Next Generation Fans 128
Tweaker writes "We just posted the first installment of an ongoing article dedicated to the latest designs and innovations for cooling your PC. The Next Generation Fans roundup starts off with five different models from four different manufacturers." I would have liked to have seen the dB rating for each fan- I've had some fans that really were great, provided I was wearing noise cancelling headphones while sharing a room with them. I have the Antec Tricolor fans they review in my case- they are gorgeous, but audible.
What about the "no motor" fans? (Score:4, Interesting)
Anybody seen any comparative tests of those?
Re:What about the "no motor" fans? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:What about the "no motor" fans? (Score:1)
These "pretty colored" fans are idiotic. Cool the damn computer and spend your money on that technology, not on how pretty the blades are.
Re:What about the "no motor" fans? (Score:2)
Re:What about the "no motor" fans? (Score:1)
Re:What about the "no motor" fans? (Score:1)
Or you could have magnets that are shielded.
Star Trek? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Star Trek? (Score:1)
Re:Star Trek? (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Star Trek? (Score:1)
Big deal.
Next on Slashdot: "Cowboy Neal Discoveres a New Brand of Lay's Potato Chips"
Re:Star Trek? (Score:2)
Careful now, you'll give them poll ideas. :-)
Re:Star Trek? (Score:1, Offtopic)
It's not an unreasonable assumption since Star Trek: Nemesis, the last movie featuring the TNG crew, will be starting in Canada/USA on 2002 Dec 13.
Re:Star Trek? (Score:1)
Re:Star Trek? (Score:1)
Re:Star Trek? (Score:2)
It's true! The editors are playing games with us! Just a few days ago there was an article entitled "Geek chic power housees" and it was about a bunch of rich assholes and thier homes!?!? That made me cry =(.
Now they make an article called "Next Generation Fans", and it's about CPU cooling?!? ARGH!
*rifles through silver-ware drawer for a rusty spoon*
Re:Star Trek? (Score:3, Funny)
DAMMIT!
I though I could karma-whore for sure in this topic.
Oh wait. I just did...
Never mind.
Re:Star Trek? (Score:1)
Re:OT: Metamoderation note (Score:1)
Actually, both the parent post and all replies are offtopic (semi-offtopic, really) and should be modded as such, but NOT below score 1. The reason is that if one of the replies to the offtopic discussion gets better moderation than its parent, only the reply will show up depending on the threshold, and thus become BOTH offtopic and confusing unless the poster used quoting. However, if all offtopic threads stay at score 1 they're invisible for most user and doesn't disturb the normal topic of conversation.
Re:OT: Metamoderation note (Score:1)
All moderation is based upon a subjective reasoning by a small sampling of the majority of the
It's all subjective as to the merits of a post. Wheter it be off-topic or not. There is no difinitive way people *should* vote, because any such suggestion is in itself a subjective view. (The possible exeception to this is if those who set up the system in the first place weren't looking for the multitude of personal views of the masses, but rather a specific kind of subjectivity. If that's the case, then it's still not the burdern of the moderators to change their view, it's the fault of the moderation system for allowing them to have a vote in the first place.)
Next Generation Fans (Score:4, Funny)
Where no fans have gone before.
Re:Next Generation Fans (Score:1)
To the showers...
-1 Flamebait
Lookee the pretty colors (Score:5, Insightful)
The fact that the first comment the authors make in their summary regarding the various merits of the fans deals not with performance or cost, but rather completely superfluous colored lights says something about this review in general.
Re:Lookee the pretty colors (Score:1)
Re:Lookee the pretty colors (Score:1)
Re:Lookee the pretty colors (Score:1)
I agree (Score:2)
Re:Lookee the pretty colors (Score:2, Funny)
Pretty lights. Useless! I bet he has a 3-foot spoilier on the back of his Honda too.
Re:Lookee the pretty colors (Score:1)
Re:Lookee the pretty colors (Score:1)
Only 12dB!!
Overclockers won't appreciate it though, as it's a mere 19.4CFM. But if you're an underclocker like me (I'll trade a few clock cycles for some peace and quiet any day) they're great!
Re:Lookee the pretty colors (Score:3, Insightful)
How about actual meansurements, not just what it says on the box? Isn't that the whole point of reviews?
Also, in my experience, a lot of the heat sensing fans have completely unrealistic heat sensors. I had one brand of heat sensing fan that would always run at full speed, unless I shot the heat sensor with canned air upside down and froze it (so cold it iced up). In other words the heat sensor is often just a gimmick.
People have also complained that antec power supplies with heat sensing fans almost never run the fans at full speed, even when the PS is putting out air hotter than they would care for it to put out. So there is the other extreme too, heat sensors that run the fan slower than you would want.
Well, hopefully the author will read this thread and get some ideas on how he can improve his reviewer skills, because this article as it is, is pretty useless.
Re:Lookee the pretty colors (Score:2)
Slashdot-lite (er.. light) (Score:1)
True enough, hence the subject line here. I placed an order for 4 Coolermaster TLF-R82 [coolermaster.com.hk] fans yesterday. They're rated ~25db, according to Coolermaster. I read more comprehensive review of this fan elsewhere, and hope they offer a low noise as well as colorful alternative. Otherwise they'll be on eBay or in a junk box, or maybe I'll submit an article here reviewing them and offering to part with them cheep. :-)
I just want..... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:I just want..... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I just want..... (Score:2)
The Avocent [avocent.com] (formerly Cybex) "LongView" will give you remote keyboard/video/mouse/audio/RS-232 over a single CAT5 cable. I've only used them with NT servers, so I'm not sure how the video quality would be for gaming (although the "3D Pipes" screensavers always looked fine).
The Icron USB Ranger [icron.com] claims to be a 4-port 100-metre USB (1.1) extender, also over a CAT5. You could use this for your floppy and CD burner.
Re:I just want..... (Score:1)
wow (Score:5, Funny)
Other than that, kinda nifty.
Alternate coolers (Score:2, Informative)
I've also been looking for a good liquid-cooling system, but has anyone solved the problem of getting rid of condensation yet? I don't want to have to mae a runoff tube leading out of my case to a bucket. *g*
Re:Alternate coolers (Score:2)
Re:Alternate coolers (Score:2)
Radial Coolers (Score:1)
I have a couple of "hot water" based radial coolers from the 1930's made from cast, really huge things to tell you the truth and must weigh 300 pounds but I'll tell you something boy that that sucker heat up a house.
Took me along time to find some and no one wanted to manufacture it, but I do have a boiler(oil) in my house and that thing heats 2 large rooms very nicely.
Umm... (Score:5, Insightful)
I rate this article (-1, Worthless).
Re:Umm... (Score:1)
Zero-noise fans (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Zero-noise fans (Score:5, Funny)
Hang on, where's all that smoke coming f
Zero-noise fans (Score:1)
No, because sound shielding isn't going to account for the noise coming from the case fans, which are exposed to the exterior. Some exterior baffles, maybe.
I just bought an Antec power supply with a temperature-regulated fan. It's quiet. Only problem is, if you let the Antec also control the case fans, the PSU ends up doing all the work dissipating heat. It ends up funneling all the heat through the PSU (which has a big intake fan on the bottom in addition to its exhaust fan). Like I said, it's quiet but I can't imagine the PSU lasting very long this way.
Re:Zero-noise fans (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Zero-noise fans (Score:1)
what happened to vapochill...? (Score:1)
Fans? What's the point? I thought we were on to vapochill now...
Advice : Don't read the article (Score:5, Insightful)
My conclusion : this article is an embarassment to online journalism (and that's rather difficult to accomplish), don't read it.
What about zalman? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What about zalman? (Score:2)
Re:What about zalman? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What about zalman? (Score:1)
From what I've heard the performance of the Zalman flowers isn't great. To be fair the Swifty and the Papst are fairly expensive, but well worth the cost.
Goblin
care about noise? (Score:1)
Well, they will run a P4 up to 2.8Ghz, and they are completely silent. So if you care about noise, then yes.
See here [hardcoreware.net], how to build a silent pc.
I own one (Score:1)
Missed most important one (Score:5, Interesting)
They removed the rotor from the center and put the magnets on the outside so more air blows where the CPU die is and it also is quieter.
Re:Missed most important one (Score:2)
Re:Missed most important one (Score:1)
Fan speed control (Score:4, Informative)
Having just fitted the noise reduction kit to my Ultra 30, I can confirm it makes a hell of a difference to noise levels. The total of the kit is:
Isn't it a little late? (Score:1)
Re:Isn't it a little late? (Score:2)
I've no idea what happens with the fans if a processor dies.
Re:Fan speed control (Score:4, Insightful)
How many software engineers does it take to screw in a thermistor? ...
Why should the CPU or any other computing circuitry even be bothered with monitoring the fan? You don't need a software solution to this. Fan, thermistor, power. As the thermistor reacts to higher temperatures, it allows more power to drive the fan. No muss, no fuss, no "if the fanstepping process dies, run fans at highest speed" bullshit software.
circuitry: why bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
Cat hair... Really!
My brother brought his PC over because it would shut down shortly after posting. I powered it up - did not hear a fan, and realized the motherboard's BIOS was shutting down the machine because the fan was not spinning. Saved the duron's life! I poked around a bit and found the CPU fan was wound up with cat hair. Power supply was in pretty tough shape too.
I cleaned stuff off, put on a better heat sink and fan, and sent him back to feed his counter strike addition.
Re:circuitry: why bother? (Score:2)
And how does this "cat hair entanglement" have anything to do with the difference between a software fan-nursing process and a hardware thermistor to vary fan speed according to heat? Hair would seize both, and the total absence of fan activity would have been your best diagnostic in either case.
Re:circuitry: why bother? (Score:2)
Some stuff might be able to survive passive cooling by throttling back (ala Intel's P4) - but the $38 duron might cook itself if the software was not watching to see there was active cooling as well as a comfortable operating temperatures. The temp can really jumps up fast, so the check for active cooling is just another safety net.. I concur that the fan should be able to take a stab at how fast it should run - crank up to 11 if its toasty, throttle back if it is idle. I mentioned I swapped out his heatsink and fan... did that with a Thermaltake Volcano 7 [svcompucycle.com] for $13.50. From the add...
Since you already have the fan RPM and the CPU temp (from the mainboard or CPU itself) already, it lets you try to do a bit more optimization than guessing based on a sensor stuck to the side of the CPU. (Not that the mainboard sensor is anywhere even close to accurate). Anyhow -- original poster's solution.... If I was using a software solution to control fan RPM's - and I don't - I would want them to go full blast if something hork the programs.
Re:circuitry: why bother? (Score:2)
Uhh, no, apparently in this case, the total absence of fan activity was completely overlooked, and the best diagnostic was the machine turning off. Varying the fan speed would not have helped in this case.
Such a novel idea... (Score:2)
Personally, I like my CPUs to be as quiet and unontrusive as possible. I think I'll pass...
Why I like noise (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Why I like noise (Score:2)
perception (Score:2, Interesting)
The thing is, for some people, the pitches are very "close together" - pitches very distant in frequency are perceived as the same pitch. These people don't mind noise because it is not so distracting... it sounds as noise.
For other people, even pitches that are relatively close in frequency sound "far apart" - they're easily distinguished from each other. These are the type of people that have perfect pitch, or perfect relative pitch. These people tend to be musicians. What others would perceive as noise, these people perceive as a complicated chord, which grabs their attention. Also, musicians train themselves to be sensitive to timbre, volume, all sorts of things. Thus, that simple computer "sound" in the background is a strange and distracting symphony, constantly playing.
Re:perception (Score:1)
I have to agree with other posters.... (Score:2)
Use larger slower fans... (Score:1)
Re:Use larger slower fans... (Score:1)
Uh... I don't think that is my goal
Noise cancellation eh? (Score:2, Interesting)
Anyone ever tried this?
Fans - I was thinking of music supporters! (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, never mind. I guess it was just me.
Why was this article posted? (Score:5, Insightful)
First of all, he expends about two paragraphs in description of each fan. That's it. No benchmarks. No measurements. Not even, as CmdrTaco pointed out, noise measurements. That's pretty damn sorry.
Furthermore, the token effort that he expended on each fan is comical. Part of his review includes such irrelevant gems as this:
I guess when you're not even presented with the most basic characteristics of a fan, you'd buy it based on the box color too!Finally, I'm appalled by both Slashdot's and Tweakers Australia's misleading and dishonest title. Next generation fans? They're fans with goddamn LEDs on them! Who cares? There is absolutely nothing new, interesting or innovative on display here. Next generation might be those "fans" that wave and are nearly silent, or one of those new fans (researched by Sunon, maybe?) that has the motor run around the outside instead of blocking airflow by driving the blades from the center. But this? This is just flashy crap that is not "next generation" and shouldn't be advertised as such.
Speaking of advertising, how much is this guy making from banner views for taking advantage of Slashdot editors who refuse to read articles before they're posted?
Re:Why was this article posted? (Score:1)
Re:Why was this article posted? (Score:2)
Lame Review (Score:2)
Next Generation? (Score:5, Informative)
Wtf, putting blinking LEDs in fans makes them "next-generation"?
The CPU fan I'm using right now is what I'd call next-generation. Why? Because it's actually quite silent. Go ahead and check out Verax [verax.de] (German only unfortunately). There's information on their fan design [verax.de], including more detailed pics of different models. Verax uses a special fan shape to reduce noise, and, most importantly, ties the fan to the heatsink with a rubber connection, reducing vibration.
Replacing my old fan with one of those babies has greatly reduced the noise level of my box.
Verax - Google Translation (Score:2, Informative)
Check it out it's an interesting read.
So not next generation (Score:5, Funny)
Intel just came out with its next generation CPU! At approximately 100% the performance of current models, it sports a BLUE color! The industry has been revolutionized!
I gotta say it. (Score:1, Insightful)
Girls are gorgeous (the good looking ones), some cars are gorgeous (the good looking ones), but cooling fans in a case you only see for the few minutes they are put on a processor are not gorgeous. They are pieces of metal and plastic! What, are you going to try and convince me aluminum cans are gorgeous? Please, spend some time tonight with a girl (or guys, if that's your thing), not fantasizing over cooling fans.
A real next-generation fan (Score:3, Informative)
Anyway, the next-generation fans I'm truly drooling over are the ultra-quiet fans from Verax [verax.de]. A power supply with a Verax fan was a part of the Tom's Hardware Power Supply Roundup [tomshardware.com] and they liked it a lot.
However, at $48.00 [siliconacoustics.com] in the US for one of these babies, I don't think I'll be splurging yet. I thought I was nuts for buying 5 Papst 8412NGLs at $20.00 [siliconacoustics.com] each.
Ian
I dunno... (Score:4, Insightful)
I'd like to have a silent PC. If I buy a new cpu, the retail version should include a heatsink - NO fan. If someone wants to overclock, great - get a fan.
When I got my Athlon around the time of the tom's hardware thermal scare, I bought the fastest fan I could - it drove me batty! Sounded like a DataCenter. I had to do the 7V trick just to be in the same room.
I don't understand why AMD and Intel take a breather on the speed race and work on a decent CPU package that can dissapate heat without any active cooler. That would sell. That's TNG... oh wait... Macs have been that way forever... maybe it's patented... :/
Not a fan (Score:1)
Re:Not a fan (Score:1)
-Una
I want a reliable fan.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Fans (Score:1)
Hot damn, you must have been *popular* !!!
next generation fans? (Score:2)
Light pollution vs noise pollution (Score:2)
"Sorry sir, Bob went home because he got shined in the eye by a laser from his cpu fan."
Centrifugal Blowers (Score:4, Interesting)
Fans (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi ?category=220&item=CF-109&type=store [allelectronics.com]
Panaflo fans are great quality and super quiet (at the expense of some airflow, but most likely you won't need it). I can't tell you about the bearing life of this fan, but I trust the Japanese built "Hydro-wave" bearing fan much more than a cheap chinese "ball bearing" fan.
http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi ?category=220&item=CF-106&type=store [allelectronics.com] is a similarily nice 60mm fan.
American nextgen fan vs. german nextgen Fan (Score:2)
America:
Guy 1: "There's no biz like showbiz, let's make a next gen fan."
Guy 2: "How that?"
Guy 1: "Oh, we just mold them in see-through plastic and put some cool 'Blinklichter' on. They'll think it german tech and pay a tripple price with no sweat."
Guy2: "Cool."
Germany:
Guy1: "There's nothing like engineering, let's make a next gen fan."
Guy2: "How that?"
Guy1: "We get us five engineers, design, engineer and patent a 'Koaxialfliehkraftluftbeschleunigungstechnologie' and there you go."
Guy2: "No one's gonna buy it. The name's to long and german."
Guy1: Ok, let's just call it 'Verax' then. They'll probably think it's international and pay the quadrippled price with no sweat."
Guy2: "Ok."
Putting the jokes aside I might add:
Verax 'Lüfter' rule! They cost a little fourtune (the equivalent of 50$ a piece), but they *do* rule. Toss your flimsy see-through Blinklicht-airpusher in the bin. Really.
ok, i watch too much star trek (Score:2)
Units goddammit! (Score:2)
<rant>
They measure the fan performance in cubic-fucking-FEET-per-minute
How about measuring in square-acres-per-yard-second?
</rant>
One cubic feet is 28.317 litres. So, one cubic-(fucking)-feet-per-minute translates to 0.472 litres per second.
Now before anyone whines "oh but then litres per second is soooo inferior because something as simple as 1 cfm translates to some 0.472 litres persecond which is just soo much more difficult to remember", let's see what the *actual* airflows of the fans was. Oh, and one litre per second is 2.119 cf/m by the way.
Antec Blue LED Fan:
34.0 cf/m => 16.0 litres/second
Antec TriLight LED Fan:
34.0 cf/m => 16.0 litres/second
Cooler Master Neon LED Fan:
32.0 cf/m => 15.1 litres/second
Enermax Adjustable fan:
94.92 cf/m => 44.80 litres/second
Last Post! (Score:1)
It takes several _hours_ to do `make' a second time on my
machine with the latest glibc sources (and no files are recompiled a
second time). I think I'll remove `build' after changing one file if
I want to recompile it.
-- Juan Cespedes
- this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...
Power scaling (Score:2, Insightful)