Review of the Handspring Treo 251
axlrosen writes: "Walter Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal reviews the new Handspring Treo, and loves it. 'For the past week, I have been carrying around a new hand-held, wireless device that is simultaneously the best personal digital assistant I have ever used and the most capable cellphone.'"
joy (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:joy (Score:2)
I used to have a net-enabled phone. I found it so worthless I stopped using it. Everytime I tried to access something, it just takes forever. I have settled with the Motorola P935 Two-way pager/pda and am much happier.
Too bad (Score:1)
Ack!
Re:Too bad (Score:1)
Re:Too bad (Score:2, Insightful)
Goodie (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Goodie (Score:2)
Re:Goodie (Score:4, Insightful)
Why is it that, everytime something new is announced, someone always complains that this thing is no good because they don't have what they want yet?
Re:Goodie (Score:2)
I think Verizon wired the DC Metro (Score:2)
Yet another... (Score:2, Interesting)
I guess it's something like treading water until the boom comes back and everyone needs one of these again.
other hybrids (Score:4, Informative)
Re:other hybrids (Score:5, Insightful)
One thing you fail to realize, I (and others in the US, thus, partially, the lack of the option) don't want super-integrated, ultra-bitchin', mega-color, web-surfin' on a screen that is 2" by 2". What I really want is an easy way to hook my computer (whether that be a handheld, laptop, whatever) into my cell phone so that I can dial into any service I want, not just the distilled pablum that the cell-phone companies try to shove down my throat because someone paid them an ass-load of cash. I've seen the 'wireless web', and it's just ugly. I didn't even use it during the free trial period. God knows I'm not going to pay for it.
I don't want integrated everything because something always gets left out in the process. Whether it's ease of use, ability to expand, ability to use it on a plane ("sir, you'll have to turn off your phone," what then?), easy to find batteries, what have you.
Damn, where did all that vitreol come from. That was a little more brutal than I intended. The message is, however, clear. I don't care about having ready access to movies and audio and internet on my cell phone because I have much better means of accessing it already available virtually everywhere.
Re:other hybrids (Score:2)
Re:other hybrids (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:other hybrids (Score:2)
Re:other hybrids (Score:4, Insightful)
That is exactly why the iMode concept isn't going to fly in the USA. Who wants a screen that is essentially a tiny cartoon-like color display that is not that useful? For American cellphone users, they'd rather wait for larger displays with full Palm OS functionality on their 3G phones so at least the cellphone have some real functionality for a change. The other thing Americans will probably want is the cdma2000 digital cellular format so high-speed data transfers over cellullar connections (read at least 256 kilobits per second bi-directional) becomes useful for laptop users.
Re:other hybrids (Score:2, Interesting)
You *obviously* haven't discovered WAP porn (or WAPr0n as I like to call it). My roomate has a WAP phone and WAPr0n is the coolest thing I've seen someone do with a cell phone.
Re:other hybrids (Score:2, Insightful)
My current phone is a Samsung SCH-3500 on Sprint's network. I bought it because I read it got good reception and did everything I wanted it to - voice dialing, and Caller-ID I can see without flipping the phone open. It is also small enough that I can keep it in my pocket during the day.
There is going to be a struggle to figure out what size screen everyone wants. If it is such a useful product (phone, PDA, etc.) that I am going to keep it on my person every hour of the day, it had better be small enough that I can do so comfortably. At the same time, if it is going to do everything, I want to do those things (browse the web, check contact information, and take notes) in comfort. This generally means a large enough screen and a decent input device.
These two things are always going to be at odds with each other. About the only soultion I can come up with is either a highly-foldable screen or some sort of projection device (the hologram-type imaging you see in SciFi movies).
I have my Samsung phone and my Handspring Visor Neo. Until someone comes up with a device integrating those those with the form-factor of the phone (or even smaller) and with the screen size of the Visor, I will stick with the seperate parts.
Re:other hybrids (Score:2)
1. I wound up carrying both my Palm Pro and Qualcomm ThinPhone everywhere anyway, and I got tired of carrying two boxes around.
2. After living with the Kyocera 6035, I would never, ever want to go back to a phone that didn't have all my contact information in it. *All* my numbers are at hand and dialable with a tap or two. I never wish I'd programmed another number in the phone or have to change it in two places. Sometimes integration doesn't provide real value - but here it does. Phone + Palm = BIG WIN
Re:other hybrids (Score:2)
Re:other hybrids (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:other hybrids (Score:3, Informative)
You don't explain your complaint with it, but I've had one for a few months and it's quite simply the best and most functional piece of electronic gear I've ever owned. It's small, rugged, integrates phone and Palm functions quite well,is completely compatible with all the Palm software I use, some of which dates back to the original 1000 (only one program, ToDo+, needed a new version, free for registered users), and the batteries last darn near forever. If you took away all my electronics and computers one by one, the Kyocera 6035 would be the last thing left, and you'd have to fight me for it.
By the way, there are other choices: Samsung has a new Palm phone out with a larger screen - the smaller screen is my only (minor) complaint about the Kyocera.
I agree with others that say they don't want and won't pay for the ridiculous Japanese 3G foo-foo of movies and animated icons on a tiny screen. A faster data connection and a real web browser would be nice, but I can't think of much else I'd want. I'm not even considering the Linux-based handhelds for a while - It's nice to be able to get all kinds of things to run on them, but unfortunately, none of them are capable of doing the basics nearly so well as the Palm, so I'll stick with what works...
Re:other hybrids (Score:2, Insightful)
Why are cell phones much more popular in Europe/Japan? Because land-lines are much less popular because of the per-minute rates etc... they don't have that unlimited local calls
Why are cell phones less popular in America? I've heard rumours that Americans have to pay to receive calls. I hope it's not true, but if it is, it's something that needs fixing.
which leads into the fancy-schmancy cell phones they have... they aren't used to using dial-up to reach the web... that's too expensive. so they *only* have internet access through their cell-phones...
That may be true for Japan, but it certainly isn't for Europe. By and large we don't access the internet on our mobiles, and we do by dialup.
I appreciate that you're talking mostly about Japan, of course. Just a European perspective. :)
Re:other hybrids (Score:2, Informative)
Generally speaking, in the states we start paying for outbound wireless calls as soon as we initiate the call. For incoming calls most services give you the first minute free (to decide whether you want to take the call) and then pay the same rate as outbound calls.
In many cases, we even have to pay for the minutes used to check our voicemail (which I find much more offensive than having to pay for the incoming calls).
However, unlike many portions of Europe, our landline systems are completely free for any inbound and outbound local area calls. This makes a difference in that we can call our ISP from a landline and stay connected for hundreds of hours each month and often incur no charge over the standard phone line cost (between $10US and $20US per month) and the ISP cost (between $0US and $25US per month). To my understanding, in Europe you often get ISP service essentially for free, but have to pay per minute outbound fees on your landline.
Everything is a compromise and everyone gets their money in the end.
Price (Score:1)
The Treo is a world phone. It works on the GSM standard and is equipped for use in both the U.S. and Europe. In the U.S., it will work with carriers like VoiceStream and Cingular.
Yeah, GSM. So I spend $400-$600 on a cell phone/organizer, plus steep monthly fees for cell phone/internet access. And to top it off, I'm locked into GSM, which here in the USA isn't exactly the leading protocol.
The Gardener
Incoming!! (Score:5, Insightful)
- While having a single standard is a good thing, having competition among multiple technologies is also a good thing
sPhMany US cell networks were built before GSM was created, and must provide legacy support for the older standards
In terms of voice quality, no system out there beats the original Motorola analog
While GSM is an impressive technical and political achievement, do remember that one of its unstated purposes was to prevent Motorola from dominating the EC mobile market the way it dominated the US, and to give Ericsson, Nokia, etc. a competitive edge. In this it succeeded, with assistance from poor management at Motorola of course
Re:Incoming!! (Score:2, Insightful)
In the early stages yes. But, in instances like this, the longer that "competition" persists, the more detrimental it is to the development of the market.
As long as the standard is not controlled by a single entity (for its own profit), it is better to have a SINGLE standard.
Re:Incoming!! (Score:2)
And of course, real audiophiles use grammaphone players and vinyl records. Hey, who needs this CD and DVD shit?
Re:Incoming!! (Score:2)
Seriously, there is no law of nature that says that if there are two ways to accomplish a task, one analog and one digital, the digital way will necessarily be superior. Most of the advantage of programmable digital electronics lies in the greater flexibility of feature and manufacturing changes, not necessarily usability or quality improvements for the consumer.
sPh
Re:Incoming!! (Score:2)
While I don't have as much experience travelling in Europe, I do spend plenty of time talking to my EC coworkers, and I can't say I am impressed on that score either. Sorry.
sPh
Re:Price (Score:2, Informative)
You say you have to pay steep monthly fees for cell phone/internet access. However, you pay only about $10/month more than normal cell phone service as opposed to paying Palm.net or something of the sort $20 or $30 a month for internet access for your Palm on top of your cell phone service. If $10/month is too steep for you, the Treo will still be a great combination of a Palm w/o internet and a cell phone.
GSM (growing in the US) (Score:3, Interesting)
Here's [yahoo.com] a ZDNet article from late October about Cingular's plans to do so; the article mentions that Verizon is considering doing the same:
Point of View (Score:3, Insightful)
For PDA users, this is great because it's smaller than you're PDA and it's also a phone, so you don't have to carry another device.
Most phone users, though, don't have a PDA, so they won't get to carry fewer devices, and the form factor really sucks in comparison to the newer phones on the market. Plus, if a PDA was something they wanted to have, they'd have gotten one in addition to a phone already. Why carry something as bulky as my phone a year ago just to have a set of features I don't really want or need?
For me, this looks pretty cool. For most of the people I work with, it's just bulky and expensive.
Dumb dumb dumb (Score:1, Interesting)
Too big to be a good phone. Too small to be a decent PDA.
It's a large clunky prototype of what is to come. I assure you the future isn't in handsets.
DUMBASS is more like it. (Score:3, Informative)
Get a clue before you post. Some fool might think you know what your talking about.
Re: not dumb, just misunderstood (Score:2, Insightful)
But I disagree that the size should matter.
Size doesn't matter, usage and implementation does.
I believe we will see even smaller devices that will succeed, but not just for any application or in any environment.
In the US and many other places you can forget about any 'real' data communication using a pda device until the service issue has been sorted out. But in Europe where GSM is good and you can almost smell the 3G networks, and Japan where the networks are extraordinaire, its the other way around. The service is there. We scream for devices that are not just a mobile phone with a game and some SMS features. Here the market are ripe, so if the American manufacturers wants some business, all they need to do is deliver the advances products and launch it here with the same initiatives they would have done in the States. But mark my words if they are not going for keeps they should rather stay away and leave it up to japs and eurotrash such as yours truely
Here we have the service and even if the device is the size of a wristwatch, if only implemented with the right applications to suit the environment, it will rock the blueeyed danish and swedish blondes panties off.
my favourite fantasy, should I have the opportunity, would be my own personal modified version of the wristwatch from IBM labs in Zurich which are equipped with microphone, bluetoothed earplugs, linux, sandisc flashcard, 1.3inches color display and camera combined with webservices applications for advanced management (and later on blessed with a projector or visor and 'virtual keyboard'). Even without the wishware in the parantheses you would have a client device that in collaboration with web services would give you so many new advantages to make you daily life simpler and more organized, that leaves you with more time for real fun.
imagine the applications with the programmable device connected to the internet utilizing administration and communication software that sorts and organize all the information and makes it available to and for you, on your command.
when the IBM wristwatch with linux was covered here on slashdot a while back I posted some of my fantasies as well and I made a small note about if IBM, Nokia, Ericsson should be interested, I would be happy to cooperate. Amazingly some good IBM professor from Zurich wrote me an email encouraging me to take contact. Greetings to you, if you should read this again. I would love to at least initiate some sort of communication regarding the subject. Unfortunately I lost your address when my thinkpad's harddrive suddenly said: NO MORE. so just to leave it up to mr. chance here is my address again: caspera@sophistic.com
Why did I just write all this again?
phone/PDA integration (Score:1, Insightful)
Anyone know how this unit handles this?
Re:phone/PDA integration (Score:2, Informative)
Yes you can. I have one. You can do it either from the address book or from the jog rocker thingy on the side. It's how I call people.
This thing likely works in a very similar fashion (I notice they also have the jog thingy on the side). Unfortunately, as so many people have already pointed out, CDMA is the ruling technology in the states, even if they're not yet close to 3G.
I did hear an odd rumor about AT&T wireless perhaps moving from TDMA to GSM, but that's probably not reliable.
The real problem with the kyocera is that it's basically an okay phone attached to an okay PDA. It does neither particularly well, and does integration slightly worse.
That said, I wouldn't give mine up. Half the people I know only call me, and the other half only email me. And most of that time, I'm not at home or work.
design (Score:3, Informative)
The reason for QWERTY.. (Score:3, Insightful)
... is simple. It's what people are used to, and what they expect. I know exactly where to find a "A", or an "R", on a QWERTY keyboard. I don't want to have to re-learn this just for my handheld.
Re:The reason for QWERTY.. (Score:3, Funny)
One of the major reasons that I got into computing is that I can't alphabetize for crap. Most people know intuitively whether W comes before or after T, but I actually have to think about it. However, after years of typing at a QWERTY keyboard QWERTY has become part of my subconscious. I can guarantee you that if they were to arrange the keys in alphabetical order I would quickly find myself singing the ABC song in order to find the 'M' key. That would be bad.
And don't give me any crap about how "learning another keyboard layout is easy." I have tried. Apparently my brain is miswired for this sort of thing.
Re:The reason for QWERTY.. (Score:2)
LOL, I don't know if it has anything to do with being intelligent or not, but whatever it is we must be wired the same way. Every time I hear the word "right" I have to suppress the urge to put my hand over my heart (I learned which hand was my right one pledging allegiance to the flag :). Even worse, I spent quite a bit of my youth sailing and my friends would further complicate things by using the words "port" and "starboard." The only way I can remember which is left and right is to remember that port and left have the same amount of letters (and are the same thing if you are facing forward in the boat).
No wonder I have such an aversion to directions.
Re:design (Score:2)
I saw it in Fry's and fell deeply in lust with it; pity I'm so good at losing tiny but horrendously expensive electronic devices
D
Not double.. quadruple (Score:2)
The high-res CLIE models (both monochrome and color) actually run at 4 times the resolution.. 2x in both dimensions.
Re:design (Score:1)
>alphanumeric characters in a QWERTY arrangement
>on such a small keyboard, when a different layout
>would make much more sense.
It makes sense to me. I'm a touch typist, and I absolutely refuse to use any keyboard that is not QWERTY, even if, no, especially if it's on a small device like this.
Having to search for the letters is a pain in the butt, especially when the labels are so tiny. I know where the letter 'o' is supposed to be, so I shouldn't have to hunt it down on a non-standard keyboard.
ALMOST there (Score:3, Insightful)
Note to Handspring (and whomever else):
Add voice recognition capability!
How many people have phones now that you can add voice tags to people's numbers? This should actually be rather easy to implement in the Treo, I'd imagine. (I didn't see it explicitly stated in the review.) Imagine just saying someone's name, and their business card comes up and it asks you if you want to dial their number. Sounds like a winning deal to me.
Other than that, add some Bluetooth or 802.11b capability in there. Then I can use this as an uplink for my laptop. Or I can beam business cards with RF instead of IR. Or imagine being able to zap someone your business card through SMS. That's another cool feature.
These devices are ALMOST there. We're almost to convergence, and I think I'll wait a generation or two and take another serious look at it.
Re:ALMOST there (Score:1)
I haven't used the cellphone feature before, but I'd be worried about calling my boss when some guy walking by me on the street happens to say "Dave". It's the same problem you run into using voice recognition in a busy office.
Re:ALMOST there (Score:2, Informative)
FYI Nokia phones already support this capability.
Where will the processor power come from? (Score:2)
Just my uninformed, ignorant, kneejerk responses (as I'm sure dozens of people will be telling me very shortly.)
Re:ALMOST there (Score:2)
Handspring limits (Score:2, Informative)
- hardware keyboard (Treo 180) OR grafitti (Treo 180g) but no sense of which is cheaper.
- 8 hour battery life: This seems short for either a cell phone OR a pda.
- only GSM network -- great everywhere but US, where it can be called "OK" at best.
It's not really there yet: only 16MB of RAM, not upgradeable, and no plans for a springboard module for EITHER additional RAM OR an MP3 player. Too bad: That would be useful integration!
Re:Handspring limits (Score:2, Informative)
They cost the same. It's purely personal preference as to which you get.
8 hour battery life: This seems short for either a cell phone OR a pda
Where did you get that number? It's 2.5 hours talk time, 60 hours standby time, which is quite reasonable. Look here [handspring.com].
Samsung I300 vs. Handspring Treo (Score:2, Interesting)
I'd like to see this Treo mate with a SCP-6000 and see what happens. Also has anyone noticed the likeness between this Treo and the old Motorola I1000-plus phones. But its definately a step in the right direction.
Fighting for Peace, is Like Fucking for Virginity.
Looks great. (Score:1)
I like the keyboard, I'm curious how the Graffiti works. Do you just write anywhere on the screen, or do you have to bring up a writing area?
It's too bad they don't have a springboard slot. If this could take my Soundsgood MP3 player and my GPS it would really sweeten the deal.
This looks like a great upgrade to my current Visor. I was going to get a springboard phone just before I ended up moving to North Dakota where Handspring didn't have coverage. If their coverage expands, this will let me finally stop having to carry a cell and a PDA.
And 16MB of memory, lord what will I do with it all? I'm doing great with 2!
You must walk before you can fly (Score:5, Insightful)
Many people, including myself, believe that the next frontier of technology is small, portable devices that communicate with each other wirelessly, though each device has a specialized function.
In order to make that happen, we need to start with devices such as handhelds - which CAN be easily specialized through software, and which have readily available wireless capability.
Its true that its "Just another handheld," similar to all of the other handhelds, but its more functional. Its not like another model car, which is exactly like the previous model, except that its "new and improved" (i.e. new and the current fashion); this is another piece of the puzzle.
And IT DOES MATTER that its slightly more functional. The advent of the 386 chipset allowed a whole new class of problems to be solvable that where previously too slow to do research - I know that this is the case for my field, which is computer vision. As time progresses, even more problems are being researched.
I'm looking forward to using technology such as this -perhaps even this model - in the near future (when it becomes pretty inexpensive - perhaps two or three years from now) as a module for home automation - it would be just about perfect for the purpose.
Sharp's new PDA just released (Score:2, Interesting)
And yes, it does run linux (2.4 to be exact) along with PalmTop, QT, and Personal Java.
SprintPCS Service - Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable now (Score:5, Informative)
It's a color PalmOS, 8MB memory which is shorter and narrower then my Palm Vx, though just slightly thicker. It does have the ability to dial from the sync'ed address book, and all the usual PalmOS features.
And it's avaliable now, though you may have to search a little to find it at a SprintPCS store. From what I can see, it has all the features the Treo has and more, except the physical buttons
More information on the phone can be found at http://samsungusa.com/i300/
Re:SprintPCS Service - Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable (Score:2, Informative)
Emmm... no.
Treo: 4.3" x 2.7" x 0.7", 5.4 oz
I300: 4.9" x 2.28" x 0.82", 6.0 oz
I wouldn't say that it is huge compared to the Treo... 0.6" longer, 0.4" narrower and 0.12" thicker.
Though, yes, there is no cover for the screen. That's what screen protectors and cases are for
Of course, the I300 is avaliable now, while the color Treo is still half a year away
Re:SprintPCS Service - Samsung SPH-I300 avaliable (Score:2)
(CDMA is also much better for mobile data connections because of its soft handoff capability, which allows the phone to "talk" to multiple cells simultaneously to produce a smooth transition rahter than the abrupt switchover used by other systems.)
Not really a world phone (Score:2, Informative)
I can mostly deal with it being a GSM only device, and not have TDMA or CDMA, but calling it a dual-band world phone is pretty much an outright lie. Yeah, its a "world phone" if you never travel across oceans.
I still might get one if the service plans are good, but being able to go to the UK and stick a £10 Virgin pay as you go sim card in it would make the thing a true winner.
Re:Not really a world phone (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Not really a world phone (Score:2)
There are also GSM 900 nets of course too, namely BT and Vodafone.
Color coming mid 2002 (Score:2, Informative)
iPod (Score:5, Funny)
1) Cellphone that works with all the cell networks
in the world.
2) 802.11x or whatever that new superfast wireless
standard is that works with 802.11b, v.92 modem,
Gigabit ethernet, and the LCD backlight should be
able to blink morse code.
3) Military GPS accurate to 1"
4) A keyboard and also hand recognition (but not
graffiti crap, REAL hand recognition). And voice
recognition.
5) It's screen should be color and widescreen
format so I can watch my cracked DVDs on it.
6) It should run linux, but have virtual machines
so it can also run Palm and Windows apps. Oh, and
a gameboy advance emulator.
7) The battery should last at least a week,
preferably two.
8) None of this SDMI crap. I can put on and take
off anything. In fact, it should have a video and
audio in, so I can take input straight from my DVD
player into the device and share them with my
friends.
9) It should be the same size it is now, and still
use firewire.
10) Flash card, Smartmedia, multimedia card and
PCMCIA slots.
Oh, and I won't pay more than $150 for it.
That'd be cool!
Re:iPod (Score:2, Funny)
Re:OT (Score:2)
Nice but what's it's battery life? (Score:2)
Battery life sucked, the unit expected to be placed on it's cradle 3-5 times a day (It will completely recharge in 30 minutes) and if you left digital land your freshly charged battery died within minutes on standby or seconds in a call.
If this unit cannot give me 2 days without needing a charge (which means within 3 months it will need daily charging due to battery life loss) It is worthless.
I really hope they have improved the battery life or at least offer a battery backpack for those of us that use a phone to death and dont sit at a desk most of the day.
PDA/802.11b/VOIP instead of cell phone(s) (Score:2, Interesting)
My CIS teacher today was talking about using 802.11b in lieu of Excite@Home and what not (he may be getting cut off tomorrow.) That got me to thinking about an iPaq/Yopy (or any of the other linux/pocket pc capable PDA's), 802.11b PCMCIA/CompactFlash card and a VOIP application, all combined with a nice NAN (Neighborhood Area Network.)
About 5 linksys WAPS ($139 a Piece on Pricewatch) would cover our entire campus (I have my own personal one but it just covers the dorm.) Anyway, carrying around a little PDA (or using your laptop) would give you nice voice/video/data as long as you were in range, spread those WAP puppies around the city and that would be pretty pimp. Imagine roaming with nice speeds anywhere in town.
That brings me to the point where I am clueless. Can anybody help, how do you provide seamless transitions between WAPs? I'd hate to be downloading a file and wander out of one WAPs range, can another closeby pick me up seamlessly? (I know I can connect to either, but can it switch automatically without interrupting communcation?) Linux seems to usually be the most ahead in these types of bleeding edge apps... Anybody have any URLs?
worldLOG [worldlog.com] Connecting the lives of friends and family.
My sig, http://www.jdhodges.com [jdhodges.com]
Against headaches? (Score:2)
Saw one at Comdex already. (Score:2)
My main rant with this is the keyboard - too small for my tastes. Perhaps it's big fingers, but it was *not* very ergonomic for me, and that lowered my impression of the overall product. I had to really concentrate to work the buttons. I would probably rather fight the Graffiti system (or tap a virtual keypad) then try and punch on that keyboard. But then again maybe if you have small fingers, or really sharp nails, it might work good for you.
I didn't see that new 'sideways' Nokia phone (at Comdex) with keys on either side of the screen (I'm sure it was there). But I would gather that *might* be better as the keys could be spaced a bit farther apart. Or, they could be close together and have more of them (which gives the same result). I'm not sure, I wish I spent the time to check that.
Anyway, some food for thought for those of you with larger digits.
- A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
- AC
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2)
Not true. [msnbc.com]
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:3, Insightful)
I do agree that driving while distracted is a bad thing. I curse at more cellphone yakking drivers a day than anything else. But to say that the manufacturers of the device are to blame? I can't abide by that logic. The devices aren't to blame, it's the stupidity of the user. I tried talking on a cell phone and driving ONCE...and I realized how my driving suffered, so I never did it again. It seems some people are unable to make that logical jump, or they're unwilling to sacrifice that "convenience" to possibly save their life or someone else's.
Aside from that part of the argument, I don't see how a Treo makes the situation worse. Cell phones already exist, as do PDAs. Any of the above behavior is already out there, and I don't think the Treo's audience is Joe Blow. Most average folk won't pony up $400 for a phone when (insert phone company name here) is giving them away with service. Two handed dialing? Maybe that'll make em realize how stupid phone use and driving put together are when they can't dial without releasing the wheel.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:1, Informative)
Or maybe they're just not your identical twin, and therefore handle it differently than you do. I'm sick of the attitude that just because you can't do something responsibly, no one else can, and therefore it has to be all or none for everyone. And it has to be legislated that way.
There's no doubt some people are unable to drive and talk on the phone at the same time, yet do it anyway. These same people are the ones who would find something else just as stupid to do, given the chance. Treat the consequences of their actions... if they get in a wreck because they aren't driving responsibly (phone or otherwise), arrest them for battery or something worse. Make the core of what's wrong with their behaviour something that they want to avoid, not specific manifestations of it. Radios, makeup, TVs, magazines, lunch, etc. can all be every bit as distracting and irresponsible (but don't have to be, either).
Some of us are quite capable of focusing our attention correctly, however, even while talking. Hell, I'm honestly a better driver when I'm on the phone, because I'm very conscious of the fact it could distract me and take pains to make sure it doesn't. And anytime the driving gets at all hairy, the phone goes on the passenger seat, no matter who is on the other end.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2)
Unfortunately, until people in general are more intelligent about their limits and their actions, that is the way its going to be. Why should I be at risk in my car because the guy next to me won't admit to himself that he isn't a good driver while he is on his cell phone?
Also, it should be noted that just because you think you are a capable, responsible driver even when talking on a cell phone, chances are you aren't. Every distraction in the car, whether it be your hot cup of coffee, your cell phone, the amazing guitar solo that you have to play air guitar to with one hand, is just that: a distraction. Each one decreases your reaction time. Sure, if you are a person with good reflexes, that time negligible, but eventually it won't be. And at that point, you'll most likely be one of the people who isn't admitting their limits. And then the cycle repeats.
As much as I dislike the government dictating how we live our lives, things that become deadly weapons in the hands of irresponsible people most likely do need legislation.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2)
I drive and talk all the time. However, I have both hands on the wheel (headset) and most all of my dialing is voice activated. This is no different then talking to someone in your front seat (which may be a distraction too!).
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:3, Insightful)
Phone conversations are traditionally continuous and uninterrupted. We've all been trained to use them that way, and the people on the other side of the conversation expect it as well. Phone conversations take up higher priorities (re-nice'd if you will) in our brain than conversations with other passengers.
Other passengers are far more likely to accept and expect breaks in the conversation due to traffic and driving issues. They often will break the conversation themselves to warn of impending dangers. You don't feel bad about not answering for a while if something needs attention while talking to a passenger, as usually they know what caused the delay.
Phone conversations are inherently more dangerous because we're expected to and pretty much always do devote more of our attention to them.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2)
It's all about mental priorities. Regardless of who you're talking to, or by what medium, you must learn how to focus on driving. Before the days of headsets, I actually found myself dropping the phone while driving because I needed to focus and use both hands (for a left turn, or something). It's not the end of the world if you have to call the person back or have them wait while you cross a busy intersection - it's just too bad most cell phone [ab]users don't realise this.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:5, Insightful)
And while I hate the idiots that are talking on the phone while they're driving, you also have to face the facts. Wish I could find a reference, but on the news around a year ago, I saw some statistics about the apparent causes of accidents. Number one cause was food, at 21%, I believe. Futzing with the radio was at 11%, methinks. Should there be laws against eating while driving, or having a stereo which has no on-wheel controls?
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2, Interesting)
Until then, I think a recent study at the University of Utah [nsc.org] is getting to the heart of the matter. In short, they found that it's the interactive nature of conversation that's the real distraction. Tuning the radio, eating fries, etc, are just fundamentally different than
talking to people.
That said, the new Treo looks damn cool.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2)
I'm not impressed by the Treo myself. Nothing against it per se, but I am not big on cell phones, or Palm devices really. As soon as I can get a card for my Newton or iPAQ that allows me to get real wireless net access for a low cost per month, I'll be impressed. Doesn't even have to be fast- I'll take 2KB/s. But as long as these services are expensive as they are, I just don't find reason to get excited.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2)
Actually, several cities are trying to do just that. Also, there are currently several unofficial restrictions to eating while driving. For example, try driving past a police officer while drinking from a container without using a straw. Believe it or not, in many places, you'll be ticketed. Food for thought; keep it in mind the next time you bring a coffee travel mug in the car while driving.
I can't find any good references right now, but I know for a fact that in my town and the areas around it, you will get fined if you are drinking from something like a covered mug or soda can while driving. They group it along with driver obstruction laws, such as having a radar detector attached via suction cups to your windshield, which is also illegal here.
Reference for this: (Score:2, Informative)
I'm not a Libertarian, but if they use PHP they can't be all bad.
..well, ok, they could use some help from the Demoronizer though.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2)
In some places, it is illegal: http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/
As somebody who used to cycle to work, I can tell you who were the most dangerous drivers (i.e. the ones who scared the shit out of me the most and came closest to hitting me): really old people, and people on cell phones. Really old people are another story though: they're second only to 16 year olds in the US for causing fatal crashes.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:1)
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2, Insightful)
The accidents that can be shown to have been caused by cellphone usage are still a tiny fraction of accidents. Most studies I've read say it's something like 2%, which is far below a lot of other distractions. If you're going to outlaw cellphone usage, how about:
- Talking to others in the car. (I see people so into a conversation they're all over the road).
- Eating/Drinking.
- Fiddling with the stereo.
- Putting on makeup
- Shaving.
- Driving while tired.
etc...
Hell, you can buy a car with a fucking TV in it these days! How screwed up is that? And don't tell me it's just for the kiddies in the back seat, I've seen plenty of models where the TV is far enough forward that it could easily be a distraction to the driver.
How about people start taking some responsibility for their actions for a change? If you can't handle a phone and drive at the same time, then don't do it. I know that I can, as long as it's a short conversation that doesn't require much thought (i.e. I'm going to the store, need anything?).
Cell phone usage in cars when related to accidents is getting a horrible rap for 2 reasons:
1. Yes, some buffoons can't handle the phone and drive... then again, there's a pretty damn high percentage of people on the road that can't drive worth a damn even without distractions. I'd rather get those people off the road before outlawing cellphones.
2. The cell phone users are the easiest to see in comparison to most other distractions. It's really easy to see them holding a phone up to their ear for minutes at a time.
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2, Interesting)
He doesn't understand that there is anyone else out there besides him. Laws about hands free don't solve the crux issue which is his lack of morals. He's not thought about and understood consequences of his decisions...or he doesn't care.
I'm going to not talk on my phone because when I become distracted I might kill someone through my reduced reaction time
So while you might solve the preceived issue through legislation... you will not solve the issue which is that people don't think about the consequences of their actions when they are behind the wheel.
For Instance take these examples...
the guy who went flying around the curve on I-95 below Hanscom Field in the inside lane at 85 on my way to work this morning seems to have a similar problem...
Or the Saab who did the four lane sweep out of US3 onto 128...
Or the lady with her kids bouncing around in the back of her minivan on rte 62 yesterday afternoon...
Or the guy I watched eating a burger as we were both going through the Hooksett tolls on Saturday...
or mayhaps the State Trooper on the Pike last thursday who while seeming in no legal rush was flying West from Allston-Brighton at 80+ MPH suspicously close to shift change...
Or mayhaps the owner of the El-Camino with Maine tags I parked next to at Dunkin' Donuts this morning that had bald tires...
Or mayhaps the low riding, detailed out Ford Contour with the stereo pumping out the latest hip-hop jam I had the joy of sitting next to at a light in Woburn a week past on a warm day...
Laws about hands free don't solve the issue that these drivers got their licenses out of cracker jack boxes and obviously didn't learn the potential impact of their actions.
Personally I didn't really realize myself until years after I got my license. I mean I knew it intellectually... and I follow the law... but it did not sink in on that gutt level.
For me the transition from an intellectual knowledge to that gutt knowledge happened when I watched from a house in Castine Maine the Hancock County Mounties scrape a young kid off a guard-rail on Maine Route 166 when he tried to take his bike around a steep curve at 110 while inebriated. People just don't realize till it affects them. I really think we should make it a requirement for kids getting their license to help clean up one traffic accident.
So while cell phones usage while driving may be a great campaign issue for politicians in seach of re-election (calling Swifty). It side steps the real issue which is that many drivers on the road today (and not just those in New England) don't really have a sense of what the impact of some of their preceived minor actions might be, the loss of their lives or even more sadly some innocent bystanders
Re:Oppenheimer's Ghost (Score:2)
I doubt it would be that hard since if you are going 40MPH you are probably changing cells pretty quickly and you can base it on that. However it is a bad idea. Why are you preventing the passengers from using the phone? Or the guy that got kidnapped and stuck in a trunk?
Re:$399 (Score:1)
Re:$399 (Score:1)
at least that's on my list....
or
PS2
Grand Theft Auto 3
Metal Gear Solid 2
Yeah baby.
Re:$399 (Score:2)
Re:But does it do Linux? (Score:2, Interesting)
An operating system is just a platform. Who care's about the platform on something that only has a few functions? personally I would rather have it run Palm OS rather than linux because I know Palm has a very nice and stable OS, and there are tons of programs for the Palm. Why you would put linux on something like this is beyond me.
Re:But does it do Linux? (Score:5, Funny)
tar -xzf /fridge/turkey.tgz / /proc/oven/preheat / /dev/oven
&& echo 380 >
&& cat turkey >
e Voila! dinner is done without me entering the kitchen.
And you're telling me you don't care!?
Re:But does it do Linux? (Score:1)
Re:This is still cooler... (Score:1)
Coal for you this year.
Dancin Santa
Re:And only $400 to $600!? (Score:2)
When you're no longer posting on Slashdot I'll believe that you've lived up to the courage of your convictions
Re:And only $400 to $600!? (Score:2)
Re:Handwriting recognition. (OT?) (Score:2)
that's the fault of your elementary school teachers
Aparrently my intake at my first primary school, for one reason or another, consisted entirely of kids that could already write. Myself excluded. Consquently I was never taught to write and ended up guessing. Badly.
Hey! I got modded down, shocker!
Dave
Re:Idiot (RANT) (Score:2)
Re:Antennas - A Pet Peeve (Score:2)
That's a good feature of Star Tac phones. The angled flip-piece and extended antenna radiate very little into your brain. Cancer notwithstanding, less radiation bouncing that close to you can only be better for you.
I personally don't like phones with no extendable antenna for this very reason. Just some thoughts.
- A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
- AC