The Incredible Shrinking Motherboard 310
DrGonzo was among several who submitted
news of the new Mini Motherboard from via. The Mini ITX standard is just 170mm squared, and this
motherboard has audio, ether, IDE, video and tv out. Not bad for something
so tiny. Here's an article about the small wonder.
Cheap book PCs? (Score:1)
Re:Cheap book PCs? (Score:4, Informative)
For more about form factors, here the definitive site. [formfactors.org]
If what I know about most of these are true... (Score:2)
Re:Cheap book PCs? (Score:2)
Yes you can get a current mobo for $100, but this includes the processor, which on a standard mobo would be another $100, putting it's total cost at $200.
I for one and looking to buy one as soon as they come out, perfect for a linux router/server if you ask me.
Re:Cheap book PCs? (Score:3, Interesting)
Hell, for a $50 case + PS combo (ok likely A LOT more expensive for a limited market like this product) and a $30 wirelss Keyboard Mouse combo from A4Tech [a4tech.com] I would be set.
Oooh yaaah.
Hehe, it already comes with TV out too.
INSANLY cool.
I am thinking Digital VCR here folks.
Hehe, actualy with Flash Memory cards approuching (at as I recall) 1GigaByte now days, hmm, hehe! The MoBo has build in compatability with Flash Memory from what I can tell, LOL! Though some sort of internal mount USB unit could be used as well with a port for the Flash memory to fit into.
Hehe!!!!! Digital VCR! MPEG4 video, w00t w00t!
Man that would rock, though using Flash Memory would compleatly negate any sort of cost savings, LOL!
Still be pretty nice to have a 120GB or so drive installed in this baby and use it to go around with your movie collection sitting in something that you can almost carry in a small backpack, LOL!
White Paper (Score:4, Informative)
Also on Via's site, the white paper describing this small wonder:
http://www.via.com.tw/en/VInternet/Mini-iTX.PDF [via.com.tw]
Uh, it's not that small (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Uh, it's not that small (Score:2)
Re:Uh, it's not that small (Score:1)
Re:Uh, it's not that small (Score:1)
that's not 170mm^2, but (170 mm) squared
Re:Uh, it's not that small -- and it's old news :) (Score:2)
Re:Uh, it's not that small (Score:2, Informative)
4 tiles up by 4 tiles wide is 16 tiles, not 4.
170 mm length by 170 mm width is 28900 square mm.
Anyway the original posting says 170mm square, which is correct, not 170 square mm.
enuf.
Good form factor for... (Score:1, Funny)
Sweet (Score:2)
But this is one sweet little box - toss a second NIC in - instant firewall! Very cool.
Re:Sweet (Score:2)
Better would be an even smaller case, for people who don't need even the one PCI slot.
Re:Sweet (Score:2)
It'll get to be the size of a paperback book (Score:2)
Here's where we get more fun out of life. Imagine it's 2005. IBM brings out MRAM on schedule, which is non-volatile RAM: no data loss on power down.
We'd use some standard volatile RAM, probably just cache, to store things we don't want people to look at, particularly. So if the DRM stormtroopers grab your box, the evil bad MP3s get wiped wihout hope of discovery when you hit the panic button.
The box is about the size of a paperback book, or maybe a VHS cassette. Two 1394 ports, a USB port for a keyboard, a digital monitor port. It has no hard drive, but, say, 10 gigs of MRAM. I have no idea what the power supply would be like; that may spoil my dream here. Okay, let's add a flash memory slot. For a CPU, let's say we go with the usual nanometer-level fab process, only instead of cranking the MHz up, we bring it down; this reduces the heat output a lot. Maybe a 500 MHz wonder.
Optionally, you could put a cheap LCD screen on one side, maybe with a stylus input for those times you are sans keyboard. Then you can be covered if you want to carry this around.
Okay, let's add a cheap camera. And a microphone and cheap speaker or earbud? Okay, there is a phone posibility there.
Hmp. Let's put an 802.11 variant in there for wireless networking.
Okay, let's dream some more, and instead of a battery, the thing runs on a couple of ounces of butane for a fuel cell.
And let's just imagine this thing costs, oh, five hundred bucks.
I see *A* future, and this is part of it.
Re:It'll get to be the size of a paperback book (Score:2)
Maybe the BGA parts aren't at any more than that. (Score:2)
Re:Maybe the BGA parts aren't at any more than tha (Score:2)
I figure its about time they start shipping the boards with 128mb of ram and maybe one socket to add more. That would work find for the application I have for this board.
Re:Sweet (Score:2)
The SV24 is louder than you'd expect. And from what I found with mine - its the damn 1" fan in the power supply which is right behind teh vent holes in the front of the case. The fan in back is slow and quiet as is the CPU fan that came with the low profile heatsink. I've been temped to take the power supply apart (unplugged of course) and replace that 1" fan. 1" fans tend to be noisy but there are some quieter ones.
Re:Sweet (Score:2)
It's a 40mm x 40mm x 10mm 12VDC fan. I'm in the process of replacing it with a 5V Microcomp fan (MCKD0504PEB3-8) which is rated at 16dBA. It has
about half the airflow, but I'm hoping it will
still be sufficient.
For more information, or to see what others have done, have a look at the informative comment thread [tech-report.com] on the SV24 article at the Tech Report.
Slowing down already... ./ effect (Score:1)
Almost what I want.... (Score:2)
Re:Almost what I want.... (Score:1)
Re:Almost what I want.... (Score:1)
Re:Almost what I want.... (Score:2)
Here's your answer (Score:2)
In other words, you're stupid if you don't go this route. I'm planning on building a full-featured LAN box with one of these, and I'll be spending about $1500 to totally deck it out - and that'll be with a 15" flat panel monitor for hauling to LANs.
See you at Quakecon.
Only one PCI slot (Score:1)
What do you need PCI for? (Score:3, Interesting)
P.s. Looks like one of the optional modules was a cable for a "2nd PCI device" so perhaps it's more flexible than you realized?
Re:What do you need PCI for? (Score:2)
I think the only upgrades home users are generally interested in are adding a larger hard-drive, and increasing the ram in the machine.
Personally, I think I wouldn't be too happy with this sort of a system unless it was significantly cheaper. Then again (like many of us here on slashdot), I don't think I'm the average "home user".
The site: (Score:5, Informative)
link to google's cached version [google.com]
and the text from from theregus.com:
VIA Technologies is expected to launch a very small format motherboard this month. Called the mini-ITX, the fully integrated mobo measures up at 170mm x170mm (yes, it's square), making 50 per cent smaller than the FlexATX form factor, VIA claims.
The Mini-ITX is supplied with an 800MHz Eden x.86 C3 processor (in EBGA packaging), incorporating 128K L1 and 64K L2 cache; integrated AGP2 graphics 2X; PC100/133 SDRAM support etc. You can check out more spec here.
The board will retail for around $100, and gets its first mainstream outing at CeBIT this week.
The Mini ITX is targeted at the embedded market - expect most units to disappear into printer routers and the like; but VIA is also reporting 'grassroots interest' in the product from home PC and commercial system builders.
The Mini-ITX may be small, but it is not 40 per cent smaller than any other form factor around, as VIA believes. The Danish firm, maker of the M-Series PC, deploys a 157mm x146mm mobo. ®
Re:The site: (HTML Version of the PDF spec sheet) (Score:2, Informative)
It's stronger than me... (Score:5, Informative)
170 mm * 170 mm is NOT 170 mm^2
This motherboard is 28900 mm^2, or 289 cm^2.
Still a nice little board, at that
But it is (Score:2, Redundant)
No, it's right. (Score:2)
Not very hackable/expandable (Score:1)
Minimal... (Score:3, Insightful)
MOST people that want/need computers actually fall under that category, not the one that the
Processors? (Score:1)
No offense, Rob, but.. (Score:3, Funny)
MONOLINUX
Small PCs make excellent Linux boxes (Score:2)
I wish that other manufacturers would jump into this boat and push this market further, I'm not buying anything by VIA anytime soon.
The VIA literature _purports_ to support Linux... (Score:2)
As for performance, it's so-so. I've got an ECS box, branded the i-Note in hand, courtesy of my employer, that I've been playing about with. It's got a different (read: known to be supported and autodetected by Red Hat and others...) ethernet and sound chip choice, but I can give out some performance figures for the CPU all the same. For integer performance, it weighs in at the same basic performance level as a Celeron of the same clock speed. For floating point, it varies from task to task, but it performs anywhere from 1/2-3/4 as fast as a similarly clocked Celeron.
As a gamer's toy, this has some, but limited appeal. As a general consumer device, this has some things going for it.
Re:Small PCs make excellent Linux boxes (Score:2)
I really havn't had any problems with the VIA all in one chipset, except X support for the VGA part of it, which kind of sucks right now. 2.4.17 and later include some patches to help the framebuffer work with it though, and there are some patches out that aren't in the main kernel tree yet that also help some. It's still a bitch to get acceleration in Mesa going. Anyway, if you aren't using it for games, then it's fine.
Heatsink? What Heatsink (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Heatsink? What Heatsink (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Heatsink? What Heatsink (Score:4, Interesting)
Regarding the images on their site (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Regarding the images on their site (Score:2)
Re:Regarding the images on their site (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Regarding the images on their site (Score:2, Redundant)
Re:Regarding the images on their site (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Regarding the images on their site (Score:2)
I just can't believe someone modded my comment as informative!!!
Good for a router.... (Score:1)
Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? (Score:2, Insightful)
I haven't used serial/parallel/ps2 in over a year at least. Disable them all in the bios to save interupts.
Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? (Score:1, Informative)
News on HardOCP today. The Intel board uses i845 and has 10 USB2 ports but support for DDR266 only. The AMD board uses KT333 and has 4 USB2 ports and 6 USB1.1 ports, and support for DDR333.
Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? (Score:4, Informative)
They actually have quite a few other uses. How do you program a FPGA using usb? how about legacy printers? LED control? modified pushbutton interface? custom card scanners?
I think you need to come to terms that the only use of a computer isn't just to play games with the newsest usb joystick/mouse/keyboard.
Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? (Score:3, Interesting)
One of the biggest disadvantages to the latest breed of laptops, IMO, is the lack of built-in serial (and to a lesser extent parallel) ports. Switches, filers, servers, and many other devices still have serial consoles these days, and for a lot of embedded purposes, serial is even more useful.
One smart approach to get the best of both worlds is to just have jumpers or other small connectors on the motherboard, to allow people to wire up a serial/parallel port if they wish, but they don't take up much space if you choose to ignore them.
PowerLeap's Renaissance [powerleap.com] product does just that, and while it's designed to use your existing motherboard (as just a benign card holder, with no power to it), and hook up to your existing power supply, it could rock as a single board computer, giving the Mini ITX a run for it's money size-wise.
-me
Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? (Score:2)
But, as has been said by others, they're primarily targetting the embedded market, and only have light interest in a bunch of geeks looking to build their own tiny machine - so the parallel/serial/ps2 ports make a lot of sense.
Still wouldn't mind a second model without the legacy ports
DMA-PIO Problem? (Score:1)
Perfect for "hidden" home systems. (Score:3, Interesting)
Although I wouldn't use it as a desktop system (although perhaps for non-techies...), something like this might be perfect for small network-access terminals of the kind used in stores and universities. Even in the home, something like this might be good as a stereo-system replacement (using the PCI slot for a decent soundcard, vs. integrated sound).
Are there any cases that would work decently with this design, though, or would something have to be custom-built?
This mobo is just begging for a beowulf cluster mention, but I suspect that the release price will make conventional solutions less expensive for quite some time.
Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. (Score:4, Interesting)
Low-power, low-cost, very small, and very few electrical connections to worry about. Also plenty fast enough for anything you'd ever need to do while driving on the highway.
All it takes is a handfull of regular PC parts, some manner of enclosure, and a reliable power supply. The whole thing should end up being small enough to fit under the front seat, which is nice for a variety of reasons (not the least of which that it is climate controlled).
I envision a plain steel box, perhaps from a company like Sescom [sescom.com], or just whatever I can find at a local surplus house. It doesn't have to be easily modified, only solid.
Does anyone know of a source for an appropriate power supply, or a kit, or even just plans for one?
-
Chibi PC-chan...^_^ (Score:2)
Let's see. I sometimes work for a tech school. I wind up doing a lot of writing copy and correspondence. I occasionally need to access spreadsheets, and sometimes I need to pull up an Access database. (I know...pity me)
I have an IBM Thinkpad 365X laptop. It runs Windows95 and Linux. It runs at 133MHz. It runs Office97 fine on the Windozer side. It also weighs 8 pounds. I keep it in a laptop backpack. It is heavy enough to where I call it "the papoose" at times. I could kill for something a bit faster than that laptop and much more portable. I've seen and used the Cappucino. It weighs a lot less than my laptop. It's my idea of portable.
If I could build a chibi-chibi PC that I could easily transport between the office and home, I would no longer have to join the fight over the two usable workstations or lug my laptop around. All I would need would be a spare keyboard, monitor and mouse. Tech schools tend to have tons of those on hand.
I am looking forward to small, portable computers using this new setup. No, this would not be the box to bring to a LAN party, despite the fact that you will be the only one there without a hernia. However, as a "take to the LUG meeting" machine or a freelancer machine it will truly shine.
Mother-in-Law Hack (Score:2, Funny)
Small Wonder (Score:2, Funny)
Supports 2 PCI cards? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Supports 2 PCI cards? (Score:2)
Woohoo! (Score:1)
On-board DRM (Score:2, Informative)
Integrated Macro Vision 7.01.
Shuttle already using it? (Score:3, Informative)
Mini-iTX
170mm 170mm
iTX
215mm 191mm
Flex ATX
215mm 191mm
Mini ATX
284mm 208mm
ATX full
305mm 244mm
Re:Shuttle already using it? (Score:2, Informative)
Flash Memory on board? (Score:2)
Anyone know the purpose of this flash memory is? I would hope it can be used to boot lilo or other similar loaders. I was pleased to see this mobo has no floppy controller. A little off topic, but why not integrate motherboards with a Type I PCMCIA slot? IMO, CompactFlash would make an excellent (and logical) replacement for the floppy drive, especially with the vast amount of cameras and mp3 players that use it.
I once had hopes for an magnetic media-based open standard to replace floppies (Iomega Zip) but not anymore. Even Award and AMI was forced into supporting zip drives as a bootable device option. IIRC, the zip drive is probably the only proprietary piece of hardware supported by these BIOSes (for AT/ATX standards).
Re:Flash Memory on board? (Score:2, Informative)
Their magic is in their BIOS "enhancement" code that makes the flash memory appear as a bootable disk drive. In DOS, it shows up as C:, and they have boot code for several operating systems, including Linux. Linux drivers for mounting/writing the filesystem are also available.
Second, you don't need a PCMCIA slot to use CompactFlash as a boot device. CompactFlash is already IDE-compliant and can be directly plugged into the IDE controller with the right adapter. They run about $20 from places like this [mydigitaldiscount.com].
The CompactFlash solution would give you a removable boot device that could be easily mounted/read on any other system. The DOC is smaller, but more convenient since it's already integrated.
Set-top box... (Score:2)
As for the question of the Type I slot; Type I is not terribly useful compared to having a Type II/III slot or a CF slot. In the case of not having a Type II/III slot, it's a little pricey. In the case of a CF slot, you can cheat and just map the device to the IDE chain- but they don't like doing that because they think they're going to be selling a lot of these things for IADs and they don't want anything that might be useful for repurposing the device. (Don't get me started on that- it's a battle I've had on many occasions over the past year with these people...)
Thanks, but no. (Score:5, Interesting)
* Integrated Macro Vision 7.01
Macrovision is a feature on just about every TV-out card you can buy today. This means that you cannot do any of the following without macrovision interference:
- Tape a video game. Sure, who would do this without being a complete gamer luzer. I can think of a few reasons to tape video game play. The one that comes to mind most readily are the occasional tournaments that happen on the MMORPG's and Shooters. Wouldn't you like to have a permanent record if you were the victor or a high ranker in such a tournament?
- Produce your own video to tape. You produce an original video, but you can't tape it without interference patterns or light noise. This doesn't even aid the hollywood studios, other than cutting potential amature video producers out of the loop. Mostly it just aids producers of high-end video hardware which gives the user control on the kind of output and copyprotection he wants on his stuff.
- Reproduce non-copyrighted or grey-area video. Anime fansubs are very rapidly becoming an all-online phenominon. Non-english anime videos are recorded from TV or other sources, subtitled, and then distributed for free in areas where that video is not otherwise available. Suppose you wanted to share such a video with someone who doesn't have a computer and can't play back Divx files? Unless you have a way to bypass macrovision, you're SOL.
- Play DVD's from your computer's DVD player on your TV. If you had a perfectly good Computer DVD setup and TV out device, why should you bother buying a separate standalone DVD player? Ease and convenience, sure, but many who don't care or are trying to save money, this is an extra expense.
Until I can get a video-out card that doesn't have macrovision enabled, I'm sticking with my pre-macrovision Matrox PCI card for TV out purposes.
Re:Thanks, but no. (Score:4, Informative)
As an aside to your point, in most cases, MacroVision is typically only enable when the drivers detect that content is being displayed that "shouldn't" be copied, so game recording probably works. I think in most cases they go by process listing and display state, if you open an overlay in a different colorspace, macrovision enables, if realplay.exe, mplayer.exe, qtplayer.exe appears in process table, macrovision enables. This is one of the major reasons companies are reluctant to release open-source drivers for tv-out devices, as they all have modifiable registers for enabling/disabling macrovision, and open source drivers would probably get them it hot water with the MPAA/RIAA.
Re:Thanks, but no. (Score:2)
As far as I can tell, DVD macrovision is by and large done by the playback device, and therefore depends on implementation. For example, my dxr2 has a register that has the effect of disabling or enabling macrovision. The linux drivers document this register (precisely what manufactuers don't want)
Under windows this translates to an enable/disable macrovision checkbox in special apps...
As to whether a DVD can explictly request MacroVision or if it is always *supposed* to be on, I don't know. In any event it seems that the playback device can ignore any such request
Re:Thanks, but no. (Score:2)
Re:Thanks, but no. (Score:2)
buy a Hollywood+ or Creative DXR3
no macrovision, accelerated Mpeg hardware playback. 100% supported under linux.
everything else is pure junk in comparison.
small mobo = large pricetag for cases/PS (Score:4, Insightful)
There's always two major sacrifices for size -- and they usually are performance and cost.
Still, I'm hopeful, as I would love to have a webserver the size of a Cobalt/Sun Qube, but at a comparitively low cost.
Low Power!!! (Score:2)
it would be nice if next... (Score:2)
Many network cards and sound cards today are 1/2 as wide as they were a few years ago, now they just have to make the part that you connect to the case 1/2 as wide. Small change there.
This design in the article is the 'throw away design'. If something goes you just throw the whole thing away. Kinda like PDA's.
Re:it would be nice if next... (Score:2)
To cool this system you could have slots like you see in many stereo recievers(sp?) today with the vents and large heat sinks.
This could be done. Imagine 2 computer cases on your desktop taking up the space of about 1 mid tower case. Connect that to a LCD and you gain back some of your deskspace that you lost in the paperless office. Now you have more place to spread all those papers that yo never got ride of. ;-)
Re:it would be nice if next... (Score:2)
The truth is that this is possible. While it may not be possible to have the newest and fastest computers it is possible to use current tech to make smaller, cooler, and almost as configurable computers as we currently have.
what i want (Score:2)
but this thing would do as well - as long as it can be incorporated into something the size of a cd player. and still must put a geforce chipset on there... even in a daughter board configuration.
Smaller Still (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Smaller Still (Score:2)
http://www.freetech.com/u.s.a/1product-2-p6f209
It's 170mmX170mm
I seriously doubt anyone will find any board much smaller than 170X170, as the DIMM slots appear to be about 160mm long. It could probably be done with SODIMMs, though.
Re:Smaller Still (Score:2)
Just one thing ... (Score:2)
The Shuttle FV-24 is MUCH better (Score:3, Interesting)
This thing has PS/2, video, audio, 2 USB, 2 firewire, an expantion slot (PCI), takes up to a 1100MHz S370 CPU, and a gig of ram.
Contrast this to the mobo from the story, which has an integrated CPU (yuck!, plus it's a Cyrix based, double-yuck!) and no firewire.
I'm using the FV-24 for a project of mine and am VERY happy with it. Plus, it was only about 150USD retail, and it's already out there, available.
Re:The Shuttle FV-24 is MUCH better (Score:2)
I don't know anything about the Via VT6103 but I really doubt it can be worse than the realtek..
I have no use for firewire and the Via board can be equipped with up to 32MB flash and two PCI devices (with an extra cable), it has a real audio system on board and not this cheopo-fixed-replay-rate-AC97 crap, it's smaller and it's cheaper.
So it really depends on your needs what is the better motherboard.
Re:The Shuttle FV-24 is MUCH better (Score:2)
iMac mobo spanks it! (Score:3, Interesting)
Mirror (Score:2)
S/PDIF multiplexed with video?! (Score:2)
One S/PDIF out (optional and multiplex with RCA TV out)
Doh. That sucks. So I can't drive my (composite) TV and digital receiver simultaneously? Hopefully there's a way to split out the digital audio before the multiplexor and add another jack.
It's not that great, but it's cheap (Score:2)
Convergence (Score:2)
I can really see how nice it would be to have integrated technology on one motherboard so my consumer box isn't unnecessarily large, noisy and consuming a lot of wattage.
But I wonder: can the same kind of reduction in form factor here be converged with all the efforts being put into making server blades that fit gobs and gobs into rack mount chassis?
It would be great leveraging if the technology used to make the single computer consumer box were the same technology used to make high density server farms.
Form size? (Score:2)
I WOULD like to ask tho, in this age of miniturization, why are there so many chips on our MBs, and capacitors etc.
Can't they integrate it all to a handful of chips?
I mean, why does my sound card have a dozen capacitors?
Great for homebuilt TiVos, DivX and MP3 players (Score:4, Informative)
I was thinking about getting one of these, put a gig of SDRAM in it (for a 500MB ramdrive), along with a 500MB solidstate compact flash harddrive (with a custom Debian install), and making the ultimate solidstate settop box (no fans either). It would make one killer retro console gaming system for playing classic arcade games, SNES, and NES games.
I believe that it supports PXE... (Score:3, Informative)
The only way that you can do that is... (Score:2)
You need PCI slots for things like video, lan, and sound. If they're all on the motherboard you don't need much in the way of PCI slots.
What's so special is that this doesn't NEED a fansink, consumes a teacupfull of power compared to most other modern machines and weighs in somewhere between the prior generation of hardware and the top-end right now. It's enough for using in offices, etc. and is priced at the pricepoint for just the motherboard cost for the other machines.