

Garmin Rino-GPS Show and Tell 137
jspectre writes: "Garmin, makers of fine GPS products, has a sneak peek of their upcoming Rino (Radios Integrated with Navigation for the Outdoors). A new handheld combination of GPS and 2-way Radio using the common FRS spectrum. In addition to downloadable maps, trip planning, weighing 8.5oz and being waterproof you can "beam" your location to other Rino users while you talk to them. Your location will show up on their GPS display allowing you to navigate to each other. Expected availability, June 2002. Great fun for geocaching parties I'd think."
good survival tool in the savannah... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:good survival tool in the savannah... (Score:1)
luckily i was able to avenge you in metamod...
One step closer (Score:4, Funny)
eParka and GPS Maps (Score:5, Interesting)
-Sean
Re:eParka and GPS Maps (Score:1)
Re:eParka and GPS Maps (Score:1, Informative)
Re:eParka and GPS Maps (Score:1)
Yeah, but... (Score:1)
Re:Yeah, but... (Score:1)
My Etrex!! (Score:4, Funny)
It's.. it's.. Becoming obsolete!
It's.. it's.. Losing that gleam of desirablilty!
It's.. it's.. Acquired a bit of dust and a scratch i never noticed before!
It's.. it's... Hey, is that a vacuum tube sticking out the back?
Where are the sonars? (Score:1, Interesting)
However I have not been able to find any GPS/Sonar combos capable of output to a harddisk.
Any suggestions?
Re:Where are the sonars? (Score:3, Interesting)
Could be annoying... (Score:2)
Re:Could be annoying... (Score:2)
Yes, but FRS has 14 channels and 38 quiet codes(*), which means you can pick a configuration where you don't hear them. It shouldn't be a problem.
(*) Quiet codes are little bursts that are sent prior to transmitting, so that multiple people can share the same channel. It's not perfect, but it works pretty well.
Re:Could be annoying... (Score:1)
Re:Could be annoying... (Score:3, Informative)
Actually the "quiet codes" are subaudible tones that open the squelch of the radio when received. Also called CTCSS (Continuous Tone Controlled Squelch System), they've been in use for years. They are not "little bursts".
Re:Could be annoying... (Score:2)
Thanks. I misunderstood how they worked.
In any case, it should avoid the rhino bursts.
Re:Could be annoying... (Score:1)
Re:Could be annoying... (Score:2)
Well that sounds more like how I thought it worked, which is that the quiet codes were only sent at the start of a message. That doesn't match the description of the continuous subcarrier that other people mentioned.
Which is it? I admit I've never looked into the details, I just read the instructions that came with my FRS, so my technical expertise in this area is severely lacking.
Re:Could be annoying... (Score:1)
There exists some other methods that use digital codes to do the same thing, but FRS uses plain-old analog sub-audible tones superimposed on your other audio.
-Joe
Re:Could be annoying... (Score:3, Informative)
This whole product undoubtadely evolved from APRS. Anyone really interested in this unit would be blown away by APRS - It's the same idea but wider-range, internet-repeated, and has digital messaging capabilities.
~GoRK
The RINOs have quads! (Score:3, Informative)
The RINOs have a quadrifilar (quad-helix) antenna, which means they should have reception up there with the Magellan 300-series and Meridian receivers (and the Garmin GPS V). The poor reception of the Garmin eTrex line will not affect them. (And the Garminites all cry "Yipee!" and no longer have to cower before those of us who have been using Magellans the whole time.)
Anyway, for group caching, the RINOs look really fun. I do most of my geocaching alone, so I'd probably pass on them, though.
RINO usefulness for the existing GPS sports:
- Geocaching: Excellent if in groups.
- Geodashing: Maybe, but not likely.
- Degree Confluences: Same as geodashing.
- Geodrawing: Multi-pen art? Cool.
- MinuteWar: Possibly... occasionally.
Re:The RINOs have quads! (Score:2)
Re:The RINOs have quads! (Score:1)
Security Risk (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Security Risk (Score:1)
OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? (Score:1)
GPS is a poistioning tool. It uses satellites to find out where you are. (i.e. you could be in aplae and it will tell you you are 35,000 ft in the air over wherever).
Unless someone was willing to follow a coastline or terrain feature then you could map it.
Re:OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? (Score:3, Informative)
While there is a lot of "open source" map data out there, there aren't a whole lot of free tools that will help you use it.
The tools and data fall under the GIS heading. Check out these sites to get started:
I've used these tools to build maps of GPS tracks on my website. A couple examples:
I've done most of these maps with a lot of manual labor...if anyone knows of open source/free ways to improve the process, I'd appreciate it!
Re:OpenSource GPS Mapping (Topographical)? (Score:1)
It's all free, but takes some work. See my page of details and examples [attbi.com].
Toys for adults... (Score:1)
Can you turn off the FRS feture? (Score:3, Interesting)
Kudo's for Garmin for using AA batteries - there are readbly available back country solar chargers out there, and it would be useless if they used YAPBP (Yet Another Propriatary Battery Pack)
Re:Can you turn off the FRS feture? (Score:1)
We did this one already... (Score:4, Informative)
The same story was posted on the 4th of March by Hemos, see 'Garmin To Marry GPS with FRS/GMRS [slashdot.org]'.
Al.Re:We did this one already... (Score:5, Funny)
Sneak peak? (Score:1)
Re:Sneak peak? (Score:1)
it is... (Score:1)
What about this? (Score:5, Interesting)
Lets say that (eventually) there is a significant installed base of GPS enabled cars. They each register their location anonymously with a central DB (anonymity could be turned off by the owner remotely for the low-jack, car recovery, option perhaps) and since the central DB would know what the speed limit on your road is (and the presence of stop lights etc...) if could monitor how traffic is flowing all across a local region.
It could then do load balancing of traffic by telling others with the same network where to go and where to not go. If you have a specific destination programmed in it could tell you the quickest way to get there and actually be right because it would tell everyone a different way to get there to avoid congestion.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What about this? (Score:1)
1. Automatic rerouting of cars is sold to the public for safety purposes (disable/pull over cars for criminal stops, automatic yielding to emergency vehicles, reroute traffic around construction, accidents, etc.) Added is automatic reporting of position, via wireless signals sent from cars, for accident notification/911 purposes.
2. Guv'ment mandates installation on all new cars. Also added is severe felony punishment for disabling or modifying such a system (modifications reported via wireless "snitch" feature)
3. Local, state and federal autorities now use the on-board capabilities of the GPS unit combined with complex mapping software to monitor driver's activities. Erratic driving? Summon police for DUI investigation. Speeding? Send tickets via mail. To many parking tickets? Disable vehicle.
4. Various federal agencies/politicians/celebrities/CEO's now get "preferential access" to the country's roads and highways. Traffic snarls in Los Angeles even more often than normal, but Britney Spears is never late for a concert appearance when she is driven from Bel Air/Beverly Hills cross town to an engagement during rush hour as traffic parts to automatically let her and her entourage pass.
Re:What about this? (Score:1)
Hopefully soon.
In fact, I imagine it won't be too many years before this sort of technology is built into state license-plates. There are a lot of potential benefits-- traffic balancing, intelligent traffic lights, instant accident-detection. And, of course, law enforcement. There'll be enormous privacy issues, but this sort of technology is far too useful for governments to pass up.
First, you'd need good, cheap packet radio networks that won't mind lots and lots of transmitters occasionally chipping in a tiny packet here and there. If I'm not mistaken, most existing networks (things like CDPD) have a reasonable amount of connection overhead that makes this difficult.
Second, you'd have an early-adopter problem where no GPS-enabled cars would be driving along a given route, and you would therefore be routed into a 2-hour traffic jam.
I imagine trusting a computer to route you through the side-streets will also lead to a whole new series of "Bonfire of the Vanities"-type disasters.
Already available. (Score:2, Informative)
The display gets these little pictures like the road signs for road works, and others for traffic speed etc.
It just routes around them, only seems to bother if the traffic is very slow for a long distance though.
I guess it takes the data from the Traffic Master which gets info from the road side traffic sensors and gantrys etc. and pumps it into the (Siemens?) navigation system.
Sorry, don't have many more details, it's like all built in, car's still on warranty, so have not got round to hacking around in it yet.
Price (Score:1)
There is a lot of kool stuff out there but without a price we cannot start thinking on whether this is something we might start begging the wifey for or not!
Neat technology, but what's the patent? (Score:1)
Re:Neat technology, but what's the patent? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Neat technology, but what's the patent? (Score:2)
If it's broad, Garmin will get toasted for prior art. See http://www.tapr.org/ - APRS and MIC-E have existed for a LONG time.
Euro GPS (Score:1)
Re:Euro GPS (Score:3, Interesting)
There are a few articles on the BBC about it.
"It will be a rival to the existing Global Positioning System (GPS) run by the United States, although the EU says the two networks will be compatible." -BBC "Green Light for Galileo project" [bbc.co.uk]
Or all three! (Score:2)
I don't know if anybody makes an affordable consumer one though-- I have only heard about them through an engineer friend who sometimes does survey work for the state.
Imagine the accuracy and the reliability you could get with all three!
Re:Or all three! (Score:2)
Re:Euro GPS (Score:2)
It may be a long time to wait.
However, the resolution of your (receiver) location will be 1 meter (a little more than 3 feet for the fellow Americans). This is much better than GPS.
Gonna be a LONG time (Score:2)
If that was their goal, it was a success. The European program got hurt badly by the deactivation of SA.
Now, by the time it gets off the ground, the next generation of civilian GPS will be available. (I believe that there will be support for civilian dual-frequency - The current batch of satellites doesn't support it though, so it'll be quite a while.)
But the Garmin Maps Suck (Score:1)
Perfect for hunting (Score:1)
Chris
Re:Perfect for hunting (Score:1)
Re:Perfect for hunting (Score:1)
Chris
What about privacy... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:What about privacy... (Score:2)
The FCC does not allow encryption on Family Radio Service bands (47CFR95.183(a)4 [gpo.gov]) They usually don't allow data either - Garmin had to get the FCC to make a specific exception for the Rino.
Anyone can listen in.
Re:What about privacy... (Score:1)
Guess I'd be happier (and more apt to buy one) if I thought it would be interoperable with other companies' devices.
Re:What about privacy... (Score:2)
I haven't looked at the patent application, but there's all sorts of prior art in this field. Most notably, APRS [navy.mil]. I wouldn't write off interoperability so soon. Besides, the patent wouldn't make Garmin much money if they can't license it. It's not like there's much consumer demand for features that only one vendor has any hope of providing.
One More Thing (Score:3, Interesting)
To make the functionality complete would be if each device could serve as a relay in a wireless network.
[Assuming relay usage isn't going to chew up your batteries too much] you could relay messages further than the limited range that these devices have for direct point to point contact.
Better, a few "wormholes" with stationary TX/RX that allow you to connect to land lines would be icing on the cake.
Re:One More Thing (Score:1)
That would be cool, but the FRS freq. regulations explicitly forbid such uses.
hey, nice present (Score:1)
Great gift idea! Could somebody from friends make such a nice present to Osama Bin Laden?
Thank you.
Re:hey, nice present (Score:1)
Re:hey, nice present (Score:1)
Wait a sec...Actually, nobody even considered this! So, make your conclusion. Well, you already did.
PS. Hey, moderators, spend your Funny or even Insightful points on a parent one...
If they were more programmable... (Score:1)
You could make a neat little networking system. Some friends and I have tossed the idea around for a while of a low-bandwidth P2P wireless infrastructure that would automagically relay messages to units outside the range of the transmitting unit.
Since these things know where they are (geographically), they could configure themselves to do the routing in a semi-intelligent way.
The routing would either be a complete nightmare or maybe just a good masters thesis. How about it, science?
-FrankRe:If they were more programmable... (Score:1)
This is already being worked on, particularly for military applications.
Re:If they were more programmable... (Score:1)
A "sneak peak"? (Score:2, Funny)
What is that, a mountaintop that creeps up on you?
Everyone has a spelling pet peeve. That's mine.
My only quesiton... (Score:2, Funny)
Devices combining GPS & VHF radio (Score:1)
Thanks.
FRS/GMRS: using data over voice-only services (Score:1)
One website to refer to on these matters is the Popular Wireless Magazine BBS [popularwireless.com] forums (a UBBS system). The Rino product has come under discussion a few times, including Garmin's petitioning of the FCC to violate the 'voice only communications' rule:
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Request for Waiver of Family Radio Service Rule Sections 95.193(a) and 95.631(d) to Authorize Manufacture, Sale and Use of GPS Transmission Enhanced FRS Units
Request for Waiver of Sections 95.193(a), 95.193(b), and 95.631(d) of the Commission's Rules Governing Permissible Communications in the Family Radio Service
----
More on that thread is located here [popularwireless.com].
As a licensed GMRS user, I do worry what devices like this can do to the spectrum when they get popular. If it's implemented right, though, they'll be an incredibly useful tool.
APRS (Score:2)
-John
(KG4RUO)
Re:APRS (Score:1)
I use APRS to track my favorite underground music icons [crackersoul.com].
They have a GPS/APRS transmitter on the tour bus, so you can track its location in real-time [contentproject.com] (well, close).
Next gen features already available... (Score:1)
While it's nice to see Garmin's continues
signs of innovation - I can see parents &
day-care workers (of kids & oldies) hand-
ing one of these to each of the people in
the charge, so that anyone wandering off
can be found earlier.
But - wait... there's more!
Noting the complaint from a poster, who
is saddled with a now-obsolete eTrax, I
just thought I'd remind people of some
of the other features that (I bet) will
sooner or later work their way into the
Rino family (or future successors).
Have a look at UI-View (recently reviewed
in the Feb 2002 issue of QST magazine;
published by ARRL)
Kenwood has dual-band (144 & 440 MHz)
Amateur handheld (radio) handhelds &
higher powered mobiles that have GPS
interfaces.
UI-View firmware is also in the radio.
Of course, a small computer is a nice
(but optional) addon to the radio+gps
Now, COMING FEATURES include telemetry
(read: Weather Data from distant auto-
matic gov't & private weather stations)
Also: each radio can act as a digipeater
(so you can get position &/or weather
data from farther away than your radio
reaches by itself)
Short messaging & broadcasts (to all)
are also in the UI-View feature-list.
Details are available (in the file areas
of) UI-View Announce &/or UI-View eGroups
(Yahoo!'s)
There is a Win32-compatible Help file
that tells it all...
A 16-bit trial version provides -all-
of the above features; registering it
allows you to run the 32-bit version,
which also connects a -fixed- station
node to the Internet (or, for special
applications, in high-use areas, pos-
sibly an Intranet...?)
Let's all look into UI-View, start de-
manding (of Garmin) that they "skip"
a few steps in the development chain,
and fewer of us will feel like the
posting eTrax owner, in future...
Oh I really NEED one of these. (Score:2, Funny)
What's the big deal? (Score:1)
LOL! Re: How This Works (Score:1)
LOL! I haven't read anything that funny in hours!
Of course, if anyone's wondering, GPS receivers determine position by solving a set of equations for the four variables of position (3 dimensions) and time (1 dimension).
There is a really nice (but Shockwave, unfortunately) overview of GPS at Trimble's site [trimble.com].
How this REALLY works Re:How This Works (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:How This Works (Score:3, Informative)
The only thing to be worried about right now would be cell phones incorporating GPS technology that transmit your location, something which the government is considering mandating.
Of course the black helicopters can always find you, GPS or not.
Re:How This Works (Score:1)
Re:How This Works (Score:1)
Call me, PLEASE!
Re:How This Works (Score:2)
Re:frosty paost (Score:1, Interesting)
According to my interpretation, what Garmin is trying to do is illegal. That is, unless they get the regs changed for them