Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Printer Hardware

Tom's Hardware Benchmarks Inkjet Printer Paper 160

An anonymous reader writes "We all know that the specs of your inkjet printer, driver settings, and ink cartridges can make a big difference in the quality of your prints. But the cheapest and simplest aspect of printing can also have a big impact on the final quality: the paper. This short article is an interesting read, the author actually found ways to 'benchmark' inkjet printer paper."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tom's Hardware Benchmarks Inkjet Printer Paper

Comments Filter:
  • by commodore64_love ( 1445365 ) on Thursday May 26, 2011 @06:12PM (#36256908) Journal

    The quality is basically perfect, and the laser printer is cheaper overall (the toner lasts 5000 pages, not a mere 100 like inkjet carts). I'll never go back to my old Commodore dot-matrix, or an inkjet like my brother got. It's worth it to get the Laser.

  • by h4rr4r ( 612664 ) on Thursday May 26, 2011 @06:14PM (#36256922)

    Did not look at it, but rest assured it is GOATSE.
    Same link.

    Can you not afford normal entertainment?

  • by Bing Tsher E ( 943915 ) on Thursday May 26, 2011 @06:17PM (#36256952) Journal

    But the cheapest and simplest aspect of printing can also have a big impact on the final quality: the paper

    The biggest expense is the most avoidable. The ink. Don't buy an overpriced spray-and-pray blotter printer. Get a real laser printer. I bought mine at a University Surplus auction for $10. Toner for it was expensive, I paid $90 for a cartridge. But that's enough toner to print on several cases of paper.

    The ink sellers will love it if you keep on using their expensive ink in your spray-printer, though.

  • Re:Inkjet? (Score:5, Informative)

    by hjf ( 703092 ) on Thursday May 26, 2011 @06:50PM (#36257328) Homepage

    Ah, I was just waiting for this comment. I have news for you: the "local placethat print photos" is just amazingly cheap. It's not always great.

    Photo printing, done right, gives perfect results. 1) An incredible gamut (more than you can get out of your inkjet); 2) extremely long life photos 3) paper that won't turn yellow or degrade.

    But in local, cheap photo shops, this is not the case.

    1) The gamut comes because of the printing system. A properly calibrated minilab (that means once a week at least, though it can go for months with no calibration and still do acceptable output) has no issues *printing* the correct gamut. The problem is the chemicals needed to develop the paper. Remember, it's regular, chemical-based printing. After a certain amount of square meters developed, the chemicals *need* to be changed. Cheap photo shops get away with adding some chemicals (Replenisher) to the solution that extends its life a little - which is fine and acceptable. It's made by the manufacturer and under certain conditions it will work just as good. But often, these guys at photo labs keep adding the chemicals until all you have is a useless liquid that won't develop anything and we're back to 1980s colors, and only then, they will change the developer. Respectable shops can change the developer and other chemicals as needed - but they charge more than the 1-hour lab at the mall.

    2) the long life of the photo comes from proper developing. Because of the destructive process used to develop photos ("ink" is removed from the paper, not added to it, like in the Kodachrome process, which lasts forever), if not done properly, the chemical reaction keeps going for years after the photo is developed (that's why photos fade). There are two steps: stopping and washing, that need to be properly done, in order to actually stop the reaction. If you remove the photo from the stopping bath (or if it's cold, old, contaminated, etc), or don't properly wash the print, the chemicals will continue affecting your print for years.

    3) photo paper is not regular "wood fibre" paper, which would disintegrate in all the liquids it needs to be processed in. It's either resin-coated or polyester. Polyester won't turn yellow, and it's not food for bugs, among other benefits.

    So, try to develop your photos at a respectable lab.

    And for that one-off print you want to give grandma of the kids playing with her that day, the inkjet on photo paper (especially a 6-color epson - even better if 9-color) is much more practical than driving to the lab and having just 1 print developed.

  • Re:Get a shark (Score:5, Informative)

    by blair1q ( 305137 ) on Thursday May 26, 2011 @07:21PM (#36257714) Journal

    "a toner grain is a lot larger than the smallest drop of ink that can be sprayed onto the paper"

    Are you speaking from knowledge of the nozzle diameter of inkjet printers?

    Toner powder is minuscule; tens of microns, maybe in diameter.

    Pretty sure to keep from spending 100 years per page, inkjet nozzles are not that small.

    Wikipedia says a 600 dpi printer should spec 8-10 micron toner powder. Various sources show inkjet nozzles down to 20 microns, but point out that they work by spitting out a bigger droplet than their nozzle, that then spreads before hitting the paper to make a flat disc of ink much wider than the droplet. Toner powder would spread, too, but the disc radius would be proportional to the 3/2 power of the radius of the droplet or toner grain, so that makes the droplet spread a lot more than the toner spread.

    Laser resolution is limited more by the size of the laser (which draws the page in electric charge on the drum) than it is on the size of the grains. Which is one reason that laser print always looks sharper than inkjet print.

We are each entitled to our own opinion, but no one is entitled to his own facts. -- Patrick Moynihan

Working...