Multiple Studies Show Used Electronics Exports To Third World Mostly Good 93
retroworks writes "Bloomberg News reporter Adam Minter writes in today's Opinion section that several studies show that there's nothing really remarkable or scandalous about exports of used equipment to developing nations. 'Some is recycled; some is repaired and refurbished for reuse; and some is thrown into landfills or incinerators. Almost none of it, however, is "dumped" overseas.' Minter begins with the most recent study (PDF), released by the U.S. International Trade Commission in March 2013. Several other studies from Peru, Nigeria, Ghana and China show there was never an incentive for overseas buyers to pay money to import junk, and that most of the junk filmed by activists in the dumps in those nations was used for years (Nigeria has had TV since the 1970s). 'A 2011 study by the United Nations Environment Program determined that only 9 percent of the used electronics imported by Nigeria — a country that is regularly depicted as a dumping ground for foreign e-waste — didn't work or were unrepairable, and thus bound for a recycler or a dump. The other 91 percent were reusable and bound for consumers who couldn't afford new products.' The one data source Bloomberg cannot find is a data point for the widely reported 'statistic' that 80-90% of used electronics imported by Africans are burned or dumped. In the comment section, two advocates for legislation banning the exports object to the survey methodology of one of the studies. But the source of the original statistic, reported by Greenpeace and Basel Action Network in their fundraising campaigns, remains a mystery."
Re:Mostly good except for electronics counterfeiti (Score:5, Insightful)
And greenpeace just making up statistics to support their agenda? Unthinkable!
Re:No wai! (Score:3, Insightful)
Greenpeace trying to make the lives of humans worse in the name of a nonexistant environment-related issue.
How ironic that an organization with such a name hides a pitch black heart filled with evil intent.
It's called "Poverty Porn" (Score:2, Insightful)
Rich do-gooder takes pictures of poor person in less developed nation, raises funds. None of the funds go to the poor kids. In Africa, they have a different word for it... "Parasites of the Poor". The NGO made up a statistic from whole cloth and raised millions, not a dime goes to the kids in their landfill photos.
Re:No wai! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Mostly good except for electronics counterfeiti (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Mostly good except for electronics counterfeiti (Score:3, Insightful)
In case of military stuff, if it prevents weaponry from working, it may just as well SAVE lives.