Cassette-Shell Sized MP3 Player/Recorder 214
octa-g writes: "USA Today tech reviews is featuring a nifty little cassette sized MP3 player that records analog audio. 'The Digisette Duo-DX can copy cassette tapes in a dual-well tape deck or boombox. Or you can make recordings by connecting an output cable from a stereo source to the Duo's earphone port and holding down the Duo's play and fast-forward buttons.' The ability to record audio straight to the player, or to record some of my old tapes/LPs to MP3 without a computer or other recording equipment intrigues me." This sounds like a good way to add fast-forward to the old car radio.
Only terrorists... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Only terrorists... (Score:1)
Re:Only terrorists... (Score:2)
Re:Only terrorists... (Score:1)
Will it get EATEN??? (Score:2, Insightful)
The question now is whether the RIAA will lobby for the right to remotely cause your tapedeck to eat your mp3s....
Only for national security, of course!
This has been out for how long?! (Score:2, Informative)
How is this "News for Nerds?!"
Re:This has been out for how long?! (Score:1)
Re:This has been out for how long?! (Score:1)
I remember looking at one and saying wow.. this would be cool if it held more than 32mb of mp3's
this just adds a few more 'features' such as analog audio and more memory.. still a neat product tho.
Re:This has been out for how long?! (Score:5, Interesting)
This particular device allows you to control playback with your tape deck audio controls, and if placed in a tape recorder, actually allows you to record directly to MP3. This could be a very nice function for college students recording lectures as they can transfer the lectures back to PC for archival purposes.
This is actually a NEW (as in news) way to present the whole cassette-shaped MP3 player metaphor.
Revenue? (Score:1)
Re:Revenue? (Score:1)
At first glance, definitly a homeless shelter. However, upon second (and oh so sad) glance, I noticed the beer bottles on the table which are decidedly not allowed in most homeless shelters. With great shame I choose : Unix Developers Conference.
Re:Revenue? (Score:1)
Conspiracy? lets go on, are you paid to post this comment on slashdot? or I am paid to post this reply to your comment? and if someone replies, is he/she paid to post reply? and so on
Its a nerd device, slashdot is news for nerds and they make it story.
Nope because (Score:1)
Re:Nope because (Score:3, Informative)
digisette [digisette.com]
Not unique, but still cool... (Score:2, Informative)
Still, the interface is a new thing, particularly being able to control it through standard FF/RW/Play controls on the tape deck.
-T
Re:Not unique, but still cool... (Score:2)
ONly thing missing (Score:3, Insightful)
The only thing missing from the Rome offering is the abillity to record which will be important to some and not to others.
Re:Not unique, but still cool... (Score:2)
And there is another one on the market (perhaps only in Asia?) the MP WOW [mpwow.com] Both the RomeMP3 and the MP WOW are aparently originally from Korea.
being able to control it through standard FF/RW/Play controls on the tape deck.
Don't forget (as the clueless article of author noted) "Even the tone controls work" too. (How did this make it past the editor? Obviously the tone controls work since they are manipulating the analog audio stream that has already left the player)
Re:Not unique, but still cool... (Score:2)
From the RomeMP3 Home Page [romemp3.com]:
Here is the product website (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Here is the product website (Score:1)
analog audio? (Score:1)
Re:analog audio? (Score:1)
Re:analog audio? (Score:1)
now people will stop buying cd's and just buy tapes and copy them with this thing... kinda hard to copy protect tapes. I guess if the idea cauht on well enough we will see no more tapes for sale and cd's will then cost about $28 a piece.
Re:analog audio? (Score:1)
Re:analog audio? (Score:1)
Er, CD sends digital data (raw,optical s/pdif) to digital equlizer, equlizer sends s/pdif to speakers via digital (laser) cable and those amps in those speakers perform the amp job and send analogue signal via 1cm pure gold cable.
Well, for digital lovers, not me.
Re:analog audio? (Score:2)
The RIAA is secret planning a new music delivery system which is implanted directly into your skull! With wires connecting directly to your brain, they will use a digital representation of sound waves to trigger nerve cells to fire and thus reproduce the sound with crystal clarity.
Satellite delivery of digital music data will beam directly into the small dish-shaped implant in your forehead (the dish may be spray-painted flesh-tone to account for ethnic asthetics).
Incorperated into this system is a sophisticated digital rights management system "BrainSTRAIN" (Brain Secure Transmission And Integrated Metering). Should you fail to pay your BrainSTRAIN bill, the system, will beam country music to your, gradually increasing the volume until a payment is made.
FORTUNATELY there IS a solution developed by Canadian hackers who have not yet come under the loathsome grip of the U.S. DMCA legislation.
Using sophisticated Canadian engineering technology, an advanced signal-blocking device utilizing common, off-the-shelf hardware has been fabricated for cranial signal blocking.
Referred to by experts as a "TinFoil Hat", this technology may be all that can save us from corporate broadcast tyranny.
Re:analog audio? (Score:2)
Re:analog audio? (Score:3, Insightful)
*boggle* (Score:5, Funny)
"Honey, can you fast-forward NPR to 7:00 am? I want to see what my commute is going to be like tomorrow..."
Re:*boggle* (Score:2)
Never did think those kay-sets had much of a future. Down here in the Bayou, we're wait'n on the 8-track version, so all us good ole boys can transfer our Roy Orbison collections. Ain' tha' right, Billy Bob?
Re:*boggle* (Score:4, Funny)
Sounded about as you would expect.
Forget fast forward for the tape deck (Score:2)
Interesting... (Score:3, Funny)
The products exist (Score:1)
(You can always plug an ipod or a competing device using a casette adapter)
Re:The products exist (Score:1)
the ScreenSavers Digisette review (Score:2, Interesting)
Their full review [techtv.com]
Real time enc? (Score:2)
Anyone have any idea how this little bitty (and pretty cheap) thing does real time MP3 encoding? From the article:
I'm I just out of it, or is that pretty impressive?
-Peter
Re:Real time enc? (Score:3, Informative)
So to answer your question, no, I wouldn't say it's all THAT impressive.
MP3 Player related question (Score:2)
I jog a few miles a day, and I'm thinking about getting an MP3 player because the radio reception where I'm at stinks (and having nothing to concentrate on but actually running makes a mile seem like an eternity). The iPod seems like a good solution, but I'm hesitant to get one because it uses a hard drive and I'm worried that the jostling will damage it in short order.
The guy at the Mac store in my local mall said that it's not a problem and that people use the iPod for workout tunes all the time, but I'm not sure I believe him.
Experience, anyone?
Re:MP3 Player related question (Score:1)
Those mac users lie.
Re:MP3 Player related question (Score:1)
I've worked out (running and rowing on an ergometer) with a Sony Walkman for five or six years, and this past April I got tired of buying AA's and making new tapes all the time, and switched to a 10 gig iPod.
The iPod is light enough that I just carry it in my left hand while running, though I have a high tolerance for lugging around a five ounce object for an eight or ten mile run, due to years of doing the same with a heavier, larger Walkman.
The only complaint I have is that the iPod crashes if I frequently skip songs while running. So you either have to stop briefly before skipping a track, or ensure there aren't any clunkers in your workout mix you feel you must fast-forward through.
No problems with sweat or rain screwing up the player, despite daily use.
Re:MP3 Player related question (Score:2, Offtopic)
I know it doesn't have HUGE capacity/etc. but you can NOT beat the design of the thing. Plus it's nice that (at least the one I have) it comes with an arm band which for me at least is a much more convenient way of carrying the damn thing.
It's small, fairly water resistant, and so far has done very well accidentally being droppped/kicked/abused in other ways not mentionable around the gym.
That's the big thing for me. I'm a clutz, especially around my 9th set for the day. I like something that's fairly impact resistant.
Re:MP3 Player related question (Score:3, Informative)
I suggest you go to Google Groups [google.com] and search for group:rec.running ipod [google.com]. This question is almost a FAQ there.
As an unscientific recollection of past threads, a minority of people seem to have problems with it, but most don't. Multiple people have recommended slowing to a walk and punching forward and then back a few tracks, forcing the disk to spin up and fill the cache so you can run for another 10 minutes without any disk activity.
Re:MP3 Player related question (Score:2)
Oh, and I use Alkaline rechargeables in mine...they last for a good loooong time even with the shock protection on. Just plan on getting better earphones, the ones that come with philips products suck.
My friend at work who had just got an iPod saw mine, and really wanted it. Especially since it only cost me $130 on sale at Circuit City.
Re:MP3 Player related question (Score:2)
Re:MP3 Player related question (Score:2)
1) Full VBR and all bitrate MP3 support
2) Great command line linux utilities to transfer mp3s
3) upgradable firmware (the latest versions add some great features)
4) SmartMedia support
5) Long battery life
6) it's $50
7) lasts forever
8) never skips or fades
9) fast USB transfer. It only takes 2-3 minutes to change music with the linux utilities.
I put a 64 meg card in mine (giving me 128 megs of space), and with a good encoder (such as LAME ABR) 3 cds worth of music will sound just fine.
Don't bother with the included windows software though. It's really bothersome. There's a project called rio500 remixed that can interface much better.
I run for 24 minutes at a time, so I never even come close to running out of tunes. You don't need a hard drive unless you're running across the country.
Cassette tapes! (Score:1)
Who wants to listen to those? Who wants to re-record that quality?
Who even HAS those? Mine or melted or were sold at the garage sales.
Re:Cassette tapes! (Score:1)
Dare?
I know CD's taken over but err, be careful while bitching about cassettes.
Re:Cassette tapes! (Score:2, Offtopic)
Recordings you have made do not count.
I seriously doubt they can really hear the difference.
I'm not talking about heavily compressed 96bit mp3's. I'm talking about CD, or DVD audio quality.
So, what you're saying is:
Ah! So you're one of those kids who grew up the the CD-era. Fine. I suppose you think VHS is better than Betamax too. Or are you too busy thinking that DVD is the dog's bollocks without actually noticing all the hideous artifacts everywhere?
</rant>
I'm holding out..... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I'm holding out..... (Score:1)
TechTV? (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/products/sto
Link [techtv.com]
More, more (Score:1)
Yeah, yeah, 96MBs (Score:1)
I disagree (Score:4, Informative)
Power it of the tape cogs (Score:2)
We needed one of the Amulet chips [man.ac.uk] which were silly low power and no power consumpton between playing samples.
But instead I decided to make one powered by a hamster [man.ac.uk].
Nice gadget - but will it sell? (Score:1)
more functionality? (Score:2, Interesting)
What if it could simultaneously record and playback?! How about TiVo for radio?
Why dont they make? (Score:2)
It will play DVDs through your video maachine.
And it would have to be powered using dinamos from the turning of the tape.
Re:Why dont they make? (Score:1)
Would you go mad if you see him being a billionaire that way?
(it can be done if a simple problem could be fixed... the size of VHS tape *g*
Besides jokes, if you can put the DVD to exactly TOP of the cassette, it could be fixed too, just "anti dust" cover of video won't be closed, not a big dealk.
Re:Why dont they make? (Score:2)
However, the size of the electronics isn't an issue, really. There already exist DVD players with very small footprints and integrated LCD screens that could be adapted to this purpose. Then you'd need a VERY thin strip of magnetic tape in the front, and a record head on one end and an erase head on the other to take the decoded video+audio stream and write it where the VCR can read. Obviously this extra equip is needed, because the VCR can't handle an MPEG stream.
At this point, you'd have a DVD player in a box...but the cost of the electronics and licensing for said algorithms would cost easily as much as a set-top DVD player to begin with. It might even cost MORE because of the engineering necessary -- not to mention the fact that it will look like pure crap having been decoded and re-encoded twice, before being put into magtape and decoded a 3rd time. That's about 3 format changes right there -- none of which are perfect.
Re:Why dont they make? (Score:2)
Re:Why dont they make? (Score:2)
Okay, that's still kind of lame... but like George Carlin once said, "if you nail two things together that have never been nailed together before, some schmuck will buy it from you!"
Time shifting for the radio? (Score:2)
Well, given that mp3's are relatively small, and radio broadcast quality is relatively low, then time shifting shouldn't be too difficult to do (especially when you got ram cards that can do 128 megs and be a bit larger than a stamp and much thinner than this cassette). Wow, that would be quite the product. Put it in your car, turn on the radio and the timeshift cassette. Let it go for like 5 min, and just listen without commercials. Or record your daytime radio show. Or record that one song that you just cannot find the name or artist of (since the station i listen to never ever ever announces who sung it or what it was).
Damn, now if you could get a radio that did all this out of the box... that would be worth buying.
Of course, now the RIAA is going to be annoyed by time shifting.
Re:Time shifting for the radio? (Score:2)
It was programmable with timers and such to record specific shows on specific stations, but MD lacks the simutaneous play-and-record TiVo-like functionality.
Too expensive... (Score:1)
OLD NEWS :( (Score:1)
Why is this "news"?
P.S. 8-track fromat is dead - I'll submit the article later OK?
Not that useful, but not old news. (Score:1)
Kind of an expensive solution... (Score:2)
Re:Kind of an expensive solution... (Score:1)
#1, it takes AGES to copy all the songs you want to your cassette, and god forbid you left IM noises or something on and someone bloops you an IM.
#2, you can fit more than one cassette's worth of songs on something the same size.
#3, i'm sure this thing has better quality (mainly because it doesn't rely on a thin film coated with magnetic particles to store data....
Re:Kind of an expensive solution... (Score:2)
The problem with tape is that it degrades with use. New tapes with good decks? No problem at all. DATs are nicer in terms of this in that the quality remains much longer, but then when they do begin to degrade, you're going to notice it (old analog tapes just start sounding progressively worse, they don't drop out).
What a 2.2 maintainer would say... (Score:1)
What the heck?... (Score:2, Insightful)
ok i'm done ranting..
Re:What the heck?... (Score:2)
Re:What the heck?... (Score:2)
Re:What the heck?... (Score:2)
It's even fast enough to play mpeg video at full screen with the new XVideo stuff in the neomagic driver.
I wouldn't try to run with it, but it fits perfectly in the area just above my gearshift in the mazda protege. Couple that with an 'aux' adapter for the car stereo and I'm good to go (has anybody reverse-engineereed and created schematics for the hardware used to control/send messages from a kenwood head unit to cd-changer? being able to control the libretto from the head unit would be GREAT!)
In addition, I can have maps/etc on other screens while driving to a destination. Very nice little setup without a lot of custom hardware/software (I just use xmms with my full collection queued at all times, and if there is a song I want to hear, just 'j' 'typetty typetty type' and I get the desired song)
Old news (Score:1)
Cassette adaptors suck (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Cassette adaptors suck (Score:3, Informative)
Wow and flutter are expressed as percentages of variance from the ideally constant speed of the moving tape. Wow are the low-frequency variations and flutter are the high frequency ones (sort of a quivering). There are no moving tapes in the device(s) you're describing, so it seems to me that wow & flutter are not possible. Poor alignment and cheap components could certainly degrade the sound, but I don't think it's wow or flutter you're hearing.
backwards compatibility ok, but innovation better (Score:1)
i think what is really needed is some interface innovation to help people manage thousands of hours of music available from their car stereo in a random access fashion. that's what's holding back car mp3 imho. maybe voice control is the best way, given the attentional demands and safety concerns inherent in driving.
-- p
good idea for car audio (Score:1)
For all those who like to listen to CDs on the road, but haven't found a good, clean solution - this is what you've been waiting for. My car, like many others in its price range, has a cassette deck but no CD player. I don't feel like springing for an in-dash MP3 player yet. The typical solution is to get a CD/mp3/whatever player with a car kit and 12VDC cigarette-lighter adapter. While this works, it leads to the "messy dash" syndrome mentioned in the article, possibility of breakin and theft, and the clincher: it requires user interaction to operate. My current setup requires me to 1) Start the car, 2) Open the glovebox where my mp3 player is, 3) Push "play", and wait a few seconds for it to "boot up", then finally 4) continue driving. If I want to put the player on "shuffle" or something, it takes even longer. It's a small annoyance, but enough of one that I finally decided to rip it all out and listen to the radio instead.
This device might be exactly what I'm looking for. It hold 96M of audio, which is enough for an hour or so of somewhat-good quality music. There is no intervention, because it starts playing music prompted by the servo in your cassette deck. Theft is unlikely, becuase your cassette deck will very likely keep the whole thing concealed by design. Messy dash? A thing of the past.
Frankly, I'm sold on the idea, and as soon as I have a spare ~$200, I will probably go pick this gizmo up.
/. question (Score:2)
Re:/. question (Score:2)
On the main page is a blurb about their 35-Watt model, which would be sufficient for covering a small town.
There is an active community (or there was, on usenet) of people who modify their products for various things... it has all the smells and tastes of OSS.
I picked up their cheapest FM Stereo kit some time ago for less than $50, but never got around to completing it. IIRC, it was advertised to work at a few hundred feet, with several available hacks to double or quadruple that.
overcoming device limitations: (Score:2)
I have one (Score:2)
The minuses are that higher-bitrate recordings limit you to about 80 minutes of music, unless you get the expanded memory (the newer ones might come with more memory). Recharging the battery is a little inconvenient. And I wish it played Oggs.
mac os on intel hardware! (Score:2, Insightful)
Microsoft® Windows® 98SE, ME, 2000, XP Operating System, or Macintosh OS9.X or OS-X and iTunes 1.X or higher
Pentium (or compatible) 166MHz or higher PC
Also, is $200 a bit high for an MP3 player/recorder that only has room for like an album and a half. Afer all, a 5gig ipod is only $299.
Great Idea (Score:2)
This will make it 10 times easier, and for that reason alone it's worth it. Being able to take mp3s in my car is another great feature but with CDRs being so cheap, it's not nearly as important.
--trb
Nifty, Pointless, but nifty. (Score:3, Informative)
Better options for MP3 playing is the MP3 CD-R(W) and a portable player. For around $100-150 plus the cost of the CD you can jam 300-600+ minutes on a blank disk depending on media type and the compression you use.
--OR--
There is the option I went with. I picked up a Nomad 20gb Jukebox for $230. It has 20gb of space on it (I have nearly 500 songs at 256k and I still haven't hit 25% of drive usage). It can record to MP3 on the fly by using the line input on the unit itself. It has front and rear speaker outputs so I can hook it to a set of Harmon Kardons with the sub and front and rear satalites and get really killer sound out of it. The only drawback that I had with the unit was no real way to carry it, but that was solved with my leatherworking skills I picked up in the SCA...made a custom leather belt pouch to hold it, so problem solved.
Now granted there are those out there that prefer the iPod, or other hard drive based systems, but hte theroy is the same between them. HD is cheaper than Flash...hands down. For my $230 I got 20gb storage. Flash memory for that same amount of storage is going to cost you say $300 for a sony mp3 player that comes with 128mb with it PLUS you would need to purchase 159 additional memory sticks at a cost of $17,600 ($110 each). For just what I'm using in storage (5gb) you're still talking about $4400 in memory sticks alone.
I don't know about you but if I had that kinda cash I'd be spending it on a Plasma TV rather than MP3.
The gizmo in the article is nifty and all, but is it going to be worth it or will it fall the way of the MP3 player springboard module in my Visor? IE Sitting in the box that it came in waiting for someone poor fool on E-Bay to take it off my hands?
Need to add a generator (Score:2)
Don't buy if you own a 2001 Accord (Score:4, Informative)
The only other thing I didn't like about it was the flimsy battery door. That would definately be a tape job after a few months of use.
Here is my review of it on Amazon.com
I was excited to see that the Digisette improved from it's orginal design and made a better tape like MP3 player. Unfortunately, on my Honda 2001 Accord, the tape deck won't align properly with the head in my cassette stereo, causing lots of static and distortion. It's not the player itself, because it works fine in my wife's Honda CRV. Actually, it works if I use an old Sony cassette adapter plugged into the mp3 player.
Im not an electronic engineer, but I think if Digisette would make the head on the mp3 unit bigger, it would have worked fine. I compared the head of the mp3 to the Sony cassette apadter I had laying around and the Sony head is much bigger.
Digisette support was very helpful and had me try a few fixed, but none fixed the distortion and static.
As far as the controls and stuff, everything worked fine. Like I said, if you have a 2001 Accord, I wouldn't recommend it.
Interesting but silly (Score:2)
Re:Interesting but silly (Score:2)
Seriously, yes it can slide depending on your vehicle's interior. Fortunately in my beastie, I have a nice little recessed area where it can safely 'slosh' to a minimum.
Only good use is due to inflated CD prices (Score:2)
Too bad CD's are at least 3x more expensive than they should be. If they came down to around $8-$10 a piece, I'd be inclined to actually buy the stuff...mostly to replace what I had as a kid on tapes..also to replace the stuff I had stolen.
Do I own the music or the medium when I buy a CD? Why can't I go to a store with only my receipt and get a new CD when one becomes ruined or stolen, or god-forbid, a new format comes out and I'd like to take advantage of it with the music I have already purchased.
Nifty little device, but it wouldn't have a whole lot of use if the RIAA would get its head out of its ass.
Does it work with Linux? (Score:2)
What about the RomeMP3 and MP Wow players? Do they work with Linux?
Obligatory Why Is This News Post (Score:2)
Why is this news? Using an analog input to circumvent copy protection is hardly ground-breaking technology. Making an MP3 player that emulates an audio cassette isn't at all new [romemp3.com]. Nor is it a particularly good idea. It sounds cool -- an MP3 player that you can operate with the controls of your car cassette player. But it doesn't work all that well in practice. Auto cassette players vary a lot in the way their controls work, and you usually can't use all the features of the MP3 player. Plus you have to do without that handy LCD readout.
All in all, I'd much rather have a conventional MP3 player with a pseudo-cassette adapter. I only bought the Digessette because it had other good features that outweighted the silliness of the basic concept.
Re:multitrack it (Score:2)
please, when you wish for something, go shopping before wishing that it existed, as they usually do already exist and are quite affordable..
the problem is that the roland device records in uncompressed format so you either need lots of cards, or very large cards. (Or if you are going on a 12 hour recording session.... bring a real recorder or a laptop with a 8 channel 24bit pcmcia card.)
Re:Nice packaging but... (Score:1)
bwhaha
Re:Why not go MiniDisc? (Score:2)
You are correct about the limitations of the transfer speeds, but I don't worry about it. Everything I have is on CD and MP3. I only write TO the md player and I can do that at 16x speeds so it's not that much of a bother.
Either one by themself is good, both together rocks.
Re:When ... (Score:2)
The advantages of a solid-state device over a hard-drive jukebox or MP3/CD player are: 1)It's immune to skipping (even with buffering, this happens occasionally with my RioVolt), 2)It uses less power and thus has a longer battery life, and 3)It's smaller.
My ideal would be a combination of a CD reader unit that could transfer files to a portable solid-state unit (so that you could carry lots of material and access it all without a computer, while preserving the solid-state advantages). However, the industry would probably crap it up with Digital Restriction Management.