Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Wireless Networking

+ - Baby monitors killing urban Wi-Fi-> 1

Submitted by
Barence writes "Baby monitors and wireless TV transmitters are responsible for slowing down Wi-Fi connections in built-up areas, according to a report commissioned by British telecoms regulator Ofcom. The research smashes the myth that overlapping Wi-Fi networks in heavily congested towns and cities are to blame for faltering connection speeds. Instead it claims that unlicensed devices operating in the 2.4GHz band are dragging down signals. "It only requires a single device, such as an analogue video sender, to severely affect Wi-Fi services within a short range, such that a single large building or cluster of houses can experience difficulties with using a single Wi-Fi channel," the report claims."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Baby monitors killing urban Wi-Fi

Comments Filter:
  • I mean, I can see ten to fifteen Wi-Fi signals at any given time. This is not a huge building, but it seems quite a few people have a wireless link. I have never had any glitches - although I don't have a very good Wi-Fi myself. OTOH, I don't know of a single TV signal transmitter or the like in the building. These seem to be people, who are pretty content with using a wire between their digital TV converter and TV. As for baby monitors I see, they're not in the 2.4 GHz range (as an old radio jock, I tend t

Single tasking: Just Say No.