Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
What's the story with these ads on Slashdot? Check out our new blog post to find out. ×
The Military

Submission + - NATO Summit reading: What's wrong with term "tactical" nuclear weapons?->

Lasrick writes: Benjamin Loehrke describes the rather odd definitions of what is a "tactical" nuclear weapon and what isn't. "There is enough ambiguity surrounding the capabilities of tactical and strategic nuclear weapons to render the term "tactical" all but useless for arms control purposes. As the United States and Russia pursue new arms control treaties, they should drop the tactical distinction and limit the total number of all nuclear weapons — strategic, tactical, or other."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NATO Summit reading: What's wrong with term "tactical" nuclear weapons?

Comments Filter:

The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much.

Working...