Cray SX-6 Installed in Alaska 198
Dhrakar writes: "Now, I know that normally press releases are imediately round-filed, however, as this is the first NEC^H^H^HCray SX-6 to be installed in the U.S. it is newsworthy. The 8cpu, 64Gb system has been installed at the Arctic Region Supercomputing Center for benchmarking and other testing. See either ARSC or the NY Times (sub. required. Yada, yada) article."
Choice Of Location? (Score:1)
Re:Choice Of Location? (Score:3)
> metal and overclocking...
For only about 9 months of the year, probably a shift less. Fairbanks is deep in the interior of the state and is known for pushing 100 degrees farenheit in the summer (and then dropping to 30 below in the depths of January).
I think Fairbanks even holds a few records for the biggest seasonal variances in temperature.
Even less extreme parts of the state get to the point where you'd have to install air conditioning to get you through notable chunks of the year.
Perhaps US records (Score:1)
(-84 farenheit to +102 farenheit according to another account)
They were on the news a while ago with kids not having shoes (in winter!) because of the financial situation. When it gets below -60 degrees C, some of the equipment stops working (similar to the situation in the UK when it gets below -1 degrees C).
And they have really nasty floods there too.
Re:Choice Of Location? (Score:3, Informative)
Fairbanks even holds a few records for the biggest seasonal variances in temperature.
I wouldn't doubt it.
I used to live there some time back. The depths of winter would see super lows around -60F sometimes in town where the ice fog [alaska.edu] and carbon monoxide [alaska.edu] from running vehicles would pile up. (You'd be afraid to turn off your car, too, at those temperatures unless you were near an outlet you could plug your engine block heater and battery warmer into.) Fortunately, on the Fbx campus there are lots of parking spaces with such plugs.
Also, up on the hill where the UAF campus is located, the temperatures in the dead of winter are usually warmer than downtown Fbx, or places southeast of the city (Badger Road).
I could tolerate the cold with minor inconvenience. You can even wear tennis shoes outside quite nicely for up to about 15 minutes at at time - about the time to go between buildings in the worse case. The more insidious drawback to Fbx in the winter is the paucity of daylight. [nami.org]
Summertime high temperatures are usually in the 80s in early July; August is the rainy season. I once saw it go into the low 90's, but that's as unusual as going below -60F in the winter.
Oh, and definitely watch out for the mosquitoes. In the height of the season, the arctic is infested with as many of the little bloodsuckers as the everglades.
Not to be all down on Fairbanks - there's a lot of wonderful scenery (Alaska range to the south, including Denali(/McKinley). Great rivers, fishing, hunting, backpacking, etc. Frequently you can see the aurora borealis in the winter.
Re:Choice Of Location? (Score:1)
Re:Choice Of Location? (Score:1)
Re:Choice Of Location? (Score:1)
Ummm, yeah.
Last I heard condensation happens when the surface in question is colder than the air in question. I assume (not that I would so much with a supercomputer) that components still get hotter instead of cooler.
Re:Choice Of Location? (Score:2)
for the record. (Score:3, Informative)
Maskirovka
Is a counter troll still a troll?
Re:for the record. (Score:2)
When will the god damn mods start looking at the stamps? Just because a reply to another thread is higher on the list than a new thread doesn't mean that one was posted before!
Re:for the record. (Score:1)
New Cray Out? (Score:1)
Yeah, it's supported by Veritas NetBackup DC already. That and my TI calculator and GBA.
ping cray (Score:3, Funny)
Re:ping cray (Score:2, Interesting)
a waste (Score:1)
They're looking for a SysAdmin (Score:5, Informative)
Re:They're looking for a SysAdmin (Score:1)
Re:They're looking for a SysAdmin (Score:1)
Registration required. [nytimes.com]
Re:They're looking for a SysAdmin (Score:1)
I'm from Texas, it is as cold as I think. I think 70 F (aka 21 C, to people with sane measurement systems) is cold
Re:They're looking for a SysAdmin (Score:2, Interesting)
before it gets slashdotted.... (Score:4, Funny)
Fairbanks, Alaska - The Arctic Region Supercomputing Center (ARSC) and Cray Inc. (Nasdaq NM: CRAY) announced today an agreement that places a Cray SX-6 at ARSC. ARSC is pleased to be able to offer this leading technology to the wi
Oh wait a minute, it's a f*cking supercomputer! Sorry about that.
Re:before it gets slashdotted.... (Score:1)
Real supercomputer, really from Cray (Score:3, Insightful)
About the Cray SX-6 (Score:3, Informative)
Cray product sheet on the SX-6 [cray.com] (PDF).
Re:About the Cray SX-6 (Score:1)
I would have never imagined, for (my)'s sake!!
I'm so shocked....
500MHz ? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:500MHz ? (Score:2)
Re:500MHz ? (Score:1)
Maybe that's because... (Score:4, Informative)
It's a measure of clock speed.
It's like saying "This engine tops out at 2000rpm, but this engine here can do 4000rpm"
Is the second a more powerful engine? Hardly.. the first is out of a huge diesel caterpillar; the second is out of 20 year old Honda Civic.
Re:Maybe that's because... (Score:2)
Re:Maybe that's because... (Score:2)
Re:Maybe that's because... (Score:1)
Re:Maybe that's because... (Score:1)
and i bet even then they could do more than 4000 rpm
Learn to read (Score:2)
...so thats the equivelent of 0.5Thz =D
or
500-fucking-GIGAHERTZ!!!
We all know what it's really going to do. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:We all know what it's really going to do. (Score:1)
"MMMMM porn 1 million times faster"
pricing (Score:3, Interesting)
This link [neceurope.com] states in it that:
The "SX-6 Series" will be shipped from the end of December 2001 with the monthly rental price starting from 2,800,000 Yen.
By my calculations thats actually only about 22 thousand a month in dollars... not like im gonna be grabbin one, but frankly i would of thought they charge more
does it use Linux? (Score:1, Funny)
Alaska is kinda remote (Score:1)
Re:Alaska is kinda remote (Score:1)
Re:Alaska is kinda remote (Score:1)
Re:Alaska is kinda remote (Score:1)
My team built this machine... (Score:1)
Re:My team built this machine... (Score:1)
Or wait ten years and have the equivalent computing power in your cellphone!
Unimpressive performance (Score:1)
Re:Unimpressive performance??? (Score:2, Insightful)
Beside the fact there is no 2GHz Athlon, you forget one very important thing: memory bandwidth.
A usual Athlon has a theoretical memory performance of 2.1GB/s. Now do 8 gigaops on 32 bit float numbers. That would translate to 32GB/s. So 8 gigaops is not sustainable. Just a short burst.
And don't forget that that SX-6 has 2048 memory banks. Best Athlon chipsets I know have 1 (in words: one). Best Xeon chipsets have 2.
So while the raw power of supercomputers and PCs look similar on a sheet of paper (peak performance, AKA speed you can never exceed) supercomputers are built to get most of that performance not only for a short period of time.
Another topic is price/performance. Here a plain PC cluster might be better. But if you cannot parallelize a problem that much, one fast computer solves a problem faster.
Re:Unimpressive performance??? (Score:1)
In bioinformatics, one of the more power-demanding applications of super computers, there are many problems that can not easily be split up in smaller independent pieces. 32-bit memory addressing is often a problem as well. Of course these problems can be circumvented, but in the end it all comes down to speed and not having to re-engineer complicated scientific code.
Re:Unimpressive performance??? (Score:3, Interesting)
For the coders among you: Suppose you had an algebraic structure datatype that you had test against a set of n! permutations. Standard programming dogma says: Generate the permutations once, store them in memory, and then grab them as needed... right?
At least on my Athlon XP (and, I suspect, any modern processor with a piece of crap bus)... WRONG. It ends up being MUCH faster to regenerate the permutations from scratch every freaking time you need them, rather than risk having a cache miss and grabbing them from RAM.
I know you won't believe me, because I didn't believe me at first either. I couldn't imagine that the memory bandwidth was THAT BAD. I coded it up this way to see how much WORSE it performed... and it ended up performing better. An important lesson about optimizing programs for modern Intel/AMD architectures was learned: often times is faster to recompute on the 2GHz processor, rather than wait for the not_2GHz_bus to fetch information from RAM.
But please, don't take my word for it, go try it for yourself.
bandwidth doesn't help with that (Score:1)
Mainframes often have several hundred MB (or maybe several GB by now) of SRAM (20 ns latency or so) along with many GB of DRAM. If this 64 GB on the Cray is SRAM that's more impressive. But even SRAM (20 ns is 40 cycles access time) is orders of magnitude slower than on-chip cache memory (1-2 cycles). So the Cray has the same locality issues as a PC.
Re:Unimpressive performance (Score:1)
I didn't think this time, it would happen... But you did...
Comparing a supercomputer to your stinky home PC... Bravo! (NOT!)
*shrug*
Re:Unimpressive performance (Score:1)
The Athlon can execute 3 macro-ops per cycle, but the MMX instructions all take at least 2 macro-ops, so you only get 1.5 instructions per cycle, assuming everything about the execution environment is optimal (all code and data are in cache, there are no conflicts between instructions trying to use the same excecution units, all data is properly aligned, etc.)
The main difference between a supercomputer and a PC is that the supercomputer operates close to the theoretical maximum most of the time - you actually get something like 90% or better of theoretical performance unless you use terrible code. On a PC, you get close theoretical performance when running benchmarks, and at no other time
(it's like getting an industrial tool versus a consumer tool - the industrial tool has the same specs, but it's meant to run continuously for years without breaking. The consumer tool will overheat, need replacement parts, etc. etc.)
Re:Unimpressive performance (Score:1)
Re:Unimpressive performance (Score:1)
ARSC has some pretty nice kit (Score:2)
Wish my
I wonder what color they ordered it in? (Score:2)
O! How the Once Mighty Have Been Laid Low (Score:1)
Re:O! How the Once Mighty Have Been Laid Low (Score:1)
So many uses. (Score:1)
Re:So many uses. (Score:2)
I work for the ARSC (Score:5, Informative)
Details are here [arsc.edu]
And yes, you get to play with the new Cray.
For more information, please contact:
Thanks! We're looking for someone with experience with supercomputers.
Re:I work for the ARSC (Score:2)
Resume
------
I read slashdot daily
I'm pretty good at quake
I think computers are just super!
guess not... urghh, gotta keep looking.
Re:I work for the ARSC (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I work for the ARSC (Score:1)
BTW, it looks fun to play with so much processing (and electrical) power. Is it fed triphased 600V? Or 208V?
Ah supercomputing... (Score:2)
Imagine a beowolf cluster of... (Score:1)
Just one question - (Score:1, Troll)
how can it help you get a date???
Obligatory Simpsons Reference (Score:2, Funny)
-Prof John Frink
Good thing they didn't build it out of athlons (Score:1)
(obpost)
500 MHz system clock. System peak performance is 6 (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:500 MHz system clock. System peak performance i (Score:1)
Watch out, here it comes... (Score:1)
Can this be some new hardware for the National Missile Defense that Bush is building over in Alaska? [bbc.co.uk]
Bottomline (Score:1)
2847 in Content Creation Winstone.
3000 in Business Winstone.
Ok, pack it up. Next!
big deal!! (Score:1)
I'm not impressed. I'll bet that the anthlon rack will compute circles around that cray and cost far less. Not only this, individual units can be pulled and fixed or replaced rather easily.
I'm reading down further at the comments about comparing the stinky desktop PC to a "super computer" and I have to chuckle at the ignorance. The company I'm thinking of that put the anthlon rack in place for the 3-D migrations had an Alexis (sp) then about 100 sparc's networked. As one of the bigger geophysical processing shops in Calgary and Houston I rather think that they know what they are doing.
Re:big deal!! (Score:1)
Re:big deal!! - think of the big picture (Score:1)
With the cray, with less cpus to deal with and bigger foot print of main memory, each cpu would have more to work with where as the cluster would have less to work with per node.
Another thing to consider is that these are vector processors which already have a solid base of development for weather simulations, nuclear bomb testings, and such ungodly application usage. (Which is why the PS2 is treated as a munitons because it too is also a vector processor.)
I am not writing this to put down the work done for in the area of beowolf clusters and the like. But you have to look at the application that is being used for and what they intend to do with it.
Another thing to consider is why should you try to get a x86 processor to do vector processing? It is like when cyrix tried to do floating point instructions a few years ago in software because it didn't want to put one in. It could never outperform a FPU that could do floating point calculations on hardware. In order for you to do vector processing, you would need to do what the cray does on hardware emulated in software. Just might not work... maybe in transmeta though.
Anyone have thoughts on this?
Re:big deal!! (Score:1)
Throughput:
Having whiz-bang fast processors is nice, but only if you can get the data to them fast enough. Why do you think processors and OS's engage in all these elaborate caching schemes... If ram was even 50% as fast as the CPU, you'd see a marked improvement immediately, but only until you had to get something off of disk. Now if you could get your Mass Storage at 50% as fast as RAM, the world would be a better place...
Another really crippling aspect of the PC is the horrid PCI bus. We need to just throw PCI away, or religate it to the realms of COM ports. PCI-X is on the horizon and that will some inprovement, but what we really need is to start getting the interconnects faster.
Melting Glaciers (Score:1)
benchmarking. (Score:1)
it gets about 923749083274fps in quake III
Re:benchmarking. (Score:2)
You should see how fast it renders Pong!
Alaska already 9 degrees warmer (Score:2)
(I know it's inisignificant amount of heat increase, but still... May be a start of a trend?)
Bachelorettes in Alaska (Score:1)
--
Billy Corgan: Billy Corgan, Smashing Pumpkins.
Homer Simpson: Homer Simpson, smiling politely.
Re:Bachelorettes in Alaska (Score:1)
VR Girlfriend (Score:2, Funny)
One VR mouse: $1000
Integration cost of the VR equipment to the CRAY: $25,000 (roughly)
Spending the rest the next 12 months with your VR girlfriend in true cyberspace: Priceless.
There are things you can buy, and there are things you can build, and then there are things you can get buy building and buying and having a perverted imagination.
American Way (Score:1)
Is this really news? (Score:2)
If it had 64 terabytes of RAM, it'd be interesting.
- A.P.
Cray is pathetic (Score:1)
My feeling is that they are utterly uninterested in selling SX systems, they'd rather sell their more profitable SV systems or their crazy MTA systems (woohoo, they managed to build ONE).
Disclaimer: I used to work for Cray in their SX support team and with HNSX Supercomputers before that, the North American subsidiary of NEC for supercomputers. I left of my own will, I wasn't part of the friday-right-before-Christmas round of layoff Cray did.
Re:Yeah, but... (Score:1)
I guess you've never masturbated to a picture of a Cray SX-6 before.
MOD PARENT UP (Score:1, Insightful)
I would say that masturbation is pretty much the same thing as trolling.
Another step towards the Grand Unified Theory of Slashdot! An AC has managed to link the forces of self-abuse and the abuse of others into one, simplifying the universe.
Re:star whores (Score:1)
Re:Do you know how much it costs? (Score:1)
i believe the sega dreamcast pulls 1.4gflops to match the cray youd only neeed 46 dreamcasts which means for a measly 2300 you could pull 64.4 gigaflops much lower than 22k per month!
Re: Japanese scare (Vector Processors) (Score:2, Interesting)
If you have to run applications, where you can not make much use of vectorized instructions, then these systems are not faster than any other computer is, too.
There are two american companies which are developing very impressive technologies:
- IBM tries to build hypercomputers (quantum computers), and research results look pretty promising. - a few images [ibm.com]
- They are going to build a One-Petaflop Supercomputer until 2005 utilizing 1,048,576 Processors (32 Cores per Chip, 64 CPUs per Board, 8 Boards per Frame, in 64 Frames) - Blue Gene Project [ibm.com]
- They are developing CPU Cores, where all execution units are connected asynchronously - that makes it easy to reach an extremly high clock frequency.
Speed per processor doesn't matter - just think about Intel SMP systems compared to RISC SMPs. Scalability is the one thing that matters in supercomputer technology.
Re: Japanese scare (Vector Processors) (Score:1)
Take Motorola's Altivec, for example. Apple wrote a bazillion lines of new code to take advantage of Altivec. Yes, Apple could have just stuck with the G3, yes, Apple could have saved a lot in terms of paying programmers, but scrimping on coders means that you don't have the acceleration code necessary to use the CPU to its full potential.
Gah! What I'm trying to say is that when you shell out a lot of $$$ for a computer, you usually try and make the most of your money.
Re: Japanese scare (Vector Processors) (Score:1)
They are developing CPU Cores, where all execution units are connected asynchronously - that makes it easy to reach an extremly high clock frequency.
Where I come from asynchronous means without clock. So as much as you would like to believe, these processors will have no clocking frequency, but you may say that they will run much faster (assuming good design) compared to clocked processors.
Re:Japanese scare (Score:3, Interesting)
I agree that Americans need a more heterogeneous set of supercomputers these days. Vector computing has "gone out of style", but it's still very very useful for a lot of applications. We may see vectors return somewhat with this reselling plan, and with the soon-to-be-released Cray SV2 [cray.com].
Re:Japanese scare (Score:2)
What happens next ought to be VERY interesting.
On the other hand, the Cray employees I've talked to - needling them for giving into the dark side and selling a SX-6 - have said that anything that is good for vector computing is good for Cray: they can always sell a follow-ob with their SV-2 and SV-2e.
I saw a post that I skimmed above that stated something to the effect that "you'll never touch [a supercomputer]. We, at NERSC [nersc.gov], are still looking for a few good sysadmins [lbl.gov]. Keep in mind we're pretty brutal about who we let in, but if you think you have the right stuff to be a sysadmin on some of the world's most powerful machines...;)
Re:This is totally unremarkable. (Score:2)
What about price/performance?
Re:This is totally unremarkable. (Score:3, Interesting)
The memory bandwidth of E10k's is a rounding error compared to an SX-6...
and... SPARCS aren't vector processors.
But since you think CPUs + RAM == net performance of a computer, I can safely assume you probably haven't the foggiest idea what a vector processor is, or how one could take advantage of it.
And its not a Cray anymore than the Dodge Stealth was truely a Dodge... the SX-6 is made by NEC and re-badged as a Cray for sale in NA.