmmm (Score:4, Funny)
copy of article (Score:5, Informative)
DISCLAIMER : The author of this article and the owner of this page are not responsible or liable for any damage caused to any equipment or persons. In attempting what is detailed below you are taking full responsility for your actions.
A Brief Introduction
When I went about water-cooling my first PSU, I was learning as I went along so now I've had the experience, I'm in a better position to do a decent job. In this article I'll go through, step-by-step, showing you how to water-cool your PSU from scratch! I started off with a nice little QTec 550W PSU :
If you've read the first article I wrote on water-cooling your PSU (which was aimed more at inspiring people than being a step-by-step guide), you'll know that my basic plan is quite simple. Basically, it involves replacing the fans / heatsinks with plates of copper. Each plate has a copper pipe soldered to it which is where the water runs to remove the heat. We'll get to that later - for now lets look at taking this thing apart.
Disassembly
If you have any doubts, this is the time to think again. As with just about every mod on this site, the first thing to do is void your warranty
Four tiny screws later and the top should be loose. If you're doing this to a different PSU, you may find there's a fifth screw near the base - there was one on my old AOpen PSU. Here it is, guts exposed :
Now the whole point of water-cooling the thing was to make it quieter so lets go ahead and get rid of those pesky fans :
I found that Q-Tec had been very helpful and given each fan a little connector that can easily be removed. Here's what you should have after removing the noisy beasts :
Noisy though the fans are, your PSU isn't going to work for very long without some kind of cooling. At this point you should be able to see the two heatsinks we're going to replace. Attatched to the sinks, you'll see rows of components - these are the really hot bits in your PSU and it's these that we'll be cooling. Now if we're going to replace the heatsinks with our water-cooled plates we need access to said components. There's two steps to this. First we need to remove the four screws that hold the main board of the PSU :
Next we need to remove the little board that attatches to the connector where you plug your PSU into the wall. If you don't do this, you'll have to bend the back of the PSU to get the board out!
Okay, all being well, you should have a fully disassembled unit :
The next step is a little more tricky. We need to get those heatsinks off those components but unfortunately, you won't be able to get to the screws that hold them on. So what do we do? Un-solder them of course
Right, lets get the first heatsink off :
With a little more de-soldering, here's the second one removed as well :
Removing the components and attatching them to the new water-cooled plates is a doddle. Just remember two points when doing this :
1) Whatever you do, DON'T FORGET what order the components went in - it could be disastrous if you got them mixed up!
2) Be careful when re-attatching, not to leave out the Mica shims (the grey pads). These stop you getting mains voltages going through the heatsink or water-block so they're pretty goddamn important!
Here you can see them attatched to the water-block I made :
If you're wondering how to get the holes on your block in just the right place, do what I did and use the heatsink you took off earlier as a template
Re-assembling the beast
The next step is to re-attatch the components to the board :
Now I run an XP in my machine and I have no intention of moving to Intel so the P4 connector's just taking up space in my machine. The same is true of the old ATX connector so I got rid of 'em :
Next it's time to implement a very handy bit of kit which makes water-cooling a little safer and easier. When you turn on your machine you don't want to have to remember to turn your pump on - if you forget, your liable to burn your chip! So what can you do to get around this? The answers simple - a 12v relay. Basically, when the computer starts, the 12v line coming out of the PC goes from 0 to 12v which closes the relay, starting the pump. I also find it useful to have an overide switch so you can pulse the pump on and off (to get rid of any trapped air in the system). Here's a quick diagram of the way my circuit works :
Apologies for my poor photochop skillz
And finally, here you can see it installed as I wait for the system to bleed :
Time for some tea and biccies! Well, I tentatively flicked the switch and as I cringed, waiting for a loud bang followed by fireworks, my machine quietly booted
Great! (Score:2)
That is one hell of a failure mode.
Re:Great! (Score:2)
Just like the electric water heater in my apartment. Except, that's operating at much higher pressure and double the voltage of this project. Can you imagine the failure mode?
For that matter, my apartment has electronic, pushbutton water at each fixture. It's all operated by a box of valves, solenoids and copper pipes under the kitchen sink, which is - you guessed it - plugged into a 120VAC outlet. Shocking, isn't it?
My fridge, during the defrost cycle, drips water down the inside of the back wall of the fresh food compartment, by design. This water is seeking the lowest point it can find, which is - you guessed it - rather close to the machine's electric motor. Can you imagine what would happen if...
What about the electric fuel pump that's inside my car's gas tank (and quite likely yours, as well)? Can you imagine the failure mode? Nevermind that the fuel lines operate at high pressure, and connect to an engine. From what I understand, such engines operate by exploding a mixture of air and fuel. Oh, and I guess they're stuffed full of electronics these days (some operating at ~100KV), and it's all water-cooled. The horror!
Now then, a few of the catastrophic failure modes of a funky water-cooled PSU for those suffering from severe logical ineptitude (see: "neo-luddite"):
1) Clean water starts spraying everywhere. Something in the PSU gets upset at this. Output voltages get funky. Mainboard shuts itself down. PSU blows fuses, shuts down. Water pump eventually runs dry, and may or may not destroy itself because of this. Root cause: Should've used de-ionized water (read: Does Not Conduct) and learned how to solder. Solution: Remove case, replace anything with convex/exploded capacitors or obvious burns, allow the rest to dry before testing and using. This costs money, as does a failure in a water heater, fridge, or automotive engine. Deal with it.
2) Low water pressure, and/or high water temperature. PSU shuts down. Root cause: Should've used a pump rated for continuous duty, and/or learned how to solder. Solution: Fix your plumbing, and power back up.
3) You didn't insulate things properly, and zot yourself while plugging your sound card into your guitar amp. Root cause: Musicians never mix well with fluids of any sort, especially when electricity is involved. Solution: Replace musician, as needed.
Now, for the fun experiments you kids can try at home: You'll need a heavy-duty extension cord, a clean non-conductive container, and some distilled water. For increased safety, use a cord with a built-in fuse of appropriate rating, and a GFCI-equipped outlet.
Fill the container with distilled water. Dry your hands (they're salty, thus conductive with water), and plug the extension cord into a fused outlet. Drop the other end into the container. Which of the following is most likely to occur:
a) Smoke, fire, lights flashing madly on-and-off, cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria
or...
b) Nothing at all
That's right, kids: Nothing happens. You just dropped an electrical cord into a body of water, and absolutely nothing happened. Zip, zilch, nada, nit.
Learn from this.
Re:Great! (Score:2)
Why? (Score:3, Informative)
People, this is not something to play around with. The disclaimers and warning on the site fall far short. It's one thing to cut yourself while monkeying around with a case mod; it's a whole 'nother country when you get a nasty zap, or worse.
Computer virus zaps oil giant [xnewswire.com]
*ZAP* (Score:5, Funny)
It'll probably end up there somewhere in the coming months, now that this has been on slashdot.
Re:*ZAP* (Score:2)
Re:*ZAP* (Score:2)
This "project" is just plain dangerous.
Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:4, Interesting)
Makes me wonder if desktops still have huge transformers at 50Hz instead of the modern switching type. We do live in the 2000s, the space age once dreamed of, you know. I fancy getting a mini-itx system some day, but only if I could use a laptop style, totally quiet PSU. I mean, PSUs are supposed to convert energy, not dissipate it, or what?
Then again, fans are not that bad compared to the sound from IBM hard drives...
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
They are very cramped, not leaving much room to apply liberal heatsinks to the components that need them (most everything active, like the switching transistors). The quick fix? Blow air through it and use smaller heatsinks.
Yeah, how about the heat generated in the transformers? It must be non-negligible, even though the transformers don't have overt heat sinks.
Seems to me that ferrite cores aren't hugely thermally conductive, so it might be fairly tough to couple the heat away from the transformers.
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
The transformers will produce heat, but not usualy require heatsinking (unless the supply is overloaded to begin with). The active components will dissapate much more energy for their package size and require something to channel the heat from them (heatsink). The key is layout... most monitors are convection cooled, as well as computers like the slot loading iMac. They don't seem to have a problem with transformers getting too hot, and have tackled the no fan problem.
The point is that the power supplies are designed for fan-forced airflow over all components, including the transformers. They're not designed for convection cooling. When you replace the forced airflow with water cooling, the transformers are no longer cooled as the supply's designers had intended. And I think you can basically ignore the effects of convection in such a tight enclosure as a normal computer power supply.
I think I'd start by measuring the temperature of the transformers normally, then with water cooling of the rest of the supply.
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
Oh really [theregister.co.uk]?
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2, Informative)
For fuck's sake, this is a geek's site. Learn your shit properly.
THERE ARE NO SUCH WORDS AS AMPERAGE AND WATTAGE
AMPERAGE is actually CURRENT
WATTAGE is actually POWER
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
Dumbass. ;-)
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
Though thing is, when people say wattage, most of the time they mean power, because people who say it generally don't know the difference between Watts and kVA.
The comment I made earlier has started a right little discussion going. Not bad.
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
Re:Cool & quiet power supplies? (Score:2)
back to the future (Score:3, Insightful)
As I recall, back in the day, the early Cray Super Computers [pipex.com] was water-cooled
Re:back to the future (Score:2)
the coolant used is not water on these though iirc it's some sort of nonconducting liquid.
ps. jeff minter kicks ass. and i run watercooled. pps. guy by the nick 'bladerunner' did this a long time ago(wc'd psu) and a lot of guys has done this since(i'm still not thinking of doing this since i would have to watercool all the passively-aircooled parts inside comp too if i removed the only fan providing airflow through case.).
Re:back to the future (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure that was fluorinert.
Re:back to the future (Score:2)
Mirror (Score:4, Informative)
That site needs a mirror, and I need karma, here is a mirror [moderngeek.com]. Be nice to it
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Dangerous. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Dangerous. (Score:2)
Use distilled water. It's non-conductive.
Re:Dangerous. (Score:2)
Re:Dangerous. (Score:2)
Re:Dangerous. (Score:2)
Use a screwdriver to short the contacts and watch it go flying across the room?
Re:Dangerous. (Score:2)
HowTo: Safely discharge a capacitor
Capacitors can store large amounts of electricity for a long time after the device has been turned off. Depending on the size/rating of the capacitor, this can be enought to injure or kill you.
If you ever plan to work on a device with capacitors, you should properly discharge them first to prevent youself from a potentialy fatal electric shock.
Look for the contacts of the capacitor, then, lick one of your fingers, and gentaly touch the contacts, making sure than your finger touches both of them at the same time.
You have successfully discharged the capacitor, and it is now safe to work on without the risk of an eletrical shock.
Disclaimer: Yes, most of use here know this is a joke. But just incase you might be up for the next Darwin award: Don't use your fingers to discharge a capacitor. Infact, if you didn't know that already, you should never taking apart anything in the first place.
Re:Dangerous. (Score:2)
Re:Dangerous. (Score:2)
Water Cooled Power Supply (Score:2)
It'll be really cool after it shorts.
Re:Water Cooled Power Supply (Score:2)
And after the fire goes out...
Nifty idea (Score:2)
But, I want to see some one come up with a ups enhanced power supply. At least in my experience most power supply problems have to be the little brown outs and black outs during storms. They generally last between momentary to 5 seconds. A PSU with 30 seconds of reserve energy at its rating (example 400W*30sec.) would be something worth having.
Re:Nifty idea (Score:2)
Re:Nifty idea (Score:2)
You'll see these at hamfests and such occasionally, and they're painted black, so are relatively easy to spot.
IIRC, they were good for somewhere between 10 and 20 minutes of runtime.
Re:Nifty idea (Score:2)
The reason that power supplies have fans... (Score:5, Informative)
High Efficiency Power Supplies (Score:2)
Power Output
% Efficiency = ----------------
Power Consumed
I wonder how much power we could save as a nation if we had higher efficiency power supplies in our PC.
Re:High Efficiency Power Supplies (Score:2)
Re:High Efficiency Power Supplies (Score:2)
Thus, if you buy a power supply that is rated much higher that you need for you system (like most case moders) you are wasting power. And, "YES" you are CORRECT that switching power supplies are very efficient realtive to linear power supplies when the are loaded properly.
I invite you to get out your meter and verify the results independently before accusing me of spouting BS!
Re:High Efficiency Power Supplies (Score:2)
It is practically impossible for non-professionals to measure the actual power used by computers these days. The common devices you can buy (or around here, borrow from the electric company) will only measure correctly when the load is purely resistant. Switching power supplies confuse them greatly.
Whether the meter used for billing electricity measures correctly is doubtful too. I would bet against it. However, it is only fair that people pay more, since the electricity company has to compensate. Anyway, legislation is coming into effect in the EU requiring that all new devices have to present a load that is almost purely resistant. This will make power supplies more expensive, but reduce losses.
Incidentally, all this would be a lot easier if we just forgot that old-fashioned AC stuff and switched to proper DC.
Why WATER? (Score:2)
Re:Why WATER? (Score:2)
Full Mirror with Thumbnails (Score:4, Informative)
Or:
Here [nerdfarm.org]
Water is not a conductor! (Score:2)
As I understand it, after installation and patching any initially detected leaks (which you should do a thorough test for immediately after installation), a water cooled system is very unlikely to develop any further leaks anyways unless you did a shoddy assembly/patch job.
Of course, this is jist what I've gleaned from my own experience
When you get a silent PC (Score:2)
My neighbor's pipes are loud. So is my refridgerator. Even my TV and DVD player make more noise than I would've thought.
If you're going to be so fanatical as to water cool a power supply, all I can say is, good luck with all the new stuff you'll eventually find annoying.
here's a thought (Score:2)
I guess you could use it as a coffee warmer to disguise it as well if it was still inside the room. heh.
Power Supply Loading (Score:2)
12 vdc (Score:2)
But ya, in a house, having the option of dc wiring is just another + to go along with running ethernet and coax. For low amperage, you actually could use an ac circuit that exists,pull it and put it in a sub panel, but you'd have to be careful with plugging stuff in (duh), and you'd still have to have dc voltage converters to get the 5 or 3.3 or whatever you need. To run all them you'd need a separate hot for each voltage, but they could share a ground I guess.
Re:here's a thought (Score:2)
Let's say you have your system happily sitting there with all of its stuff humming along. Chances are, it's using about 200W of power. Let's say for sake of argument that it's using an amp at 12V (12W), 5 amps at 5V (25W), and the remaining 162.5W at 3.3V. That 3.3V rail is supplying just shy of 50 amps. 50 amps is a whole hell of a lot to be pushing through a long wire. Even if your wire only had 0.01ohm of resistance, you'd be dropping half a volt and end up with only 2.8V at the computer. You'd also be dissipating 25W of energy in the wire itself as heat.
Here's are some interesting experiments.
Experiment 1: Use a thermocouple to measure the steady-state ambient temperature of the inside of your computer. Then, turn your computer off, let it cool to room temp, and attach a thermocouple to the 3.3V wire coming out of your power supply. Then, turn it on and start up your favorite CPU-pegging application. After a while, note how much hotter than the internal ambient air the 3.3V wire is. It's likely to be at least 5-10C higher.
Experiment 2: Unplug the power supply from everything in the computer. Turn the power on and measure the zero-load (open circuit) voltage of the 3.3V rail (it's probably something more like 3.45V). Then, plug everything back in, start the computer, and start up your second-favorite CPU-pegging application. Then, use your multimeter to measure the 3.3V wire at the motherboard. You should be able to get to it on the connector where the wire is attached. It's probably a lot closer to 3.3V.
Just a couple of things to demonstrate voltage drop and power loss in high current applications...
Why stop there - submerge your whole computer! (Score:2, Funny)
It would look cool in a fish tank with some fake fish and plants. Plus you could use your aquarium thermometer...
Any Material Scientists out there? (Score:2, Interesting)
1) High Thermal Conductivity
2) Very high electrical Resistance (insulators)
3) Fluid at ~0-200 degrees C
If there are no suitable fluids, perhaps merely a powdered solid would be workable
4) Low chemical reactivity - not poisonous or corrosive.
I envision a change in packaging where the
1) silicon wafer is mounted on a stand-off inside a thin composite, mostly electrically insulated 'tube' (see 2), so that a fluid as above could entirely bathe the chip
2) the connections of the chip connect to discrete contact points (possibly in three dimensions) which are conductors through the tube to the outside, which are the 'pins' of the IC.
3) Fluid is constantly pumped through the package, going to a (variously sized) 'vat' of fluid: once the heat is away from the pinpoint source, it is very much easier to cool.
-J
Re:Any Material Scientists out there? (Score:3, Informative)
I'm not a material scientist, though
A little feedback for you all... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:A little feedback for you all... (Score:3, Interesting)
and i'm not insulting him. with a ton of up-and-coming geeks, it's nice to see a modicum of safety exhibited. in this case, he actually used a multimeter (!) to check the capacitors (!) to save himself from being fried while modding his computer (!).
it's the same with cars: ricers deck out their cars with 32987543289 amps of tasty goodness, but fail to demonstrate any level of foundational knowledge. which isn't to say that there are 32987543288 geeks frying themselves out of every 32987543289 geeks.
what i'm saying is that the pinnacle of geekdom lies in the studying everything. not just where you can go, but where you should have been.
and thusly, you can prevent yourself from sizzling the tender slushy organ known as the brain.
i think that this message should be drilled into the heads of all future nerds. i would sincerely hate to see future slashdot stories like:
- GEEK FRIES SELF MODDING POWER SUPPLY or
- DO NOT MOUTH PIPETTE BATTERY FLUID or
- "I TRIED TO OVERCLOCK MY WALL OUTLET WITH MY TONGUE AND _LIVED_!"
safety first. discharge static electricity before doing your work. test your circuits. and always, ALWAYS wear a cup.
G3 iMac, G4 Cube (Score:4, Insightful)
Obviously the iMac only works that way because it's also engineered not to produce very much heat; I wouldn't expect the same to be possible with your standard Athlon system. Even Apple's newer desktop systems don't run cool enough not to need fans. Still, it seems to me that some of the same concepts could be applied.
One of the reasons for having a fan on the power supply is to act as a case fan as well - it draws warm air out of the rest of the system, and cools the power supply on the way out. It seems to me you wouldn't want to just remove the power supply fan, unless you had another way of cooling the rest of the system.
Hmm, I was going somewhere with this. Oh well.
I'll wait for the production model (Score:2)
Even better would be a complete case and power supply, so you could route some water to the drive carriers, so the sound insulation doesn't make them fry. You'd have to do some custom plumbing to hook in the CPU cooler, but the rest of the system could be completely assembled with the case and PS.
Just use really good DI water (Score:2)
Toilet-Water CPU (and PSU) Cooler (Score:5, Interesting)
Here's a thought I had, but probably will never get around to building.
Lots of people go to the expense and effort of building/buying radiators or using large tanks of water as the heatsink for their water-based CPU cooler systems.
Last year, I started measuring the temperature of the water in my toilet tank. After a flush, it drops to 5-6 degrees Celsius. Between flushes, it gradually reaches room temperature, of course, but this is still no worse than a radiator or bucket. In practice, however, it never actually gets above about 10C (while room temperature is about 20C).
In other words, it's a supply of cold water which you were going to simply flush away.
Place a small bucket inside the toilet tank. Put a submersible pump in there, run the water to the CPU coolers, bring the water back and drain it over the bucket in the tank.
Everytime you flush the 6 beers you went through while flaming me for my Linux isn't ready for the desktop article [glowingplate.com], you can rest assured that the water which cools your CPU is being replaced with fresh, cold water. No mold, no mildew.
The purpose of putting the pump in the bucket is so that there's always a supply of water for the pump, even during the flush. And the purpose of draining the return line over the bucket is so that if your toilet tank doesn't refill for some reason, you'll still keep your bucket full of water and buy some time for hardware monitors to shut the system down if it's getting too warm.
I don't know how hot the water in the toilet will get, but think about this:
Of course, the only thing I'd worry about is the quality of the submersible pump. After all, if water leaked into the pump, then the water in the toilet could come into contact with one side of the AC line... the other side of which is grounded to your fusebox. If you happened to touch another grounded object while urinating (concrete floor, sink faucet, etc), then enough current could find that your stream of urine and urethral tissues are a more attractive ground path than the plastic sewer pipe. I think I'd invest in an isolation transformer (search ebay) to reduce the risk of highly ...unpleasant... damage.
I think if one were pumping water through tubes soldered to the heatsinks of their power supply, the risks would be compounded, conceivably by a failure on the primary side of the power supply: I think I'd make a point of running the computer on an isolation transformer as well.
Ahh... the joys of being an eccentric genius.
Re:Toilet-Water CPU (and PSU) Cooler (Score:5, Funny)
OK, this takes care of the terminal in my powder room. How about the rest of the network? Maybe I could have a toilet installed in my office. Come to think of it that's not such a bad idea...
Re:Toilet-Water CPU (and PSU) Cooler (Score:2)
I learned something from a Penn & Teller show a year or so ago. You only need a sink or a urinal in your office -- not both.
Can we say Karma Whore??? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Toilet-Water CPU (and PSU) Cooler (Score:2)
You want the water to never go below room temperature to avoid condensation on the outside of the pipes. I've seen condensation build up on the outside of a water tank.
Re:Toilet-Water CPU (and PSU) Cooler (Score:2)
OR, you can just use a bucket at room temperature.
Re:Toilet-Water CPU (and PSU) Cooler (Score:2)
You want to... cool your computer from your toilet?
Last year, I started measuring the temperature of the water in my toilet tank
And you... spent a *year* measuring the temperature of your toilet water?
You must be the most popular guy in your town! ;-)
Re:Toilet-Water CPU (and PSU) Cooler (Score:2)
Wow - and I thought I was the only one.
WARM TOILET WATER=SMELLY PUUP (Score:2)
but you are true to your word: you are indeed an eccentric genius. for it is an eccentric genius who would rather have a faster/quieter/more kickazz computer than less smelly puup.
as for me, i'd like to keep my bathroom smelling as fresh and clean as the day a cool spring rain. perhaps someone could develop a system to cool toilet water? maybe use fluorinert, as they used in crays, to freeze the puup on contact?
Re:Why not using non conductive fluids instead of (Score:2)
You cannot be a electronic engineer if you don't understand thermal effects with regards to electronics. It's one of the most important performance limitations in a PC. It's important in most electronics, if not all, apart from muppet circuits you build on a 250 in one electronics lab.
Re:Why not using non conductive fluids instead of (Score:2)
Ok, now, at least in countries and universities where a degree counts for something, to do an electronic engineering degree, you need a physics A-level or equivalent. You certainly need a science anyway. So you would know that water has a very high specific heat capacity.
If you know about thermal effects in electronics, it is fairly easy to work out that water is very effective at moving heat. I certainly learnt this in my first year of my degree.
Re:look at those capacitors (Score:2)
Switching power supplies are generally designed with only enough ESR in the output caps to make the thing stable. Depending on the switch frequency, there can be lots of ripple current flowing through them. A general rule is that there will be 0.4 times the output current flowing through the output caps as ripple current. If you have a 10-amp supply, count on 4 amps of ripple current. Now, if you're thinking of your ohms law, you wonder how much power is dissipated because of that. The answer is: none that is due to the capacitance. All the capacitor does is change the phase of the power relative to the voltage (power factor). However, capacitors have an ESR (equivalent series resistance) that will dissipate some real power from the ripple current (and put a ripple voltage on the output). Typical ESR numbers for caps used in switchmode supplies range from 5 to 15 to 50 milliohm. So your 4 amp supply could be dissipating enough power to heat up your caps...
Caps are constantly a problem in switching supplies, because a bad one CAN explode violently, especially if it's Tantalum or Aluminum Electrolytic. There are some new Niobium oxides that have a much lower ignition energy than Tantalum, but their ESR characteristics are somewhat less ideal for switchmode power supply applications.
Another thing to note about switchmode power supplies none of the caps should have a high enough voltage to hurt anybody. Usually, the input transformer steps down the line voltage to a level suitable for input capacitors, generally something at least 20% less than 35V (the popular rating for input caps).