Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Canada Input Devices Hardware

Creating a "Force Field" Invisible Touch Interface 138

Posted by timothy from the put-your-hand-on-my-sensor dept.
angry tapir writes "Using infrared sensors like the ones on television remote controls, Texas A&M University students presented an inexpensive multitouch system at the Computer Human Interaction (CHI) conference in Vancouver. 'I like to consider it an optical force field; it's like a picture frame where we shoot thousands of light beams across and we can detect anything that intersects that frame,' said Jonathan Moeller, a research assistant in the Interface Ecology Lab at Texas A&M University. The frame is lined with 256 IR sensors, which are connected to a computer. When ZeroTouch is mounted over a traditional computer screen it turns the display into a multitouch surface. Taken one step further, if the screen is suspended then a user could paint a virtual canvas."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Creating a "Force Field" Invisible Touch Interface More

Creating a "Force Field" Invisible Touch Interface

Comments Filter:

  • Okay... this is cool (Score:3)

    by mark-t ( 151149 ) <markt AT nerdflat DOT com> on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @08:16PM (#36089122) Journal

    The question is, will it drive down the price of devices with multitouch capability?

    More specifically, could we see this being applied in a competitor to Microsoft Surface anytime soon?

    • I don't really see this as a competitor for the microsoft surface.

      I'd love for someone to enable the back of my phone for touch, leaving the screen clear of my clumsy heads. Something like this might make it possible

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by mjwx ( 966435 )

      The question is, will it drive down the price of devices with multitouch capability?

      More specifically, could we see this being applied in a competitor to Microsoft Surface anytime soon?

      Will we see Microsoft Surface in the real world any time soon?

      All I've seen are tech demo's and I haven't even seen one of those in a while.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Shark ( 78448 )

      I don't care so long as they include a cool theremin sound!

    • It only had about a 256 touch-point resolution (16x16), but IR sensors were
      standard on most Plato terminals back at the U. of Ill. It had a few terminals scattered off campus, as far away as Hawaii, so would have qualified as one of the first nationwide 'network' systems.

      Behind the touch grid was a 512x512 plasma display (monochrome) (didn't require refresh!).

      The base system supported interactive chat (multi-person as well as two people), email, multi-user forums, per-user 'cookies', program-loadable font

  • Hasn't this been done already? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by honestmonkey ( 819408 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @08:18PM (#36089152) Journal
    I swear we used to have these at work, 10-15 years ago. They were not multi-touch, but that was likely due to the computer interface (serial) and the perhaps more primitive technology at the time. But I'm pretty sure the sensors were infra-red. As I recall, it wasn't necessarily the most accurate system. So, these guys just improved it a bit, or is this truly "revolutionary"?

    • Re:Hasn't this been done already? (Score:4, Informative)

      by guruevi ( 827432 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @08:24PM (#36089196)

      Yes, the Elo CarrollTouch Touchscreens use this technique.

      Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with Elo but we have 2 of these screens for primate research.

      • The technique debuted commercially in the 80s. From Wikipedia:
        "The HP-150 from 1983 was one of the world's earliest commercial touchscreen computers. Similar to the PLATO IV system, the touch technology used employed infrared transmitters and receivers mounted around the bezel of its 9" Sony Cathode Ray Tube (CRT), which detected the position of any non-transparent object on the screen."

      • Plenty of touch overlays for larger screens used this technology, I have a stack of overlays for 32" panels that use IR like this. A much better options would be something like Next Window Overlays http://www.nextwindow.com/ [nextwindow.com] They use a pair of 1 dimesional ir cameras and a bar of ir lights to triangulate objects in their field of view so by placing the cameras in the top two corners of the screen and the ir leds between them you can have a simple bar rather than a square frame like this thing. Mount a bunc

      • Have you tried giving the primates an iPad? Just curious?

      • but we have 2 of these screens for primate research

        So who's the other lucky primate?

        /* me reads disclaimer *homerslap
        D'oh! My bad!

    • Yes this isn't new technology (other than the multi-touch support). IR touch screens have been around at least since the 80's. You could get add-on bezels for the Apple ][. They are used today for industrial settings where the environment is to harsh or dirty for resistive or capacitive sensors.

      • At least since the 80's. These were used in a local business museum (Enterprise Square USA) game called Venture. This is really old tech, the only thing remotely interesting is it's ability to now do multi-touch. What next, Pong in 3D!!

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Cosgrach ( 1737088 )
      Yes it was done before, but without the multi-touch. We had them as well. A bunch of IR-LEDs and IR receivers along the frame of the CRT. Welcome to the 1990's. I'd vote for simply 'improved', certainly it is not revolutionary.

    • Re: (Score:2, Redundant)

      by Hadlock ( 143607 )

      These are commercially available for schools already. Whiteboard manufacturers are buying this off the shelf to integrate with their existing whiteboard systems; they use IR emitters/sensors and hooks up via USB as a standard USB HID multitouch device.

    • Yep, the only thing that's "new" is how cheaply they can be made today. Back in the 90s I worked with a 10ft by 40ft optical sensor array, which drove a synthesizer as a big performance-art techno theremin.

      It had multitouch, though certain combinations would not fire due to line of sight limitations. It was certainly good enough to amaze our druggy audience :)

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Nemyst ( 1383049 )

      The latest generation of Sony Readers use infrared touchscreens. This method isn't exactly novel, but here it's applied to a much larger screen and is said to be an add-in component, which is still rather cool. Pick your favorite display and you know you can make it multitouch on top of that.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by hitmark ( 640295 )

      Iirc, a Swedish company Made an attempt at selling mobile phones using this as the sensor system for their touch screen phones. Was back around 2000 or so.

    • Try 39 years ago, at least. University of Illinois PLATO IV terminals connected to a Control Data mainframe. We used to do our physics and chemistry homework on these things, and I can tell you from personal experience that they worked great.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Platovterm1981.jpg [wikipedia.org]

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLATO_(computer_system) [wikipedia.org]

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Posted this comment earlier, but it got deleted somehow, not sure why.

      Disclaimer: I'm the guy in the video.

      The biggest difference between our approach and prior infrared touchscreen technologies is the use of one-to-many emitter-sensor pairings. Each infrared emitter is detected by all sensors in view, as opposed to using a single sensor for each emitter. Using a single sensor for each emitter limits the touch detection to two perpendicular grids of parallel light beams. Our approach enables us to reliably

      • Thanks for the reply. I had worked on a system in the early to mid 90's where we used an IR touch grid to implement "buttons" that were drawn on the screen. I think we used the CarrollTouch system mentioned above. Guess I should have RTFA. This definitely sounds more interesting than what we did.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Bob9113 ( 14996 )

      > I swear we used to have these at work, 10-15 years ago. They were not multi-touch, but that was likely due to the computer interface (serial) and the perhaps more primitive technology at the time. But I'm pretty sure the sensors were infra-red. As I recall, it wasn't necessarily the most accurate system. So, these guys just improved it a bit, or is this truly "revolutionary"?

      They have advanced significantly since then, including multitouch and even interactive objects (think 3D icon-pucks you can place

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Bob9113 ( 14996 )

        Err -- my bad, the home-brew ones are not "optical force field" based, as described in the article (similar to original touchscreen technology), they are based on changing with the surface index of refraction when you touch the screen. I suspect the index-of-refraction approach is sensitive to fingerprints, which would be an advantage of capacitive touch or this optical force field.

        The "air-canvas" concept is interesting too, and could not be done with either capacitive touch or index-of-refraction.

  • This is news ? I mean, it's a cute college project and all..... but it's sort of a joke compared to the cutting edge. And the cutting edge is what's NEWs.

        This is something i'd expect to see in make mag, or similar.

    • Also, FYI.. these guys are re-inventing the wheel... so, sadly, it's not even new: http://www.irtouch.com/ [irtouch.com]

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Ruke ( 857276 )
      Yeah, that Make comment is about right. I could probably throw one of these together given an arduino, an afternoon, and a handful of IR sensors. Not exactly groundbreaking...

  • No wait -- a roaring lion!

    Better: a subordinated debenture.

    I mean, if we're going to just go making up shit like "force field" when characterizing a simple grid of eye-beam sensors...

    (Hint: where does the "force" come in?)

    And yes, the earliest touch-screen technologies were essentially exactly this sort of light-beam interruptor laid near the surface of a CRT. They were soon replaced by surface-acoustical-wave systems and even capacitive feedback through the cathode beam itself.

    Urg.

  • 1981 called... They want their technology back.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchscreen#Infrared [wikipedia.org]

    (and yes, for you xkcd [xkcd.com] fans, I did warn them about Haiti and Japan)

  • Slashot .... (Score:4, Funny)

    by cyberfunk2 ( 656339 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @08:48PM (#36089374)

    .. demolishing your self-worth and your senior research project in front of all of Nerddom.

  • BUT.... (Score:4, Informative)

    by uncanny ( 954868 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @08:56PM (#36089438)
    how is this a FORCE field?

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      I'd call it a 'field disruption' interface rather than a 'force field' interface.

      They're introducing disruptions in a saturated 2D IR field, which allows for multi-touch as well as point density identification. 'Force field'? Not seeing where the standard 'F' (force) we all know from physics, intersects here unless you define the density of disruption as 'force' (F).

      /my take.. work at A&M, but in a separate College

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by ebuck ( 585470 )

      After a few minutes of using it, you're applying a lot of force against your monitor [youtube.com].

  • Reminds me of the U-Force [wikipedia.org] I got for the original NES - that was over 20 years ago! Still have it in its original box, actually. Maybe in another 25 years it'll be worth something... it certainly wasn't when it came out! It sorta worked for Punch-Out, and not at all for anything else.

    I can't remember if the U-Force was what would now be called "multi-touch"... probably not. Didn't RTFA, but at any rate I assume (and would hope) the one in the article works a lot better!

  • In my local mall, during last christmas holiday, Disney set up an interactive display game to promote their wild-4-disney passes.
    It consisted of multiple flat-screen tvs setup in a wall with an IR sensor setup in a field-sweep above the whole display. The point was to "drag" christmas ornaments to decorate the tree.

    This is a similar tech with multi-touch.

  • or (Score:2)

    by Osgeld ( 1900440 )

    you can use a webcam for free out of a dumpster and stick it in a light box like everyone else has been doing

  • cause those have been out for like what 60+ years

    you have light on one end, photodetector on the other, there you made a force field here is some juice and a cookie, go play now

  • Welcome to 1983 (Score:3)

    by dazedNconfuzed ( 154242 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @10:18PM (#36089850)

    Main feature of the HP-150 [wikipedia.org].

  • A Brief History of Pads, Part 2: Touch me! [x7.fi]: "PLATO was a series of educational computer terminals that originated from the University of Illinois. In the 1960’s and 1970’s, PLATO contained many features that we take for granted today like e-mail, message boards and online tests. The fourth generation PLATO IV terminal featured a flat (and bright orange) plasma screen that students could touch to answer questions. The touch function was achieved by a series of infrared lights and receptors around

  • Is Texas in Canada now?

    • The Canadian government is owned by Texans; so no, Canada is in Texas now. We have our own mini GB, just lacking his likability and intelligence.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by mini me ( 132455 )

      I agree it is a strange choice, but the event took place in Canada, so there is at least some Canadian connection.

  • Seen this a long time ago, at least 10 years ago. It was essentially a frame lined with IR sensors facing each other and tracking your hand movements and turned any flat panel display (such as a plasma TV) into a touchscreen surface. While it didn't do multi-touch, it was essentially the exact same concept

  • What's new about this? (Score:5, Informative)

    by jm0le ( 2139028 ) on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @12:12AM (#36090326)
    Disclaimer: I'm the guy in the video.

    The big difference between what we're doing, and what's been done before, is that we are using one-to-many communication between emitters and sensors, as opposed to earlier systems, which use matched emitter/sensor pairs on opposite sides of the display to generate a series of parallel lines in both the x and y directions that can be interrupted.

    By reading from a large number of sensors for each infrared emitter, we generate a dense mesh of infrared light beams, which is what enables the sensor to detect multiple touches. Prior infrared systems using parallel beams suffer from ghost touch ambiguities when multiple fingers are on the display. Ours does not. This is the big differentiator between what's been done before and what we've done.

    Most SMART boards and other commercial multi-touch sensors, use two cameras in the corners of a screen (some use four), and computer vision algorithms to identify and track touches on the display. Our approach is different in that it generates a more complete visual hull of the interactive area than with these types of systems. Using two cameras means you can only reliably track two touches due to occlusion issues, whereas we can detect 20+ touchpoints with high reliability.

    More info can be found on our website: http://ecologylab.net/zerotouch/ [ecologylab.net]

    The publications at the bottom of the page should help slashdot readers understand the technical innovations a little bit better.

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Guidii ( 686867 )

      Quick links: There's a good paper [ecologylab.net] describing the process, and a discussion of the electronics [moeller.io] on Jonathan's blog.

      One question.... what are the production costs of the electronics if I wanted to build one of these? (I never quite know what people mean when they say "low cost";) Also, are you planning to publish the schematics?

      (Ooops. I guess that's two questions....)

  • A lot of people seem to have missed the point here. Either that or the old sensors were cleverer than I thought. Anyhow, I like this approach, I wonder how well it copes with fingers bunched together looking like a single fat finger or whether it can still be confident that the finger it tracks out of a bunch is the same one it tracked going in without getting confused.

  • As a semi-professional cynic and the guy who tore into the Rice University students [slashdot.org] who's PR dept. claimed they had invented a revolutionary solution to a huge health problem, I had initially thought, as many here have claimed, that this IR-beam touch-screen frame was nothing new. However, I was also trained at one of the the EloGraphics plants (I can't remember where the heck it was now) on how to install and repair those old IR-beam touch screens. I also serviced several other makes of IR-beam touch scree

  • "... because I don't know what a force field is. That's because I have never watched Star Trek. That's because I am not a geek. Please sleep with me."

  • Theremin? (Score:3)

    by Sir Holo ( 531007 ) on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @01:24PM (#36096128)
    You mean they've re-invented the Theremin?
    • hey, i was just wondering if this is the same Sirholo i played Zatikon with. This is Joseph Mullen by the way.

  • HP already sells this! (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward

    I bought a HP monitor about 3 months ago that does this. It's got two IR light plane generators in the top corners, and an IR detector array around the bottom and sides. It's multitouch and works great. And this technology DOES make multitouch cheaper. It was $100 less than the other capacitive multitouch displays in the same size.

  • I thought shields had to be dropped for phasers?

  • Hmmm...I don't see how this tech deals with occluded fingertips...

  • The basic technology to do this has been around for ages. Maybe not the computational power to drive it, but definitely the underlying technology.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Close