Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Oracle Stats Sun Microsystems Hardware

Is the Sparc T4 Too Little Too Late? 128

Posted by Unknown Lamer
from the intel-crushes-all dept.
packetrat writes "Ars Technica reports on Monday's launch of the Sparc T4, and how it finally (nearly 20 years after everyone else) brings out-of-order execution to Sun Sparc ... er, Oracle Sparc. But the benchmarks that Oracle has thrown up (surprise) are a smokescreen for the fact that the processor is still woefully behind state of the art, and it serves mostly as a placeholder to keep the remaining Sparc user base from defecting to Intel — even as Oracle is selling systems based on Intel and Oracle Linux. With the right benchmarks, my minivan outperforms a Maserati. The T4 is a minivan."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is the Sparc T4 Too Little Too Late?

Comments Filter:
  • car analogy (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 28, 2011 @01:56PM (#37543740)

    With the right benchmarks, my minivan outperforms a Maserati. The T4 is a minivan.

    When you're moving lots and lots of boxes, then yes, a minivan does outperform a Maserati. It's a pretty good analogy IMHO.

    As Seymour Cray noted: Anyone can build a fast CPU. The trick is to build a fast system.

    Personally I've always found SPARC boxes to be good with I/O.

Some people have a great ambition: to build something that will last, at least until they've finished building it.