Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Did evolution start on Mars? Probably not.->

Submitted by schweinhundert
schweinhundert (3042319) writes "Last week saw the suggestion at a geochemistry conference that life may have been more likely to start on Mars than on Earth due to the presence of molybdenite minerals. This week comes another argument, from Christopher Adcock of University of Nevada Las Vegas, published in Nature Geoscience (paywall), that Mars is likely where chemical evolution began, because Earth lacked a good source of usable phosphorous. Not so fast, says geochemist, Matthew Pasek of University of South Florida, in the same issue of the journal. The Earth had a large number of phosphorous bearing meteorites called schreibersite, which recently has been shown to phosphorylate organic molecules in his lab."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Did evolution start on Mars? Probably not.

Comments Filter:

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.

Working...