First Looks at Linux DA PDA 160
e1en0r writes "My Linux DA PDA finally arrived yesterday. It's a great PDA for under $100. I put up a review of it here. It's very similar to the Palm OS, with a few more interesting features. The most notable being the file manager. You can see where everything is and view all the files in text and hexadecimal mode. It also appears that you can overclock the 16 MHz DragonBall CPU up to 25 MHz. There are some screenshots on their site, which include the CPU Speed application. Unfortunately that application is lacking in documentation." The review is a little thin, but its still cool seeing these in the wild.
Someone had to do it! (Score:2, Informative)
2 MB Flash Upgradeable
8 MB RAM
Motorola Dragonball CPU
Battery Operated
Color Available - GALAXY GREY
15 Days Technical Support by Email
6 Month Linux DA O/S Software Upgrade
One Year Warranty
DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform
Includes: Carrying Case, 2 AAA Batteries, PC Sync Cable, CD with PC Sync Program, Quick-Start Manual, Handwriting Guide, Warranty Card, Registration Card
Irony: (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Irony: (Score:1)
It is not irony in the correct sense of the word since rsync is available to sync the Linux PDA with any *nix system.
Nice try, however. Better luck in the future.
Rsync?!? (Score:1)
Re:Rsync?!? (Score:1)
Re:Irony. {part 2} (Score:1)
Misery loves mediocraty, perhaps?
Re:Irony: (Score:1)
Re:Irony: (Score:1)
All of the Linux PDA's I have seen have only synced with winblows. This is very irritating. News flash for marketers. If people are buying a linux PDA (generally) they use linux, other wise most people would just use Palm. When someone gets there head out of thier arse and writes software that syncs thier linux PDA with...gasp...Linux, then I will buy one.
Until then, it just seems to be fueling the stupidity of bad marketing.
I'll buy one. (Score:1)
Shameless plugs:
I hope it doesn't put off any harmful radiation [lostbrain.com] like the pentium 4 [lostbrain.com].
tcd004
Get real (Score:3, Interesting)
This is just the current state too. We know that Palm is doing all this in an economically viable way, whereas Linux DA may not be and probably is not. In other words, with Palm the continued support and development is pretty much a sure thing...Linux DA on the other hand.....will likely be forced to fold very shortly.
I don't get it. (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2)
Sancho
Re:I don't get it. (Score:1)
Nope. Just "on a medium customarily used for software interchange".
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2)
-- iCEBaLM
Re:I don't get it. (Score:2, Informative)
Now the GPL also says that they can't keep anyone else from giving you the binary. But my guess is just the kernel is GPLed (since they have no way around this) but the actual PIM applets are proprietary, so nobody could give you anything besides an updated kernel, which probably wouldn't do you much good.
Linux at the wrong end! (Score:1, Interesting)
"DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform"
It'd be nice to have a PDA running Linux, but if it can't talk to my other computers, it's pointless.
Rats.
Re:Linux at the wrong end! (Score:3, Insightful)
Now, to get Linux "at the right end" companies just need to be convinced that there is a large enough paying population to justify putting out a product. My bet would be that this is less likely to happen. Even if a company put out a great product that ran on Linux it would likely be cloned, forked, warez or simply not purchased. Typical Linux users don't want to pay for code; if its not Free (as in beer) they don't want it. Now there are some that will plunk down some $$ for a project they like or an application that they need, but overall there is no large market for commercial Linux desktop applications.
Re:Linux at the wrong end! (Score:1)
from the review ... he'd recommend it if it worked (Score:3, Insightful)
It runs very little software and won't sync.
A linux PDA that doesn't even attempt to sync with anything other than Windows and then fails anyway ?
Seems like a pointless device. Why try to emulate a palm anyway ? If you're going to take them on try to be BETTER.
Seems like a joke device. I wonder if the reviewer would be favourable at all if it wasn't a linux based device ?
Re:from the review ... he'd recommend it if it wor (Score:4, Insightful)
Nope. The product wouldn't even get to market. Inferrior products don't go anywhere unless they've got some reason to survive. In this case the company hopes that Linux users will buy it (over Palm, etc.) simply because it runs Linux, not because it has better features.
Re:from the review ... he'd recommend it if it wor (Score:1)
Re:from the review ... he'd recommend it if it wor (Score:1)
Wow. That looks pretty funny out of context.
Screenshots (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm a big fan of Linux, but why would I want this instead of kicking a few bucks extra and actually getting a Palm device?
I'm serious here; my Visor does what I want it to, does this solve some problem that existing PDAs don't? It seems like sort of a tough sell, especially when the device has only 15 apps.
Re:Screenshots (Score:1)
Go to the screenshots page, and look at all the wasted space on the display. Unessesary borders/icons, colums not set out to the full width of the screen etc.
These may seem like weak points. But not when you consider that the screen is only 160x160, it's important.
If they had improved the interface (and belive me, there are 100's of things that could be added/fixed to out of the box PalmOS), then the fact that there aren't as many apps out at the moment, woudn't bother me so much, since half the apps installed on my Vx are extentions/enchantments anyway.
Re:Screenshots (Score:2)
More? Wow, I heard on my car radio that I can get a Palm M100 for $99.99 plus tax - $CDN too. That seems cheaper than $100 US for this thing, and the Palm is far better supported.
Besides, what do I need 8 megs of memory for? I don't know 8 megs worth of people or send 8 megs worth of e-mail.
--Dan
Re:Screenshots (Score:1)
Besides, what do I need 8 megs of memory for? I don't know 8 megs worth of people or send 8 megs worth of e-mail.
Re:Screenshots (Score:1)
Download Palm OS & load it on (Score:2)
Some pundits think a good proportion of buyers will just load Palm OS on it (if this as the same one mentioned in an article I read a month ago that was to be released in about a month at a RRP of US$97).
All the hardware is fully Palm OS compatible
Re: runthe PALM EMU then (Score:1)
Linux DA or Agenda VR3? (Score:2, Interesting)
For a few bucks more, consider a mono iPaq... (Score:3, Informative)
I've had my eye on the iPaq H3135. 200MHz StrongARM, 16MB RAM + 16MB ROM. Those specs put the VR3 to shame, and handhelds.org [handhelds.org] should have all the info on flashing the OS to Linux. Amazon.com is offering them for $150 [amazon.com] after rebate.
Note: the status of Linux on the mono iPaq seems to be a little behind the color version, so be sure to check the relevant info [handhelds.org] on the development site before jumping on the idea.
Re:For a few bucks more, consider a mono iPaq... (Score:2)
Article at LinuxDevices.com (Score:2)
"LinuxDA" (Score:1, Interesting)
License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:5, Interesting)
What bugs me about this is not that some company is using the Linux kernel to build a proprietary PDA, but the fact that they so prominently use the Linux name. This is not a "Linux" PDA in any useful sense: it doesn't run Linux utilities, it thumbs its nose at the open source process, and even its kernel software development appears to take part outside the Linux community.
I also wonder whether the company even still has the right to use the Linux kernel. They failed to make source code available for months (I requested it), even though they were distributing binaries. That was a violation of the GPL, and once you violate it, you lose the right to use the code. Also, the source code that they did finally distribute is a mess, and I have my doubts that it even corresponds to the kernel that they ship, which would constitute another GPL violation.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:3, Insightful)
The AgendaVR, Yopy, and Sharp PDAs are "Linux PDAs". This is a proprietary PDA that happens to use a Linux kernel.
So what's a non-proprietary PDA?
This is not a "Linux" PDA in any useful sense: it doesn't run Linux utilities, it thumbs its nose at the open source process, and even its kernel software development appears to take part outside the Linux community.
And the opposite is true of the VR3. It runs desktop-style Linux utilities, complete and Open Source is available for everything on the box, and the kernel is a relatively standard linuxvr/linuxmips kernel.
I think the only way you could claim the VR3 is a "proprietary PDA" is that the schematics and license for the hardware are not freely available. But by that standard, the hardware you're using right now is proprietary. (OK, there are probably a few slashdot readers on homebrew/reference/open hardware right now; feel free to hit reply...)
The VR3 isn't perfect. It has many things wrong with it. But it's the flag carrier for development of PDA systems Linux-style. Well, handhelds.org wins for repurposing the iPaq hardware, but Compaq isn't corporately dedicated to supporting Linux on that PDA.
(Insert rant about what "Linux" really means here. Imagine I claimed that glibc+kernel was the most useful definition right now.)
What _are_ you talking about? (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, I didn't make that claim. In fact, I gave the VR3 as an example of what I would consider a true Linux PDA, as opposed to to the "Linux DA".
In fact, I like my VR3 a lot. The only thing it really needs is an MMC expansion slot.
Forgot to turn on the brain again?
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:2)
Maybe one that allows you to use non-prprietary software to interact with it?
DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform
I don't think these will sell very well at all.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:1)
I raised the GPL concern with LinuxDA earlier in the year. I was informed that until the GPL was upheld under a court challenge, they didn't think it carried much weight. Curiously, they felt they were justified in cutting the GPL corner with a statement like "how else can anyone make money with Linux?"
God's honest truth.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:1)
2)"useful sense"!?! I don't think you're a human in any useful sense in that if I were to mince you and turn you into sausages they would contain only a very low percentage of meat.
What was your point again?
3)This is not a violation of the GPL, try reading it sometime.
Your doubts are worth nothing.
You wouldn't know a GPL violation if it deflowered you.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:2)
If the binary is available for download, the source must be available for download from the same location at the same time.
Also who knows...that source you got could actually be the kernel in your system...a mess or not..sometimes shitty code actually works.
The GPL is pretty explicit that they need to include the source in the form they are using for making the executable. My impression is that this is not the case.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:1)
Isn't it a lot more general than that, it's more along the lines of "if a binary is available then source must be available", no distribution methods specified. So if they provide binaries to download they don't have to make the source available on the same site, just give it out when asked.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:2)
Well, I asked, and they didn't make it available in any form for several months.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:2)
Who really cares if they release it or not? Sure, it's technically part of the GPL and it's within the right of the public, but it still seems to me that some people are just out to whine. Their value added, insofar as the kernel and hardware goes, is probably almost zip (judging by what i've seen). It's the applications that they actually "did" something with, but even there.... looks downright mediocre.
Furthermore, this company JUST released this product, did they not? According to the GPL a company is not obliged to release their sourcecode, unless they DISTRIBUTE it. In other words, if they just started distributing this past week, it's still reasonable for them to take awhile longer to reply.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:2)
They released the software in binary form months ago. They refused to make the source available at the time (probably while they were trying to get licensees). Months later the source appeared on their web site. They licensed the software to a hardware manufacturer and the hardware manufacturer apparently released a hardware product recently.
Re:License? Trademark? Proprietary programs? (Score:1)
So it's a PalmOS Clone??? (Score:1)
Powerplay 3 (Score:1, Informative)
Rip off of Palm UI (Score:1)
Good points: The price - this is in the price range of many people. However, would the Palm m100 be a better deal because of the wealth of applications available?
Also, that website has a way too small font, and it is a fixed size so I couldn't scale it up in the browser (konqueror). Mozilla will probably fare better as its font resizing even works on sites there the stylesheet has been rude enough to specify a fixed font size instead of a relative font size.
ueber geek! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:ueber geek! (Score:1)
I even tried to suck my gut in!!
Well, I thought the same thing but then realized that it was a very true to life model, they had choosen. The only one who would be seen wearing a belt like this.
Re:ueber geek! (Score:1)
1) Never wear white pants with a white shirt. You wear dark pants light shirt or the opposite. In otherwords, you are trying to avoid being in SPY VS SPY. (Hint: dark pants also mean dark socks!)
2) NEVER (that means ever) do the "Batbelt" in any visable public place. One phone or pager is normal. Pager, phone, PDA, wireless email, leatherman, etc = BATMAN
Got it? Good, now get out of the house and meet people, you can't do that in front of your computer.
Re:ueber geek! (Score:1)
Nah, white tennis socks are good for all colors of pants. Besides, they are much more comfortable and cheaper than "dress" socks.
In case it gets slashdotted.. (Score:2, Insightful)
It's about twice as thick as my Palm Vx and comes with batteries, a data sync cable and a pretty decent case. It looks pretty nice too. There was a lame Linux DA sticker on the case that I peeled off right away, thinking it was just protecting the logo like the cover I peeled off the screen. Heh. Oops. The packaging was nice and it arrived in one piece.
But on to the important details - the PDA itself. I'm very happy with it. It's got a DragonBall EZ 16 MHz processor that you can apparently overclock up to 25 MHz, 8 MB RAM and 2 MB Flash Rom. The physical buttons are pretty much the same as a Palm and there's a backlight and contrast control. It comes with 7 games, 10 applications, and 4 system utilites. A lot of the features are similar to the Palm OS, but it has some cool differences. For one, you can change the keyboard to QWERTY or natural. I also like that you can choose whether or not you want small or large icons. I'm having a little trouble with the handwriting recognition because it's a little different than Palm's. One cool feature is that when you write something it pops up a box showing what you're writing.
My favorite application is the File Manager. It's cool to see where things are, and you can view the files in text and hexadecimal mode. I'm trying to figure out if you can actually do anything with the htdocs directory. It seems strange to have it but with no purpose. I also like the paint application. It's a basic application that lets you draw crude pictures and save them, but it's so fun coloring things in. The games are your basic free games - snake, mine, tetris, etc. Plus there's the standard applications like an Address Book, Expense, Email, Memo, Schedule, Clock, etc. There are some screenshots here.
Unfortunately the software that this comes with only works on Windohs. And it even seems to have problems with that. I'm using Win2k and I'm getting various sync connection errors (COM2 is using by the other program!, Communication error). The strange thing is when I press the sync button, the PC pops up an error and the PDA shows the sync screen but times out. So they're both recognizing the sync request but not connecting. I've tried both serial ports but have had no luck. There is a nice feature that lets me import my Palm addresses and memos. Hopefully I can actually sync them eventually.
Overall I'd say the Palm is easier to use, but if you're looking for a cheap PDA I'd highly recommend this one, assuming that the sync utility will eventually work. It definitely holds its own against the others that I've played with. The lack of software is an issue, however. I haven't found any other applications for it. You can download their development kit, complete with core dump, and try making your own though.
Here are the specs from the official site:
* Manufactured by Linux DA O/S Licensee
* Embedded with Linux DA O/S for PowerPlay III
* Palm IIIxe Hardware Compatible
* 2 MB Flash Upgradeable
* 8 MB RAM
* Motorola Dragonball CPU
* Battery Operated
* Color Available - GALAXY GREY
* 15 Days Technical Support by Email
* 6 Month Linux DA O/S Software Upgrade
* One Year Warranty
* DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Platform
* Includes: Carrying Case, 2 AAA Batteries, PC Sync Cable, CD with PC Sync Program, Quick-Start Manual, Handwriting Guide, Warranty Card, Registration Card
Pictures coming soon. Although the pictures on their site are accurate.
Dial a phone with one? (Score:1)
Re:Dial a phone with one? (Score:1)
Re:Dial a phone with one? (Score:1)
Re:Dial a phone with one? (Score:1)
In short: Kyocera did a nice integration job.
Re:Dial a phone with one? (Score:1)
other linux PDAs (Score:2, Informative)
Anyway, I don't use PDAs since I took my Visor sailing with me - doh! (WON the sucker from Handspring too, easy come, easy go I guess)
DataSync Program Only Available in MS Windows Plat (Score:1)
My God... (Score:1, Redundant)
Even in my darkest days of true geekdom I was never this bad [linuxda.com].
I mean, I know it runs Linux, and it looks nice and all, but how much digital crud do we really want to strap on our bodies anyhow? A certain borg analogy comes to mind...
NOTE: grep -r "humour" > your
Re:My God... (Score:1)
I carried a cell phone (big, clunky thing - this was a while back), a walkie-talkie, a keyring with about 40 keys on it, a mag-lite, and sometimes a handcuff case. All on my belt, and not a geek-toy among the lot.
but we already have handsprings (Score:1)
I'm not an embedded systems sort of person, so there may be something terribly cool about mushing linux down into little devices, but why not use NetBSD? NetBSD is very portable, and I'd bet my socks there's one that runs on the dragonball. Linux (as far as I know [let's be honest, that isn't very far]) was designed to run on i386, wasn't it?
Re:but we already have handsprings (Score:2, Informative)
Apparrently, it was a management decision from the top, and most people agree it was only used so it could get "Linux" buzz. Maybe they'll be as successful as VA Linux...
Weird Webpage (Score:1)
<meta name="generator" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">
I find it interesting that a company that thinks it is important enough to put linux on a PDA still can't make a web page without Frontpage for Microsoft Windows...
Re:Weird Webpage (Score:2)
I think it's time we revisit the key details surrounding this story:
It would seem this is actually a convoluted plot to reduce consumer faith in the Linux family of operating systems in favor of Borg alternatives. The viscious Microsoft PR machine has struck again!
host os (Score:1)
Re:host os (Score:1)
Re:host os (Score:1)
However, battery life on this unit is absolutely horrible.
The only available color is... (Score:2, Funny)
Looks like a piece of junk.... (Score:3, Interesting)
Not to mention, Palm could probably sue them for ripping off their UI... Other than that the fonts are ugly as fuck and not positioned onscreen properly, it looks exactly like PalmOS.
The one thing i'm curious about though : They claim "Hardware compatibility with Palm IIIxe". Does that mean I could buy one of these devices, get a ROM image of PalmOS 3.5 somewhere and throw it onto this $100 handheld? (Slightly illegal, I know, but I'm just wondering if it's possible)
Re:Looks like a piece of junk.... (Score:1)
Hrm... just think of it... (Score:4, Funny)
... oh, wait, it already runs Linux. Move on geeks, nothing to hack here
Why bother with a Linux PDA? (Score:1, Troll)
It showed how flexable Linux really is AND has the additional benifit of producing improved code for the desktop/server Linux code.
It says if needed an imbeded Linux CAN exist. Linux CAN be stuffed ANYPLACE.
I like my Visor Neo...
Can I get a wireless modem for the Linux PDA? Unlikely... But I can plug a wireless into my Neo..
Mom has a wireless built in her Palm IIV
Can I get a camra for the Linux PDA?
Unlikely... But I can plug one into my Neo
Mom has a Kodak she uses on hers...
How about a GPS? Yeah just about every PDA ever made has a GPS. The ill fated Zoomer had a GPS.. My Neo.. moms Palm... but this? Unlikely..
This comes off like a toy.. and hurts the Linux credability...
I'll stick with my Visor thank you..
battery life? (Score:2)
Re:battery life? (Score:1)
It takes 2 AAA batteries, and warns against using rechargables.
Hexadecimal display (Score:1)
Finally a PDA with good sense. How else to view core dumps than in hexadecimal?
don't forget the development tools (Score:1)
Nobody seems to mention that their sdk is freely available, including a cross-compiler, all under linux right
here [linuxda.com].
Seems like the ideal pda for the linux hacker who want to develop custom apps on a Free platform.
Re:don't forget the development tools (Score:1)
Uh, the PalmOS SDK is also freely available and there is a gcc cross-compiler and development environment. It's been this way since the early days of Palm.
DragonBall CPU???? (Score:3, Funny)
So can you just reflash with PalmOS? (Score:1)
If so, it can be a cheap memory upgrade for my 2MB Palm III while keeping the old one for someone..
'Cause the only thing that makes a Palm great is all the software and SDKs for it.
I bought one too... (Score:1)
The day I recieved the acknowlegement, I also downloaded the all of the developer stuff.
I figure that if the code DA runs on a Palm III or Palm V, at least SOME of the code that is used with those will be of use with a LinuxDA. As a rough template if nothing else.
And, yes, I am a linux user. The argument the it will only me of interest to linux users is, I think, facicous.
Recognition slow and not grafitti. (Score:1)
The handwriting recognition has a box that shows the letter as your write it. That's cool, but it's disappearance is timed, so you can easily write too fast and write two lettes at once.
Also, I havn't opened th book yet, but the alphabet seems lowercasish, not grafitti. I think some single stroke alphabet like grafiti will work better and get rid of the need for a timed input window. Does someone know if the source is available in their handwriting?
Also, I need a simple serial terminal for this. It doesn't run Palm or Java apps, so I'm limited to writing my own right now.
Did some digging... a Palm clone from PC-Chips (Score:1)
This is the Palm III Clone from PC-Chips... (Score:1)
Is it hackable? (Score:2)
how much crack did they smoke? (Score:2)
The SDK download wants you to agree to a fairly restrictive license, the tar files have cores in them, the docs are almost useless, and there is no way to backup or restore the unit from linux.
Someone at empowered technologies is a very confused person. Without more hacking info, that is easy to get, this thing is doomed.
Originality and Linux? (Score:1)
* Checkbook programs that try to duplicate MS Money/Quicken
* Linux trying to duplicate UNIX
* KDE trying to look like Windows
* this handheld copying Palm OS as closely as possible
Is there ever any originality in Linux development?
Re:Originality and Linux? (Score:1)
Actually, KDE has done some pretty innovative stuff over the past year or so -- things that can't really be directly attributable to either Windows of MasOS (OS X, whatever).
I was rather startled the first time I saw someone boot up XP, though -- it looked a whole lot more like the typical KDE desktop I see around than anything else I'd seen so far -- right down to using the Mandrake star as one of the Explorer buttons and assigning personal login icons to each of the machine's users.
Actually, as I consider myself a member of the free software community, I take this as a high compliment. While fearing our impact, MS has also apparently chosen to copy the few areas in which we have begun to lead them in innovation.
Re:Originality and Linux? (Score:1)
using logo's/foto's in the login manager was in sgi-irix a long time before it even appeared in mac-os. actually, mac-os introduced this together with the multi-user capabilities of OS9, which is not *a long time ago*.
i'm probably not the one with the best historical knowledge on this, so someone can probably correct me on this and claim someone else has done this before sgi.
although i like the way they made it look in the XP login screen (shoot me, i don't care), this just goes to show that there's hardly any *real* innovation in interface-design land.
this is anyway *way* off-topic...so let's stop this thread.
meneer de koekepeer
Network? (Score:1)
pcmcia (Score:1)
Re:erm (Score:1)
macosx follows the same strategy and is generally considered ubercool...
meneer de koekepeer