Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Portables Hardware Linux

$199 Freescale Tablet Design Runs Chromium OS 93

Posted by Soulskill
from the proof-of-concept dept.
Charbax writes "This is an extensive video interview with Freescale's manager of software development about their integration of the Chromium OS onto their ARM Cortex A8 i.MX51-based $199 Tablet reference design. It seems to run smoothly and fast with multiple tabs. There's no touch screen support yet, so input is done through a USB keyboard and mouse for now, but the WiFi drivers are fine. Freescale is also demonstrating Android and Ubuntu versions. Those have a 3G SIM card reader built-in, an HDMI output and 720p video playback. The question is: will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites and support a large amount of opened tabs?" The demonstration of the Chromium tablet begins at about 11:20 into the video. The Android and Ubuntu versions are displayed earlier.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

$199 Freescale Tablet Design Runs Chromium OS

Comments Filter:
  • Yeah right (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 10 2010, @02:27PM (#30715780)
    Wake me up when I can buy the thing at a store for $199.
  • by Dzimas (547818) on Sunday January 10 2010, @02:32PM (#30715824)
    I don't need a tablet PC unless it offers access to a compelling suite of applications. As it stands, this thing is basically an extremely underpowered netbook with a discrete keyboard and pointing device. Even with a touchscreen, it can't compete with a bottom end netbook for generic computing tasks (for example, typing just isn't efficient - I can't manage 45 wpm on a touchscreen). Apple gets this. The iPhone/touch is successful because of its integration with the app store, which offers *device-specific* apps. If apple releases a giant iPod Touch/eReader in the next couple of months, it will succeed only if there's a strong suite of apps written specifically for it. Other manufacturers will be left scrambling, because Chromium OS, Ubuntu NBE and Windows 7 just don't translate well to the tablet environment - you're left using a desktop OS on something that very definitely isn't a desktop. So Freescale's initiative will fail, as will dozens of goofy "tablets" that are little more than touchscreen-equipped PCs with user-hostile ergonomics.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 10 2010, @02:54PM (#30715956)

    at last? i strongly suspect the first ecosystem of increasingly powerful web connected devices didn't use intel processors or the windows operating system at all

  • by obarthelemy (160321) on Sunday January 10 2010, @02:57PM (#30715984)

    Oh, OK sorry, didn't realize you wanted specific apps for the thing. The way I see it, I don't, it's just a more portable way to do the same things, and it's easier to add a keyboard want I want one than to rip it away when I don't ^^

  • by SmallFurryCreature (593017) on Sunday January 10 2010, @03:15PM (#30716114) Journal

    And that is to blame website developers who use flash for stuff that it ain't needed for. Such as playing video. The video tag works now (not on IE, but lets face it, if you got IE, you got flash) so support it.

  • by KeithJM (1024071) on Sunday January 10 2010, @03:40PM (#30716254) Homepage

    How can you dismiss something that doesn't exist?

    Uh, you made good points until this. How can you NOT dismiss something that doesn't exist?

  • Re:Flash + ARM? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by symbolset (646467) on Sunday January 10 2010, @04:40PM (#30716746) Homepage Journal
    Annnnd... that's what Microsoft gets for bringing out their Silverlight "Flash killer": Enthusiastic support from Adobe for alternative platforms. Way to drive innovation, Microsoft! Why don't you come out with a creative suite next? That would be great.
  • Re:IDEA! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by StreetStealth (980200) on Sunday January 10 2010, @05:00PM (#30716940) Journal

    Ouch, man. Ouch.

    But warranted.

  • by insufflate10mg (1711356) on Sunday January 10 2010, @06:17PM (#30717640)
    I agree fully. My main use for this would be browsing the internet and (since monitors do not strain my eyes) I would also use them to read on the couch and have much more massive personal library available for 'dedicated reading'.. When I need a more diverse range of applications I will go to command central and do work where my work is best done. It would just be nice to have a decent tablet capable of full web browsing capabilities and touch screen. Reading takes up such a large portion of my day that this would be invaluable and I would be willing to pay well over $200 for it.
  • by mgblst (80109) on Sunday January 10 2010, @10:56PM (#30719404) Homepage

    You are right, but since he is talking about having Microsoft OS on those phones, I am pretty sure he is talking about smartphones, since Microsoft only produces OS for smartphones, not for regular mobile phones.

    He seems to be confused.

  • Re:Yeah right (Score:3, Insightful)

    by PopeRatzo (965947) * on Sunday January 10 2010, @11:09PM (#30719450) Homepage Journal

    The dirty tricks squad is out in full force to nip this in the bud.

    And the media is going to do their dirty work, just like they are with the Nexus

    Watch and see.

    But it would have to be pretty blatant before the DOJ gets involved. The antitrust group practically works for the dirty tricks squad, after all. They won't bring a lawsuit until the Freescale is safely dead and buried, and then in 10 years, the fines will be a fraction of the profits that the big boys make.

    It's just the cost of doing business to them.

  • Re:Yeah right (Score:5, Insightful)

    by hairyfeet (841228) <[bassbeast1968] [at] [gmail.com]> on Monday January 11 2010, @12:35AM (#30719900) Journal

    Well considering that we have been hearing about $200 and under ARM netbooks that are supposed to come out "any day now" for a couple of years now I'm afraid you're probably right. I just wonder how much of it is other companies interference VS being new players and simply not having their shit together?

    Starting new products in a field where margins are usually razor thin to start with is hard enough, then add in the fact that you can't show VC investors your new device running the dominant OS, because Windows don't run on ARM, add in having to cut corners all over the place and the sometimes dodgy vendors one deals with when going bottom of the barrel, and I can see why so many devices end up as nothing more than vaporware.

    Personally if they come out with sub $150 ARM netbooks (preferably $99) and $200 tablets I'll be happy to snap some up to sell in my shop, but I'm not holding my breath. There is a niche for these non Windows devices, how big a niche I don't know, but with a college nearby I'm sure I wouldn't have any problems moving a "browser in a box" that let them take notes in class and had 6 hour plus battery life. For college and HS kids these things would be perfect! Hell i would even snatch up a couple for myself just so when I had to go to the doctors office or some other "hurry up and wait" establishment I could kick back and surf and read.

    But considering the money Intel is already losing by having Atom eat into notebook sales, plus now AMD entering the market with really nice sub $500 netbooks with Radeon GPUs and real Athlon CPUs, I really don't see Intel sitting back quietly on this. so while I'm sure a lot will go tits up thanks to simply not having all their ducks in a row, after Intel shelling out 1.25 Billion to AMD for not playing fair i wouldn't be surprised if any of these do manage to get their shit together that old Chipzilla wouldn't be willing to grease a few palms to make them go away. with the kind of money Intel has in the bank if it looks like one is close to market Intel can always "buy 'em and bury 'em". So while I would love to have this and a few of those cheapo ARM netbooks sitting in my shop, I won't be betting the farm on them.

Were there fewer fools, knaves would starve. - Anonymous

Working...