Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Hardware Hacking Wireless Networking Build

Dutch Hackers Create Wi-Fi Sniffing Drone 81

Posted by timothy
from the junior-birdman dept.
An anonymous reader writes "The WASP, or Wireless Aerial Surveillance Platform, has been built out of a hobby-grade airframe and open source Ardupilot autopilot, reports sUASnews. In the words of the Rabbit-Hole website, it's a 'Small Scale, Open Source UAV using off the shelf components. Designed to provide a vehicle to project cyber-offensive and defensive capabilities, and visual / electronic surveillance over distance cheaply and with little risk.'" Want a drone of your own? The makers have some pointers to helpful resources.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Dutch Hackers Create Wi-Fi Sniffing Drone

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 16, 2010 @05:22AM (#33261812)

    The makers of the WASP give an interview in the s7e25 episode of Hak5 [], where they explain that the platform currently has a very tight flight envelope. It's almost always on the brink of crashing. Quote: "It flies much like a wounded harbor seal would. [...] It's a real juggling act to keep it in the air."

  • Re:Yes but... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 16, 2010 @05:27AM (#33261830)

    The meaning of "unmanned" extends to the pilot on the ground. UAVs don't have people on board and can fly more than a straight line in a controlled manner without immediate control input from a pilot on the ground. It's technically illegal to fly UAVs without visual contact in visual flight rules air space.

  • Re:I want one (Score:3, Informative)

    by Alphathon (1634555) on Monday August 16, 2010 @08:18AM (#33262324)

    I don't know if you were simply using it's to spite the troll or not but I'm fairly sure its is correct. Unlike most words the apostrophe is only added when it's a contraction of "it is", "it has" etc, not to indicate "belonging to it" (possessive). The GP was a troll to be sure, but an accurate troll nonetheless.

Is it possible that software is not like anything else, that it is meant to be discarded: that the whole point is to always see it as a soap bubble?