Net Neutrality a Bad Thing?

Slashdot

+ - Net Neutrality a Bad Thing?-> 1

Submitted by

jeek

on Wednesday August 11, 2010 @11:41AM

jeek writes "While I certainly don't agree with it, this article tries to make the case that Net Neutrality may actually be bad for America."
Link to Original Source

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Net Neutrality a Bad Thing?

Load All Comments

Search 1 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

Blame the FCC for everything??? (Score:2)

by AHuxley (892839) writes:

"benefits to a single given consumer from net neutrality are relatively minor, while the costs are bared by the companies"
All my packets move around without some p2p like slowdown on news, ftp, irc, voip ect, so yes its 'relatively" nice to get what I paid for, ie all packets moving without 24/7 shaping.
"may mean that cheap wireless limited internet plans exist" until they get to be near monopoly and the its milking time or a nice cartel forms.
"you can simply switch to another one."
http://arstechnica.co [arstechnica.com]

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

You will be audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Net Neutrality a Bad Thing? More Login

Net Neutrality a Bad Thing?

Blame the FCC for everything??? (Score:2)