Dell Dumps Keyboardless Windows RT Tablets 186
jfruh writes "On Friday, Dell was selling Windows RT tablets for as low as $300. By this morning, the cheapest one on offer was $479. The difference? The only tablets they're selling now come bundled with keyboards, which may indicate that customers are finding even the Metro-focused RT version of Windows 8 too irritating to navigate by touch alone. (If you really want a 10-inch Dell tablet without a keyboard it looks like you can still get one on Amazon, at least for the time being.)"
not low enough (Score:4, Insightful)
sell those silly things for $100 and people will be able to put a real OS on them to be useful
Re:not low enough (Score:5, Insightful)
sell those silly things for $100 and people will be able to put a real OS on them to be useful
Before I buy one even for $100 I'd need proof that this could be done.
Hardly surprising (Score:5, Insightful)
I suspect that the keyboard was initially not included to (a) make the cost of ownership seem less than it would later prove to be, and (b) give people the impression that Windows 8 could be used in some reasonable fashion entirely via touch. Neither of which is true, of course.
Let's see (Score:5, Insightful)
So first MS inappropriately tries to put a desktop operating system on to smart phones where it's pretty much unusable.
Then they decide inappropriately to put a smart phone operating system on to a desktop where it is pretty much unusable.
Genius. Pure and inappropriate genius.
I'm not a Windows RT expert, but ... (Score:5, Insightful)
... it strikes me that the main reason to buy Windows RT over the competition (e.g. Android or iOS) is Office. Realistically, Office needs a keyboard so offering a keyboardless version is just another part for Dell to manage. It likely leads to poor reviews and extra support issues as well, since some ill informed people are going to buy the cheaper keyboardless version and expect Office to work as well as it does with a keyboard.
Why not a proper 10" netbook for $400? (Score:5, Insightful)
If a tablet must have a keyboard, due to a lousy operating system interface; why not build a proper 10" netbook with all accesories for $400?
Atleast then, the Windows OS would run all Windows applications, including legacy applications. Now the only 'apps' or applications on a Windows RT would be those on the Windows Store; which are largely useless and unusable.
Microsoft and its partners seem totally confused on what constitutes a tablet, what is a notebook and what is a desktop. Why would anyone want to run a full fledged Office package on a 10" tablet? What else could be the reason for investing more than $400 on a smallish computing device?
Swirl swipe (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, Swirl-swipe, triple tap, Windows Key+C+4, followed by shoving a charm bar across the screen diagonally probably wasn't as efficient as clicking the start menu after all.
Re:"Press F1 to continue..." (Score:2, Insightful)
Because these are problems we should be having in 2013.
Re:Hardly surprising (Score:5, Insightful)
That is all predicated on the faulty assumption that anyone wants to use Windows 8 in the first place.
At first I passed this off as snarky, but there is some insight into what you've written. Microsoft with the Surface RT seems to be trying to replicate the ipad phenomenon, which appears to be, make an engaging product, and people will buy it despite the fact that it's (a) priced at boutique levels, (b) doesn't play well outside its ecosystem, (c) is a walled ecosystem, and (d) is more for content consumption rather than content creation. So:
a) High price, check.
b) Doesn't play well outside its ecosystem, check.
c) Walled ecosystem, check
d) Consumption, yes, creation, not so much. Check.
e) ???
f) Profit!!!
In this case, the missing (e), the part they forgot, is of course, make it engaging. The device itself must make you want to pick it up. You should want to operate it, and how to operate it should be intuitively obvious. And I don't mean "intuitively obvious" because someone wrote those words in the brochure, but actually, intuitively obvious to regular people.
In summary, you can't duplicate the success of a product merely by duplicating its major features, especially when many of those features are seen by consumers as disadvantages that people put up with in order to own the product. What's missing in this case is a reason to own one.
That Microsoft commercial that tries to compare the ipad to the surface completely misses the point. Siri is engaging. The ability to play chopsticks on a lifelike piano is engaging. Even though neither of those features were of tremendous use, they made you want to pick up the product and play with it. There's nothing about Windows 8 that makes you want to pick up a Surface. It's flat, unattractive, and you can't just start using it, without first learning the eccentricities of the interface. The only reason to own one is that it runs Windows software. And then you find out that's not true either.
My daughter had a great observation about the Microsoft Surface commercials that are deluging the airwaves and shown in theaters before the movie (which pisses me off to no end, but never mind). She said that each commercial should show us how to do a certain thing on the Surface. Stop with the dancing already. Stop showing "attach the keyboard... detach the keyboard... attach the keyboard..." WE GET IT ALREADY! The keyboard is EXTRA. The commercials should show someone really using the interface, not just sweeping tiles from right to left, but using the hot corners, bringing up "charms", making the machine work. Why don't they do that? Perhaps because if people saw how Win8 actually *worked*, they'd go buy something else?