The DIY Book Scanner 177
azoblue writes "Daniel Reetz did not want to lug around heavy textbooks, so he built a book scanner to create digital copies. '... over three days, and for about $300, he lashed together two lights, two Canon Powershot A590 cameras, a few pieces of acrylic and some chunks of wood to create a book scanner that's fast enough to scan a 400-page book in about 20 minutes (PDF). To use it, he simply loads in a book and presses a button, then turns the page and presses the button again. Each press of the button captures two pages, and when he's done, software on Reetz's computer converts the book into a PDF file. The Reetz DIY book scanner isn't automated — you still need to stand by it to turn the pages. But it's fast and inexpensive.'"
A bargain (Score:5, Informative)
Except for the lack of an automatic page-turner, Daniel's device is the same as one you can buy commercially for about $20,000 (http://www.treventus.com/bookscanner_pageturner.html).
He was wise to decide on manual page-turning.
repost (Score:5, Informative)
http://bkrpr.org/doku.php [bkrpr.org]
Same thing, much cheaper (I built mine for ~150 USD.)
Re:Are there scanners that accept a stack of sheet (Score:5, Informative)
You must not have ever gone to college. A textbook for $15? Get real.
Re:Cameras usually stink for this.... (Score:3, Informative)
There's no problem with the resolution.
9" x 6" page, scanned at 300 dpi = 2700 x 1800 pixels = 4.86 MP.
Re:Cameras usually stink for this.... (Score:2, Informative)
Lots of book scanners use ccds. They are good enough. No one really wants a 'portable' scanned document that weighs in at 3 gigabytes anyway, current laptop IO makes that a pain in the ass.
Re:Cameras usually stink for this.... (Score:5, Informative)
You haven't actually tried this have you? I've had various flatbed A4 scanners over the years, all at much higher resolution than a camera, and hence all got down-sampled afterwards for my display that is only 1.5MP anyway. Then I switched to using a phone camera with only a 2MP CCD, but a really good lens and decent macro mode (Sony-Ericcson Cybershot for those that are interested). As long as the focus was good it produced perfectly readable shots, and so it became my portable scanner. These days I mostly shot stuff at home so I have a 12MP DSLR to hand. It's huge overkill, and I massively down-sample stuff afterwards, but entirely readable. So your basic claim that this can't be done with a camera based on the resolution compared to a scanner is a complete load of bollocks. The focus of the lens tends to be the important issue.
Re:Cameras usually stink for this.... (Score:3, Informative)
FYI, the color camera on the Mars Rovers.
One Megapixel. Really spiffy and detailed images of the Martian landscape for only one megapixel, don't you think?
Also, TFA states he's using OCR to create a PDF.
If the image from the camera is sharp enough, the OCR software should have no trouble "reading" it.
Re:repost (Score:5, Informative)
better wy (Score:4, Informative)
from the comments with the article
posted by: irrational | 12/11/09 | 11:56 pm
I do it in 5 steps, and you get rid of the book when you’re done since you don’t need to store it. After you get done putting 200 hours into your creation, you’ll have spent thousands of dollars worth of your time. I solved this problem much more quickly years ago:
1. Buy a good sheet-fed and high-speed scanner. I have a Panasonic KV-S2026 color.
2. Get a decent jigsaw from Home Depot. Use metal cutting blades (24 teeth/inch or better)
3. Saw the spines off the book and for God’s sake use some C-clamps on each end of the book. Preferably sandwich them between two flat boards.
4. Remove and feed sheets through the scanner to OmniPage and text recognize the pages.
5. Save as PDF.
6. Repeat. You now have searchable digital books!
Re:Are there scanners that accept a stack of sheet (Score:1, Informative)
Yes. The photocopier in the maths department where I work scans a stack of sheets and emails the pdfs to you. Others can save it to a usb flash drive. It is great for things like theses we have lost source for but have unbound. But the point of the machine described here is to scan whole books non destructively.
Did the same thing with just a single camera (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Heh (Score:4, Informative)
He has details of the reasons on his blog danreetz.com/blog [danreetz.com]
Re:He's just pretending (Score:3, Informative)
Dupe ? (Score:3, Informative)
The scanner was described 3 months ago in a question to Ask Slashdot:
http://ask.slashdot.org/story/09/09/27/199251/Software-To-Flatten-a-Photographed-Book [slashdot.org]
The answer:
http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1383895&cid=29559637 [slashdot.org]
Re:I've (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.geocities.jp/takascience/lego/fabs_en.html [geocities.jp]
turning the pages and scanning is childs play
Re:repost (Score:3, Informative)
Your idea would end up with bent pages.
Re:Well, ironically (Score:3, Informative)
This means that every textbook HAS a doc or PDF version you can get from the publisher. As a professor I regularly get pdf versions of my text books for "disabled" students who can't afford the $95 these leeches charge for the text I use.
I'm in the process of putting together a "text pack" that consists of short excerpts from dozens of books and journals that I will put together as a pdf and give to the students. Fuck these leeches. They piss me off.
RS
Re:better wy (Score:1, Informative)
Although a little slower, an Olfa wheel knife works 1000 times better than a jigsaw at disassembling hardcovers, paperbacks and magazines alike.
Just saw the spine off! (Score:3, Informative)