Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×
Earth Moon Power

Underwater Ocean Kites To Harvest Tidal Energy 203 203

eldavojohn writes "A Swedish startup has acquired funding for beginning scale model trials of underwater kites, which would be secured to a turbine to harness tidal energy for power. The company reports that the kite device allows the attached turbine to harvest energy at 10 times the speed of the actual tidal current. With a 12-meter wingspan on the kite, the company says they could harvest 500 kilowatts while it's operational. This novel new design is one of many in which a startup or university hope to turn the ocean into a renewable energy source."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Underwater Ocean Kites To Harvest Tidal Energy

Comments Filter:
  • sweet (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gandhi_2 (1108023) on Thursday May 06, 2010 @02:42PM (#32115094) Homepage

    now whales can enjoy the "renewable revolution" like migratory birds and bats do with windmills.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 06, 2010 @02:44PM (#32115134)

    Is it possible to exhaust the wind or sea's natural momentum, if there is such a thing? Where does the energy ultimately come from? In other words, is it theoretically possible to have so many wind farms (or, in this case, tide farms) that the atmosphere becomes still?

    (captcha: "universe". heh.)

  • 10x the speed? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 06, 2010 @02:53PM (#32115296)

    last i checked power wasn't measured in meters/second.
    very confused summary.

  • by Scareduck (177470) on Thursday May 06, 2010 @02:54PM (#32115324) Homepage Journal
    Like windmills, PV solar (and arguably, thermal solar), this will use a ton of capital (in multiple dimensions -- energetic, costs, and materials) to harvest very diffuse energy. The cries to subsidize installation -- and possibly operational -- costs will start almost immediately.
  • by NeutronCowboy (896098) on Thursday May 06, 2010 @03:24PM (#32115798)

    Wind farms are unlikely to stop the wind. Wind is a byproduct of temperature differentials, and as such, as long as the earth isn't exactly the same temperature everywhere all the time, there will be wind.
    Tidal farms, on the other hand, I don't know. Tides are due to the difference in gravitational fields at different points on the earth. As such, the tidal energy comes from the Sun's and the moon's gravitational field. Since neither the sun nor the moon are losing mass through the use of tide turbines, what has to change is the distance between the sun, moon and earth. Somehow, I think the time scales on which this becomes a problem are large enough that we'll have entirely different problems then.

    The only real problem I can see with tidal turbines is that if they are large enough, they will restrict the flow of the tides, and tides will become less pronounced - which will have an immediate impact on any tidal areas. And since tidal areas and shallow bays are pretty much where the food chains for a lot of marine animals reside, this could be a real problem. But again, it would have to be something on the scale of putting turbines across the entire straight of Gibraltar, and reducing the flow to near zero. Unlikely to happen, but not impossible.

  • by h4rr4r (612664) on Thursday May 06, 2010 @03:37PM (#32116010)

    No, because the rest of us know that Funny gives no karma, so people choose other options.

  • by Chris Burke (6130) on Thursday May 06, 2010 @03:47PM (#32116144) Homepage

    Why, yes, from economic activity derived from burning fossil fuels.

    Yes, like essentially everything we do today, no matter if it is something that is trying to get us off of fossil fuels or not. Our economy is based on burning fossil fuels, ergo all economic activity is based on burning fossil fuels.

    Spending some of that activity to stop using fossil fuels is, if you consider using fossil fuels bad, what we would call "intelligent".

    We should be looking at truly sustainable energy solutions, not scams.

    If they produce more energy in their lifetimes than they take to produce -- which, if the system works, they almost certainly will -- then it's not a scam, it's a viable energy source. The more of these we build, the less of our economic activity will be based on fossil fuels, and the problem in the first part of this post will be resolved.

    Up-front costs can prevent the development of new technologies, even if in the longer term they are a net positive. Something can be economically viable (which is what it means to have a net positive return on investment) without necessarily being economically practical for a particular entity at a particular time. Subsidies offset this, and get us to the point where we are using fewer fossil fuels faster. This is a good thing.

  • by dbIII (701233) on Thursday May 06, 2010 @11:42PM (#32121936)
    Different energy sources make sense for different reasons. Windmills for instance have a very small unit size, but that also means that if one is down for maintainance there is little difference to the total energy generated. Distribution and peaks also drive the use of technologies other than pure base load ideas. Some technologies are actually complementary in ways I doubt you have considered, for instance solar thermal providing preheating at a coal thermal power station (Liddell NSW, Australia). I can also see a strong argument for wind driven pump storage to supply water for hydro at peak loads.
    Then there is the obvious niche filled since the 1970s of small installations off the grid where PV solar etc is competing against internal combustion engines. Then there's things like google's solar in datacentres - effectively just a giant UPS which makes perfect sense if California's electrity supply is as poor as it used to be.

As of next Thursday, UNIX will be flushed in favor of TOPS-10. Please update your programs.

Working...