Motorola's i95cl 229
thefalconer writes "MSNBC has a very detailed article about Motorola's new all-in-wonder phone offered by Nextel. It is a PDA, has a Walkie-Talkie, phone, web browser, instant messaging, addressbook, it has a high resolution Color LCD screen, and it's running on a Java Based OS! It even comes in a variety of styles and colors just to your taste. There is so much to this phone that it makes you ask "how'd they get all that, into this tiny little thing?" Makes me want to ditch my old phone for one of these right now!"
i85s (Score:5, Informative)
Just my $0.02
~Adam
copy&paste time (Score:3, Informative)
General Features
* Color Display
* Voice Recorder
* Speakerphone
* Voice Activation
* Multi-Language Support
* Time & Date Display
* SIM Card Operation
* Custom Styles Settings
* Pre-Installed Software Applications
* JAVA(TM) 2 Micro Edition Capable**
SLIM BATTERY: 19g, up to 2h talk time, up to 45h standby
EXTENDED BATTERY: 33g, up to 3.33h talk time, up to 75 standby.
(hmmm
Digital Cellular Phone Service
* Voice Activated Dialing
* 250 Entry Phonebook
* Quickstore Phone Numbers
* Last 20 Recent Call List*
* Turbo Dial® one-touch dialing
* VibraCall® alert
Digital Two-Way Radio
* One-Touch Private & Group Call
* Quickstore Private IDs
* Built-In Speaker
Message Service
* Consolidated In-Box Storage
* Voice & Message Mail Indicators
* Time & Date Stamp*
Data Capable*
* Software Download Capability
* Internet Access Services
* T9® Text Input for Fast Entry
Performance Specifications
* Dimensions: 90mm X 50mm X 28mm with Slim Battery
* Weight: 154.4g
* Power 600mW typical
* Frequency Range:
Tx 806 - 825 Mhz/Rx 851-870 Mhz
* Channel Spacing: 25 kHz
* Channel Access: TDMA
* Operating Temperature: -10C to + 60C
* Storage Temperature (Radio Only): -40C to + 85C
Specifications are typical and subject to change.
* Network and subscription dependent feature not available in all areas.
** Visit www.motorola.com/idenupdate [motorola.com]for a list of downloadable software applications.
*** I was not paid by LG to type that
Re:copy&paste time (Score:1)
from the it-fluffs-it-folds dept. (Score:3, Funny)
from the it-fluffs-it-folds dept.
Fluffs? I'm getting one right away...
(sorry - I apologize for that.)
Re:i85s (Score:2)
The differences are mostly geometric. I like my i85 but it is not significantly different than the i50, which can be had for 25 dollars with a one-year commitment. The feature set is practically identical to the 85.
Re:i85s (Score:2, Insightful)
I wonder why don't they get rid of keys alltogether and move to using just a touch screen that could display the approriate keys. That way there would be space for a big display without lame sliding or folding lids for the keyboard.
Re:i85s (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
just say no to techno-hype (Score:1)
(Yes, it is not in the story, but my post is thin without it)
denwa (“d˜b) (Score:2)
Of course, there is definitely some "Steve" in that name as well, eh? ;-)
Re:denwa (“d˜b) (Score:2)
Re:just say no to techno-hype (Score:2)
Re:radeon? (Score:1)
Press Release.... (Score:5, Informative)
Motorola's i95cl Press Release [motorola.com]
- HeXa
"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:4, Insightful)
Ever try sending a message on a keypad? MAJOR pain in the ass. You can use chat-shorthand to send message to friends, but replying to business email? Where is the spll chker?
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:5, Funny)
You're obviously doing it wrong -- use your fingers!!
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:2)
You're obviously doing it wrong -- use your fingers!!
Use his fingers? On his phone or his ass?
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:1)
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:1)
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:1)
~q of course
contre.org. fighting crime since 1985. [contre.org]
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:2)
My LG phone has this. (The VX1 aka TM-520) Most of the time it works pretty well but if you are typing someone's name and it is not in the dictionary, you have to turn off the T9 mode, enter the name, then turn T9 back on (causing the name to be added to the dictionary.) It is a great time saver. Aside from proper nouns, it gets the word right almost every time. (For some strange reason, many people claim it never works. Maybe they try to use uncommon words.)
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:3, Interesting)
Also consider that very few people in North America actually use features like text and email messaging.
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:1)
http://www.cellphones-accessories.com/ert2
Only for English... (Score:2)
During my first several months here in Japan, when my phone was my only contact to the outside world (went 8 months w/out internet), I eventually gave up emailing my family and friends in English, but instead would email my Mom in Japanese (one of her co-workers would translate) because it was taking 10-20 minutes to type a message in English that would only take 2-5 minutes in Japanese.
Anyway, compared to the offerings on phones here in Japan, that phone doesn't seem like much...not to mention it is huge. Of course, I don't really have much use for a walkie-talkie so this kind of thing isn't really for me.
Cheers. :)
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:2)
If you can spell at least the first few letters you are all set.
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:2)
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:2)
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:2)
Nextel includes T9 text auto-complete with a dictonary of something like 15,000 words. For example:43556 is hello. If there are more words that match, pressing the zero key scrolls through all current possibilities for the word. There is also the option of entering text the old 'multi-tap' way, where hello would be: 4433555555666. You can teach the T9 software words that it doesn't know. I don't know what the limit on learned words is though.
Yes it would be more convienient to have a full keyboard that plugs in to the expansion port, but That would be something else I'd have to take with me.
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:2)
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:3, Informative)
You're obviously very old (at least 24) and from a country that hasn't had SMS for very long. You've got to check out the teens in Europe who all have cell phones and GSM service with SMS. They use it like crazy because they're all using pre-paid accounts and SMS is cheaper then a call. They can type with both thumbs on a normal telephone keypad faster than I can probably type on a normal keyboard. You've got to see it to believe it.
-Russ
Re:"all-in-wonder phone" (Score:2)
Keyboard (Score:2)
In countries where SMS is popular, many people can type quite fast using a phone keypad. It's just a matter of practice.
Saw this in 'GoldMember' (Score:1)
Video Cellular (Score:1)
Re:Video Cellular (Score:2)
I have read that this is already available in Japan. The 3G phones have 384kbit downstream and (I think) 96kbit upstream.
It makes me cry because the best internet connection I can get where I live is 28.8. Even my Canadian cellphone can do better than that -- 144kbit on 1xRTT in metropolitan areas.
when will someone develop the advanced technology (Score:3, Funny)
Re:when will someone develop the advanced technolo (Score:1)
Re:when will someone develop the advanced technolo (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:when will someone develop the advanced technolo (Score:2)
Re:when will someone develop the advanced technolo (Score:2)
If you could get a sample, you could actually put in a sample of a real Bell telephone ringing, which might be pretty amusing.
Uhh Great But.. (Score:1)
Re:Uhh Great But.. (Score:1)
Re:Uhh Great But.. (Score:1)
Re:Uhh Great But.. (Score:1)
And the reason for that is (Score:1)
TDMA and GSM are incompatable formats. My phone, the Nokia 3360 [nokiausa.com] works just fine with Cingular, which uses TDMA. Sprint dosn't, and so my phone dosn't work with Sprint.
Also, the Cingular sales rep was open about the fact that phones besides the ones in store worked, just to make sure that it supported TDMA.
Re:And the reason for that is (Score:2)
TDMA simply stands for Time Division, Multple Access. This is in contrast to systems that use CDMA, or Channel Division, Multiple Access.
The only real incompatibility between traditional TDMA and GSM is the protocols used. The underlying transport layer is essentially the same.
A phone capable of TDMA should be just as easily capable of GSM (as it's just a protocol change). In fact there are many iDen phones out there that can speak GSM for use in Europe and elsewhere. CDMA is a bit more challenging as it's a patented technology by Qualcomm.
The biggest obstacle is frequencies... traditional TDMA and CDMA use the standard cellular ranges. GSM (in the United States) uses 1.9 GHz. In order to be "universal" you'd need to talk 800MHz, 900MHz, 1.8GHz, and 1.9GHz (have I missed any?).
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Uhh Great But.. (Score:1)
Re:Uhh Great But.. (Score:1)
Pretty cool.. (Score:2, Interesting)
I find text entry isn't that bad when using T9. For quick replies, it is quite nice.
It should also be mentioned some of the features Nextel can give you. If you sign up for the developer plan (http://developer.nextel.com) you get 5 MB worth of data and a ROUTABLE IP for the phone. Neat stuff.
Just a thought...
Re:Pretty cool.. (Score:2)
Almost Useful! (Score:2)
Nice, but still a long way to go (Score:1)
insite... (Score:1)
tell me something (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:tell me something (Score:2, Funny)
Re:tell me something (Score:1)
Re:tell me something (Score:5, Funny)
Also, if we crazy-americans can't get out handgun out qucik enough, we can just beat and GSM totin' weasel-faced euro-toll with out CRAZY -HUGE CELL PHONES.
Note: Non San Francisco Americans will never refer to their cell phone as a 'handy'. God knows how the Europeans picked that habit up...but it must have somthing to do with the water. Or the Gremans. There up to somthing - I just know it.
Re:tell me something (Score:2)
Please don't embarass America any more with your pathetic spelling/grammar. (for the 100th time, you mean "their", not "there" - dumbass. And if you think that these phones use analog, think again.
The real reason America is so F'd up when it comes to cell phones is because we are so damn big. We simply have a lot of surface area in our country, and to produce phones that can work everywhere takes a lot longer. The logistics of it are just more complicated.
And, we have to drive EVERYWHERE. Unless you live in a city, chances are you are going to be in your car every day. If we were able to properly use public transportation, people might be more inclined to use phones. Well, not that they don't while they are driving, but those people aren't the highest memebers on the evolutionary scale.
I guess what I am trying to say is, we have a different kind of country. What we can't do in the way of cellphone technology, we make up for in other areas. (good or bad, take them for what they are)
Re:tell me something (Score:2)
The best thing about the phone, is that the landline originating caller pays for the entire call! I hand out the number with no fear.
Re:tell me something (Score:2)
iDen? (Score:1)
Re:iDen? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
heh heh (Score:5, Funny)
Until then I was using some of the built-in, pre-composed responses. Needless to say one co-worker was confused when I sent him a message saying "I love you"!
But the confusion quickly turned into shared delight as Gary and Tom discovered the vibrating silent-ring feature and sent each other instant messages long into the night.*
Motorola.. bringing people together..
*optional waterproof cover required
Re:heh heh (Score:2)
Uh oh. (Score:4, Funny)
Sorry, but enthusiastic bantor about Operating Systems are reserved for Linux items only.
This story has angered the Open Source Gods. Retract this open enthusiasm at once, or fear their retribution.
Re:Uh oh. (Score:2)
what I want. (Score:1)
My dream phone details would be:
1. About the size of a Nokia 3390. This is big enough to be usuable, but small enough so it doesn't feel like you're carrying a sidearm
2. Waterproof, and capable of withstanding a fall to concrete from atleast 6ft (most people's height) My clumsiness has ruined a few phones.
3. Absolutely secure RF communications. Link from handset to cell site should be encrypted.
4. Extra features would include a simple phone directory and email.
Too me, everything else is just overkill. If you want a toy, buy a wireless PDA.
Re:what I want. (Score:2)
Not a PDA (Score:3, Insightful)
And of course the OS is not written in Java, it is just running J2ME apps (hopefully MIDP ones). For some apps for such Java phones, see www.midlet.org and www.mobiled.net.
What? No GPS ?!? (Score:2, Insightful)
(that's all... simple surprise at the omission)
My problem with Nextel (Score:2)
If you want a full QWERTY keyboard in a cell phone and have a decent GSM service in your area, I highly recommend the Nokia Communicator [nokia.com]. Heck, you can even run Opera on it (see here [my-communicator.com] for details).
-- PhoneBoy
"Forward into the past."
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but... (Score:2)
Already been done (Score:2, Informative)
Oh and don't worry about the typing. Some Japanese people can get up to 100 kanji characters per minute which I would say is equivalent to 70-80 English words per minute. Granted, these are people who win thumb-typing contests, but if one were to have good word recognition software and a little practice, typing on a keypad would become much easier and usable for lengthy messages.
Re: (Score:2)
Not such a great idea... (Score:2)
I know that I use my PDA to remind me when to pay bills and such. I also have a tendency to let my Cell Phone battery get low on power...especially when I'm away from home for along time...imagine if your battery goes dead...now you no longer have a PDA, Walkie-Talkie, phone, or addressbook.
And to be honest, the "Walkie-Talkie feature is a Nextel only feature. It's really just a special channel...the phone has to be changed, but it's still only available with Nextel. The person you are talking to has to be in the Nextel network as well, and you are still charged per minute for using this feature (XXX "free" minutes under your plan). That having been said, it's also a very kewl feature...however, simply calling cell-to-cell would acomplish the same thing with another provider...
I like having my PDA seperate from my cell phone. The other thing is, this thing seems too small to be very useful as a PDA (1.9" x 1.9" screen vs. 4.5" x 3.1"). I like the big screen of my Palm IIIxe...
There's another point, how long must these batteries last? They claim 2 hours of talk time and 45 hours on standby...I have to say that this number is most likely without using the PDA feature...I didn't even buy a color Palm because it eats batteries too much.
Then again, I have had to replace my cell phone twice in the last year, yet I still have a Palm III with no problems. Wonder if this has a Flash ROM that can be switched out when the phone dies...what about syncing with a desktop...if you can't switch the memory I certainly hope you can sync with a PeeCee...otherwise, it's useless as a PDA...
Re:Actually an AWESOME idea! (Score:2)
Yea, but your phone is also 8 ounces which a little bigger than my cell phone (4 ounces...which is rather heavy anyhow). And belive it or not, that's a rather heavy size for a handheld phone that's going to cost $400 [palmblvd.com] to replace!!!
On the other hand, my phone [skynet22.com] is well under $100 and even comes free with some services...
The other advantage of my phone is that the screen is rather tough...versus my Palm's touch screen which is rather "fragile".
For the $400 that you pay for one of those, I can buy my phone, and an new color Palm for the same price. And still have some $$$ left over for a nice case, a li-ion battery, and a few months of service.
if you can't remember to plug in your phone each night you've got problems.
Really? Well, I guess you're right then, because I still forget to take it out of my coat pocket...which brings me to another point...I don't guess it's very easy to fins accessories for this phone (cases, chargers, batteries, etc).
And as far as I can tell, that's still got to be fairly small compared to the screen on my Palm IIIxe.
As well, if I'm not mistaken, there have been complaints about the phone portion of that phone being of poor quality, poor integration with the PDA portion, etc. That's just the point, it's hard to do everything in one device...some thing has to suffer or the thing is going to be too expensive. Which yours is, but it still has problems. I don't doubt that you like your phone, just that alot of us don't see it the same way.
SonyEricsson P800 (Score:5, Informative)
I am suprised no one has mentioned this yet as this appears to be the first truly killer integrated solution to come along. Phone sized, with a decent display, bluetooth, java, gprs, camera, memory expansion and lots more rolled up in a symbian (psion) os.
What I want. (Score:2)
I need a wirelss telephone replacement of my wired one, which is all what MOST of us want. Why are the wireless companies so averse to selling this?
Re:What I want. (Score:2)
how exectly are you going to tell your boss with POTS phone and desktop computer, that you just got jammed in a traffic jam and will be late from work?
mobile phone with camera: just take a pic of the jam and send it to your bosses email.
impliying that mobile phones just replace POTS is like 80's thinking. At least here in Finland. And yes, we have a excellent POTS network, people just find mobile phones more usefull.
Re:What I want. (Score:2)
Yeah. Like anyone's boss reads their e-mail. Right...
Heck. If anyone did that, he'd probably figure they was surfing the web from home and screwing with him. What are the chances of a PHB beliving someone was really in their car taking photos with a phone?
The dilberts of the world never win.
groan.... (Score:4, Insightful)
why do we have to keep coming up with new operating systems for these things? I hate to admit it, but Microsoft is on the right track with these things.
I love my Samsung I-300....phone+color PALM....
Whats the point of being able to store all these wonderfull names and addresses, if you cant transfer them to someone else without a hassle?
Re:groan.... (Score:2)
Re:groan.... (Score:2)
Sounds a bit like the Motorola Accompli (Score:3, Informative)
Nextel Direct Connect (Score:2, Informative)
I am a user and administrator for our company's Nextel account. The biggest selling point for the Nextel/Motorola phones is the direct connect feature. What they don't tell you is that this is that you can only use this "radio feature" in your local calling area. Users do not have the ability to connect across the country (USA). Or even in the next State in some sections of the country. Our office is based in Connecticut, but we cannot communicate via the "radio" to our field personnel miles down the road in Rhode Island or Massachusetts. Users are restricted to using the phone to communicate. However the Internet part will work anywhere that there is service.
I have been told by people working inside Nextel that the Direct Connect radio feature will be available beyond local calling areas next summer. I also read this in one of Nextel's brochures I received the other day. This will be a big plus for their service.
whiny americans (Score:3, Insightful)
for the rest of us who actually embrace new technology, I want a color display, ir for palm pilot syncing, fast sms capability, gprs for data transfer and fast web service.
I don't understand the reluctance for people on slashdot, a site devoted to the latest computer hardware and software, to get into sweet cellphones. It's like everyone's running around with linux laptops looking for free 802.11 nets, enjoying their massive storage mp3 or md player, developing new cool software, and talking on three pound analog cell phones from the late 80s. why is this?
my theory is that people are just jealous of the phones that everyone else in the world can get, and so they get defensive and pretend they don't want any of that. It sucks for america to be behind in some cases, huh?
I considered the i95cl - why not a Ericsson T68i? (Score:3, Informative)
Check this out, a $399 Motorola i95cl gets you:
-Pat
Just another "wannabe" (Score:2)
"Java-based OS" - While it may technically be cool, it's basically useless. An OS is as good as its applications, which means that unless you're using PalmOS or (dare I say it) Windows Crack Enhanced, you're dead in the water compared to the competition. No one is going to want to pay $$$ for a large phone that's NOT compatible with the majority of PDAs out there. (How many people have PDAs that are not PalmOS or WinCE? Not many. Linux PDAs are cool, but PalmOS is still the best in the market for PDAs in my opinion.)
Someone noted that the battery life listed for this is crap compared to most other phones - another reason this is "wannabe" that will never truly succeed. For many people, battery life is EVERYTHING. This is why I will NEVER touch a color-display phone. Motorola tried the integrated StarTac/PDA before, no one I knew bought it.
On the other hand, there's the Kyocera Smartphone 6035, which I have and I LOVE. It has killer battery life, runs all PalmOS apps, etc. It's bigger than a phone, yes. But considering I was carrying around a Palm III and a phone all the time before, it's a big improvement.
Kyocera's next-gen phone (Due out in Sept-Oct) is color (unfortunately), PalmOS based, has a larger screen in a smaller phone. (It's a flip phone and the graffiti area is on the keypad portion while the screen is on the main body. kewl. Something like those nextgen Palm concept designs that looked like the Graffiti area pulled out from inside the unit.)
Samsung's Palm-based phone is also far better than this thing and is Out There already, despite bad things I've heard about its abilities as a phone. (The review of it I saw indicated you have to dial the number on the touchscreen itself - screen fingerprints ahoy!)
I believe there are also some WinCE phones out there too, which will blow away any proprietary OS for phone use - Still not something I'd buy since CE devices are generally not known for good battery life.
Other products using Java-based OS? (Score:1)
Re:Other products using Java-based OS? (Score:2)
Re:Other products using Java-based OS? (Score:1)
Maybee I don't write code that is going to run on an asics chip.
Maybee I know Java (and -gasp- like Java), but still find C more usefull for what I do.
And you know, I think they can implant a sense of humor now. Try it, you'll live longer.
Re:Java-based OS (Score:1)
Re:Java-based OS (Score:2)
I can think of some other replaceables... (Score:2)
Java has all the great things you've mentioned, but it has the draw back of a lot of overhead. It's not a cut and dry decisions - you have to weigh the costs and the benefits in every situation. Java has its place, but give me C or give me death!
Re:I can think of some other replaceables... (Score:1, Informative)
Would unemployment do instead? You fool, the Java programs for EMBEDDED systems are compiled down to machine instructions. It's part of the CLDC (j2me) package. Your comments were about the j2se package (and are incorrect, considering the new jit technologies in Tiger and JDK1.4).
It's like running your mouth off about flaws in Fortran 77 when the conversation is about Fortran 90. Read a little more about j2me before you ask for death, ok pal?
Re:What I want in a cell phone (Score:2)
Being trialed in the UK at the moment, by Virgin I believe.
Cheers,
Ian
Re:v60 (Score:2)