An even more useful article would explain the difference between what they are supposed to mean (generally that the item complies with the requirements of a standards body), and what they actually mean (generally that a standards body has mandated that all items of this type have their logo on it), and what they mean in practice (in my experience, that the vendor told the manufacturer they were worried about the lack of sufficient impenetrable logos).
If the article was really, really useful, it would dispel
TFA total mess (Score:5, Insightful)
TFA is a convoluted mess of industry jargon and useless information.
A useful article would involve the icons themselves and what they mean.
Re: (Score:3)
An even more useful article would explain the difference between what they are supposed to mean (generally that the item complies with the requirements of a standards body), and what they actually mean (generally that a standards body has mandated that all items of this type have their logo on it), and what they mean in practice (in my experience, that the vendor told the manufacturer they were worried about the lack of sufficient impenetrable logos).
If the article was really, really useful, it would dispel
Re:TFA total mess (Score:5, Informative)
Here's your useful article [anarchius.org].
Re:TFA total mess (Score:5, Insightful)
This is why, on /., you read comments and not TFS/TFA. Thank you.
Re: (Score:2)