Long In Development, Toshiba 'SCiB' Battery Debuts 284
Posted
by
kdawson
from the could-be-the-one dept.
from the could-be-the-one dept.
relliker notes Toshiba's announcement of the SCiB, a battery we have been following for years. (As usual, use NoScript to avoid the incredibly annoying timed begging popup on Gizmag's site.) Here is Toshiba's SCiB site. The battery's specs claim 6,000+ charge/deep-discharge cycles with minor capacity loss, safe rapid charging to 90% in 5 minutes, and enhanced safety regarding overheating or shorting out. It could make its way into electric vehicles before long.
Erm... (Score:5, Insightful)
Toyota? Or Toshiba?
Re:Erm... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Time for the maths! (Score:4, Insightful)
According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt#Battery), the driver can only use 8.8kWh of the full capacity, to maximise the lifetime of the battery. Given that the lifetime of these batteries is the main draw, you might be able to get away with 90 SCiB-model batteries for a comparable capacity. Incidentally, that works out to about 180kg, comparable to the Volt's 170kg Li-ion pack, which is still an improvement given that Li-ion are one of the best battery types for energy/weight ratio. So it'
Re:Toshiba (Score:3, Insightful)
game changing, if true (Score:5, Insightful)
The electric motor beats the combustion engine in every way: Simpler, more reliable, much more efficient, more powerful, smoother and leveler output of power over a wider range of RPMs, quieter, smaller, lighter weight, and much less expensive. The big reason we don't use them everywhere is lack of a way to store sufficient energy that is 1) cheap, 2) lightweight, 3) quickly refillable, 4) durable, 5) not bulky. The humble gas tank is far better than the batteries, fuel cells, ultra capacitors, and other things (like flywheels?) that we have now. Solve these problems and bring the battery to the point where it is at least competitive with the gas tank even if still a little inferior, and powering cars with gasoline will be history so fast that the oil companies won't know what hit them.
Overhyped breakthroughs that really aren't are legion. But often it really does happen. 2009 was the year of the LCD. I'm still astonished at how quickly the CRT vanished last year. Over the last decade, the incandescent light bulb was pushed into niche applications as compact fluorescents took over But seems they won't reign long with LEDs steadily improving. The 1980s was huge, with the shift from vinyl records to CDs, the microwave oven, and the PC. The 1990s was even bigger with the Internet and the gigantic leaps in hard drive capacity. Doesn't seem there will be a year of the Linux desktop, more like a decade.
But this change seems very likely to be real. We've had electric motors on the sidelines for more than a century, and we know they work great. We've also had batteries a long time, so maybe we should be more cautious and skeptical about breakthroughs. But what we haven't had all that long are all these new battery materials such as lithium-ion. So I think that even if Toshiba's advance is less than it sounds, many others are working hard on the same problems, and we'll see huge improvements soon. Like LCDs were 5 years ago, batteries are on the cusp, and it really won't take much more to make the battery + electric motor combination better, much better, than combustion engine + gas tank. I'd be hesitant to buy a new car with a combustion engine. Might be obsolete very quickly, the way CRTs went last year. Combustion engine powered cars still have a few years, perhaps, the only question is how many?
Re:Time for the maths! (Score:5, Insightful)
You could maybe come up with a design that uses batteries like this for hard accelleration, climbing, and startup, when drain is high - and use the base-load batteries for other times, meanwhile shifting charge from the base-load back to the high-drain ones while driving normally. Such a design would get better use out of both battery types.
Re:So... (Score:3, Insightful)
If that were the case, you could roll in to a refitted petrol station to exchange your battery, and the system can manage with the grid when it juices the batteries up.
If you had enough batteries in rotation, you could even charge them during low usage periods, but you would still be able to rapidly charge in times of high demand.
Re:So... (Score:3, Insightful)
If this takes off your at home charge station will probably be a larger battery bank which gets topped off overnight rather than direct power from the grid.
Everyone plugging their charger into their vehicle and then starting to do cooking, laundry etc. after work is going to create some horrid spot prices for power in the late afternoon.
Re:So... (Score:4, Insightful)
having 5 minute recharge was needed to get away from the battery-swapping trick, as that has the nasty side-effect of giving you a battery which may or may not be as good as your old one, with scrapping of old ones being the responsability of the power-stations (which wont ever scrap one, if they can rent it out for a few bucks)
Re:SCIB (Score:1, Insightful)
At least he gave us something useful.
People modded him up to show appreciation. I'm guessing far fewer readers will appreciate whining.
Re:Supposed to work well below freezing... (Score:3, Insightful)
when it gets to -30 in your jeans pocket/coat pocket, you probably have bigger problems then your cell-phone battery..
Re:So... (Score:2, Insightful)
If this takes off your car will trickle-charge to 100% directly off the grid overnight the vast majority of the time, when power demand is at its lowest. You get home, you plug it in, and if you know you are going back out soon you push a "charge the car now, I know it'll cost me more" button and it'll draw whatever it can get to load up the batteries as quickly as possible.
Most of the time, you'd plug it in and the charger would start itself at 10PM or whenever you get better rates, and it would know it had 6 hours or whatever to charge the batteries, so it would use a more efficient charging method.
The 5-minute charge will only be used at charging stations for long drives, which will probably be located where gas stations are today - in more industrial areas where more power is available. They'll probably charge up capacitors or batteries or use some similar technology to level out the load where possible.
A 5-minute charge is hugely convenient for long trips. But for most users, the car would rarely be charged that way.
Re:Supposed to work well below freezing... (Score:1, Insightful)
Live in Wisconsin with real winters, and I would guess the number of times my cell phone would be used at -30C (-22F) would be less than once per winter on average. Who's whipping their phone out outside on a nice -30 day? Everybody's focused on getting inside.
Re:game changing, if true (Score:2, Insightful)
Let's see - assume a tank of gas last 200 miles (low, but lets aim at the US - gas guzzler market here, not a super-efficient euro-diesel that does 1K miles per tank)
200 miles x 6000 tank-fulls = 1.2 million miles. That's a pretty high mileage vehicle. I think more than the fuel tank might need replacement.
Also the batteries don't drop dead at 6000 cycles. They might only take 80% of their original capacity.
Assume a charge only lasts 100 miles (pessimistic) you are still looking at 600k miles of driving. If you do 10k miles a year then that is 60 years, so the batteries are likely to outlast the driver!
Re:Time for the maths! (Score:1, Insightful)
Furthermore, the ability to charge at something like 10 times its nominal discharge rate means that it can actually absorb most of the energy of braking, much like a capacitor. That will make the battery pack last much longer under normal driving conditions (but not highway driving).
dom
Re:game changing, if true (Score:5, Insightful)
You shouldn't have been marked troll but i think you underestimate the ammount of use you get for 6000 cycles. At 100miles per cycle that's 600,000 miles of life! Even 50miles per cycle is still 300,000 miles. During that time you skipped like 200 engine oil changes. Didn't consume 20,000 gallons of gas (assuming 30mpg). Air filter changes too. If you drove an average of 100miles per day, that's 16 years of non-stop use.
I get what you're saying about no electric charging points around. But where there is elecricity, there could be a charging point, right? There aren't many places without electricity. I would think gas-stations would want to usher in electric cars because if it takes 30min to quick charge.. that's 30 minutes those people have to buy stuff at the station. They don't make much on fuel sales anyways, what do they care.
Disclosure: I drive a year 2000 Jeep Cherokee and also use an SSD. The TV is still 2D.