First Wind-up Phone Charger Review 222
Jonathan Bennett writes "Here's the first actual review (as opposed to speculation) of Motorola's FreeCharge hand-operated mobile phone charger. Only works with Motorola phones for now, but other devices on the way.
"
Not too bad... (Score:3, Insightful)
That's actually not bad at all. The only problem is that if you wind it to get standby back, if someone calls you are likely to only have a minute or so of talking. This seems like an excellent idea for emergencies though.
Re:Not too bad... (Score:2)
Simple. Turn off the phone while charging it. Turn it back on when you're done.
Re:Not too bad... (Score:1)
You are waiting for an important call at the beach (don't ask =] ). Your cell phone dies. You wind it up to keep the phone on standby so you can still get the call. Depending on when the call actually occurs, you may only have a couple minutes of talk time. Of course that would be enough to let the caller know the deal, and then call from a pay phone, but hey *shrugs*
Re:Not too bad... (Score:2)
Re:Not too bad... (Score:2)
Re:Not too bad... (Score:3, Insightful)
You've got it all backwards--buy your weed before you go to the beach. It's much more fun that way!
Re:Not too bad... (Score:2)
Who told you to stop winding after 45 seconds? D-oh!
Re:Not too bad... (Score:2)
It is understood the more work you want out of a system, the more work you have to put in. (Energy can't be created etc...)
Re:Not too bad... (Score:3, Funny)
The only problem is that if you wind it to get standby back, if someone calls you are likely to only have a minute or so of talking.
Could be a potential problem when I call up those automated voice mail hell^Hp trees that force me to navigate <wind>through the <wind>duration of every inappropriate <wind>branch and <wind>twig until I get to a nice operator <wind>leaf that puts me into a queue to talk to a real person.
"Thank you for calling $CORP. <wind>Your call is important to us. All of our operators are busy assisting other customers. Please <wind> continue to stay on the line...<music> ... <wind> <product_advertisement> ....<wind> ..."
(I can see carpal tunnel setting in from winding...)
Re:Not too bad... (Score:2)
Big Deal, (Score:1)
I'm not impressed!
AWG
Re:Big Deal, (Score:5, Funny)
What kind of long distance rates are you getting with your dynamo flashlight?
Re:Big Deal, (Score:3, Funny)
Free, if you know Morse Code.
Re:Big Deal, (Score:2)
So?
"...it's merely applying technology in new..."
Yes, that is called an invention.
So
OoooooooKay! Never mind that lotsa people go camping, or break down on the highway, or forget to take their charger when they travel. Heh. It's funny how the less somebody knows, the stronger their opinions are.
All that excercize finally pays off... (Score:5, Funny)
And if I can get one of those phones that can view color photos, I might be able to continue excercizing after I've charged it.
Re:All that excercise finally pays off... (Score:2)
So it's a reciprocal motion dynamo? I swore the article said it was rotary.
You know, you can make both your forearms the same size by winding this phone charger with the hand you don't "exercise" with.
Another box to lug around (Score:3, Insightful)
A "squeeze the handle a few times and you can make a call" unit might be more useful.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Inerita Chargers (Score:3, Insightful)
Also watches require much less power to operate.
Re:Inerita Chargers (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Inerita Chargers (Score:1)
Why bother (Score:1)
Re:Why bother (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't get many calls on my cell phone, so I get lazy about charging it. If I could wind it up a few times and get 10-15 minutes of talk time (which sounds reasonable based on the article), then it saves my booty if I get stranded or something.
You're operating on impractical assumptions there. Heh.
Shamless advertisment plug? (Score:1)
Re:Shamless advertisment plug? (Score:1, Offtopic)
nerds like gadgets.
when a new gadget comes out, it's news.
Re:Shamless advertisment plug? (Score:2)
Is it wrong of me to take pleasure in seeing posts like these? All of these "I dont get it therefore it is stupid" posts make me feel 733t. Heh.
This is just great... (Score:1)
Cool! (Score:1)
As well as the mobile charger modules, you're given a torch module for the FreeCharge. Unfortunately it's a bit disappointing, considering that FreePlay has produced wind-up torches before.
This sounds like some cool James Bond device. Battery charger for emergency phone calls AND bad guy incinerator!
(Yes, it's a joke.)
The product page is moderately more interesting. (Score:2, Informative)
The nerd in me wants to know if you are winding a sping or direct charging....
Re:The product page is moderately more interesting (Score:3, Insightful)
excellent (Score:4, Funny)
We will all be quite muscular!
A possible problem... (Score:5, Funny)
Me: *pant* *pant* *pant*
Her: Ew! Pervert! *click*
Me: *pant* Wait! *pant* Damnit!
Maybe this isn't a good thing...
Re:A possible problem... (Score:2)
And, oh yes, please be so kind as to go fuck yourself. Thank you so much. ^_^
In all seriousness, I can see the argument for it being spelled "Dammit," given that it's only a phonetic representation of a commonly used spoken contraction, and not an "official" combination of the words "damn" and "it." But I'll need to see some pretty convincing arguments before I'll agree it should be "I" and "She" instead of the far more common "Me" and "Her."
There. I've taken the low ground _and_ the high ground in this argument. Yee-hah.
Re:A possible problem... (Score:2)
Miranda: O, woe the day!
Prospero: No harm.
Suppose Her is Miranda and Me am Prospero. One can say "Miranda went to the city" and "Prospero went to the city". These sentences can be substituted by "She went to the city" and "I went to the city", but not by "Her went to the city" or "Me went to the city". Conclusion: if "Me" and "Her" is common in plays, maybe playwrights don't know much about English.
crank'able web server (Score:1)
Telemarketing needs more motivation... (Score:1)
"You made me crank my phone for this crap?! You better tell me something interesting and fast, or I'm going to let you wind down!"
Bye Bye horror movies (Score:2)
Yeah 911? There's an axewielding maniac freak after me, send help. Thanks.
Yeah! (Score:1)
Everyone else: For sixty bucks yeah..
Us: $60?! Are you F*CKING CRAZY?!
not very efficient (Score:3, Interesting)
Human legs are much more powerful than arms. some sort of foot-operated device would be more tolerable in terms of effort, but probably not as portable. Piezoelectrics that sit in the soles of shoes are not very intrusive, and could provide power over a long time. I believe this is what the MIT wearables group is using.
Hand power, foot power, wind power, and water power require different gearing ratios in order to operate efficiently. An impressive design would allow this type of switch through some type of transmission (CVT? Pneumatic?), and have linkage adapters to hands, feet, windmill blades, waterwheels, etc. The problem is accomplishing this while maintaining a light weight.
Re:not very efficient (Score:1)
Re:not very efficient (Score:2)
Given the dirty look (at a minimum) that you get when you ask some jerkoff to quit yakking on his phone so you can watch the movie, how is this any different than the way things are now?
Self winding? (Score:1)
Makes a nice addition to a survival kit (Score:2)
Now if they just would come up with a portable cell tower...
Seriously, on the chance that in an emergency I would be near enough to civiliazation to use a cell phone, I'd put one of these in the survival kit in my plane. I have a long-shelf-life disposable battery for my Nokia in there now.
Re:Makes a nice addition to a survival kit (Score:2, Informative)
They have, it's called a COW (Cell On Wheels). Wireless companies mostly wheel them out for special golf tournaments etc. so that the area has additional coverage.
Please! (Score:4, Funny)
"Son, we need to have a little talk. Has your mother told you anything about the Birds and the Bees?..."
Crank Call (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Crank Call (Score:2)
Why not clockwork? (Score:5, Interesting)
Of course it would be much harder to turn the crank, but you wouldn't have to keep up an exhausting pace of over 100rpm. At least in my mind, I'd rather turn a very hard-to-turn crank 10 times than an easy to turn crank 1000 times.
Does this model work? I've seen it work in some of the various other 'squeeze and go' utilities out there. I had a flashlight/FM radio combo a little while back that used something similar (handle, spring, and flywheel arrangement). It was relatively hard to crank, but one or two cranks got you 30 seconds of flashlight or 5 minutes of radio at top volume.
Re:Why not clockwork? (Score:2)
IANAP and IANAEE! Physics majors or EE's please correct me!
Re:Why not clockwork? (Score:2)
Man trying to control phone while driving: <SMACK> Ow!
Re:Why not clockwork? (Score:2)
the issue is that the flywheel must keep spinning, though it is constantly loosing energy to power the phone -- as soon as you get that wheel spinning at 1000rpm it starts slowing down due to resistance from generating power. IANAP but to keep your phone operating that 1000rpm is going to be 0rpm within a minute. i estimate, by conjecture, that 1000rpm, on a small light disk, would only last about 2 seconds.
as an example, consider an upside-down bicycle with a perfect, frictionless mount. now you add energy by cranking the pedals to get the rear wheel spinning, like a flywheel. next you want to get some energy out of the system. no matter how you do it (heat through friction or electricty through a reversed motor/generator) your wheel will loose energy and momentum.
but if you get that wheel spinning wayyyyyyy fast, as in the-rubber-tire-flew-off-from-centriptal-force and the rim is barely holding on, you'll have more energy to extract which translates to longer 'battery' life.
also, another silentbozo mentioned that the gyroscopic forces which would be too severe to be able to use the device. that's probably true. there are ways to balance the spins by using multiple flywheels at right angles but at that point it looses portability....
Next step (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Next step (Score:1)
Or a hampster and a its wheel.
Re:Next step (Score:1, Offtopic)
Cellphone Hack ver 1.0 (Score:3, Funny)
Repetitive Stress Injuries (Score:1)
Yet another way for us to get RSI. I cant wait.. Think about it. Sitting around the campfire with your friends tipping back some brew.. And then you friend passes you..no not a joint.. but the hand cranker. The hours just fly by.
Great..... Now we have another clue... (Score:2, Funny)
Now we'll all know that the in-duh-vidual having the wild converstaion is on a hands free cell phone call because they are crancking for their life.... and looking like they are having a conversation with their "inner" self.
NOTE: Your not that important, and nobody want to hear it.
Ad free link (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Ad free link (Score:2)
ahh, the wonders of the Proximotron...
Cool! (Score:1)
In case of emergency... (Score:1)
good stuff (Score:1)
Far Side (Score:2)
cant remember exact context though.
Environmental benefits? (Score:1)
I could use an extra hand here... (Score:1)
Doh. (Score:1, Insightful)
hmmm (Score:2)
prolly a long way from that type of service, but I am sure we will have these some day.
Rewind? (Score:1)
Cool Idea (Score:1)
I wouldn't want to use it to reguarily charge my phone, but it could come in handy in an emergency situation.
Oh, no. (Score:2, Insightful)
Picture a crowded intercity train. With an inconsiderate commuter phoning home.
Then:
"HELLO? HELLO? I SAID I'M GOING TO BE LATE! HELLO? @#$% battery!"
Now:
"HELLO? HELLO? I SAID I'M GOING TO BE LATE, DARLING! Damn."
(insert loud cranking sound)
"AAH, THAT'S BETTER! NOW, ANYWAY, I SAID I'M GOING TO BE LATE BACK! HOW LONG? UH, ABOUT HALF AN HOUR TO AN HOUR LATE! YES? CAN YOU PUT MY DINNER IN THE OVEN? WHAT? HANG ON!"
(insert loud cranking sound)
"YES, DINNER! IN OVEN! OH, CAN YOU GET THE WASHING MACHINE READY FOR WHEN I COME IN? OK? WAIT, GOING THROUGH A TUNNEL! HANG ON! PUT THE WASHING MACHINE ON! WHAT DO YOU MEAN? MY SUIT! HELLO? HANG ON!"
(insert loud cranking sound)
To be repeated ad fucking nauseam.
foot pedal (Score:4, Insightful)
I glad.. (Score:1)
How about.... (Score:1)
why wind when you can flash... (Score:2, Interesting)
http://www.teleadaptusa.com/nme/order_solar_pow
google cache on
http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:72Iu9P5i5X
Re:why wind when you can flash... (Score:1)
Well you can always use your wind up torch (yes, one exists) to power the solar powered charger, DUH
Good thing (Score:2)
That's STILL NOT A REVIEW! (Score:2, Troll)
Is this the state of pathetetic journalism?
I wanted to see what someone said after they had one in their hands.
My god! How much time does it really get?
Heck, Sony claimed I could get three hours battery time off my VAIO laptop. Not once did I see it get two hours from regualar use.
Until then (Score:2)
- Locate a quarter
- Purchase scotch tape
- Tape quarter to phone
When you need to make a phone call, but it's dead. Just remove quarter.Re:Until then (Score:3)
You forgot a step...
4. Bum another quarter off somebody because phone calls cost $.50
Re:Until then (Score:2)
Off the Grid Power + Mesh Networks = ... (Score:2)
No, I don't honestly think that the hand crank is good enough. But combine solar, human (on an exercise device, perhaps), and efficiency gains, and something like this might be possible.
Of course, no gain will probably power Central Air Conditioning, which seems an awful lot like an essential of life at the moment.... : |
Like a solar powered flashlight..... (Score:1)
Back to the future (Score:2)
Lassie come home!
Hasn't Motorola BTDT? (Score:2)
And by 'they', I do specifically mean Motorola. Wasn't their start in making walkie-talkie's and other military communications equipment like this wind-up radio?
Where's the news?
Re:Hasn't Motorola BTDT? (Score:2)
That was probably a field phone, not a radio. The crank would've rung the phone at the other end of the line.
http://www.motorola.com/content/1,1037,115-110,00. html [motorola.com]
Their first product was a battery eliminator to enable a radio to run on AC instead of the three batteries (filament, plate, and bias) they previously needed. After that, they got into car radios, which is where they got their name.
Emergency use (Score:2, Interesting)
There's a much better chance of the cell-phone tower working (they have generators) than the 3 miles of cable between you and the CO still being in one piece. You'll still have trouble getting dial-tone, but that's just a matter of retrying until you do.
Chip H.
Third World Use (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Third World Use (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Third World Use (Score:2)
Re:Third World Use (Score:2)
Or Second World (Score:2)
Human energy not free (Score:4, Funny)
Now this hamburger needs to be heated up. In a place where they need to have light. And toilets. And wireless headsets. And lighted billboards that can be electronically updated. But first of all a cow had to be created. And fed. In a place with electric fences. And a sewer system. And grass that had to be mowed by a tractor that had to be created somewhere in Pennsylvania. And then the cow had to be hollered over to the slaughterhouse in a big truck made in Detroit. And the truck would do about a mile to the gallon. And require new tires every 6 months. And the slaughterhouse would have to buy new Magnum 45s every year to shoot the lead bullets in the cow's brain. And all those people that where so busy making your hamburger now also lost energy and could use a hamburger themselves.
And you call THIS good for the environment?!
Re:Human energy not free (Score:2)
Re:Human energy not free (Score:2)
let's say the extra energy lost requires you to eat an extra hamburger.
Macdonalds Quarter Pounder with Cheese - 530 calories
Big Mac - 560 calories
30 minutes of pedalling exercise bike at gym this lunchtime - 250 calories.
I don't know how much effort it would require to use this phone charger, but it's got to be a lot less than 30 minutes on an exercise bike. Most north americans are probably carrying around tens of thousands of calories worth of stored fat. You might as well use it for something.
HH
--
emergency (Score:2, Insightful)
I bought it to be my work radio, just to listen to talk radio while I'm working in my office. But I started using it in the kitchen while I'm cooking because it's small and durable.
Anyway, I figured I'd never have to buy batteries for it. If you crank the thing for one minute, you get about 30 minutes of power. But the thing is, it's a pretty stiff crank (heh), and you have to crank it pretty fast. After about 3 minutes, you're pretty much sick of doing it. But that does give you a good hour or so of listening. It'd be good if you were stranded in the woods and you wanted to hear the ball game, or use the smoke detector noise scare away predators. Otherwise, it's just easier to use batteries, which seem to last forever.
These crank-up electronic devices are really only useful in emergency situations, or by really committed environmentalists.
another review is bizarre (Score:2)
Now, I don't know about you, but when I'm in a car, I have a battery and if the car is running an alternator that can be used to charge the phone just fine.....
Wanted to get onw, but I have a StarTac... (Score:2)
Mine's a StarTAC, which they have lamentably stopped producing, and I wasn't sure if the charger would work with it, given that it wasn't one of the listed supported models... Anyone know if they're compatible?
Who'da thunkit? (Score:2)
Which one is progress? (Score:2)
So are hand-cranks "old-fashioned" or are they "innovative"? Technology is so confusing these days.
Re:Finally humans are really used as batteries. Ya (Score:2)