Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Hardware Hacking Intel OS X Apple Hardware

OS X Update Officially Kills Intel Atom Support 610

bonch writes "After apparently disabling and then re-enabling support for the Atom chipset in test builds of their 10.6.2 update, Apple has officially disabled support for the chipset in the final update. This makes it impossible for OSX86 users to run 10.6.2 on their Atom-based netbooks until a modified kernel shows up."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

OS X Update Officially Kills Intel Atom Support

Comments Filter:
  • by paimin ( 656338 ) on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @09:59AM (#30059418)
    I saw this on Google News yesterday, and I figured, "Huh, must have missed that on /."

    Ah well, let the shitstorm begin.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @10:16AM (#30059660)

    I RTFA, and there's no acknowledgement by Apple of what they have done or why they have done it. So the update does not "officially" break Atom support, it just breaks Atom support.

    It's official because CmdrTaco said so!

    My news stories have leveled whole cities! I'm not afraid of you!

    Sincerely,

    CmdrTaco

  • by magnus.ahlberg ( 1211924 ) on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @10:25AM (#30059812)
    Ah, there's nothing to support an argument like a blog post from 2006.
  • by TheRealMindChild ( 743925 ) on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @10:58AM (#30060238) Homepage Journal
    Or if they're not capable of working that out they'll just post whiny little messages on Slashdot about how their freedoms are being repressed by the big bad company that chose not to support hardware they don't even ship.

    ARTHUR: Please, please good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle?
    WOMAN: No one live there.
    ARTHUR: Then who is your lord?
    WOMAN: We don't have a lord.
    ARTHUR: What?
    DENNIS: I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.
    ARTHUR: Yes.
    DENNIS: But all the decision of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting.
    ARTHUR: Yes, I see.
    DENNIS: By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs,--
    ARTHUR: Be quiet!
    DENNIS: --but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more--
    ARTHUR: Be quiet! I order you to be quiet!
    WOMAN: Order, eh -- who does he think he is?
    ARTHUR: I am your king!
    WOMAN: Well, I didn't vote for you.
    ARTHUR: You don't vote for kings.
    WOMAN: Well, how did you become king then?
    ARTHUR: The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water signifying by Divine Providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I am your king!
    DENNIS: Listen -- strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    ARTHUR: Be quiet!
    DENNIS: Well you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!
    ARTHUR: Shut up!
    DENNIS: I mean, if I went around saying I was an empereror just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away!
    ARTHUR: Shut up! Will you shut up!
    DENNIS: Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system.
    ARTHUR: Shut up!
    DENNIS: Oh! Come and see the violence inherent in the system! HELP! HELP! I'm being repressed!
    ARTHUR: Bloody peasant!
    DENNIS: Oh, what a give away. Did you here that, did you here that, eh? That's what I'm on about -- did you see him repressing me, you saw it didn't you?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @11:29AM (#30060646)

    I saw this on Google News yesterday, and I figured, "Huh, must have missed that on /."

    To make up for the delay, it will be posted here a second time, probably next week.

  • by blueg3 ( 192743 ) on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @11:45AM (#30060894)

    I'm not sure calling exit(0) in the kernel will do what you expect.

  • by DdJ ( 10790 ) on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @12:45PM (#30061840) Homepage Journal

    Huge generalisations really help no one.

    Sorry, I just felt a deep, burning need to quote this sentence out of context.

    That's all, I'm done. Everyone can move along now.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @01:50PM (#30062706)

    How does a product that doesn't compete with anything Apple makes somehow challenge them? If I sell pull-knit sweaters, and Apple doesn't offer anything in that market, have I somehow stolen a run on them?

Happiness is twin floppies.

Working...