Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Power Hardware

Sweden Imports European Garbage To Power the Nation 165

Hugh Pickens writes "NPR reports that Sweden's program of generating energy from garbage is wildly successful, but recently its success has also generated a surprising issue: There is simply not enough trash. Sweden has recently begun to import about eight hundred thousand tons of trash from the rest of Europe per year to use in its power plants. Sweden already brings trash from Norway and hopes to get garbage from Italy, Romania, Bulgaria and the Baltic countries. Sweden creates energy for around 250,000 homes and powers one-fifth of the district heating system. Its incineration plants offer a look into the future where countries could potentially make money off of their trash instead of dumping. Landfilling of organic materials – a highly inefficient and environmentally degrading system (PDF) — has been forbidden in Sweden since 2005 and emissions of the greenhouse gas methane from landfills has fallen dramatically (PDF). 'I hope that we instead will get the waste from Italy or from Romania or Bulgaria or the Baltic countries because they landfill a lot in these countries,' says Catarina Ostlund, a senior advisor for the country's environmental protection agency. 'They don't have any incineration plants or recycling plants, so they need to find a solution for their waste.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sweden Imports European Garbage To Power the Nation

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 30, 2012 @08:27AM (#41816387)

    Well, at least Sweden has a "Pollutor pays"-inspired law in place, meaning that anyone who sells anything must pay for the costs of taking care of the waste produced throughout the the lifecycle of the product (even from packaging of the product).

  • Re:Haven't read TFA (Score:5, Informative)

    by Sqr(twg) ( 2126054 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2012 @08:55AM (#41816631)

    The elecric energy that can be recovered from one tonne of waste (0.5 MWh) is approximately sufficient to transport one tonne of cargo the circumference of the Earth by rail or sea. The distances discussed here are significantly shorter than that.

    (In addition, incineration generates about 2 MWh of heat per tonne, but that can only be used for applications like domestic heating, not for transport.)

  • Re:Haven't read TFA (Score:5, Informative)

    by Sqr(twg) ( 2126054 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2012 @09:01AM (#41816695)

    I made a mistake in my calculation. The electric energy is only enough to go half the circumference of the Earth. The conclusion still holds, tough.

  • Re:Haven't read TFA (Score:5, Informative)

    by FishTankX ( 1539069 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2012 @09:02AM (#41816703)

    You would be surprised.

    Trains can get about 400 ton-miles per galon of diesel.

    So if it's 1600 miles to sweden by rail, that means that you're burning 4 gallons of diesel per ton of garbage transported.

    4 gallons of diesel is about 32 pounds. So you're getting around 60 pounds of trash for 1 gallon of diesel.

    I've seen some figures that peg municipal waste as ~4000 BTU/lb. If you're doing cogen then that's almost all used.

    Diesel is probably closer to 16,000 BTU's per pound but even at those ratios, you're getting about 500 pounds diesel equivalent of energy out of 32 pounds of diesel.

    That is a highly favorable ratio so no, it does not make transporting the garbage less energy efficent than burning diesel. Not by a long shot.

    Also, if you believe in anthropogenic global warming, eliminating garbage by burning it keeps it from producing the much more AGW effecting methane gas.

  • Re:Bloody socialists (Score:4, Informative)

    by Misagon ( 1135 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2012 @09:15AM (#41816811)

    Trash from Napoli is already being incinerated in Sweden. At Värtaverket in Stockholm.

    story [www.svt.se] (Swedish).

  • Re:Great solution! (Score:5, Informative)

    by swillden ( 191260 ) <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Tuesday October 30, 2012 @10:25AM (#41817657) Journal

    Population is a non-problem. Growth is already basically zero (and often negative) in the developed world, and leveling off in the developing world. We've already reached "peak child", to use Hans Rosling's terminology. Due to the trajectory already in place we will reach ~10B population by around 2050, but that's it. We need to figure out how to handle that many people, but no more, and in fact beyond 2050 there's every reason to expect that the population will begin to decline, barring significant improvements in longevity.

    http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_religions_and_babies.html

    An excellent book I'd recommend to anyone who is scared of the future is "Abundance: The Future Is Better Than You Think". This Swedish garbage burning is an example of the healthy trajectory the world is on... no, it's not a perfect solution, but it's a significant improvement, both in greenhouse gases and in waste management, and it will be followed by other significant improvements. We're following an exponential curve of improvements in efficiency and cleanliness while the population growth is leveling off.

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...