Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Facebook Open Source Hardware

Open Compute Project Driving Open-Source Hardware Development 29

Posted by Soulskill
from the hope-they-have-a-learner's-permit dept.
The Open Compute Project was launched by Facebook early last year to facilitate collaborative development of highly-efficient computing infrastructure. They wanted to make datacenters cheaper and less energy-intensive to operate. Since then, many industry heavyweights have joined up, and the effects of the project are becoming evident in how companies buy hardware. "Instead of the traditional scenario in which the company’s buying decisions are determined by what the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) such as Dell, HP, and IBM are offering, open sourcing hardware give companies the ability to buy the exact hardware they want. Businesses are increasingly more curious about open source, and many of them are already deploying open source tools and the cloud, [Dell's Joseph George said]. They are increasingly looking at open source software as viable alternatives to commercial options. This level of exploration is moving to the infrastructure layer. 'Driving standards is what open source is about,' George added. With specifications at hand, it is possible to manufacture server and storage components that deliver consistent results regardless of who’s in charge of production.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Open Compute Project Driving Open-Source Hardware Development

Comments Filter:
  • by Taco Cowboy (5327) on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @09:53PM (#40680941) Journal

    Off the shelf components are dirt cheap, slap on Linux

    True, off-the-shelf components are comparatively cheaper

    True, Linux, in principle, is free, as in Free Beer

    But that does not mean the combination of off-the-shelf components and Linux is the best there is

    Proprietary hardware / software combo may carry a very high price tag, but, when we are talking about enterprise level computing, or computing in the level of data-centers, there are times proprietary equipments make more sense than off-the-shelf components - in term of stability, performance, and/or energy efficiency

    I am all for open-source, but my own experience in the computing scene - especially in large-scale deployment - tells me that the best option there is might not be the cheapest option
     

You can do this in a number of ways. IBM chose to do all of them. Why do you find that funny? -- D. Taylor, Computer Science 350

Working...